Are there any games where you can actually play like a real life barbarian

Don't be racist.

>involuntarily celibate
>barbarians forcing people to have sex with them
they're the complete opposite

i swear incel has become the new edgy, like holy shit do normies like to eat grass together

Attached: npc kek.jpg (416x416, 10K)

Incel means nobody wants to have sex with YOU, not you forcing yourself on anyone else.

um sweaty rape is bad mmkay

Incel means you can't get laid. Those barbarians are actively getting laid. Why tell people to have sex and then get mad when they do?

PROTIP: if you rape someone you aren't celibate

Lots of RPGs where the main character takes his childhood girlfriend with him on the quest.

None give you the option to pressure her into sex with the implication of them being miles away from their home village, and her being completely dependant on him until they get back.

most of the places they travel too probably don't even speak the same language, so she'd be in even more trouble if she tried to run away when they were there.

>anything
>incel
its like the iq level of this community is going down by the day

Attached: Dang.jpg (583x581, 158K)

Modded Skyrim. I made a huge Nord barbarian type character who would raid bandit lairs, leave the women alive and bound, gather them all up in a room once the rest of the lair was cleared, and then rape and murder each one while the others watched.

What part of the word celibate do you not understand, user?

Yea Forums is primarily populated by 3rd world brown people (yes LA county is 3rd world) and preteens. as such they dont have high IQs, and they also think sex is the only thing valuable in life. irionically, 85-95% of the "have sex" posters are incels themselves. living in their basement, unemployed, uneducated, penniless.

Who hurt you?

You, by not having sex.

Not that user, but it kinda annoys me that you faggot ass armchair psychologist types always insist on there being some sort of trigger or past trauma to cause this kind of behavior. The reality of the matter is that sex and violence are completely natural and they often get entwined, not everyone who enjoys the thought of abusing others was abused themselves, some of us were just literally born that way.

based

That's an amazing painting. How does one learn to paint like that?

youtube.com/watch?v=SlCRfTmBSGs

by having sex

One day I'll paint that good. And I won't waste it drawing dumb scenes like that. But really lewd shit.

Well, yes. A good number of raiding vikings were involuntarily celibate because they were often young men who were still lacking land to farm and slaves to fuck. So they partook on raiding parties to rape, pillage and bring back home both plunder and slaves to fuck and eventually marry.

Attached: millwood knight.png (298x375, 183K)

>incels grooming themselves into becoming rapists to cure their inceldom

Oh dear.

Attached: iStock_93408419_MEDIUM.jpg (1200x800, 265K)

>real life barbarian

You understand that "barbarians" are a concept from fiction, most of which was from the 20th century, right?

Fun fact: Vikings didn't actually "pillage" anything. That's just in movies and shit.

Dilate and realize you'll never have true vaginal sex.

What was even the point of the first sentence? This entire side is filled with retards from all over and all you fags annoy me equally with your autism

God speed user, I look forward to the day you get to that level and pray you grace us with some great material.

Attached: 1531640798382.jpg (691x1024, 89K)

Either Sengoku Rance or Kichikuou Rance.

Attached: 1544242302593.jpg (668x768, 161K)

>Barbarians
>Begin dynasties
No. Barbarians/incels merely ruined a glorious civilization and set mankind back.

SOMEONE POST THE ONE WHERE THE VIKINGS RAPE THE ABORIGINAL WOMEN

I HAD IT ON MY LAST PC BUT IT DIED

Attached: lol.png (377x377, 247K)

Neither will you lmao

Who told you this? How can you be so ignorant? What happened on what's britain today? What happened to greenland?

>You understand that "barbarians" are a concept from fiction
Terrible post

old timey "rape" meant 'kidnap', it was literally just 'taking'
nonconsentual sex was different

>tranny doesn't know rape is the most common fantasy for women
No surprise here

Thats exactly what they did. Pillaging valuables and most of all pillaging slaves. Used to be the danish had one of Europe's biggest slave markets during Dark Ages. Not only did they raid and pillage but eventually they even conquered territories both in England and Ireland.

Attached: BattleofClontarf.jpg (800x557, 253K)

That's a good one. But still too tame.

Depends what you call barbarians. Mongolians were counted among barbarians and they began one of the most prosperous dynasties and the single biggest land-bound empire in history.

Out tranny

Everyone posting the world incel should get permabanned. Its just said to intentionally derail a thread for no other reason than being a total cunt.

Based Cao Cao

And they were directly responsible for murdering one fifth of human population and wanton destruction from which many regions never recovered.

Why is rape illegal? How dare these men fulfill humanity's evolutionary purpose?

Remember the council killing Caesar was singlehandedly responsible for this.

So were the romans at the time. And they're not counted as barbarians. Kublai-era mongols were not barbarians per se anymore.

Dude, theres like 400 years between death of Caesar and fall of western Rome. And eastern Rome was still a thing for 1000 years after Vandals buttfucked the Romans.

>So were the romans at the time.
Really? Do you have articles on lasting effects of Roman savagery?

was it your dad or your uncle?

You mean like when they made sure Carthage ceased to exist completely?

>incel thinking rape fantasies equals wanting to be raped

Literal danger to society here.

...Torygg isn't in the game.

My sides

Is this what they teach in history classes now?
I quit History college because it was so cucked and tried to make everyone seem peaceful and earth-loving.

>So were the romans
Huh? By who?

>they made sure Carthage ceased to exist completely?
Are you stupid? Salting Carthage is a meme. Romans founded their own colony of Carthage which lasted till the muslim conquest.

Only with mods, but yeah.

liars
post link to mod

spawn him with commands and tie him up
Loverslab defeat mod

t. actual retards. The word "incel" has come to describe more of a state of life than what the word originally implied. Even if a guy rapes somebody he will still be left with the betacuck/incel mentality.

Attached: 1543391969455.png (1161x881, 1.04M)

>Romans founded their own colony of Carthage which lasted till the muslim conquest.
What do you think Mongolians did to conquered lands? Their empire spanned a robust logistical system on placing horse-switching outposts in regular intervals and thats just their mail delivery. Of course they had their new subjects inhabit new lands (or old lands if they were wise enough to become vassals). Your territory won't last very long if you leave it unoccupied.

If slaughtering a city-state isn't barbarism as long as you take over the remnants afterwards, then by your very own definition mongols weren't barbarians. Nor were Goths for that matter.

>we'll make our own Carthage... with prostitues and gwent!
Based Romans.

>frog poster can't comprehend the word celibate
Of course.

I did this as well. Also I would chop of their arms and legs to make a "love pillow", and then make them crawl on the floor like maggots.

Attached: 1551296512560.png (1584x1584, 2.7M)

What civilization? Rome was falling apart before they even walked in.

>Even if a guy stops being celibate and got laid, he can still be involuntarily celibate in spirit.
Do you know what sex is? Do you know how it works?

Attached: 123.jpg (555x585, 33K)

By not living in a jew dystopia, aka kys.

why do retards want to change the meaning of words so much? it's such a simple one at that

Attached: 1557349437689.gif (275x225, 133K)

I doubt it.

go back to elementary level english and learn the difference between connotations and denotations

Do you comprehend the subtle distinction between mind and flesh?

Attached: 1547120083229.jpg (1024x1004, 269K)

>he's still at it
oh i am laffin

>too stupid to understand incels are incels because they are too afraid of failing and sure they'll get rejected because of bullshit

Yeah, I'm sure all those people measuring their skulls, chins and noses will become normal people if they rape a girl.

Attached: 순욱2.jpg (740x796, 58K)

You should stop digging yourself deeper in your hole.

Because language evolves, autist.

damn I never noticed the couple beheaded mother fuckers in the bottom left

Oh my god it's tgat fucking cat again
How many different images of that fucking cat are there?

They will remain weird loser fucks, but they can't be celibate anymore if they got their dicks wet.

God I wish that was me.

You can enslave any female and force them to strip naked.

Attached: download (7).jpg (276x182, 8K)

user, why do you want to rape them? You can't rape them, anyways, women offer themselves up for free.

How does not being able to get laid ruin civilization/set mankind back? If anything, you're - perhaps unwillingly - helping civilization/mankind by not reproducing and creating even more losers. Also, the average man throughout history didn't reproduce. Even low tier women want a decent man. Now, you're going to say, "Ha! WRONG! Look at all the dumb people having babies!" And no, to the women who fuck them, those guys aren't losers. They might be dumb, but women don't find intelligence attractive. They find other qualities attractive and they're probably pretty good in those.

Attached: 1512425838819.png (500x576, 381K)

user, you think barbarians, the most savage of chads are incels. You already fucked up the moment you started typing that.

Proofs:
My personal elevator whore in my fortress of stone.
Half my army is comprised of big titted archers.

Attached: received_390923431761016.jpg (1280x720, 55K)

>What do you think Mongolians did to conquered lands?
Burned them to the ground like many Chinese cities, Urgench and Baghdad. They slaughtered civilians and surrendered soldiers as their strategy of terror to intimidate future victims. It's a matter of dispute if Mongols spread Black Death to weaken new areas before invasion or it was mere consequences of chaos they created. I'm still waiting to see those articles on comparison between Mongol and Roman conquests, you literal fucking Mongoloid.

Yeah actually. One of the early missions in Bonecraft has you raiding an enemy village and raping the women while you’re there.

You can do it in Stationmaster but that game has a futuristic setting rather than a historical/fantasy one.

Well they're not celibate, so they can't be incels.

Damn you’re retarded.

literally rance
also the gameplay is no bullshit good

simple. because they're retards.

i recommend you acknowledge their existence by laughing and leaving one word replies to their posts. they'll get the memo eventually.

Barbarians were honored in their culture, inceloid. They didn't have problems finding women happy to get down consensually. Meanwhile your kind are simply reviled.

I dunno why you're lashing out calling everyone who disagrees with this post incels when he's clearly wrong. Is everything alright at home, user?

Reminder that vikings did nothing wrong and they never raped anyone, what actually happened is that they were so Chad and alpha that the women from the places they raided were so wet from the sight of them that they would beg them to take them to Scandinavia to be their loving and loyal wives. The beta medcuck kike worshippers made up all kinds of lies about the vikings on an incel rage tantrum

>oh no the scary boogeyman is replying to all posts!

Attached: My Anonymous Can't Be This Retarded.jpg (744x1340, 185K)

Wait. Why are people saying shit like "at least they will have had sex?" Having sex, in and of itself, is worthless. It's just a fun activity that can spread disease and lowers the sexual market value of the woman. And accidentally having a baby with someone you only like enough to stick your dick in is even worse than those other things, so it's not that, either. What you should actually be striving for is a relationship with someone else you want to raise children with. If everyone right now went out and had an orgy with each other, society would be WORSE, not better. Sure, people should be pursuing a relationship over playing video games, but you're making it sound like sex is the pinnacle achievement of humanity. That's how 15-year olds and brown people think. No one cares what they think. The reason sex feels so good is to bait you into having kids. I know you all know that, so why do you care about it so much? Because it feels good? Are you a fucking caveman? Slitting your wrists feels good, too. Maybe you should focus your life on something other than just "feeling good" like a fucking baby does.

Attached: 1520045099754.png (238x357, 207K)

I like you

based unlikely pearl of wisdom on a chinese cartoon image board's video game section

You don't erase the original meaning of words when they become slang. Also, the whole concept is sex being impossible for those individuals to obtain, hence being involuntarily celibate. The moment you have sex, no matter the circumstances, you are no longer celibate.

>Yeah, I'm sure all those people measuring their skulls, chins and noses will become normal people if they rape a girl
But that's the point, isn't it? Why bother telling those people to have sex when it won't change them? If anything you're just telling them to hire a hooker or resort to rape.

HAHAHAHAAAAAA. What a fucking incel.

Attached: soyjak.jpg (233x217, 9K)

I don't get this, you can always hire a hooker, so Intel is a term you use for someone incapable of obtaining sex, while trying because if he doesn't it has another name, and that he's so poor he can't pay 50-100$ for a hooker.

It's like the person that is described as Intel is such a specific kind of people it's almost useless.

I fucked my ex wife again. What the fuck is wrong with me.

If she's hot there's nothing wrong with that.

Because it's a pejorative that's thrown about without ever establishing whether it's true or not. And it's bandied about by people who complain about the abuses of prostitution and rape while disregarding that a person's status as an "incel" can be solved if they "have sex". Guess which two ways are the easiest for undesirable people to have sex?

There's still a fuck ton wrong with it, but Im so fucking weak minded I can't help it.

If we acted like fucking bonobos society would be better, fait mi.

Also anything you do is for the same reason we pursue sex, too feel good, so don't act all high and mighty because you make productive things, or read a book or whatever the other shit things you do, as it's the fucking same, to feel good.

I agree with everything else though.

>If we acted like fucking bonobos society would be better, fait mi.
If we acted like fucking bonobos there would be no society.

A girl i was dating was separated from her husband and she kept fucking him every now and then, when i found out about it i ghosted her and later found out that she got back together with him. This could be you maybe you can get her back

The whole "bonobos fuck all day and are peaceful" is an absolute myth, sorry fellas.

skepticink.com/incredulous/2017/10/09/bonobo-myth-demolished/

>we live in a society
Also bonobos do have a society, having sex without much regard for it doesn't destroy society, else we would have non thanks to all the emperors humanity have had.

While said we have to always be peaceful? I was just talking about the sex, thinking peace can be always maintained is stupid

That woman is a worthless whore and I guarantee she'll end up fat and alone lmao

That fucking sucks, and Im sorry you had to go through that.

>we live in a society
I see these words so often and I still have no idea what they mean because they are dropped without any context seemingly at random.

Why are you dating old married women wtf

Attached: 1557715911431.gif (728x408, 748K)

>all the emperors humanity have had
Ottoman and Chinese harems were means for families to make favor to the emperor. Women who didn't receive attention would be discharged after several years. Or you have examples of the emperors who had huge harems which weren't mostly symbolical to their status and wealth? Post them please.

Crusader Kings 2

fpbp

I don't think she will, her husband works all day and she's by now fucking around 4 other men (according to her friend) plus all the other orbiters she has on her bag. If her husband leaves her she'll just find another sucker
It's no big deal, i realized she was a gold digger the moment she started asking me for money to hire a lawyer to divorce her husband so that we could be together, she would bring that up every time i would nake a move on her. I only kept chaising her tail for a pump dump, i had no deep feelings for her
She wasn't old, she was like 23 and super sexy. Blonde, cute face and voice, big boobs and ass, great hips and to top it off she was very tiny. The hottest women i almost fucked

Western women were a mistake

HELLMOO
Conan Exiles, Skyrim with porn mods.

You mean like how Roman emperors had tons of bastards? Or that emperor that fucked his 3 sisters at the same time until one died and made her a goddess? Or that other kne that had an idle full of debauchery and sex and left the empire to his son and the son of the guy he killed? Oh, how about that emperor that fucked whoever asked for it?

>fantasizing about being raped doesn't mean you want to be raped
>fantasizing about raping means you want to rape though
lol you're fucking retarded

>Fun fact: Vikings didn't actually "pillage" anything.
Fun fact: You're a fucking retard.

Hellmoo is based but boring

>real life barbarian
So you mean just be a farmer for 99% of the game's run and go on maybe one or two military excursions?

There's two groups who use incel unironically. One is low quality women who want to shame low quality men into not being low quality. That's silly, but women are silly. That group doesn't want you buying a hooker. They don't want you just fucking anyone, they want you fucking them. The other group would be okay with you buying a hooker. That's the bread and circuses group. They just want you doing anything frivolous and self-destructive.

>If we acted like fucking bonobos society would be better, fait mi.
The best human societies are the least like bonobos, so what is your basis for believing this? I'll tell you what would happen if everyone just started having casual sex with everyone else. Conscientiousness would plummet as the cleanest/hardest working people would end up having less sex and, as such, reproducing less. Juvenile delinquency and child molestation would skyrocket as more and more kids would be raised either without a father or by a man who isn't their father. Diseases would spread, due to both the sex and drop in conscientiousness. An increase in disease means an increase in authoritarianism, so authoritarian states would take over everything. In other words, we'll have gone back to the pre-enlightenment world. The least degenerate people would take over and force everyone, like the Catholic church, to behave NOT like bonobos. So, no, everything would be worse in every way.
>Also anything you do is for the same reason we pursue sex, too feel good
Workaholics don't feel good when they work, they just can't stand not working.
>so don't act all high and mighty because you make productive things
You're straw manning me. The only benefit to having sex is pleasure, there's plenty of benefits to reading a book. There's also no downsides to reading a book, unlike sex, which comes with a ton of downsides. When you add up the pluses and minuses, video games are clearly better than sex, and drugs are just not worth considering at all.

Attached: 1508031972815.png (1139x358, 444K)

Well, if you put it that way, you are right, current society is fucking retarded and could not handle people not behaving like slaves.

>You mean like how Roman emperors had tons of bastards?
List three which had 10 bastards or more. The rest of your post is hilarious as it goes against your very point. The acts you mentioned were seen as signs of degradation, demise and death opposite to virtue of moderation. Historians argue that they were slander and exaggeration. Yet you claim that it's a proof that 'having sex without much regard for it doesn't destroy society'.

for your collection

Attached: 1551609705093.png (755x587, 311K)

Literally what. That's not at all what I said. Acting like bonobos would cause society to regress. Some people would try to stop it through forcing people to not act like bonobos. This is what happens in Africa and South America all the time. They constantly get dictators because they can't just act like white people and so people either already in power or with a vision take over everyone's lives and forces them to behave the right way (which is really the Northwestern European way). This is why right wing libertarians are all white. You think anyone else could actually maintain a first world society without the state?

It didn't destroy it, as we still have it, I think you are actually retarded. Also bastards were not recognized, not for the father, that's why nerone was such a particular case.

>It didn't destroy it
Lol at dumb gay LARPer

So, let me get this straight, what you are saying is that African and south American dictators rose in power... because people were fucking too much? So they are the heroes their people deserve to fix society?

I have no words...

>It didn't destroy it, as we still have it
There was a very small range of civilizations before 1500. It was pretty much "civilization with easy trading opportunities" and "civilization without easy trading opportunities." After 1500, Northwestern Europe completely redefined civilization and left everyone else in the dust. Now, everyone's hanging onto their coat tails, but they're still the same people who made those shitty societies, so of course they act more like bonobos. The people who made the West don't, it's all the guests who do. And I'm talking about men, obviously. Women are conformists. They see people slutting it up on TV, they're going to slut it up, too. That's just how they are.

And it doesn't end there! He is also saying they are not prone to fall to sin! So no dictator abuses their powers to have sex with whoever they want!

The people who made the west act less like bonobos than the rest of the world... that's what you are saying? So no sex scandals on the west, no orgies, no sex parties, no concubines, no lovers pursuing prohibited love of any kind. Sounds something you could easily prove wrong with a simple Google search!

>So, let me get this straight, what you are saying is that African and south American dictators rose in power... because people were fucking too much?
First of all, I actually already explained how one begets the other a couple posts above. I'm pretty sure you read that post. So, I don't know why you're "getting it straight" now and not then. Second of all, it doesn't even have to. I'm describing a degenerate behavior. That goes hand-in-hand with other degenerate behaviors. No, it doesn't have to be "the thing" that causes it, just like being intelligent doesn't need to be "the thing" that makes you money, but it's the best predictor of it.
>So they are the heroes their people deserve to fix society?
They see themselves as heroes, but do they actually end up fixing society? Probably not. What made Northwestern Europe different from the rest of Europe was at least, in part, draconian laws enforced by the church which had a eugenic effect of making Northwestern Europeans less violent or less "criminal," whatever that is. People got tired of the church's shit eventually, but yes, they didn't and still don't realize how they reshaped them for the better. But that's just one factor that lead to modern civilization, who knows how big of a deal it really was?

So sex is the best predictor for the cause of dictatorships in Africa and south America. But you also say dictatorships don't help as they are also degenerate behaviors, but they did work when the church did them because current society "didn't and still don't realize how they reshaped them for the better."

But you also state we don't really know how big of a deal it really was, as it is only one factor, implying its role could actually be none existant. But you say it actually "had a eugenic effect of making Northwestern Europeans less violent or less "criminal,"

Dude, I think you are just pulling shit from your ass because that's what you believe in and have no way to back that up. Stop contradicting yourself and at this point just post something to back up what you say, because it sounds all retarded.

>The people who made the west act less like bonobos than the rest of the world... that's what you are saying?
Sure. I think just about everyone would agree with that. The West is famous for the nuclear family and more puritan beliefs.
>So no sex scandals on the west, no orgies, no sex parties, no concubines, no lovers pursuing prohibited love of any kind.
No, user, that's a straw man. Why do you keep straw manning me? Are you actually retarded? No one would ever say any society never has any of those things, but it's manifest which societies have them more and less.
>Sounds something you could easily prove wrong with a simple Google search!
You're either brown or a woman, because a white man wouldn't use Google for anything.

>Implying women didn't want to have sex with barbarians
Go read an history book.

He who controls the meaning controls the narrative.
It's in the marxist rulebooks. That way, they could effectively subvert society in a lot of ways (like using the word "gender" instead of "sex", in which both words got their meanings changed)

This painting is of when the Gallic tribes raided early Rome, not the eventual fall.

That’s literally what fantasy means

Lmao I can't believe there is actually someone based in this cesspool

>So sex is the best predictor
No. The spread of disease predicts a rise in authoritarianism. That part is absolutely true. The part that's conjecture is me saying that fucking like bonobos would lead to more disease.
>dictatorships don't help
They don't help because they have no idea what they're doing. The church didn't either, the West just got lucky. They didn't just order people to behave, they murdered people who didn't, for hundreds of years.
>because current society "didn't and still don't realize how they reshaped them for the better."
I didn't say the church's policies worked because no one realized what was happening. Is English your first language?
>its role could actually be none existant
Sure, that's possible. It's also possible gravity is non-existent. You can't prove cause. Ever. You can only infer it. The onset of Christianity in various European countries is correlated with the drop in homicide at .25. That's not nothing, but the drop is also correlated with manorialism at .50 and more focused family structures (like the nuclear family, and this could just be individualism under another name) at .60. And of course Christianity is correlated with those things at .33 and .52 respectively. Which caused which; how big were their effects really; hard to say.
>"had a eugenic effect of making Northwestern Europeans less violent or less "criminal,"
That's the logical conclusion. The church slaughtered people who did x and people gradually did x less and less, even after the church lost power.
>and at this point just post something to back up what you say, because it sounds all retarded.
Like sources? For what? Now I'm confused. Which thing did I even say that sounds weird? Disease and authoritarianism? journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0062275

Why hasn't some woman who got raped by Rance keep her level high - wait till the next game when he inevitably gets lazy and goes back to being level one - then hunt him down and castrate/murder him at the start of the game?

have sex