Medieval III when?!
Medieval III when?!
Blake Reyes
Other urls found in this thread:
Ryder Morales
Shogun needs at least 20 more DLCs before this gets released
Liam Peterson
>SJW Medieval III
black kangz
transsexual nobles
female knights
indian street shitting pope
it's going to be glorious
Nicholas Martinez
Never. Never ever. Med II is peak total war made by a team that knew what they were doing. Medieval III is going to be a shitshow with openly gay popes, crusades that always backfire, jihads that always succeed, princesses who campaign on the battlefield for trans rights and all that other shit. On top of this, it's going to use the dead in the water, still being beaten like a dead horse with petrified stick Warscape engine, which was designed solely for gunpowder warfare and couldn't even do that properly. If Medieval III comes out, it's going to be the worst total war ever made, fail completely to live up to its predecessor, and basically be Rome 2 2.0.
Gabriel Mitchell
>made by a team that knew what they were doing
what happened to CA afterwards?
Luis Reyes
But you can have female Pope in Medieval II...
Nolan Hernandez
You can have secretly female priests, yes - something which perfectly encapsulates the culture of the times and the strict patriarchal heirarchies the world followed. This is different than historical revisionism by having openly female popes who have ugly bull dyke sex with their female cardinals in front of their tranny council of black nobles - all in the Kingdom of Sweden.
Lincoln Phillips
Please no.Not until they get new engine and change current year CA staff.
Julian Thomas
Never. It's just not worth triggering the M2-autists. They will never accept M3, purely because it's not an exact copy of M2, even if it's somehow a perfect game.
Christian White
three kingdoms sucks
Jaxon Harris
>tfw want a Medieval 3
>Know that it will just be a reskin of Rome 2, like ever TW since Rome 2
I've given up on Total War and CA
Anthony Richardson
Medieval II is my favorite but if it has one serious flaw it's that they never fixed player unit and AI pathing / behavior. Archers in particular are still fucked because they randomly walk around and bunch up to change formation when firing and half of them don't fire at all.
Sebastian Scott
So how's Medieval II definitive edition?
Ayden Reyes
based and Teutonicpilled
Oliver Ramirez
Anyone miss general speeches?
youtube.com
Adam Howard
Its good if you mod it.
Colton Perry
First Medieval was better
Robert Evans
I've barely played vanilla Med2. Most of my time was in the Divide and Conquer mod as well as Call of Warhammer BOTET.
Owen Campbell
How so?
James Carter
the AI during strategy map sessions is also a pile of crap, the game doesn't do shit just throw factions at you again and again, including allies as well, diplomacy isn't worth shit
David Hill
Never.
Anthony Lopez
It's called Total War: Attila and Total War: Thrones of Britannia
Josiah Miller
As much as I want Medi3 there hasn’t been a good total war since Shogun 2 and I don’t want them to fuck it up.
Christian Taylor
No kidding. Do you also constantly get foreign diplomats and princesses kneeling and bowing at your cities over and over for no reason? Like no diplomacy screen or prompting ever comes up but still turn after turn there they are?
Hunter King
It’s literally the same thing as base game + kingdoms.
Jason Bell
Yeah but I think those were bribe attempts
Carter Morales
>Divide and Conquer
I was more of a Total Overhaul Submod kind of guy. When it comes to mods though Stainless Steel is a fantastic vanilla+ overhaul and everybody should be playing it over vanilla.
Goddamn the vanilla campaign AI was awful. All of those stacks after stacks of the same cheap unit, no unit composition, to just form around cities. Empire was especially heinous with that.
Charles Hughes
Both Attila and 3K is good. This is not debatable.
Ian Turner
From nu-CA? Hopefully never
Ayden Rivera
dark ages=/=medieval
Ian Collins
they only modern total war that isnt crap is shogun ii
Jose Perry
Hopefully never, the last good game they made was Shogun 2.
Isaac Mitchell
With all the treatment it's been getting I think I prefer the updated Rome 2 over Attila. Now if it got the horde, razing, and more diplomatic mechanics then I will know I prefer Rome 2 over Attila.
Kayden Morgan
Med 2 > Shogun 2 = Rome > the rest who fucking cares
Luis Morales
>General speeches in Rome 2
>It's the same three speeches every battle
>Only the generals unit cheers
At least Shogun 2 had some half decent ones
Jason Cook
R2 is certainly playable now, but I still think Attila is better. It's simply better at depicting it's time-period in a satisfying way. Playing Rome in R2 still isn't satisfying to me, when that should be the main draw, while playing the Western or Eastern Empire in Attila was certainly fun, not to mention all the other interesting factions.
David Smith
IT'S SO BORING
Brody Reyes
Yeah, I don't really play base game Med 2 either. It's either Stainless Steel, Third Age with dac submod or Kingdoms campaigns.
Julian Cooper
Med 2 > WH1&2 > Rome 1 (and Barbarian Invasion > Rome 2 > Attila (but only because it runs like shit for me) > don't care about the rest
Michael Hill
Why would you want? The games are glorified mobas now.