Look, I understand you’re not supposed to expect a handheld to perform like a home system, but sub-HD resolutions...

Look, I understand you’re not supposed to expect a handheld to perform like a home system, but sub-HD resolutions, low res audio, 30 fps, ultra long load times (what happened to the “carts will assure almost zero load times for games when compared to blu rays” argument used before Switch’s launch anyway?) in 2019 is just not acceptable, unless you’re not asking for $60.

There is absolutely no reason Switch versions of multiplat games should cost the same as other versions. These titles should be capped at $40 max on the Switch, like handheld games used to, these prices are absurd.

Attached: 8797727F-9128-45E0-B7AE-B5A11CD489DB.jpg (2036x994, 1.43M)

Other urls found in this thread:

psp2roundup.blogspot.com/p/ps-vita-games-by-resolution.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

The game has horrid loading times on all platforms, and in fact takes longer to load on XboneX than it does on Switch for some reason.
Also that's handheld, native 720p in docked.

>720p
>current year
ya switch games should be forty and under

You do realize nobody buys Switch for purely docked play right?
It's a handheld with a TV out.

This is literally the resolution of a 3DS using it's 3d mode.

720p is HD, you should have said sub-1080p from the start so you wouldn't end up moving goalposts

Some """"people"""" do but they aren't going to live past 30 due to severe mental retardation.

Please don't post because you are literally retarded

>These titles should be capped at $40 max on the Switch

CTRNF is $40.

Attached: 1475534144615.png (598x525, 424K)

He'll move goalposts again