Untitled

.

Attached: conflict.png (254x198, 11K)

smw always wins

SMB2

hard to compare, different consoles

bros 3 was really well made for a NES game and for its time

smw is the better game in the end.

Platforming wise: SMB3

Comfy wise: SMW

Unironically this.

Attached: 220px-Super_Mario_Bros_2.jpg (220x309, 32K)

I prefer SMW but SMB3 is fantastic too

Wrong
Correct

Mario 3 GBA
>16 bit graphics
>all the greatness of mario 3
>portable
>extra content

SMB3
only true patricians understand

based
cringe

SMB3
Running on a real NES

Yes it makes a gameplay difference, all ports have different control.

Where are my Toadbros?

Super Mario Bros 3 is way better

Mario All-Stars + World

Attached: hmm.jpg (300x300, 12K)

SMB3 is way better. SMW only has graphics (barely), joeshi and a couple cool level ideas.

Hahahahahaha

Attached: wrong.jpg (1400x2300, 888K)

now make one for SMB1 and 2

Toads are cool, but Luigi is the funnest.

I'm a fairly big Mario fan but I've never been that fond of SMW. I prefer SMB3 by far, and probably SMB1 and even SML2 as well. I don't dislike SMW but it never clicked with me. Still hasn't.

>SM3 came out 1988
>All Stars came out 5 years later in 1993

Why the FUCK would they not add some more graphical pizzazz on the original that was made under hardware limitations, even if it did make them come up with some charming stuff. It isn't like today where there's more of a reason for wanting remakes to stay true to the original.

Attached: 1560810944345.jpg (960x720, 74K)

SMB3 has tighter platforming, more focused level design, better power-ups and even better atmosphere. It's not even a contest really.

Attached: 1561811883310.png (784x638, 377K)

If World had all the Mario 3 powerups then everyone would agree it's better

>OLD GOOD NEW BAD
The remake is better, faggot

>I want caves to look like outer space

>Fails to give any actual reasons as to why

SMB3 vanilla is a better game, but SMW has so much more depth in its mechanics that shows in any decent romhack.

Your average SMW romhack>SMB3>SMW

I think they're both wonderful games that excel, above all else, in giving the world a joyous world to jump around in.
This one is more difficult than either of them if that's your bag.

Its funny. I only ever got smb 2 and 3 as a child along with yoshis island. I loved smb 3 and yoshis island. I really liked the comfiness of smb 2, but i honestly wasnt a big fan of the platforming mechanics, especially compared to the other mario games. I had an extremely brief oppurtunity to play world as a kid and it seemed amazing. It became the game i dreamed about having someday. I always wanted it and didnt get it way later until i was an adult. I played it, and was honestly unimpressed. My dream game didnt live up to any of my expectations. I only really liked that yoshi was in it. SMB 3 and YI are my favorite platformers to this day.

Well, atmosphere is the one thing that some people can arguably say is better in world. I agree with you though that smb 3 is honestly better in nearly all catagories than world including all the ones you mentioned. I dont get how its a contest either.

I mean, the level design in 3 was still much better which is a big deal.

fpbp

there is no 2d mario that compares to Super Mario World

This is known

The first SMB is the best don't (YOU) me

This is literally all subjective aesthetics bullshit, dude. Has literally nothing to do with the actual game. It barely even looks different, except for some minor color and texture changes

>469127863
Would you at least explain why you have that viewpoint?

Nah, it's too easy. the cape breaks the game

smb3 is above it

This. 3 isn't just superior to World, it's the best Mario game of all-time.

it's two arrows for a reply, just click their post number and save yourself the trouble, it'll do it automatically for you

>more innovative/creative power-ups, levels, and enemies
>provides a decent challenge, slowly getting harder and harder with each world
>manages to keep the player interested by introducing fun, new ideas half way into the game
>better gameplay
SMB3, not even a contest. SMW is such a huge downgrade from 3 it's not even funny.

Attached: 61dTz09yPaL._SY355_.jpg (355x355, 37K)

but he said not to reply

I played sm3 first so that is objectively the better game.

is it just me or is SMW really slow compared to SMB3? i replayed both of them recently and had to quit with SMW because it felt so much slower, even while running. not sure if it was my ROM or not.

>he

Attached: 1559699056189m.jpg (1024x974, 65K)

>_

Super Mario Land 2

Attached: 1560287627291.jpg (1357x960, 103K)

I like the cape more than the super leaf
Also Yoshi that shows up often enough > Hammer suit, Frog suit and Goomba shoe that show up too rarely
Also spinjump is fucking awesome
Gonna have to go with world even though I fucking love 3

World has better mechanics, so I pick World. I like being able to spin jump on shit, and flying in areas you're expected not to.

The patrician choice

>and flying in areas you're expected not to
you can do that with the super leaf

bump

>get a tail
>Fly
???

>get a cape
>fly
???

Tanuki fly using their balls.

Not even joking

SMB3 is more creative and interesting. Almost every world brings something new and there are way more power ups. SMWs secret exits and different ways of traversing the map are also awesome, but 3 still wins.

Bump