720p DOCKED

>720p DOCKED
>576p handheld
>heavy anti-aliasing
>severely reduced textures
>constant crashes
But hey! It's portable, right??

youtube.com/watch?v=LcamTEsNu8k

Attached: Untitled.png (1911x1067, 2.91M)

If Mario Kart 8 and Odyssey run at 60fps with their level of fidelity in willing to throw blame on bloodstained guys

>OVER 140ms input lag
YIKES

why do you people keep on looking for reasons to hate consoles you don't own?

>Bloodstained is brilliant
can't upload a video without putting in bait these days

I do own a Switch, the point is games wouldn't need to be gimped if the hardware wasn't such dogshit.

Can someone tell Alex to stop drinking so much onions?

QUICK, CALL BASED PANIC BUTTON

THEY'LL FIX IT!!

It's clearly a dogshit port on the dev's part, there's shit ports on all the systems and Bloodstained is one of them. The Switch has bigger issues than a bad port.

*employs dynamic resolution*
Alright fellas, pack it in and call it a day

It's a shit port, we get them all the time on PC. There is no reason for Bloodstained to not run at 60 fps on Switch.

SWITCH IS SO CRINGE LMAO YOU CAN'T EVEN GET FULL 720P BRO HAHAHA

Switch can barely run Unreal Engine games, especially when the Switch wasn't the original platform.

Attached: Untitled.png (1909x912, 2.03M)

>Game is shittily optimised after going through 5 different devs and 4 years of development hell

Yeah it's all because of the "lack of power" of the Switch

>incompetent devs make garbage port
>hurr it's the switch's fault!
you're one of those retards who probably downloads RAM from the internet and thinks that everything just works and doesn't need to be optimized.

The switch might not be very powerful but it would easily be able to run this dogshit game if the devs weren't incompetent.

this can't be real.

No wonder they scrapped the Vita version.

Well, Switch runs Fortnite, isn't it? At stable 30 as far as I can find. There is no reason to not run Bloodstained at stable 30.

>There is no reason to not run Bloodstained at stable 30.
It does, but look at all the concessions that were necessary to facilitate that end.

Fixed your image for you.
It even looks like the right side image on the PS4Pro

Attached: Bloodstained comparison.jpg (1911x1067, 414K)

GRAPHICS
DON'T
MATTER

A game can't be truly great without good graphics, music, and gameplay. All three are necessary.

Literally no.

As expected of a Nintendofag.

>2019
>720p

Attached: 15486223746420.jpg (500x396, 22K)

Nintendo dominates every single all-time toplist. This is a fact.

You know, I remember that Pinball FX3 used to be gimped like this. Then the devs took the effort to optimize it, and suddenly it became as good as any other platform.

Where the fuck do you think you are?

fuck the resolution, I feel bad for the consolefags because they're forced to look at the s o y portraits.

>When the subject is Nintendo

>At stable 30

Not even fucking close. I just booted it up and it's a choppy mess. Feels like it's closer to 20 just as often as 30.

Considering that quality is subjective, you're both idiots.

>heavy anti-aliasing
you mean heavy aliasing, right? anti-aliasing is what prevents jaggies, you donut

Lel. Still looks garbage on pc

>It does, but look at all the concessions that were necessary to facilitate that end.
Sure, but it still runs at 30. Why couldn't the Bloodstained port do the same?

No one is really at fault with this thing. The issue is UE4, which was made before the Switch was a thing. It was never even on Epic's radar when making the engine. It was designed specifically for the PS4/Xbone consoles which the Switch is not.

The game looks like shit even on pc and other consoles but it's appauling on switch. It looks worse than your average PS2 game and runs like a slideshow. Also, add the 300ms input lag and you're in for a shit time.

Absolute bollocks.

>Mfw buying 200 bong kikestarter switch edition

Attached: dawson_crying.jpg (702x336, 28K)

>back the game for gog
>change pledge to switch version when it's announced since physical pc games are basically a waste of space
>after the deadline for being able to change it back to pc we find out the switch version is unplayable
>got the $100 tier and they never even gave me my bonus stuff like the keychain
I've never been so hosed in my life and honestly I'm considering contacting the better business bureau or something.

Attached: 1559099735768.jpg (699x605, 85K)

So THIS is the power of Tegra?!

There is a reason why Nvidia killed it- and offloaded the leftovers to Ninty for cheap.

Attached: new-shield-tablet-k1-controller-update.jpg (1548x745, 407K)

>I've never been so hosed in my life and honestly I'm considering contacting the better business bureau or something.

What will they do? I feel fucking ripped off, the game is terrible. Can we force a refund somehow?

It uses UE4's shit-tier AA

That's no excuse. Look at the new Yoshi game, that runs on UE4 and it looks a million times better.

To be fair nobody wants the Switch to hold gaming back.
Thankfully publishers don't really want to repeat the Wii and go all in on Nintendo.

The AA implementation used makes it look worse and it is suggested another type would look better. The resolution is so low it makes it even more of a blurry mess.

looks like dogshit on both consoles

how does it drop below 60fps on pro consoles though? I play with 1050 ti and get 120+FPS all the time on epic settings

>soulless vs soul

optimisation is the responsibility of the developer, not the publisher

IT'S OKAY WHEN NINTENDO DOES IT!