Game is reviewed unjustly because the reviewer can't be assed to learn it

I thought Gerstmann was based bros, what went wrong?

And I thought Giant Bomb are based and not a sjw cucks..

The controlls in gothic are complete ass you cant deny that

imgur.com/nFOWyPc

I remember some cunt gave Mafia a bad review because the car was slow and could barely ride up the bridge.

Attached: d52a0954f4f424fafdbf8d5a79de2d60ac54155317f7997542ff9c85fa6a1fa2_product_card_v2_mobile_slider_639[1 (639x361, 29K)

What's even funnier is the people trying to 'champion' the idea of putting brown people where they don't belong unironically tried to use the argument of "all it takes is one" in the hypothetical situation of a trade caravan, likening brown people to a cockroach infestation. These people are unreal.

youtube.com/watch?v=3oXXA3WRNX4
I hate this useless shitskin faggot

pathologic 2/1

"its too hard" when the game idea is to fuck the player up as much as possible.

Fuck what a good game. That shit takes me back

Game is reviewed unjustly because the reviewer hates the franchise.

Gross. How come blacks always supposed to get special treatment? Where are asians, indians, arabs, hispanics in games/movies? Nobody complains about it, but forget to add an afro and you're a racist.

>Reviewers actually using the stylus to draw instead of the stick and then complaining that it was convoluted

Attached: (kiss) Gooood.png (883x893, 253K)

Controls in Gothic are fucking great. Specifically in Gothic 1.

>that IGN video where the guy literally gets stuck on the first of the game for 10+ minutes

Attached: 1c9bbc4233af27f2311f0ad9f9eda356.jpg (115x219, 6K)

Your kneejerk "us vs. them" attitude is not helping. You are part of the problem.

Some morons whine loudly to drum up clickbait controversy for money, moron dev whines back, and you retards use it to pat yourself on the back about "them leftists" like some boomer who is too lazy to make an effort to understand the younger generation but thinks they know everything.

>fails to do basic task
does someone have that reviewer failing the jump dash puzzle next to the pigeon completing the same task in a webm?
if you have that pls post it

Attached: 1558500475516.jpg (1072x1053, 90K)

You sure typed a whole lot of nothing there.

One of TW101's faults was being one of the only games to truly try and weave the gamepad into the gameplay experience.

i've never even bothered to look at TW101 is the drawing similar to okami or something?

>God Hand is bad because I couldn't even get past the fucking first miniboss, but I don't mention this in the interview and just call it bad game design which makes people assume I finished it
>W101 is bad because it's confusing, also this "Unite Guts" move wasn't very useful and I didn't like that a Wii U game made me use the Gamepad (even though it has multiple options to not need it)

Attached: 1525105021549.jpg (680x680, 32K)

You use the right stick (not the stylus, that's just a gimmick control scheme) to draw different shapes that correspond to your weapons ("Unite Morphs") or encircle enemies/pieces of the environment. On lower difficulties it slows time to a crawl but it's in real-time on the highest difficulty. It gives the game a very unique flow as you have access to well over a dozen relatively simple weapons at any time once you get them all. You can also draw a weapon and press the "group attack" button to make it a CPU-controlled assist attack without changing your weapon, and if you draw the shape really big the weapon gets really big and has more range/power and lower speed.

Kind of? You draw with the right stick and raw the "shapes" of the weapons to use them in a Unite Morph, all in real time. So you draw a circle and you get a first weapon to you how you like and then you can draw shapes as you combo to assist with other weapons. There are several segments in the game that require you to look at the gamepad though and not the TV.

Seriously? Nobody reviewed it?

>reading the reviewer say Unite Guts didn't seem useful

Attached: 1390869064794.jpg (848x900, 36K)

sounds similar enough, if a bit more expanded upon
>okami only has a few shapes for certain enemies

Attached: 1553819098416.jpg (650x665, 61K)

there were specific outlets that didn't review it, like Giant Bomb

This is the most american post I have ever seen on Yea Forums

Plenty of people reviewed it, Giant Bomb famously did not review it because at the time it was being plastered as "alt right" and probably didn't want to review it in case they liked it.

It wasn't even leftists who whined about it, just some butthurt niggers thinking they can now collect good boy points for pointing out how rascist that game is.
And so what if Giantbomb fell for the twitter drama, don't act like you didn't.
Don't fucking mix leftists with whining twitter niggers just because you follow both.

I can. They are very intuitive and simple.

Nah, it had numerous reviews. The game was just utter shit, especially at launch.

>Fire Emblem Radiant Dawn got destroyed sales-wise because a reviewer said you couldn't waggle the wiimote to play the game

Game's good, but yeah it was an utter pile of shit at launch in terms of stability.

More like it got destroyed saleswise because it was a hard strategy game at the peak of wii shovelware and got released alongside Mario Galaxy.

>moron dev whines back
Yeah what a whiny bitch. How dare he say something bad to the people who literally smear his reputation. What a fucking loser amirite? Kill yourself.

GB doesn't review most games anymore but they did just flat-out blacklist the game for ideological reasons. They did the same thing to Hat in Time, to the point of deleting a fucking quick look they'd already made for it.

Not an argument

All that happened before the game even came out and before that incident nobody gave a single shit about that game. Within a few week I saw Yea Forums and /pol/ flooded with KCD shills claiming that everyone who wanted to stick it to the SJWs should buy it.
It was a fucking marketing gag and you completely fell for it and now you're most likely too moronic to admit it.

>reviewer is evidently jerking off with one hand while attempting to review the game

Attached: 3064015-3926899138-doom3.jpg (705x397, 113K)

It did take me time to actually understand you have to left click or hold CRTL to perform action, after I did, it became my favorite game.

What is so bad about the controls? It plays like any other third person action RPG. Only difference is that in the first game you have to hold CTRL to perform actions. Oh the horror, I can't wrap my head around this complicated control scheme.

The second game actually gives you an option between the old and the new control scheme which is pretty much the standard that every modern RPG uses.

Why did they snub Hat in Time?

What an idiot, there are plenty of other reasons that game sucked.

>game is too hard
>it looks like shit
>it's not right that I die so easily whenever I visit new places even though I'm low on resources
>game feels empty because the map is too big
>game feels boring because I have to run 20 minutes to reach a destination
>game feels lifeless because I only do main quests and I don't like exploring

Attached: outward12.jpg (1920x1080, 376K)

Lol isn't that from the Aliens fps on playstation?

Honestly, I hate playing FPS games on consoles. There are some genres that are made for gamepads, fight sticks, keyboards and mouse, or some other accessory. I really enjoyed that Metroid Prime strayed from the herd with their controls and had sound logic for it in-universe. I even like that the target-lock could change based on your visor due to a higher heat signature or results from your scan visor, etc.

DBZ Infinite World was basically Budokai 4 with significantly improved gameplay compared to B3 where characters fell off and barely had different strategies after the 2 top 8. It also improved the capsule system giving characters all their transformations and moves without crippling yourself and getting rid of the clunky useless minigame based Dragon Rush and worthless Hyper mode.

Unfortunately it came out back in the time when you had to buy good reviews and the biggest reviewer mashed buttons and complained because the game didnt play itself in a cut-scene and said it was a worse B3

What game, sounds neat.

I remember some review where the guy complained that the game was too short, then it turned out the reviewer was playing easy, causing him to miss the later levels were exclusive to the higher difficulties. Forgot which game.

It's literally written in the filename

Jontron voices a character in that game.

>>marketing gimmick
Hmm, no. That medieval POC lunatic and his hatred for the KC devteam were and likely still are very real.

Oh excuse me, I did not think to check. Thanks.

Imagine Party Babyz? Really?

Attached: 250px-God_Hand.jpg (250x354, 35K)

Yeah and nobody but butthurt niggers and butthurt /pol/tards care about twitter drama

Attached: 1561079783211.jpg (500x375, 22K)

It was some indie platformer I think. The best thing was all the Nier reviews complaining it was short because they're so fucking stupid they didn't realize there's still another second half of the game after the credits.

It was some kind of shoot em up iirc

oh damn, I wanted to buy it while the sales are up, thanks for reminding me

Attached: AAAA.png (297x256, 76K)

>God Hand STILL has a lower score than imagine baebiez

Fucking this. One of the greatest action games of all time, if not one of the GOAT games of all time period and it'll never get the recognition it deserves because games journalists are fucking morons.

First thing I thought of and I'm still angry

Attached: unitegutsuseful.jpg (840x516, 258K)

For the record, Gothic 1 has an average score of 81 on Metacritic so I'm not sure what OP is implying.

There's a reason why there are embargos now on game reviews. To mitigate these retards churning out subpar reviews and skimming through each game. Sadly, it doesn't stop them. I really wish all these sites would just be cut off from the publishers. Publishers are better off just doing their own marketing. If they need to use shills, it's simpler and more honest to just use streamers and YouTube content creators. Hell, the YTers actually know what the word "editing" means.

You're missing the point. What I wrote are the usual complaints coming from reviewers who don't want to spend time on the game and don't want to learn things. The game is good, especially at this sale.

You're missing his point. He's saying thanks for reminding him of the game, he's going to get it.

Oh is he? I thought he wouldn't buy the game.

The game reviewers at those large outlets are basically just article writers first. They are failed journalists that want to write about ideological bullshit and pontificate endlessly about how the shape of Mario's mustache proves that Luigi is in a gay relationship with Bowswer and other bullshit like that.

See, they're actually embarrassed to be associated with video games. That's why they always call for games to "grow up" and to be "art" whatever that fucking means. One of them actually wrote an article about it, blatantly saying that when they go to these journalist industry get-togethers they feel actual shame to be video game "journalists" and "reviewers" while they're among who they consider their peers which are writing about music, or movies, or politics, or whatever.
And it's funny because you'd think they'd at least try to have some integrity but nope they're complete sell-out whores on top of that. Handing out good scores to any game that comes from a company that is advertising on their site or gives them a bag full of trinkets at E3.

One thing to note about these people. When they review gameplay as fun, what they are saying is that the game let them press as few buttons as possible, pay as little attention as possible, to get them to the next cutscene. Because that's what they really care about.

Don't trust reviews from people who don't put video of themselves playing the game.

Attached: 1539540523262.png (1920x1080, 1.58M)

Millennial spotted

Yuuup. Gone Home got a shit load of positive reviews from journalists and it was a game that could be beaten in under 2 minutes without glitches. A 20 dollar game that can be beat in under 2 minutes.

Your kneejerk "us vs. them" attitude is not helping. You are part of the problem.

Is Outward good for people who like Gothic?

Gone Home honestly wasn´t that bad for a Walking Simulator.Of course you could skip most of it if you knew exactly where to go or what to do, you wouldn´t be able to do that if you´re playing it for the first time. Was it worth $20? Fuck no. The biggest problem was the retarded amount of praise it got, way more than it deserved. Shit was completly overblown.

The SJW stuff was tastefully doneThey went off the rails with Tacoma though, that game forced that shit down your throat so hard you could almost think you were playing some kind of parody. Seriously, look up a long-play for shits and giggles

Attached: 1561785257525.jpg (2048x1446, 430K)

I did, wanted to get it on the sales but ended up forgeting

Attached: nicest.png (115x86, 14K)

All the praise it got was because of the SJW stuff.
Really if there are any game developers on this board or aspiring ones just add some gay shit and some brown people and your game review scores will ratchet up by at least 2 points.
You get another point for having a fat chick and/or an ugly chick too.

Like I said, I thought the gay stuff was tastefully done, fairly subtle and not like it was meant to pander to anyone. It only ever gets straight up mentioned towards the end.

Play Tacoma if you want to see something that does what you describe: Every single character is either a minority, gay or fat...or all of the above. I´m not making this up. The ship's food supply also doesn´t include pork because one of the crew is a muslim woman. It´s like they had a fucking check-list

not really, it's got more more jank in it than any PB game. Pirate it first and see it for yourself. I never got into it desu

this
you gotta use G1 controls in G2 aswell, keyboard only

>buy a boost to catch up in ffxiv
>literally paying money to avoid playing the game
>reviewer then complains they aren't invested in the story and the characters
This happens so many fucking times. Even with just normal players, you get these paste eating wow refugee retards saying this in game

Attached: 1405126304900.jpg (1326x1075, 572K)

That was Yooka-Layle.

Anyone got that webm of the idiot trying to play cup head?

As a lover of Gothic 2, I'm absolutely loving Outward too, even though the games aren't as similar as most people say. Gothic is better in making the world feel more alive: people in Gothic have their own habits, you can talk with everyone and every person can tell you useful info; you have the freedom to even kill or harm people if you like. In Outward there's nothing of this. On the other side, I think that Outward is better than Gothic for what concerns the world size and the variety of environments and creatures: it really feels like there's a lot to see, to learn and to explore. Gothic is more difficult than Outward at the beginning, but in Gothic the stronger you get the easier the game becomes. In Outward the combat mechanics are easier to learn but every creature can be a huge threat to your life because you must learn a little secret/strategy or two to beat it. Outward does not have a level progressing mechanic like Gothic, so no learning points. Training is done through payment of silver coins or gold to the trainers and your character doesn't have combat stats. The only thing that matters is your equipment and your ability to manage your inventory before every adventure. One more thing: Gothic allows to create saving points, whereas Outward doesn't. I'm stopping here since I don't want to give you extra knowledge on the game.

Tldr: both Gothic and Outward are great games imo, they're not perfect, they compensate each other.

Jon had voice roles in both games. YL's people threw Jon under the bus and removed his "voice". AHiT's devs kept Jon's stuff and drew the wrath of the industry journalists. If you want to hear Jon's voice for Hat in Time he's the bird behind the desk at the start of the Film Studio.

map is legit too big/open and lacks polish
it tries to be gothic 1/2 but its map reminds me of a more sparse in content gothic 3 map
otherwise a bretty good game

gothic is legitimately shitty

Even better they did it out of nowhere AFTER shipping the game. They patched his voice out to virtue signal and cause a bunch of people to get their money back

>map is too big/open
No such thing in a open world RPG imo.
>lacks polish
Very vague assertion.

What hurts is that despite this development, Jon still wished YL the best because he loved the genre and wanted a comeback. Life is a screwdriver in the dick-hole sometimes.

Luckily the game did not do as well as they predicted. First level or so was well designed then everything kind of shit the bucket

Don't. Trust. Reviewers. Period.

Two periods..

mg survive

>Giant Bomb
Well, that's your problem right there

It is now. It was groundbreaking when it came out.

>CTRL+F "God Hand"
>4 results
Based Yea Forums

The map is very big but theres nothing actually there except infinitely respawning enemies.