Challenges that are OK for everybody are possible

Question

Challenges that are OK for everybody are possible

Adam Phillips

>Challenges that are OK for everybody are possible.
>More stimulating, skillful gameplay is more rewarding.
Agreeing with either is experiencing objectivity in designs and critiques.

Warm memo: This is vidya.

Attached: Objectivity (Strawberry, chocolate, and brie).png (628x882, 879K)

July 8, 2019 - 16:56

Other urls found in this thread:

Xavier Campbell

Quality is not objective by fucking definition. "Quality" or any evaluative statement is a matter of priority assigment, not of a any criterion independent of an observer. Quality may be subjective, though to have relevance it generally is best treated as normative. Objective is quite literally the sole epistemic form that it cannot have. At absolute best, it is rooted in consensus.

July 8, 2019 - 17:02

Carter Rivera

Both of your premises are patently incorrect. There's is no point in the conclusion because the premises are objectively flawed.

July 8, 2019 - 17:10

Robert Rivera

Read a book. Quality is absolutely objective as there are patterns and designs that work objectively better than others. Video game design isn't art it's engineering.

July 8, 2019 - 17:12

Easton Rodriguez

Quality isn't objective, you're just trying to make so that people can't question your dumb opinions.

July 8, 2019 - 17:14

Kevin Peterson

>Quality is absolutely objective as there are patterns and designs that work objectively better
Objectively better at WHAT. You have to have a defined function to establish a priority list, and function, as you should well know, is not an inherent property of the object itself.

Also, don't tell people to "read a book" when you clearly haven't read so much as a dictionary entry, much less anything actually relevant on the subject. I don't mind you being an idiot, but being an idiot arrogant enough to insult others when they are trying to help you is pathetic and you should really snap out of it before it is too late.

July 8, 2019 - 17:17

Cameron Lee

Where's your trip nutriment nigger? When are you going to start posting a bunch of unrelated shit and claim it corroborates your retarded claims?

July 8, 2019 - 17:18

Thomas Bell

>Quality is not objective by fucking definition.
You're just stating this to get yous so here is your you mother fucker.

July 8, 2019 - 17:18

Robert Hill

At being good which is can be found with an objective standard (ie a standard that is consistent with reality). You need a human for objectivity. Read a book.

July 8, 2019 - 17:20

Gabriel Johnson

I'm too retarded for this please explain before the threads take off

Attached: 1530774461450.jpg (400x800, 246K)

July 8, 2019 - 17:21

1 2 ... 4 Next

Challenges that are OK for everybody are possible

Last threads