Why do you hate me, Yea Forums?

Former #1 shill LevelCapGaming recently released this video
youtube.com/watch?v=_YYkw4xBRYk

Current #1 shill JackFrags also released a video about his frustrations with it
youtube.com/watch?v=KNXf9OD4qE0

It's All Over Now Baby Blue by Eric Burdon and the Animals
youtube.com/watch?v=kUmmSIMGm-E

jackfrags has bemoaned the game since it's release. I don't deny he's a shill though.

>murder the cosmetics to appease the crybabies
>they dont play the game anyways

a tale as old as time

ok i can tell you this since i stopped playing to take a break literally 15 minutes ago

pros:
>no 3rd spotting bullshit
>no suppression bullshit
>TTK and TTD are the best of the series
>no more kill bloat gadgets, most weapons have a recognizable recoil pattern that can be mastered and you can be effective with ANY kind of weapon regardless of how broken it is
>vehicles are horribly underpowered, especially tanks, tho bombers are still really effective if you are really good at flying
>construction is something nobody ever asked for, yet it quickly became something effective that everyone likes and puts effort into
>maps are hit and miss, but among them there are literal gems that are an absolute blast to play (rotterdam above them all)
>no premium, game is extremely cheap and you get all the future content for free

cons:
>horribly marketed towards a non-existant player base, you can easily sue EA for false advertisement since anything they've shown in the launch trailer is NOT ingame, including prosthetics, katanas and other customization bullshit
>anyone that shilled the SJW hurr vagina durr women shit has left the team way too late, the people that made battlefield games great have left way before BFV was even made
>that means the game has no direction, it's filled with annoying bugs and even tho DICE LA is now in charge, the same team that saved BF4, the hopes of the game getting actually great are really small
>bugs
>bugs
>bugs
>dripfed content because no premium
>horrible mtx system, retarded fortnite-tier skins only available with real money, forgettable shit-tier skins purchasable with gorillions of in-game company coins (grind currency), you're not going to use those
>questionable assignments
>nobody asked for firestorm, it's dead as fuck

tl;dr game is not perfect, but it's fun and can be great if they put the same effort that saved BF4
the gameplay is a huge jump from casualfield 1, for sure

>devs literally celebrating that their game sold like shit
>just to spite angry anonymous people on the internet
A reaction image doesn't exist for this

Attached: 1484858710402.jpg (440x393, 31K)

>Teammates are bumbling retards.
>ME OOGA TEAM BOOGA
please go back to overwatch
thank you

>vehicles are horribly underpowered
Nobody asked for an infantry game.

i quit around the time firestorm launched, was there any noteworthy change since then? Might play again now that my go-to game has gone to shit

t. tank shitter sitting out of range and shelling flags bragging about his 50.00 kdr in the battlefield general

some maps, outpost mode was fun but it's gone now, some new weapons
nothing really
also more bugs

Fuck that man, i only play aggressive vehicles
ptfogang

tanks are ok its just that every assault carries a small tactical nuke so it makes things difficult

>the battlefield general
only oldfags will remember this

then you can still play tank, you just can't yolo anymore as you get fucked in the ass pretty easily by panzerfausts and assorted bullshit
this

>outpost mode
fuck, I remember logging on randomly and played the mode where you had 1 thin strip of the map and you had 32v32 absolute nightmarefuel slaughterfests

it was like frontlines but on genocide mode, it was fun af

are these modes on rotation or are the devs retarded and not bring back popular ones?

They need to individualise the classes again imo,

Can they just give it out for free like they did with BF4 already

they are on ((((rotation))))
aka they will bring 'em back when it better suits them
rush is coming back sometime this month because of the chapter IV weekly shit
i like this, it mantains a healthy playerbase playing on core modes like conquest, operations and tdm
i just wish they rotated the "weekly" ones a bit more often, like in bf1

>implying this isn't exactly what happens when you make vehicles out of paper so everyone becomes too scared to push objectives with them

cool, any decent weapons added like flametheower or w/e
just going to play it on the weekend, i realized focusing on chapter unlocks is a surefire way of burning out and Ill just focus on having fun

vehicles are shit and classes have been completely homogenised to the point that you're really just picking a gun
the game has no direction and was clearly designed as multiple different games (see: the building system)
it doesn't feel like Battlefield, it feels like a F2P shooter
the series is dead, DICE has clearly lost its talent to other studios

don't lie to yourself, that has always been the case
vehicles were op not because they were sturdy, they were op because they had an unmatched firepower against everything and everyone
a tank vs tank matchup in past games was a pull-the-rope minigame
you had tons of anti-vehicle weaponry in past games, that didn't stop vehicles to dominate the scoreboards every single time
the fact that vehicles work differently in bfv, are clunky and big risk big reward makes it an interesing change of pace

Who are you?

I still play it, but with the amount of bugs present it's a fucking dumpster fire

Attached: Battlefielddevpropagandaparty.jpg (740x555, 55K)

Feels too much like CoD to be fun, you don't need to play as a team to win.

Don't see why BF1 gets so much hate though, pretty much the best game

vehicles are meant to be powerful

So much wasted potential. I bet they hoped the game will sell like hot cakes because it has BR mode, and now it's just left to die.

It's disgusting that they're trying to lionise their abortion of a game as a 'liberal victory'.
I hope they change their ad team for the next game.

I never played as a tank in previous games so can't comment, but in BF1 vehicles were very OP if in the right hand. I'd frequently be top scorer with a crazy KD just by pushing objectives and knowing when to run.

A competent tanker in BF1 will always be OP and needs either a determined group to take him down or someone sneaking about and mining behind. In the little of BFV that I've played tanks aren't made of paper, but they're not as effective at taking infantry out. The turrets turn too slowly and the damage they give out isn't as high.

With the artillery truck in BF1 as long as I hit somewhere near the player then they're dead. In BFV unless it's a headshotI need to finish them off with the machinegun.

>the next game.
oh sweatie no... x

Disgusting nazi propaganda. Letting you play as a nazi is NOT okay.

>for the next game.
user,I...

But there is no nazi in this game, what are you talking about?

dont forget that DICE added a fuckton more environmental destruction, allowing us to basically flatten entire streets with a tank and do a fuckton of damage with debris

>construction is something nobody ever asked for, yet it quickly became something effective that everyone likes and puts effort into
From what I've seen people only set up the ammo station and ignore everything else

w-what do you mean? are we this lost already...

How could you even know if your team is retarded, it's battlefield. Also literally what microtransactions

crazy how the new CoD is poised to put it back on top while BF has pretty much faded into irrelevancy

I'm straight.

Stylewise it's a weird cross of bad company and regular bf, which affects a lot of things.

I've only clocked 40hrs on it and if I wan't to play BF i just play 1 or 4 now. I usually just check V out when there's a new patch or map.

EA doesn't have a good track record on letting game studios live after high profile failures.

The new class system has corroded any obligation to actually play your role - when there's pickups on the map and everyone's abilities are merged.

New ww2 battlefield should have been a layup but I played that beta even after all the bullshit trailers just didn't do it. I skipped bf1 for not be a ww1 game and I skipped v for not being a ww2 game. Franchise over.

Attached: 1365613041352.gif (250x250, 976K)

>pros
>vehicles are horribly underpowered
Maybe go play an infantry centric game like CoD if you want vehicles to be useless.

I dunno, after BF1s marketing success you'd think they would give it a go. Modern day (best setting) hasn't been done in 5 years (Hardline doesn't count).

They can just call the next one Bad Company 3 and have a motherfucker marketing campaign and it will sell like hotshit, regardless of what it's like.

incels hate it when women do things, so they shit their pants while crying about it.

Attached: 1560419821875.jpg (1280x720, 92K)

I'm not sure I understand the appeal of 64 player headless chicken run around anymore.

I never feel like it's important to win or lose, you just wander around doing stuff. I cannot for the life of me understand how people put hundreds of hours into these games that have no stakes and next to zero strategy.

Attached: almost unpleasant.png (384x390, 175K)

It's fun to squad up with your buddies and cap flags
Nowadays most people playing are just trying to tick off whatever assignment they've selected though

Squads working together can easily carry teams. Co-ordination and teamwork do win matches, most players will forget this inconveniently though.

You will never be a real woman no matter how much hormones you take.

Pathetic is more fitting then disgusting

this is what I discovered playing bf3 and it's part of what turned me off the style, 4 people actually trying to win is all it takes to effectively never lose again.

We weren't good at games either, or at least I'm not. We were just actually playing it.

Bf1 gave battlefield exposure to a wider audience and dice threw it all away with this disaster

Play against and get friendly with other groups and have your own public "scrims" in a dedicated server.

>pissed off incel shows up to project his creepy obsession with transsexuals onto his superior

every single time

Attached: 1500238879872.jpg (755x696, 93K)

Didn't you enjoy working together and winning? That's all it takes for me really, I get a huge buzz off that.

Operations in bf1 fixed this problem. I don't really like conquest myself either.

Go dilate

or I could go play something with a ranked mode built in that ensures people will be trying and the challenge always adequate?

Attached: bearputer.png (481x481, 184K)

Main reason why Rush is always the better game mode. BF stealing the game mode from Splash Damages Enemy Territory games, which was one of the major reasons why Bad Company 2 was considered to be as good as it was.

Usually there's a good squad per side so it works out. Fucking around is a lot of fun too when you have friends and C4.

DICE began listening to the infantry only players, shrinking the maps and nerfing vehicles into near uselessness unless you were highly proficient with them. BF4 was the last Battlefield game imo, BF1 onward resemble Battlefront EA more than Battlefield of old.
There's a reason why they keep bringing back "the most popular map ever", Operation Metro. BF is dead as a large scale combined arms game.

Or you could find a good dedicated server, which are always better than any online game's own MMR system.

Conquest Assault was the best
Strike at Karkand bless
Special Forces bless

I always laugh remembering the moment the EA CEO came out and seriously looked like Satan

Communication is what's key. It's easier to win when you're all talking to each other and can direct each other to the enemy.

Nothing more satisfying than taking a tank down together

Sometimes I think back and imagine what Battlefield Hardline would have been like if the developer studio had enough time to polish it.

But vehicles were OP in BF1...

Primarily because of DICE's retarded game design. Vehicles were very mobile despite the time period the game was set in and infantry didn't have easy access to anti-vehicle weapons.
I can't remember, did vehicles still have health and ammo regeneration in BF1?

Unlimited ammo and you could fix them whilst inside (I think)

Why didn't they make a sequel to the futuristic Battlefield then they could add all the women and minorities and gays they wanted? EA fucked up big time.

What the fuck is up with the timed-achievement-exclusive weapons as well? Dead game and I don't care enough to korea grind shit every week just to get a gun

>infantry didn't have easy access to anti-vehicle weapons

This not true, they always had access to anti-tank weapons it's just that tanks didn't feature that heavily in WW1 due to the static battlefield and the terrain. It's only in a few battles that they were heavily involved.

No point arguing realism because it's a game. I recently visited the WW1 battlefields and DICE did get a lot right but there needs to be artistic license otherwise we'd get tanks moving a 4km/h

They couldn't reuse half of BF1 assets then.

>This not true, they always had access to anti-tank weapons
No infantry anti-tank weapons though which I guess was what the other user meant. It was either artillery shells or hoping they get stuck in the mud (like they often did).

It's not Battlefield 3. Also it's buggy as fuck and does nothing new. It's a boring game.

I swear if next battlefield will be full of immersion breaking wymyn It's over for me, I won't buy any other battlefield game until it's made properly

The anti-tank gun was real, though you had to be within 300ft to fire it and do something meaningful damage. You also could only realistically get 2 shots per man due to the kickback from the rifle.

There were lots of infantry based weapons, but it's just that tanks weren't as heavily used along the Western Front and as you said, they'd usually just get stuck.

that's why you play Operations

The anti-tank gun was made very late to the war, the anti-tank rifles designed to destroy WW1- and later iteration tanks were more used at the early stages of WW2 until armor got too thick for them. Tanks were considered a success in WW1 frontiers because despite often getting stuck and having logistical- and machinery problems, they did manage to get over no man's land and into the enemy territory. And there wasnt much the infantry could do about it or knew what to do about it. The "throw a log inbetween tracks/throw a molotov where their fresh air intake/fuel is"-sort of infantry tactics once again became more common in early WW2.

They could have either reduced the speed/mobility of the vehicles or double the size of the maps. I'd prefer the latter. One of the biggest problems with vehicles from BF3 onwards are the tiny maps; I shouldn't be able to die, respawn in a tank and be back at the frontline in 20 seconds. It gives the infantry no downtime.

shit bf3 tier netcode, shit open field maps and shit visibility that encourage camping, ttk that makes the shit netcode even shittier, shit cosmetic microtransactions, and a shit ton of bugs. i think on xbox the game crashes 9 times out of 10, and there's a bug with the cosmetics that makes them literally invisible yet there's been no motion to fix it because they know it's just going to sell more cosmetics.
overall a giant trashheap cashgrab piece of shit and that's foregoing the politics

live service
>Yeah we will make a great game (if it sells well)
>Oh It sells like shit? well too bad, fuck you, and thanks for your money :)
>drops game and moves on to creating new SJW shit title

Horses are so fucking OP in 1.

You mean it has the worst gameplay of all battlefield games, right? BFV is an abomination.
t. ex BF3/4 comp player

Destruction ruined Battlefield change my mind

You are actually right, only low IQ and low KD players like to have all their cover flattened by tanks and rocket launchers.

>everything that makes me shit my pants in anger is a transsexual

Attached: 1549947444506.png (1110x1534, 226K)

>his superior
>his
did you just assume my gender?

>t. low IQ monkey too shit to understand spread and effective engagement ranges
Unironically BF1 has a higher skill ceiling and more engaging gunplay than the dumpster fire that is BFV

Nah. Creating new firing angles by blowing holes in walls or forcing out campers by bringing the building down was a good addition to the game, and also fun.

Being able to slowly creep up to flags in operations due to the various craters was hella fun. Even more satisfying throwing a grenade into one and catching a bunch of people

Best bit as a medic is hanging behind the crater and healing rezzing people fighting at the lip

>Posting memes from tranny discords.

Did 5 get of that ratio detector thing where you could see who was on the flags?

of course it will

Attached: gg.png (626x743, 79K)

No idea, haven't played V after the beta. That shit was terrifying seeing one or two people turn up and not knowing whether you should go hunt them or let them come to you

i wouldn't know, but since your cringe inducing obsession has ousted you as being someone who hangs out on those, we'll have to take your word for it, little man.

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
what I will play now? indies are making these shitty larp milsim

>yfw BFV bombed

Attached: chadzam.jpg (947x647, 65K)

Tranny detected, opinion discarded.

felt more like work than fun
less ways to play than previous bf games
grand operations is total mess
shitty tacked on battle royal mode to try and grab some cash

>we are satisfied with not making money
lol

>gets exposed
>shits his pants

not an argument, incel.

I want that to happen. I want to see them double dib. Because no video game company is smart enough to attack gamer's wallets. Let it all burn.

Keep crying, Resetera-fag.

>more incoherent rambling

cringe. it's also still not an argument, incel.