Does anyone NEED this level of fidelity in their games?

Does anyone NEED this level of fidelity in their games?

When do we just agree to stop wasting money and effort on improving graphics?

Attached: 1550477876623.jpg (1920x1080, 332K)

do we need anything? probably not. is it worth striving for perfection even if we don't succeed? i don't know, maybe. it's human nature dude. there's no reason to just halt all progress in a certain field just because some guy says we've gone far enough.

>improving
How is that improving, it's fucking ugly.

Precisely.
Imagine someone making the same argument, but 20 years ago.
>Does anyone NEED this level of fidelity in their games? A link to the past looks good enough to me who needs this three dimensional stuff?

You're a retard OP

>OP: "pixelshit looks like trash bruh
>"lol wtf why does this game have ps3 graphics"

No. We should have stopped at pixel art.

>this level of fidelity
Is that supposed to be high end, she looks like plastic love doll.

Yeah man I just love this normie-infested moviegame live-service exploitation plague that's been killing the industry for a decade now, good thing we didn't stop 20 years ago that would've been silly

Attached: 1560936802124.png (1401x1251, 1.09M)

Be edgy as much as you want but that's what devs are striving for and we can only hope to see even that in real time in the next few decades or more, the level of CGI fidelity necessary to make something not look like a plastic love doll doesn't exist in farm rendered movies

Attached: 1550476966540.jpg (1920x1080, 467K)

what does that have to do with graphics? can you read?

Attached: 1552404710056.jpg (329x346, 12K)

If you can maintain that level of fidelity in real time for porn games that would be very good. Non-porn games don't need it.

Attached: 1562551434813.webm (1920x1080, 2.84M)

>3d cunny
yes

damn dude you are so cool and jaded

Graphics are what turned games from a relatively niche medium into a normie hobby on the level of movies or music, and pandering to normies is what ruined AAA and killed AA games

>Nose and cheekhairs

See I don't know how I feel about this, I know people have them for real, but I never notice them but it's super noticeable here despite not all that big.

People developing these technology arent always the people that make games, but people who make games would use said tech when viable cuz why not.
Now you might wonder why games suck and take ages, well sadly cuz the industry of games as a whole is in a slump where everything is all about money, and shiny graphics = more sales.
These same devs that make shiny turds embed the idea in our heads that associate awful games with good graphics, but we can still have em both... Meaning we dont necessarily have to have one or the either.

Attached: Screenshot_20190712-094717_Manga Rock.jpg (558x654, 206K)

Dude correlation is not causation
you've essentially just argued that games with good graphics = bad automatically.

This

Do we not need this kind of fidelity?

Based illiterate retard

Attached: 1562423819003.jpg (1280x720, 241K)

>only games with good graphics can be liver service
>only games with good graphics can be moviegames
>all games with good graphics are these 2 things and have ruined muh industry

Attached: 1555964299085.jpg (496x496, 134K)

>he doubled down on it!

>love doll
fuck doll

I miss hand animated faces. For the same reason we still have cartoons while movies are thing. If videogame was an art directors would realize why.

Attached: Disgust.png (502x455, 263K)

Once we reach the graphical singularity (which isn't too far off now that the RTX meme is becoming a reality) more devs will take a step back and consider which art style to use

>trying to fit in this badly
>love doll

How else are they gonna cover their game design flaws?

Who cares if 99,9% of any new gameplay is shit.
Handholding press F for fun storyshite

tfw no bald gf

Attached: hirokazu-yokohara-girl-d[1].jpg (1920x1080, 304K)

That's what I get when I look in the mirror and makeup fixes that. Games should sell the fantasy because I see too much ugly everyday.

We don't NEED video games in general. If you're gonna start clipping the buds, be prepared to just uproot the whole damn thing eventually.

She's cute.

Actual retards

>graphics technology advances regardless of videogame makers
>console company A
>console company B
>all things being equal company A offers more graphical fidelity
Sure people don't need it but they will choose it over a lesser alternative every time, even the purist gaymers will.

Games will never reach total photorealism, so yeah, pursuing that dream is useless anyways.

We're just starting to dabble in real time raytracing there's still advancements to be made, and even if we do reach 1:1 recreation in a limited tech demo scale and performance will be additional factors.

This post is so 7th gen. We're approaching the limit of practically useful graphics nowadays anyway.

not only I don't need it. I literally don't want it.