screenrant.com
Thoughts?
Good, took them long enough.
Fire Emblem has been dead for a long time.
article reads very shill-y, especially for something they admit was written after seeing a mere 15 minutes of gameplay
who knows, though, it's not like I want it to be shit. hopefully it'll deliver.
I have to play game but honestly I wouldn ot mid if fire emblem use the school formula for one more game.
That's technically correct since the game isn't released yet.
>a decent effort to tell a good story
>no shitty child units
>waifufag pandering kept to a minimum
>hopefully building upon the good foundation that was conquest's gameplay
the future is looking bright bros!
When did it use the schoole formula
says the increasingly nervous 4channer for the third game in a row.
Can they start making fire emblem tactical strategy games again instead of waifu simulators please.
good. now get it out of smash
all the FE characters do something slightly different, at most they could maybe remove Lucina and Chrom, but the whole point of echoes is that they don't take up a slot anyway.
I'll make my peace with the FE characters already in the game as long they don't add any more.
They should remove Marth and Roy instead
Clearly that's not on the table because they already dropped tactics for waifus.
Kill yourself, subhuman.
looks good
when will they kill fire emblem and revive advanced wars
Conquest had good gameplay
>Three Houses is unlike anything the series has ever seen before, and that's a good thing
Jesus Christ I didn't think you could be any more generic after Awakening but this shit just might prove me wrong.
>we want back to average-high HP numbers
I'll miss fates' dumb hp figures
>Clones are just superior versions of the originals without the tipper/sweetspot shit
If anything they need to make the clones have to use tippers/sweetspots too, as it stands they're literally just objectively better versions of the originals
I was under the impression that FEfags quite enjoyed the tactics in conquest.