Censorship

Why do games rated for adults censor stuff like smoking and nudity while movies don't?
Why am I not allowed to see anime tiddies in an adult rated game but I am allowed to purchase and watch pornography?

Attached: Peanut Chad.jpg (680x907, 39K)

Other urls found in this thread:

unqualified-reservations.org/2007/06/ultracalvinist-hypothesis-in/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

But why would "they" only censor games and not other media?

Games are seen as an entertainment medium for children, that's why.

Gee, I wonder. Could it be that like the pipe tobacco, it's simply a relic of the past that's both harmful and stupid? The only places where normal people smoke tobacco anymore are third world countries where people want to die early. The only first world people who still smoke are middle-aged women and teenage boys who are a few steps beyond the fedora, and a few steps behind learning to tap dance in a desperate bid to seem old fashioned because they think it makes them interesting. Truth is their breath stinks and nobody likes them.

Big companies have to make their games china friendly

Small indie devs are all SJW cucks who eat kale chips

Then the very rare dev who doesn't give a fuck makes stupid shit like Hatred

Yes but that is no reason the censor is only in games but not in film.

Film companies are ran by the jews who want you to die form tobacco use so they can take over, I guess.

The duality of man

They are also cleaning movies from faggots smoking and I'm glad, fuck smokers you piece of shit.

You're assuming this doesn't also happen for films and television, which of course it does. Not every film and TV show, obviously, just like not every videogame from now on will ban smoking. But this is in no way a new thing.

I didn't make this thread about smoking. Why are some thing censored in games but not in other media for equivalent ages.

...

Wtf is your point, retard. Guns are way more fucking harmful.

>Games rated for adults
>By law people are required to show their ID before buying those games in a store
>"lol it's for kids"
You are factually wrong.

Tell that to the oldfags in charge.

So true. I remember hearing about that movie that sexualized children and it wasn't censored anywhere. Fucking frenchs and their obsessions with half naked kids.

When is the last time you saw anyone get carded for a videogame? I mean i'm 31 and I still get carded when I order a beer, never once got carded over vidya.

So are atomic bombs. Also I believe owning a gun does not contitute the same risk as consistently inhaling tar smoke on a regular basis. You could try smoking a gun I suppose, if you'd like.

liberals

Don't need to. The ESRB does that for me.
Never but law is law. You need to be 18 to buy an M rated game and you are by law required too idenitify your self when you want to purchase those.
So why can I not have anime tiddies in my rated M game while I can have anime tiddies in a hentai?

Because Americans, and American "liberals" especially, are mentally ill subhumans that exist for the purpose of politicizing everything.

Attached: 1562411043969.png (860x782, 734K)

So what you're saying is nobody holds the regulations up so minors can purchase something they shouldn't be in a specific medium, then wonder why devs choose to censor that same medium?

Conservatives and
>muh family values
>muh degeneracy

Anyone who says liberals is trying to deflect the blame away from themselves. Do not buy it.

>Why do games rated for adults censor stuff like smoking and nudity while movies don't?
>Implying they don't

>The ESRB does that for me.
then you are awar that to see anime titties you would need a game rated AO, or Adults only, and not M correct? And most retailers and stores shy away from selling AO games.

Conservatives are only ethnically conservative, we all know that. It's basically just a way to bake your racism into a somewhat socially acceptable format so you can deflect moral judgement.
Conservatives have never helped the economy, and they always spend far more than liberals do. They're anything but fiscally conservative.

>family values are bad

typical mutt

What I am saying is that's it's weird that games rated for adults are censored while other media rated for adults is not censored.
Why are games so special in that regard?

Shouldn't you be off fucking your bible or something?

What film?

That must be Yea Forums favorite movie.

Yet sony censorship is due to the most liberal movement #metoo, cope harder

They're not. I honestly don't know where you got this idea because it's not reflected by reality. I think you're just uniquely concerned with video games yourself.

Innocence. It's hilarious yet sad. It's literally ok when movies do it, I'd swear.

With anime tiddies I did not mean actual bare breasts. I ment sexual character design like cleavage and exposed skin.
Companies like sony seem to want to censor these things even though they belong in the rating catagory. But why? Why censor these things? Why are things like that not cenosored in other media with an equivalent rating?

#metoo was about abuse of power, I don't see how you're trying to connect it to anime tiddies

Probably because Sony reps and devs stated the censorship policy came into play right as metoo did?

Why are you so angry? Single mother?

Bible is not in vogue outside of Muttland, mutt.

So your question isn't about the medium, but rather about a company's policy.

>They're not
>Microsoft censors smoking.
>Sony censors sexual character designes.

Yes, abuse of power by feminazi cunts crying rape.

Because theres a difference between the government censoring a game and the game developer/publisher "censoring" the game.
When the owner of the game changes it, it isnt "censoring" as legally the anime titties arent going to get them into trouble
They just want to do it for their own reasons (brand image).
Now, you and I may not not agree with their reasons, but its their product, so they get to choose how it is made and portrayed, if sony wants to publish a japanese game but change it for an american audience, its their choice to do so.

Because modern progressivism is evolution of american puritan sects.
unqualified-reservations.org/2007/06/ultracalvinist-hypothesis-in/

It's also why Super Seducer got banned by them.

Yes why is company policy so different in games? Why is it apprently not ok to show smoking or erotic stuff in games but it is ok to show it in movies and books of the same rating? It happens too often in games to just pretend like it's an isolated case of just one company.

And many, many tv shows and movies do the same.

Kale chips sound disgusting

I want to rape conservative bitches until I break their minds and turn them liberal.

It's a shame that capitalism provides such perverse incentives to companies. In a truly free system artists would not have to compromise their views to appeal to the masses.

Look up the number of rapes that never go to trial, the number of untested rape kits, the number of rapists and sex criminals in politics and the likelihood of Esptein and his posse to get away with a slap on the wrist.

Say what you want about feminists - they don't have nearly as much power as misogynists.

>Why is it apprently not ok to show smoking or erotic stuff in games but it is ok to show it in movies and books of the same rating?
The rating is irrelevant. They're obviously not doing it to get around the ratings, in ways that movies often do. The rating is often unaffected. They're doing it out of personal preference.

see
Even though it's "the same rating", it's still seen by the people in charge and the masses as a medium for children, unlike books, movies, etc. which are seen as a medium for all ages.

I don't support it, but I can think of a reason why games are more censored than other media. It's easier, and often encouraged to self-insert into characters. Now why violence is allowed while sex and smoking aren't, I think that's simply because you would lose a lot more gameplay potential by removing violence in games. Most games are about fighting in some way.

This has to be a troll post.

They're for kids

They don't. Watched netflix recently? Smoking and bare breasts are very common.
I cannot speak for regular American TV as I live in the Netherlands but it is also incredibly common to show bare breasts, drugs and alcohol on TV here.

The truth makes for the best bait in communities that are built up around elaborate lies.

>rapes that never go to trial

False accusation rapes you mean? Quit your life, mutt.

The left is entirely sex-positive.

What they don't like is sexual material that is entirely one-sided and only caters to one subset of one gender with one kind of taste, all the time.

If it was up to Yea Forums, there would be generic White blonde barbies as waifus with toddler-voices and female characters with no agency and personality everywhere, like in DoA.

Why are they for kids if it's illegal to sell them to kids?
This argument makes no sense.

>Smoking and bare breasts are very common.
And in some video games they are, too. And in some tv series, they also aren't. Just like in video games.

What you're doing is cherry-picking examples.

Learn reading comprehension.

So is every other goddamn media known to man. The children part is just a damn excuse. It's so parents won't bitch when they buy tommy an 17+ rated M game. It's nothing but mirrors and bullshit. That logic only works if they censor everything but gee fucking wiz they don't It's nothing but a stereotype and it's horseshit.

@470342763
(you)

There are about one hundred rapists that never see so much as a police interview for every malicious, fake accusation. Besides, you'll never get your DNA in or near a woman so you would have nothing to worry about anyway.

Females enjoy being raped by high status and high value men. Extraction of money via accusation is just a bonus, of course men in power won't give this bonus easily because bitches getting too greedy for their own good.

Sorry, I meant 6 million rapists. Whoops!

Which is odd because the earliest games were arcade games and university-developed computer games, and kids didn't enter the picture until later, and even then computer games continued being obviously adult-oriented.

What's the point of @ing someone if you're going to manually add the (You) anyway

It's pretty pointless and petty to begin with but now you just completely nullified it

you'll never see a naked boob in a marvel or disney movie either because they still want children's money even if they're not always the main target audience, same idea for videogames

Attached: 13b.gif (680x498, 224K)

Imagine thinking its still the 90s and blaming boomer conservatives for this censorship

Attached: 1555458463820.jpg (1080x1197, 388K)

Take it up with the oldfags in charge, they're the ones who are still stuck in the 80's notion of "Video games are childrens toys". Even the rating system for it doesnt mean squat as most parents don't bother to check or understand the rating on the games little nicky asks them to buy.

t. lib writing this on their macbook in a starbucks that they visited for the 3rd time that day and reading tweets on their iphone

>Females enjoy being raped by high status and high value men.

Do you ever wonder why feminists and the left aren't 100% focused on worrying about Muslim misogyny and scary immigrants? You're the reason.

Keep on joking about the holocaust anonymously while you still can. One more Christchurch shooting and we'll be able to force every person who writes something on the internet to invisibly attach their social security number to it so the police can check up on it later.

Blame Nintendo

>lol the old dudes who own the companies think videogames are for childeren
>Even though they are aware of the laws that force you to rate your games
>Even though they are aware of the laws that do not allow selling games with mature ratings to minors
I like how you also have absolutely no source on this claim either. The guys at top think games are for kids because?

You can stop now user.

And those games are getting censored by big companies while those movies are not getting censored by big companies.