Upgrading GPU, is the 2070 worth it, or should I go for a 1080? Running a 750 right now

Upgrading GPU, is the 2070 worth it, or should I go for a 1080? Running a 750 right now.

Attached: image.jpg (1200x627, 297K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_games_with_hardware-accelerated_PhysX_support
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Bump

If you want a 1080 you might as well just get an RX 5700/RTX 2060s.

2070 is EoL, a bad value (even compared to what we have now), and the 2060s is only marginally behind it.

2070 is better across the board as far as I can tell. also cheaper

Get a 2070S

Super lineup made the OG 2xxx cards one of the worst bang for buck seen in a long time. Don't buy

What resolution/framerate are you aiming for, first?

4k240 in cs 1.6

why?

because your question is meaningless without context

1050ti and 1060ti are great considering how cheap they are. But they are quite outdated now. Just save for a 2060.

rx 5700, faster and cheaper than both of those, you just need to wait for the partner models that'll come out in like 20 days

If you want to spend $400 or more on a GPU, then 5700xt with a custom cooler.

Why you would want to spend $400 on a GPU is another question. Severe case of nogames. Better buy something ~$200 or below and save money for an upgrade in 2020 or 2021

>is buying gen 1 architecture worth it?
oh yes, by all means

>1060ti
this is the kind of expert hardware advice you would expect to get on Yea Forums

If I bought a 2060s or a 2070 would an i7 4790k bottleneck me hard? Currently have a 970.

Attached: 1542750252378.png (387x320, 122K)

Anybody actually recommending a RTX card is a shill
In terms of performance:
2080TI > 1080 TI > 2080 > 2070 Super > 2070 > 2060 Super > 2060
People are selling 1080Ti's for as low as the price of a base 2070, Nvidia fucked over their own performance gains for raytracing which is fucking worthless right now.

Raytracing isn't auto on.

If you dont know what you're talking about shut the fuck up

depends on the game
t. 2500K + 1080

RTX is here to stay. It's only going to become more common as it becomes optimised. Buying a non RTX card for a bunch of money would be dumb.

Nah he has a good question. If some one is running a 750 right now, you want to ask them what their intended resolution and framerate are.

Raytracing is actually great but wont be used for another 4 years or so, we might even have a new gen by then so who cares?

Attached: relative-performance_1920-1080.png (500x970, 51K)

What i5? Also, that's probably not a good buy right now.. Wait for the new consoles to come out and see what specs they have.

>RTX is here to stay.
Just like physX, right?

RTX is a meme that will end up like physx

The 2060 has the performance of a 1070Ti, it totally makes sense for the 2060S to rival/beat a 1080

what resolution? if 1440p, probably not much.
1080p, for sure, quad cores don't cut it anymore.

Yes? Physx used all the time and while not impressive anymore its a good and commonly used baseline system. What is your point here

Didnt imply it was, that doesnt change the fact that the 1080ti still gives higher results than every single RTX Card besides the 2080TI and even then its a 2% difference at max.
Paying an extra $1000 for a feature that is yet to be optimised and currently gives framerates in the 60's and is only supported by three games is fucking retarded
It might be here to stay, and your RTX cards are going to get the shit kicked out of them by the next generation of cards that support Raytracing when there are more games to support it.
You fell for marketing and you got fucking played because you're a fucking smoothbrain that cant look at the numbers.
All RTX cards at launch took over 60% FPS decrease because of RTX on all of the THREE games that support it, only now is it SLIGHTLY better with the 2080TI, a $1500 card, having playable framerates.
You brought a fucking RTX card on the promise of more games supporting it, where are they retard? You brought a gimped 1080 for a shitty lighting affect you cant use for 99.9% of your games.
>techpowerup
No.

OP here. I want at least 60fps, 1080 resolution, ray tracing is neat. 2060s, yes or no

but bro, RTX quake is sweet.

Newegg's selling one for around $430 which seems better at that point than a used 1080.

I definitely wouldn't pay over $500 for one.

>20 year old game
>30fps at 4k on a $1500 card in 2019
Fucking oof

not anymore
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_games_with_hardware-accelerated_PhysX_support

>Get BTFO
>All he can say is No

Attached: smug 2.png (770x648, 418K)

I mean yeah a 2060 will do what you want I suppose, you do you bro money is does not bring happiness anyway right?

never ever, ever upgrade your technology unless you're going for the best
there is simply no point in it

for 2070 money you should be aiming for a used 1080Ti. no less. a 2070 is bad value proposition and unless you can get a 1080 for peanuts it's not worth paying 'going rate' for one.

Well this seems like my fault for not playing many new games I suppose, you miss trends like this.
Looks nice tho :)

well, I have a 1080 and so far every game runs 60FPS minimum, 120FPS on most, at max settings

>Supporting Nvidia and their RTX kikery.

>Get BTFO
Here's a graph with as much validity as yours

Attached: 21312.png (800x600, 4K)

Pretty much no reason to get a 2070 now that the super cards and the 5700/XT exists. For that pricepoint I'd recommend the 5700XT, since if you go with the 2070S instead you're getting marginal (~5%) extra performance for $100 more. Up to you if that's worth it.

RTX VR Quake 4 When?

>Your dick is tiny
>My dick is huge
Sorry for your loss.

Nice dick man.

the thing with physx is that it wasnt worth it considering how bad was the performance and how minimal it impact the graphics
and its exactly the same with RTX

>Your dick is tiny
>My dick is huge
Sorry for your loss.

Let's stay on topic about how assmad you are on being BTFO

Attached: Putin Bored.gif (391x158, 2.75M)

RTX is a huge improvement in visuals however, even if it turns your game into a power point presentation its still clearly the way things will go in the future.

>Post Techpowerup
>BTFO

Attached: 1554462210185.jpg (267x299, 16K)

Raytracing will never be used, Nvidia jumped on it way too early for it to develop
Remember PhysX? It's an old as fuck technology that was bought up Nvidia in it's infancy and left to stagnate
>Oh yeah that game looks cool but you know it's look cooler if you bought Nvidia next upgrade

...

How the fuck do you expect us to recommend you anything if you don't tell us what resolution and refresh rate you plan to play at? Jesus fucking christ these are the retards that come to /g/ asking everyone to check their build. If you're using a 750 I can assume you're currently playing at 1080p 60hz, if you're considering a 2070 then I can assume you're looking to up your refresh rate and probably resolution as well. Unless you give us this info we can't tell you anything of value

I am not talking about RayTracingTM! I am talking about Ray Tracing technology, shit actually cuts down on dev time and makes things look better, you can bet the moment someone gets that shit running at 30-60 on mid ranged rigs it will be in everything.

>I am talking about Ray Tracing technology, shit actually cuts down on dev time and makes things look better
Last I checked it was the stuff used to make invidual models in shit like Toy Story, hence why NvidiaTM is so fucking demanding when it's rendered in real time and wasn't attempted before now, are you talking about prebaking raytracing? I don't think that's possible

The prices will probably go down a lot in the used market tho. I never buy new cards, they're always a complete ripoff. Used is the way to go just test before you buy

OP here, I've fucking said that shit like 3 times. 1080 resolution, at least 60fps. Read the thread

>Buying used cards in the era of coin mining

Attached: 1534206185795.jpg (255x202, 13K)

Also 60hz

>I have a gtx1080. It smashing everything at 1440p and I can play most games in 4k 50-60 fps on ultra settings
What are you playing? Fucking goat simulator? I have an i7 8700K cooled by an h100i, and 1080ti and in a lot of AAA modern games at 2K I'll often go well into the 70fps range at med-high settings, but usually hover in the low 100's. I can't even imagine how poor a 1080 would perform unless you just play CSGO and League

The point of raytracing is that you don't have to prebake it, that is an interesting idea however, you would of course be using ray tracing for shit we have more efficient programs for, you know I bet you could use it to calculate scene lighting and reflections.

>ask for advice on upgrading GPU
>turns into shitflinging over raytracing
Wew lad. Thanks to the anons who provided though

Not if he gets the 1080 used
why the hell do you even want to think about getting a 1080 or 2070 if you just want 60fps at 1080p? A used 700 or 900 series card will destroy that no problem (get a 780ti or a 980 and even this will often be overkill). Unless you're going to get a higher refresh rate and/or higher resolution screen, you shouldn't even be thinking about this. A 1080 is for either 1080p 144hz or 1440p 60hz, unless you only play easy to run games like csgo which will run on a toaster

Post the specs

the 2060 is already on par or better than a 1080 in every benchmark ive seen

I own a 1080ti currently, but as for it beating the 2060, most recent benchmarks I see show the two cards being on par with eachother, with the 2060 pulling slightly ahead at times. The 1080ti used is still a far better value

The 2060s is insanely overkill for 60hz at 1080p. Couldn't you have done even the slightest amount of research before coming here and starting a thread for this insane question. A 780ti can be bought for nothing used and that is already overkill most of the time for what you want

I posted that, then read through the thread and watched you repeat it over and over again, when any person with an IQ above 60 would have just included it in the intitial post instead of making people ask and having them scroll through the entire thread searching for it

rx 5700 xt

I've literally never had a problem with the used market. Just ask what they used the card for. If they say it was a mining card, avoid unless the price matches. If they say it isn't, assume they could be lying, but either way, just stress test the card before you buy, and if the thermals are good then buy it and save a ton of money. Even if it was a mining card, it will have already been an obsolete card that you replaced a few generations ago before it actually breaks

I wish there was an 8GB 1660 Ti

this, but wait for the MSI version with a normal heatsink

>being an autist over whether the info's specifically in the OP
>not just accepting that it's been posted multiple times
Your issue is unnecessary and nitpick-y. I was tired and forgot to post my specs in the OP. So fucking what. Why is this so important to you

Has GPU discussion always been subject to this much autistic shitflinging?

Attached: image.jpg (317x265, 39K)

>expecting people to be autistic enough to crawl through mountains of discussion on a Myanmaran neck stretching forum just to answer your question
Lucky for you I was

but coin mining doesnt do anything to the card.

Little late but I just replaced an i5 6600k and am waiting to replace my 1060 6gb and I can tell you that it won't even run most VR games that great so not really worth it.