First Computer

Doom 1, 2, 64EX
Duke Nukem 3D
Blood
Shadow Warrior 3D
Half-Life -series
Quake 1 & 2
Serious Sam -series
STALKER trilogy
FEAR + expansions
Portal 1 & 2
Far Cry 1
Crysis 1 + expansion
Max Payne 1-2
Worms: Armageddon
System Shock 1 & 2
Fallout 1 & 2
Killing Floor
Red Orchestra 2 + RS
Warcraft 3 + TFT
C&C: Red Alert 1 & 2
Witcher 1: Enhanced Edition
Talos Principle
Nier: Automata
Silent Hill 2-4 (+1 via emulator)
Resident Evil REmake HD, 2-4

I see Nier:automata, and I think this is a great list I'll check em all out thanks

Don't listen to the elitists. You did fine job.
My household's 2nd PC runs the 8-yearold Intel i7 2600 (non-K), 16GB DDR3 RAM, and said GTX 1050ti.
The thing runs anything I run at it at 1080p/60fp, with mix of around Medium and High settings in modern titles. Witcher 3, Killing Floor 2, FFXV Royal, The Talos Principle, Zelda BotW on the CEMU ... not a problem.

dark souls 3
sekiro

Yeah thanks a ton man, suppose I'm diving off the deep end asking this board but then again you guys are infinitely more honest than the shit stains like IGN

>more than half of the games are incredibly lightweight ones that won't use his hardware to the fullest at all

Attached: headset.png (392x271, 136K)

Digits of truth I guess,

Attached: 1562822416296.png (626x461, 349K)

Attached: big think.jpg (887x338, 104K)

Your newfaggotry is showing, a lot.

Yup, am proud

retard doesn't understand how digits work

I'm building a PC soon and haven't in years. My old one lasted me 5 years but eventually broke down. On a budget of 2k what card/processor should I go with? everything else I think I'll pick up on black friday like a solid state and all that. I think I'd prefer to go AMD for reference but if that's a bad idea i'll take others into consideration.

;(

So? The games' worth is not measured by their system requirements. There's fucktons of poorly optimized shit on the market nowadays that don't provide any entertainment past a couple minutes.

AMD is still the poorfags' choice.
Intel + Nvidia combo is still the true masterrace, that provides best performance and most features.
It's crazy to see some Ryzen fags suffer of terrible FPS in modern games / CEMU emulator, while my nearly 9yo PC has no issues playing 'em.

Haven't been in the market lately, all I've heard is 20 series Nvidia cards are out but I don't know what there capable of. Then again you could probably play anything 60fps at high with a 1070, and there what like 300-400

Can't argue with this, aren't the Ryzen CPU's more directed to designers than gamers?

Yeah, I know, I know. It's just funny to me how people have expensive builds that can run heavy games but still prefer playing old games anyone could run on cheap hardware. Nothing wrong with that though, modern gaming is dead. Might as well just relive the past.

Super RTXs has been running circles over non-Super RTXs for cheap last I heard, even the new 2060 is better than old 2080

The only difference I've noticed in gaming with amd/intel is that amd is always steady if you turn off vsync but my intel pc for some reason requires vsync and still gets frame drops, albeit small barely noticeable ones. I had a sapphire 7950 back in the day and that thing was a monster, honestly. I don't remember what my cpu was called but I eventually upgraded to the black edition of whatever was out.

you can find those for a lot cheaper already.
Nvidia did a bit bizarre move and released a new GTX 16XX series alongside the RTX 2000-series. They're pretty my like the RTX cards, without raytracing cores and shit.

The 1660 is like a middleman between the old 1060 6gb (which still gets the job done VERY well at 1080p), and 1070, on top of not requiring external power.

>aren't the Ryzen CPU's more directed to designers than gamers?
Dunno where that claim originates from. Intel's the go-to choice for graphic artists and simulator fags.
Not saying that AMD would not get the job done in most cases though. It's just a very case sensitive matter that's hard to summarize.

fortnite
call of duty black ops 4
minecraft

tarkov
f.e.a.r
total war warhammer
devil daggers

Fair point I think I'm pulling that out of my ass. Anyways it's late here goodnight guys and thanks for a LL the games

yikes

stalker

Ryzen is better for everything except adobe premiere. For purely gaming it's a mixed bag for games, but usually intel pulls ahead due to higher clock speed. In the end the difference is negligible though.

If you do any kind of multitasking on your PC, get a Ryzen

Hunt: Showdown

youtube.com/watch?v=-MlbAAaqNdA

So, would you say Ryzen is better for streaming?

Since other people have suggested FEAR, make sure to buy it from a key site and not the bundle. Fear 3 is a fucking travesty.

yes for streaming you'd defintely want to go with ryzen

Honestly, please do not get a 1050 ti. It is a scam.
You could get an RX 580 for the same price or less and get like like 30+% more performance.
I'm very much someone who usually prefers Nvidia, but in that price range AMD is just vastly superior.

>usually intel pulls ahead due to higher clock speed
Nope. Intel unironically tends to have less cores and lower speeds these days, yet it BTFO the AMD's competition in many many tasks.

Something Something internal tech and shit.

But that's not true?
AMD still doesn't have a CPU that can go as fast as the 9900K, especially with how decent its overclocking potential can be.
9900K on average is still slightly better for most games than any 3rd gen Ryzen currently on the market, it's just that the price-to-performance ratio is extremely terrible on it (and any other currently existing Intel consumer CPU).

this. Anything under a 2070 super, go for AMD. They can't compete at the high end though

>1050 ti

Its worse than 980 ti

You're an idiot, of course the previous gen flagship card is gonna be better than the next gen's low end trash.
A generational jump doesn't mean that every card from the next gen will be better than any card from the previous gen, that's absurd.

intel has less cores but higher clocks. The 9900k can run at 5GHz easily, the 3900x is supposed to go up to 4.6 but it's unlikely it can actually reach that

minecraft

>runs with way less power
>runs way cooler
>way more modern tech and software support
>same amount of VRAM
>yet the polar opposite tier
you're not the brightest bulb