The answer is no, not right now at least. Game audiences are way too indecisive about what they want. I think there are games that are good, intelligent experiences, but I don't think that there are any games as enigmatic or deep as some of the defining works of art in other art forms. We're still waiting for the video game Shakespeare, the video game Ingmar Bergman, or the video game Mozart. At this rate, I kind of doubt that that person will come any time soon, if only because of the rampant anti-intellectualism in the video game community. (and also because video games were invented at a different stage in capitalism's history than any other form of art thus far, and they take much higher budgets than most other artforms, therefore only the safest and most commercial works will be made, relegating games to kitsch instead of art)
you can't make art from a movie the same way you can from a picture by showing a still frame of a move for 90 minutes, you can't make art from a video game by trying to pretend it's a movie. a video game is art when it tries to be a video game
The second games become art, they are no longer games. You can have a great story. You can have great music. You NEED great GAMEplay. Art is art, games are games, and that’s a good thing.
Yes, I agree. I'm not saying games need to copy other art forms. I'm saying that we do not have anything that is uniquely a game that would be considered a defining work of art in gaming yet. Right now, designers are JUST starting to learn how to use mechanics to make a statement, and even that is mostly relegated to lower budget indie titles. There are games that artistically inclined, like the MGS series, Mother 3, etc, but I do not feel that they use their status as a game to the advantage of their story or their messaging. Oh, yeah, another reason it's difficult for games to get to the level of art: most of them are designed by committee, with no distinct authorship. I hate auteur theory, but it's undeniable that it was crucial in moving film as an art form. The closest thing we have to an auteur in gaming right now is Kojima or Sakurai maybe... but Kojima makes games that are trying to be movies, and Sakurai doesn't make games with any statement in mind.
In purely technical terms, yes, but there's a distinction between kitsch and what a lot of people call "high art", or "great art". When most people ask "is _____ art?" they're asking if it's the latter, not if it literally exists as art. Sure, but as mentioned above, the discussion isn't really "are video games art or not" it's more "are video games worthy art".
games dont need to be art, modern art is a money laundering scam and AAA gaming is a gambling exploitive scam that has ruined the industry. so games are art now right?
The portraits it was trained on were likely 99% Europeans considering the style it's emulating Although honestly Kiryu doesn't even look asian in that screenshot
lol the crux of my argument has nothing to do with modern art. it's not fair to compare games to painting or sculpture, the times they were developed in are too different. a better comparison is video games and film. anyways, most people who argue modern art is a scam don't get modern art (for one, most of what they hate is postmodern art, and most of that is literally satire on the art industry, but people are too dense to understand that no, an artist is not seriously trying to portray a toilet or an apple as art)
Doesn't anyone else find this disturbing? I mean, what if this technology has existed for a long time and all the famous historical people were just made up.
David Scott
>e
Carson Ramirez
Take your pills
Eli Gray
That looks like the top half of Jim's face stitched onto the bottom half of Stanley's face
Yes. They are already art. Logically they are some combination of art, storytelling, sound, music and computer science. I feel the problem with having this discussion is people think "art" has to be artsy, and many "art games" try to focus so hard on everything but gameplay. I think games as a medium provides ample mechanics in which to make artistic expression. Gameplay itself can be artistic in and of itself.
You heard it here first people, mexicans aren't human
Xavier Cooper
Firstly your post reeks of progressive faggotry. Dilate. Secondly video games like reading are an active and engaging art form thus you cant quite take the same approach to it as other forms as you describe. We've ventured to far into emulating reality and visual quality as opposed to good story telling and complex game design, and at the moment companies employ bargin basement fan fiction writers. While most of the current stream of games are trash pop art there are gems of actual real video game artistry floating around.
>Painting of the real Jack the Ripper uncovered in London, more at 11
Landon Sanders
That's not what they're arguing about. This conversation isn't "are video games literally art" it's "are video games high art/art that is on the level of other art forms" i assume that you're calling my post progressive faggotry because it's not positive towards capitalism. i am well aware that you can't just have video games imitate other forms of art, i don't think they should, i think they should develop as their own artform. what would you argue is an example of "real video game artistry"?
Ethan Perry
go back to plebbit if you don't like it faggot
Ayden Allen
that actually makes him look cooler which is surprising
Brayden Johnson
I can't download pair for some reason.
Austin Green
John Lithgow?
Charles Mitchell
screenshot and put into paint and crop unless you're a phoneposter lol
Bentley Walker
I know, but I'm just curious if it's my browser problem or site.
Benjamin Lewis
Or you could just click download couple. It's the thing at the bottom with two arrows pointing at an envelope
Landon Smith
cringe
Henry Myers
>that kike forehead
Jonathan James
It doesn't work for me as I said above(firefox).
Charles Miller
ゴゴゴゴゴゴゴ
Colton Perry
>we truly wuz
Henry Anderson
>are video games high art/art that is on the level of other art forms Well that's subjective based on who you ask. My dad doesn't get video games, but me and my brother can discuss them for hours. High art as a concept is outdated due to the fact we no longer make that art for kings and queens to gawk at. Art is enjoyed by everyone now, not just the "educated." Video games are an astoundingly new medium with no real inspiration to draw from aside from "real" games like sports or board games. Film had a rich history of stageplay, but games within a few decades had such a diverse range of content made that we seemingly pulled out of our ass in terms of the functional game mechanics. It's honestly just a silly question to ask.
David Garcia
WHERE THE NEW THREAD AT and keep it vidya related you dumb fucks i don't want to look at pics of your dumbshit classmates.
Video games being new is a big reason why I wouldn't consider them art yet. As someone who is pretty experienced in both film and games especially, would I ever in a million years feel like comparing a game to something like 2001, Persona or even Akira is fair? Absolutely not. As I mentioned earlier, game devs are JUST starting to learn how to make a point mechanically. I'd say that games are firmly in the realm of pop art or kitsch for now. Within the first 30 or 40 years of film existing as an art form, defining techniques had just been introduced. I wouldn't say that film hit it's stride as "great art" until around the 40s or 50s, when it came into it's own and stopped relying on techniques established in other art forms to carry it. Games have been "figured out" in around the same time. It's a matter of time to see when they'll hit their stride, but I'd argue that it'll probably take longer, because it's being developed in a commercialist system. Let's see how it goes.
Nicholas Mitchell
...
Kevin Martinez
>MY VISION IS AUGMENTED
Xavier Phillips
Game mechanics have already been used to make a point in several games. AAA games are the equivalent of mass consumer films, you don't go to Transformers for "High Art".
Christian Miller
retarded picture in, retarded picture out
Michael Mitchell
>would I ever in a million years feel like comparing a game to something like 2001 >2001 Yikes.
Ryder Johnson
That's the other point. Video games ARE the newest medium out there and is probably the last to realistically exist. Within the next 25 years I think games will have its Citizen Kane moment. >games are pop art >pop art >not art in and of itself