Rockstar is about a 2 billion dollar company, Pokemon is a 60 billion dollar company...

Rockstar is about a 2 billion dollar company, Pokemon is a 60 billion dollar company, but I think rockstar still keeps up pretty well in terms of quality. Do you think rockstar will ever be able to match the quality of Pokemon?

Attached: ps4vsswitch4.png (2886x1047, 3.33M)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Pokémon_Company
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>pokemon is a company

how much is game freak actually worth?

Rockstar probably puts a lot more money into their games. Pathetic, when will they learn that boot lickers will defend you as long as you made at least one good game?

Attached: 1561688598089.png (1066x1066, 597K)

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Pokémon_Company

kys zoomer

>pokemon is a company
That said, I'm genuinely surprised Rockstar isn't worth more. Didn't GTA 5 make something close to a billion in its first day/week of sales?

All blown on cocaine.

Nintendicksuckers bought LITERAL cardboard for $80. If you are Neokiketrashitpisstendo you can take a shit on a plate and Nintenbroeaters will gulp it up for $200

>neo Yea Forums

Attached: Entrance_of_The_Pokémon_Company_in_Tokyo.jpg (4608x3456, 2.87M)

Attached: 1558544155493.png (375x375, 98K)

>One makes games.
>The other is responsible for games, toys, movies, tv shows, cartoons, electronics, branding rights on popular products including box/canned food, clothing, snacks/treats, accessories.and decorations.

Hm.

Why the fuck is it censored?

>abstractions of real life vs imitation of real life
This but unironically

>Caring about the graphics and not the horrendous artstyIe

Who the fuck thought this gay as fuck main character was in any way COOL?
Why does he Iook Iike such a fucking effeminate numaIe? Why is he so skinny? Why is his HIPS wide as fuck? Why are his shouIders so narrow? Why is he wearing a fucking pyjamas outside and a cut IittIe fuzzy hat?

Attached: Unavngivet.png (520x435, 290K)

>ninshit
>quality

lol

Actually like that first pic unironically, so get fucked.

The second pic has no distinguishable paths or objectives aside from a difficult to see shadow of a house. The first image is clearly presenting the contents without clutter.

Attached: 1550637485890.jpg (452x544, 47K)

A better comparison to weigh against SW&SH is to place it alongside Battle revolution which had better stylized representations of both pokémon and environments, and it came out more than 10 years ago.

>one make games
>the other one make games too, and will put the most famous video game licence on mainline console
>so it's okay for the quality to be subpar
hmm

SwSh will unironically be more enjoyable to play that RDR2. so probably not.

The right one is the way it is because the console they had to make the game on has shitty hardware. The concept of the switch in a fantastic one but of course Nintendo fucked it up by giving it less power than a mobile phone.

As for the lack of classic Pokemon and other missing features, that was just GameFreak being lazy.

Huh. I never knew people cared about generic Pokemon protagonist.

probably because they're fully aware 90% of the playerbase only cares about the female one