>remind a Stevefag that his mineshit character is never, ever getting in >he seethes so hard that he makes an entire thread about it with some imgur filename jimmy neutron picture
>see two anons having a back-and-forth >reply to one with something mildly relevant like "okay dude, I was just trying to help. fucking fag" >leave thread the ol' hit and run pot stirring. DEVILISH
Levi Sanders
I made a dude so mad once that I got him to make a strawman oc of me that I saw through pure coincidence a week later. It felt pretty good
Jose Ortiz
Post it
Zachary Gutierrez
Is that supposed to represent their hitbox?
Angel Moore
>start losing an argument >someone else backs you up and proves you right I owe you anons my life.
>That one user who will keep arguing anyway >The whole thread could be calling him a retard, and he'll still be replying and defending his stand Some people will just die on any hill
Nothings better when you semi-know what you're talking about but dont have enough facts to prove another user wrong, then some random encyclopedia user comes out of nowhere, backs you up with obscure facts that literally nobody fucking knew, and ruins your opponent.
>winning the argument >debunking every counterpoint he's trying to make >thought there was no way he could possibly refute my arguments >get a reply notification >"cope"
>typical ironic zoomer newfag Man i would love this if i was a newfag and young but im old and jaded.
John Campbell
If there multiple people blowing you the fuck up with well made arguments and facts, no one else is backing you up, and your still convinced your in right you're just being stubborn at that point
>with well made arguments and facts This is the key though. If it's just people calling you wrong, then they aren't deconstructing your argument. You can't be aren't wrong just because a bunch of people are saying you're wrong without backing it up, that's argumentum ad populum.
Chase Williams
no problem pham
Aiden Moore
Before you guys get ahead of yourselves, just remember it doesn't even matter unless a thread in question where this happened was being observed. At this point anythings hypothetical so who gives a shit
Oliver Butler
To this day I still have to understand what constitutes winning an argument. In theory it would be defending your points and attacking the opponent ones, but here we just have people giving one word answers or ad homs, expecting the other user to answer them despite literally providing no argument.
