Now that the dust has settled, can we agree that this game did nothing interesting, Gameplay-Wise?

Now that the dust has settled, can we agree that this game did nothing interesting, Gameplay-Wise?

Attached: red-dead-redemption-2-art0205-780x428.jpg (780x428, 56K)

Good gore and dismemberment system, satisfying guns and the dialogue system was great fun as well. You're a goofy and a lame.

>Good gore and dismemberment system
doesn't affect gameplay

>satisfying guns
There's literally no reason to use anything but the Lancaster repeater and cheese Dead Eye since it has the best damage, capacity, and rate of fire

>dialogue system was great fun as well
Be nice or be rude
Wow, so complex!

Oh it did something interesting alright lol

Attached: 1562696376560.webm (1280x720, 1.41M)

>but but but
fuck off

>but it's realistic!
Says the 400-lb Rockstar Fanboy who can't walk up the stairs without almost fainting

i had to drop it once i got into a bathhouse and realized i wasnt gonna see any big ol western titties

i mean, you just dont do that

I enjoyed building the house in the epilogue. I also enjoyed that I didn’t have to have a quick draw time event every ten minutes. I did not enjoy not getting to make Arthur fuck Abigail secretly.

Gameplay = being a cowboy
Being a cowboy = fun
Fun = good game
Nuff said

This game makes me feel nothing like a cowboy. It makes me feel like a sadsack whiney man who moves around like he’s 90 years old, politely slows his horse down in town and doesn’t run in buildings. This game absolutely does not fulfill the fantasy of being a badass cowboy in the Wild West, it makes you feel like an awkwardly moving, slow, sadsack.

Sorry but I'm gonna have to disagree, this game did something very interesting gameplay-wise and that is the horse rides. They are pure sex.

>zero coins to collect
>zero heart pieces
>no princess
>no sex scenes
>no tranny ads
you're right, 0/10 unplayable garbage

The game was a Western-genre story telling masterpiece. The gameplay was immersive for the purpose of selling that feeling and story.

I don’t believe the gameplay was intended to be “fun” or “gamey” so much as engaging. It is difficult to describe, but I believe everything was developed to push forward the narrative of the story and world even if it wasn’t traditionally good gameplay or made for a great video game experience. It felt like they wanted me to live western novel than play a cowboy arcade game.

I don’t have a problem with them going that route, but it was very different than other games I’ve played and remains distinguished in my memory months later.

Correct. Overall I loved the atmosphere and tone but I think most people look at that instead.

you just reminded me, no tits in a rockstar game
no brothels in the old west
fucking -10/10 game

>The game was a Western-genre story telling masterpiece

it's a masterpiece wild west game, but the story-telling isnt the game's strong point. besides the fact the player gets railroaded without warning into very inconvenient places, the writing and pacing all over the place.

Fishing was somewhat alright gameplay wise.

Rdr was my favorite game and up until a few days ago I would talk about how it's better than rdr2. Played it again on the weekend to see how it looks in 4k. Horses control and look like dog shit compared to rdr2. Graphically the game is still impressive but I couldn't play for more than 20 minutes.

Attached: 20190709_120524.gif (202x202, 983K)

The dialogue system is awful. Almost every conversation goes nowhere. It shouldn’t have even been included.

The story sucks. Dutch is clearly shitty from the start so there is nothing interesting or enlighting about seeing the gang fall apart. So much filler in the story that goes nowhere. This is an awful story told in an awful way with awful characters. If this was a show or movie everyone would be picking it apart for how terrible and forced the story is at every turn

It does take a moment to turn fully around before you can start moving.
Is there also a delay when moving forward (or near forward), because then I would agree that that would be pretty bad.
I'm genuinely curious, PC only, haven't touched the game but might get it when it eventually comes out. Not if there's a delay on every motion, though.

That’s the weirdest opinion ever, the horse control in 1 is way more fun because the horses are so much faster and the tapping is more spaced out. You feel like you’re blazing across the map with your horse, whereas in 2 the horses are slow and boring. I still enjoy 1 more when I play it.

Better than other games that aren't fishing focused. Every other game is just push the opposite direction and reel in. Rdr2's fishing is pretty good

What I fucking hate about Dutch is

For no apparent reason at all, he trusts Micah that he's known for a few months over Arthur and John that he's both known for 20 years

>game did nothing interesting
it set the record for how boring and annoying one game can be. i dont think it will ever be topped

how many times a week do you make this thread?

honest to god question

The animation of the horse legs is down right retarded if you compare the two. They are faster but a lot of that is remedied in RDROnline. With the nagodoches (sp?) saddle and Spurs you don't have to worry about stamina draining

I completely understand why people find RDR 2 lacking but I fucking love westerns and this game came the closest to my dream game I could ever hope for so I will always praise the autism sim stuff in this game. Also Arthur is one of GOAT characters

Micah is a yes man to dutch and feeds his ego which in the end is all Dutch really wanted

3 times a day minimum

it wasnt that weird. micah, javier, and bill were the only ones that werent questioning dutch. dutch is a narcissist, of course he's going to listen to the guys that are taking his side. shit, it happens on this shanghai shadow puppet saloon all the time.

this pretty much

I think the worst decision I have ever seen in my life is my horse stealing my guns every time I jump on his back


This isn't fortnite faggot

This was stupid as well, and so was not being able to hire a prostitute. The only options were "no" and "harsher no", it was really fucked.


I agree

I hated that we couldn't pick up prostitues. It sucked in RDR1, but they were able to pass it off as john being a fag. When i was arthur and this woman comes up to ask for a fuck I was like hell yeah, I'm not ths married character anymore, and then I get those only 2 options. I returned the game after that

>Yea Forums still seething over the game of the generation

Attached: 1563226074293.jpg (882x863, 235K)

Don't bothwr asking for Yea Forums's opinion. They hate anything that's popular, regardless whether it's actually good or not.

Despite its' flaws though their is some pretty excellent moments in the game especially if you go in unspoiled

now imagine if this was an unironic response

Attached: 47BA730A-86A7-4D80-BC50-D908476A3E7C.png (935x855, 152K)

>dialogue system
What dialogue system?

he means the system where you tell a random pedestrian "hello" or "go fuck yourself"

>that charge with the native Americans into the oil field

Now THAT was kino. Just wish it was longer.

It's just a bit of foreplay that either goes nowhere or initiates combat. Very disingenuous to call it a dialogue system.

sims are the most overrated genre in existence. realism =/= fun.

RDR 2 is an unironic masterpiece; evinced by pissing off every group of gaymers.

The concepts in this game are way too half baked to feel like a sim. This game is a mediocre sim and a mediocre shooter. It doesn’t do anything all that well.

? but the hunting is GOAT.

I liked that the actual main chars are Dutch and Marston and Arthur is basically just a henchmen with a tragic twist.

Makes him kinda more believable that he is just a side character in his own game.