SOON
Attached: 65573_10_battlefield-bad-company-3-coming-next-gen-consoles.jpg (620x348, 54K)
SOON
Samuel Wood
SOON
Other urls found in this thread:
Parker Anderson
you think somebody would do that
just go on the internet and tell lies
Zachary Young
Time to tell some story why Bad Company 2 is such a great game:
>Be playing Bad Company 2 on release
>Literally playing like a god
>Know all the tricks, hide outs etc
>Literally killing choopers with tanks everytime i see them
>Fire Magnettracer with such precision its crazy
>Stop playing because well time for university
>Ride with the bus to campus
>Get out
>hear chopper flying above me
>OH SHIT OH SHIT TAKE COVER
>Run behind next car to get cover
>Search for my tracer gun
>mfw realize its not a videogame
>mfw people stare at me
>mfw stopped playing after that
Austin Gonzalez
Wyatt King
it would never live up to the hype and, it would be the worst in the bad company series. I know it hurts up its true.
Owen Flores
You trust EA to make a proper sequel?
Juan Thompson
>Current EA/DICE
It would be shit if it ever happened and every FPS is shifting towards BRs anyway.
Isaac Mitchell
call of duty bad company 2 is not a good battlefield game and neither is any other multiplatform 'battlefield' title
Noah Roberts
BFBC1 was so fucking kino
Julian Garcia
>bad company with women
pass
flush this garbage franchise down the drain
PS : fuck niggers
Carson Cruz
Still desperately waiting for the PC release eventually right?
Seething EA tranny
Colton Barnes
Agreed, it's very unlikely that dice will be able to redeem themselves.
John Cooper
2142 was an actual masterpiece, and titan v titan is still one of the greatest game modes ever created
Eli James
Just a general question, what would make a Bad Company 3 stand out from other titles (aside from the campaign)?
I absolutely loved BC2 (more than any other Battlefield since), but what would make for a good sequel? BF 3 was already kind of a continuation of BC2's core design, just with a drastically different tone and visual style. Just about every BF game since has done the same, just updating and refining itself. How could a theoretical Bad Company 3 make itself unique as a BAD COMPANY game rather than just a mainline Battlefield game? Because I feel that Dice are just planning on making just another modern war Battlefield game, something that is basically a continuation of BF4 but with BF5's gameplay.
Just curious as to what you guys might think.
Alexander Bailey
Either this never happened or you should go see a psychiatrist user.
Carter Baker
>why Bad Company 2 is such a great game:
You disgust me. It was a fun but bad game compared to previous Battlefield games.
Connor Cooper
PLEASE NO, DON'T GIVE BAD COMPANY THE SJW TREATMENT
Sebastian Flores
BC2 was peak comfy bros I want to go back
>40mm shotgun
>hardcore shotgun slugs with crosshairs one shotting at any distance with zero damage fallout
>absolutely the most based M1 garand in the history of BF games
>treating weapons addons as the actual bonuses they are, having to tradeoff better sights for other perks
Isaiah Taylor
>nu dice
>nu ea
who cares
Owen Green
Agreed. BF4 was excellent. Hardline was trying something new, so I forgave them when it was fucking terrible. BF1 was a novelty, but overall a shitty setting for a battlefield game due to the technology of the time, compunded by poor gameplay design and customisation. I didn't even buy V. I don't give a single fuck about the SJW elements, the gameplay was the same decline we saw in 1. I hate to say it but I might not even bother with a modern BF if it ever comes out, the series has had three strikes in a row. They fucking murdered it.
Easton Martinez
>dude we should play bfv together
>don't be such a nerd
>decide to get origin access to try it
>shittiest vehicles in any bf
>toy guns
>fall down only to get revived by a female with a long braid in a ww2 settings
not even worth the $4, I'll continue playing BF1942
Michael Nelson
>being this right