Why is Nintendo the only company with this stance...

nichegamer.com/2019/06/29/nintendo-president-further-pledges-to-not-censor-third-party-games-says-censorship-inhibits-the-games-industry/
Why is Nintendo the only company with this stance? How is it profitiable for them when Sony (and valve to a degree) has supposedly decided it's more profitable to do the opposite?

Attached: nintendo_shuntaro_furukawa_photo.jpg (1280x720, 77K)

Other urls found in this thread:

store.steampowered.com/app/955560/Evenicle/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Sony moved their HQ to California so degenerates are running their company. These people think cute girls in media are damaging to society because it raises female beauty standards.

because Nintendo has been based as fuck lately. Treehouse were kicked out and moved to Sony, in their Commiefornia's HQ.

Attached: 74985569_p0 Mythra.jpg (848x1200, 539K)

They're the only one with that stance because they see the profit in being a counterculture company.

Though they are more than willing to censor their own games.

big dick move

Reminder:
>Nintendo Treehouse ran by literal pedophiles and sjws: games got censored left and right
>Nintendo Treehouse after firing the pedos and replacing them with hot mommies: games stopped getting censored and freedom became the standard

Attached: mommy.jpg (1280x720, 78K)

>(and valve to a degree) has supposedly decided it's more profitable to do the opposite?
You can literally buy Koikatsu on Steam now. I don't think Valve gives a shit anymore.

I don't know. Nintendo mostly makes mario and zelda games. There's not really much to censor. Except they did in the 90s with zelda if I remember right. But it didn't have anything to do with tits.

>we will never get a PS1/PS2 era SONY ever again
FUCK CALIFORNIA

It's ironic that NoA got so pro free speach after Reggie left.

But Nintendo never really censored 3rd party games unless it was game funded by them.

Attached: 1539956952773.png (900x900, 507K)

NoA was acting free before the switch launched, Reggie was the one who fired the pedos that censored everything.

>(and valve to a degree)
Nah not really. They require some degree of censorship so that they can maintain their professional integrity but they never censor the tons of comments/reviews that tell you where and how to get the uncensored patch.

Also generally when a porn game is removed from Steam it's because it's just garbage. The good ones are still there.

Attached: 1526085827315.gif (276x250, 1011K)

Xenoblade, fire emblem, ARMS, Splatoon, Zelda, etc. All have hot women with nice bombs and butts. I'd like to highlight Splatoon in particular because the characters are clearly 10 years old but have very well defined asses. Nintendo doesn't give a shit.

>These people think cute girls in media are damaging to society because it raises female beauty standards.
same group who also wants kids to dance naked at pride parades

>the game was shit anyway
>it's to maintain their reputation
that's literally Sony defense force talking points

based nintendo dabbing on snoygoys

Attached: 1549225754184.jpg (182x276, 9K)

God, sony is so fucking shit. Only trannies can defend them at this point

>the only company with this stance?
Valve has had this stance forever. They're actually hardcore in their quest for anti censorship.

This.
>Literally saying SONY is 'significantly inhibit the diversity and fairness of game software'

there's a chance they found those rogue employees but wait a few months and another game will get censored

they see the japanese developers getting antsy and want to swoop in and steal 3rd party support from sony

zoomer detected

>(and valve to a degree)
Do consolefags actually believe that Nintendo censors less than Valve?
Seriously?
Show me all the loli porn games on the eShop.

its not that fair to put valve on the same level, they allow some games that would never be ok on the switch as an example.

Valve only cares abou their cut if they had any standards steam wouldn't be full of scams and early acces trash.

>Show me all the loli porn games on the eShop.
those aren't really games, Nintendo has standards you know

Nintendo isn't california'd.

How does one join Nintendo's Department of Ethics? Seems like a cool place to work

Attached: 1559716202645.jpg (988x1893, 190K)

>muh loli

user you're not even allowed d-cup breasts on the PS4

No it's completely different. Sony has been censoring games with somewhat sexual content by editing their clothing/models to appear less sexual. They don't allow straight up porn games on their platform, they're censoring non-porn games, generally JRPG's.

Valve is censoring porn games only, and even then they still allow the high budget porn games and even give the developers an easy workaround so that they can put their games on Steam.

For example with Koikatsu the game itself is censored and you don't get the sex scenes on Steam but the dev gives you a free patch that gives you the full game if you bought the Steam version. Valve has never censored discussion about this patch on their platform, all you have to do is read the reviews and you'll find it very quickly.

Attached: 0820-384-08.jpg (449x498, 29K)

>Nintendo has standards you know
Dude, have you seen the eShop lately?

There's not really any porn games worth of playing. At best you might fap and then lose interest. I genuinely don't see the point of buying those from steam or any other digital platform. Would rather buy a fucking playboy magazine than some shitty chinese "adult content" game.

you feeling ok?

>Do consolefags actually believe that Nintendo censors less than Valve?

No and no one made such a statement.

Cucked and blasphemous where is the outrage from us /pol/ guys sexualizing children how are we going to get pure wifes if they're corrupted straight out of the womb

He's not wrong. Since ratings boards happened they left them alone.

rent free

It's crazy to think that Xenoblade 2 would be impossible for SONY to make

Attached: DqGVlXuU8AEoI_y.jpg (755x1118, 239K)

>Show me all the loli porn games on the eShop.
You know you can't have actual porn games on steam right? The best are those nip vns with external downloads containing nude images.

It would be impossible to make for anyone beside based Monolith Soft you mean
But I thank Nintendo for funding them

>You know you can't have actual porn games on steam right?
Pic related features full on loli sex and is on Steam.

Attached: 1540829792076.jpg (952x719, 163K)

For more than one reason.

>with external downloads containing nude images.

I just mean the game is far too "problematic " for SONY to even publish
>'damsel in distress'
>beautiful women

That garbage would never pass quality control at Sony.

Yeah too much gameplay and not enough cutscenes

>Knack
>inFamous
>Killzone
>Knack II

IF YOU KNEW YOUR VIDYA HISTORY you’d know Nintendo wore the other shoe once before. And it cost them dearly against Sega. Nintendo is still struggling to expand beyond the children’s market they boxed themselves into during the 90s. They tried branching out in the n64 days but ultimately regressed with the GameCube and doubled down on the Wii systems. This is their chance to be taken seriously by the 14+ demographic.

Heavily censored with all the schoolgirl stuff removed

They banned some no name western shit vn just a few days ago

I think this is the best that we're going to get for awhile. Kudos to Valve for allowing smut in this day and age, but they got some really conservative legal advice that pretty much reverts everyone back to off-site patches for a good majority of jap porn

You're a mongoloid, it's literally available in the game from the get-go.
Also it's an RPG.

Attached: ss_866c4b8d684857f4da35505557d5c957813883b0.jpg (1280x720, 287K)

Nintendo are signaling jap devs to jump ship from sony. Simple as that.

and they'll all flip flop again whenever its convenient.

Attached: nintendont.jpg (1494x840, 206K)

You mean Sony ethics department, probably

So just give Sony 20 years to flip flop back?

>36 years ago

So what you're saying is you haven't played it.

>whenever its convenient
So when they win?

>CoC fully illustrated with 10,000 iterations based on width and girth will never be a multi platform release

Hold me

>(and valve to a degree)
What do you mean? They literally broke the censorfags brains when they made a blogpost about how "anime tiddies are here to stay, deal with it".
That some fag deleted some loli games is unfortunate but it seems very arbitrary when games like monobeno and evenicle are still being sold.

It's not an issue of profit for companies like Sony, it's pure ideology, they're a Californian based company now, need I say more?

Who was that one faggot that bragged about censoring Fire Emblem?

Kimishima must've shat really hard on Treehouse during his first year as temp leader, it's only been a few years since Nintendo was one of the more rigorous self-censorships for their games and now they got shit like this available on the international market. And the fucking joycons vibrate to simulate the feeling of grabbing boobies in this game.

Attached: Senran Kagura Reflexions Screenshot 2018-08-29 21-09-33.png (1600x900, 901K)

Source on what you're saying, because I can't actually find any info on Wii U era Treehouse members being fired and being hired at Sony.

We're talking about first-party here, where the Japanese releases of Nintendo games got censored hard for American releases.

>You know you can't have actual porn games on steam right?
You can actually.
>B-but you have to download a patch!
Meanwhile they're not even available on Switch.

I don't think it was just Kimishima, I think it was Iwata being a softie and letting NoA step all over them on this issue that dragged on the precedent until he was gone and someone decided to put them in their place.

It's great that nintendo holds this posistion now, but my point is that you can't trust big corporations to hold any values or principles.

wouldn't surprise me.

I give it a 50% chance they flip flop back halfway through next gen. If they see profits dip at all they're gonna want that sweet otaku money back that they just handed off willingly to nintendo.

Nintendo’s center of corporate power is in a country where the local Left is presently weak, disorganized, and would be shunned out of polite society if they tried the openly aggressive tactics the western Left uses. Recall this is the country that has a far-right Illuminati of cultists that idealize the militarist era that effectively controls a third of their parliament.

That and Nintendo needs all the software support they can get, so presenting themselves as a “safe space” for devs that either can’t or won’t be able to make the cut elsewhere helps resolves that.

I don't know why Valve just doesn't force everyone to get ESRB ratings. It's a simple online questionnaire, and if one of these games do turn out to be "illegal", then Valve can just point to the ESRB and say it's their problem for allowing this to be sold

>How is it profitiable for them when Sony (and valve to a degree) has supposedly decided it's more profitable to do the opposite?

It's too early to tell what, if any, change in profit it'll have, though limiting your products probably isn't a great selling point, Sony used to be the werb magnet but now it's changed to Nintendo.

>That and Nintendo needs all the software support they can get
You say that but they do have a lot of well known and popular titles under their belt that set them apart from the competition.

Nintendo still censors first party games mainly because of ratings boards.
They also used to censor the crap out of third party games all throughout the NES-N64 eras. They're on the right side of the issue now though so it's fine.

Nintendo is just desperate to recover from their failure and is doing anything to sell. It won't be long before they go back.

Has there actually any kind of backlash what so ever in regards to questionable content on the switch? Because I'm pretty sure nobody gives a shit.

You do know that's Evenicle he posted right? And not Koikatsu or whatever.

I think you need to be registered as a legitimate business to qualify for ESRB ratings, that would cut out a lot of indie devs (and shovelware devs) on steam and cut into valves profits.

>but my point is that you can't trust big corporations to hold any values or principles
doesn't sound like it. You are targeting muhnintendo only there so far.

>Nintendo still censors first party games mainly because of ratings boards
Eh not really. It's only been smash because it has a lower rating in Japan.

>They also used to censor the crap out of third party games all throughout the NES-SNES eras
Ftfy. Once those rating boards popped up they stopped completely because there was no need for it.

Shit like that is just fucking gossip tier faggotry for nerds to reinforce they gay ass notions and feelings among each other in a weird circle jerky faggity fashion.

That said everything that sony is doing is really nothing more, prudeish, or whatever the fuck else one trys to label it. Since really just thinking about it at least to me it is more so about power. Since given how beholden they are to everyone else to essentially make their consoles and such successful. Well them feeling themselves ultra hard are just exerting power as to at least try to put out the air of them actually being the ones in charges instead of everyone else who actually makes the software to make the console sell well. At least in my opinion.
Otherwise then if people wanted to drag politics into the mix well one should actually look at the parent company and the shit going on there. Since the right wing nerdos are prudeish as all fuck over there. To the point of them being the ones actually pushing for the censorship and such of anime bitches. Hell one can just look at the ratings board alone over there and how fucking concerned they are about panty shots more so than violence in family/kids games. Hell even the porn over there has gotten a tad more cautious bumping up that mosaic shit to avoid problems with them dumb vague ass indecency type laws.
Which then if one were to take an honest look as to the root cause shit makes me laugh how shallow fags are with the shit moving to California and that affecting anything. When again it is the right wing in their homeland/market leading to them do that shit simply to avoid any headaches and shit.

Attached: 1498677323229.png (1024x1024, 283K)

store.steampowered.com/app/955560/Evenicle/
Look at the mature content description retard, Evenicle is fully uncensored on steam, and it's not the only game like that, though games that require external patches might still be the majority.

that is a whole lot of cope, holy shit

Oof

Even resetera's opinion seems to be more about supporting Sony's position rather than shitting on Nintendo for theirs.
All I've seen was a snarky polygon/kotaku article that says something like "Nintendo is allowing these icky games unaltered whlie Sony forces guidelines" Literally no reasonable adult should have a "if I don't like it no one can" attitude over this.

>That said everything that sony is doing is really nothing more, prudeish, or whatever the fuck else one trys to label it
user, third party censorship like this hasn't happened since before the esrb, pegi and CERO.

Roughly 30 years ago.

>Be 6
>Nintendo notorious for censorship in the west, their most egregious crime being the censorship of blood in the original Mortal Kombat.
>Be 31
>Nintendo is the only company refusing to censor 3rd party games for release both in Japan and internationally.

What a time to be alive...

It was always Nintendo of America that censored shit. Sony moved to America and they started to censor shit. TLDR: Jews in America are behind everything

Attached: 1505325959696.jpg (1200x1081, 60K)

You mean this guy?

Attached: 1456198338169.png (627x620, 127K)

>yfw account suspended
>yfw no face

what a faggot lmao

Hope that guy lived worse than Etika.

I sure hope I can now play meme run uncensored

>says-censorship-inhibits-the-games-industry

thank fucking goodness

Attached: Allright.webm (1024x768, 1.58M)