Another shoddy port. Why can’t third party devs make their games perform well on the switch?

Honestly this.

>weak hardware

horseshit this game could run on Vita and would have been released on it if it wasn't a piracy machine nowadays.

Get your money up.
You sound poor.

Because the Switch is less powerful than most phones

I'm a fucking spic, of course I'm poor

Isn't the bad quality of the port also partly caused by the fact that few or no game(s) released on Switch used UE4?

>MUH POWER fags forgetting about shit like optimization and whether or not your phone will turn into a bomb if it tries running anything remotely within it's tech range

Attached: 1548352346660.jpg (499x360, 35K)

>Why can’t third party devs make their games perform well on the switch?
Because x86 architecture is easy to port between Xbox One/PS4/PC. On an under-powered handheld that uses different coding, problems develop.

Definitely this.

I think what he means is that the Bloostained team is used to working with stronger machines, so when they go back to Switch, the port needs A LOT more optimizing to get running properly.

>powerful consoles like ps4 and Xbox
Hahaha oh wow

Attached: hqdefault.jpg (480x360, 22K)

also the dev team they got to port the Switch version were jokes. Wayforward is literally fixing their fuck ups as we speak.

ITT: snoyboys

I mean compared to the Switch, yeah. They're powerhouses

why can't the switch have a decent hardware?

Took me like 40hrs to 100 percent it on PC, booted up the switch version just to mess around and holy shit it looks and runs like a bad vita port

>Why cant the switch run games
>NO ITS NOT BECAUSE ITS WEEK

optimization can only go so far, you cant play red dead redemption on a game boy no matter what

Week?

>game literally has problems on all platforms
>it's the switch's fault I swear
lol

where did i mention the switch? I was just mentioning that mobile gaming is a meme because phones aren't meant to run AAA titles for more than an hour or so.

PC version runs on a toaster at a locked 60

Switch version has the most problems by far.

"Cringe" is so overused, but what else can you say to shit like this, really?

Imagine spending 300 dollars on a kiddy gimmick tablet that can’t run games properly.

> Weird
ARM is literally the most popular architecture in the world. It's in every iPhone and Android device on the market. It may be unfamiliar to console/PC devs, but there are a gazillion mobile devs that they could bring onto the scene if they genuinely have trouble understanding ARM architecture.

>it's never the Switch's fault, it's every single developers' fault
I love this meme.

Bloodstained isn't exactly a perfectly functional game on other platforms either

>user you are quoting doesn't mention the switch
>BUT SWITCH

cope

ARM is weird??

I played it on my laptop for like an hour and I can assure you it does not

they literally outsource hired a team of code monkeys to have the Switch version finished on time.

You should stop seething every once in while lad ;)

Jokes on you, faggit

Attached: 017B0497-C2B3-46DF-A0E9-35570FCA20EB.jpg (640x638, 100K)

I assure you it does. Potato does not mean 3rd world poverty spec

The Switch is basically a mobile phone. They should be happy that dev's even try to port stuff.

yeah nintendo literally begged them please port your game to the switch

Switch is x86 too, its basically a handheld PC. Stop making shit up to sound smart.

No, that poster is just retarded. ARM is the most common architecture in the world and is used for basically every type of device outside PC, Xbox, and Playststion. There is no shortage of devs that are familiar with ARM

its ARM retard

>gets proven wrong
>decides there are now computers under potato-tier
user this is just silly

Attached: concern.jpg (480x433, 25K)

> Switch is x86 too, its basically a handheld PC
Holy fucking shit imagine being so stupid you can't even use Google to check your facts. The Switch uses an ARM Nvidia Tegra processor which was originally designed for an Android tablet. It is NOT x86, and it is NOT a handheld PC

the Kickstarter promised a WiiU port, they're fulfilling that with a Switch port. Nintendo had nothing to do with it.

This is what happens when you support games via Kickstarter. No Man's Sky, Shenmue 3, Mighty No 9, Yooka Laylee, Star Citizen (lol), Bloodstained...

You fags will never learn.

game still not well optimized

What specs are you running? I played it fine on a 940mx laptop, that is absolutely potato tier. Only proof is coming from your gaping hole, probably trying to run it with Intel gma or some other bullshit

Hey fuck you NMS is actually very good nowadays

>owning a Shitch
TOP LEL

Yeah because the Switch has entirely different hardware. The alternative would be not having the Switch version at all or waiting months or a year to port it.
The fault is the fanboys for insisting that every single game have a day 1 Switch port. How about you beg for actual first-party exclusives, which have been the only reason to buy the last four Nintendo consoles?

No man sky wasn't a KS

I check in with it every few months since I paid 60 for it at launch. Still fucking shit.

>multiple games have this problem
>NO THEY'RE JUST ALL BAD GAMES, IT CAN'T BE THE SWITCH'S FAULT EVEN THOUGH THAT'S THE COMMON LINK HERE

>lumping Bloodstained with the rest of those garbage fires

there is a difference between incompetence and laziness. You can fix the former but not the latter.

It probably is a Vita port. That version was being worked on before being cancelled.

there isn't a tier under potato, retard.

>the fanboys for insisting that every single game have a day 1 Switch port
the Kickstarter literally promised a Nintendo port.

They’ll never forgive Nintendo for not going bankrupt and porting BOTW to PS4

>UE4
Well there's your problem. Barely any games using unreal runs well on the switch. I'm sure the devs tried their best but when the hardware is shit at running the engine, what else can you do?

Attached: 1518444703865.jpg (1165x828, 203K)

Would not question ya if you said it was for a fact. Even if it was a locked 60 I'd be disappointed with the visuals on the switch version. While docked it looks so blurry

By your retarded logic nothing would run on a potato because a 20 year old 486 laptop would be potato spec.

>developers want to make game
>Nintendo keep releasing inferior hardware making sure said devs have to fucking make a whole port intself just to run on that shit
>chances are no one buys it anyway because PS4 and PC exist

So glad i didn't buy a switch.

no that's Capcom that hates porting stuff to Switch

>console barely weaker
>powerhouses

or just don't say potato when you don't actually mean potato.

>ask a question
>cant handle other anons replies

I can wait to see the ps5 be a Switch knock off and they call it a masterpiece in tech design

Funny. I remember weeks ago when you anons said you won't buy this game because it costs 40 dollars/euros.

I hope Cringe gets word filtered to something else like candy

>if you say something bad about Nintendo you must be Sony

I'm still waiting for a price drop, I've got plenty of games to keep me occupied in the meanwhile

>game literally has problems on all platforms

I have not run into a single issue

Attached: E13413DB-1D1D-44C8-9DBB-F944B3E52A08.jpg (1536x2050, 797K)

Cuphead would like to say hello

Have you played the game?

Again who is to actually fucking blame here? Thats right, the only hardware that decides to need its own fucking porting staff in 2019 to get the fucking game out on time. Devs should really just start NOT releasing games on switch at all. Fuck em.

Nani?
They’ve ported over almost every resident evil game even RE6 which they really shouldn’t have bothered with

>The biggest issue with switch version is the graphic, resolution and performance, Which the PS4 and PC version does not have.
Big HMMM

>Switch is x86 too

this desu senpai

You shitting me?
It has frame drops out the ass

Why would devs care about the switch? It's a console for children and children have no standards

the devs for rushing out a shitty port, probably.

Because they want money and they know switchfags will eat it all up regardless

I do mean potato, your poverty spec netbook doesn't even meet potato requirements

I dont blame them really, probably still mad about their retarded decision to make RE Nintendo exclusive during the PS2 era

indie games tend to sell very well on Switch for whatever reason

>Again who is to actually fucking blame here?

the dev team for doing a shitty job. Bloodstained can run on toasters it's not the hardwares fault.

Tagra chips are the weird part. They're very far away from the design of most ARM chips. They're not using reference design at all.
All because the ISA is the same dosn't mean that it isn't weird.

Yes

>devs make a shitty PC port
>it's the devs' fault
>devs make a shitty Switch port
>it's the Switch's fault

>inflated prices
>Megaman Collections are part digital on Switch because Capcom are too cheap to get the more expensive carts
>TWENTY FUCKING DOLLARS FOR DMC1

Works on my Pro

Capcom were the one who had the bright idea for the Capcom Five to begin with. Capcom are just greedy jews because they saw how well RE4 did and then threw all their toys out of the pram.

>shitch
HUE! Cry more shit childrens.

Read your post again and you'll realize how dumb it is

Then get used to the idea of wither late ports or none at all, why the fuck should people who own PC, PS4 or Xbone have to wait for a finished game just so devs can make sure the third party poison machine doesn't complain their version is late?

PC regularly waits for console ports, though

It's because there are big gaps between major Switch releases and the novelty of portable versions of games

>Capcom are just greedy jews because they saw how well RE4 did

RE4 sold like complete fucking trash, what are you on about?

Attached: 3BE0FE0B-93D1-44D9-AF50-288F575051A0.jpg (1462x4050, 812K)

When?

Reminder that Nintendo fans literally bought cardboard because Nintendo was selling. They will eat shit and love it.

>there are big gaps between major Switch releases
It has over 1800 games out or coming out, what gaps?

And somehow you are jealous.

It's so inconsistent. Some things look great like Hellblade, which looks fantastic for a handheld and then something like Brothers: A tale of two sons looks like a PS1 game compared to the console versions.

Remember PsMove or Kinect

Is that how you’re trying to cope? LMAO

Monster Hunter World is the biggest one I can think of that was recent

if Sony wasn't at the end of a console generation they would have tried to copy it

prove me wrong

Maybe. But you are still jealous.
Should I buy one for you, too?

The switch version runs with the lowest settings, no antialiasing, low resolution and capped at 30 FPS and still needs optimization patches. Just deal with the fact that the switch is a terrible console, fag.

But its normal for PC to get a port afterwards. People play on consoles, they are the priority.

just move those goalposts, user

You need to look at the lowest common denominator
spoiler: it's the switch itself

>why do all these games look and/or run like shit
>could it be this console's garbage specs
>no, that's impossible, every single developer on earth is just retarded
note how i didn't include anything specific to one platform, because the truth is you're all like this

Those are the facts of life. You take care of the PS4 first, then others can get their copy.

>Works on my Pro
seething

replies: 120
posters: 49

It's the same guy who keeps repeating same thing over and over again.

Yea cause all the censoring they need to do first

This. Look at REmake:
>PC =no issues
>PS4 =no issues
>Xbone =no issues
>PS3 =no issues
>360 =no issues
>switch =11 second load times between doors that literally dont even finish animating properly

Its the fucking switch

you're not wrong but blind fanboys will use shit like that to pile shit on *insert console you don't like*

Why would i be mad about that?

>take care of it on PS4

you mean filter it through the "ethics department"

Attached: 1557335240469.jpg (2660x3000, 1.78M)

What was censored in MHW?

>PEOPLE ARE RESPONDING TO EACH OTHER AND POSTING MULTIPLE TIMES? MUST BE A SHILL

Hows that RDR2 PC port?

That was fast.

the secret scene where the handler gives you a blowjob

You mean UE. Its poorly made. Its the only engine I know that devs NEED to edit its code heavily. Im just glad they werent able to make the characters look like plastic that happens a lot in UE

SEETHING nincels cry more

but the characters do look like plastic

>It's the developer!
>It's the engine!
>It's unoptimized!
Nintendo fags trying to cope hard in this thread.

woah, 2.45 posts per poster
that proves it!

How many of those 1800 games are MAJOR releases like Zelda and Mario?
Reading comprehension, you retard

is that Naija?

Fix your eyes. I get 15 fps in some areas on PS4.

literally all three of those things are said about shitty PC ports but you never see people blaming PC as a platform

OH NO NO NO, shoddy ports, disappointing online, when will the embarrassment end for Nintendo fans?

Attached: 704FA49B-A323-4AA5-A139-EC8312A2F094.png (750x1334, 1.09M)

>September 2018
>b-b-but it's still bad

You'd have a point if we weren't talking about poorly optimized plastic anime dolls: the video game.

fpbp

That's the dev's fault

>Switch version also costs 10 dollars more than every other version for no reason

Nah Capcom got lazy and wanted more money for lazy optimization

I'm fucking a spic, and I'm rich

It literally is the engine. UE is a fucking meme in game development

Because the switch version most of the time is an afterthought rather than a priority

Also . There's a reason the switch is still getting "new" FIFAs

Is that all you guys come up with?

I’ll see you’re disappointing online and raise you manufacturing problems. Nintendo can’t even make their own controllers properly. At some point you just have to shake your head and feel pity for the Nintendo cultists that just keep pumping money into this scam.

Attached: DC186D92-045F-4C18-82D4-C9CFE8C2AAFB.png (750x1334, 1.1M)

BB ran like shit on PS4 launch, and also needed a lot of updates.

>Not mentioning the constant crashing
That is all on the dev's shoulders

Pro tip:it is.

>because switch owners will eat up anything
Then why don't bad switch games outside of pokemon sell like say, bad ps4 games?

>b-but Sony
Take your console wars elsewhere, son.
This thread is about Nintendo’s weak, impotent hardware.

youtu.be/Ngf6hMWSmFA?t=269

it's all they have left

Use WD 40 because it works.
Not the ''quality'' we'd expect from Nintendo, but still better than buying PS4 controllers every 12 months because analog sticks stay in one place.

No this is about the dev's not being able to work with some of the most common architecture on the planet and its their fault the game runs like shit

BING BING WAHOO

Fucking based

That's lazy optimization considering cartridges are supposed to speed up load times not slow them down

It’s still bad. I own a switch and it’s still fucking bad.

Ran out of arguments, eh?

Let me guess, you don't have games to play.

>Infogrames

Attached: 1538090221752.png (353x334, 149K)

correct

Attached: punished paper.png (433x567, 130K)

You fucks aren't asking the real question here: why the fuck are you playing multiplats on the fucking switch in the first place??? Who cares how it runs, why are YOU on there?

The art of optimising shit was lost with 7th gen. Nowadays devs brute force everything with more hardware, and when they suddenly encounter less hardware they start to run into problems.

is this why THQ failed?

Probably because Switch fags port beg like crazy

Reminder

Attached: muhnintendogaf.png (1000x3000, 1.59M)

because more people own ps4s
crunch the numbers, you'll find the sales of bad ports on ps4 are proportional to sales of bad ports on switch

Nothing when compared to the daily Sony obsession threads

>make game with low graphical quality
>it's developed for hardware that doesn't require much optimization because it's much better than what the game needs
>port game to weaker hardware, don't optimize it
>runs like shit
It's that simple.

Portability. I wouldn't play this kind of game on a proper console, I have better things to play there.

Yes, user. If Switch owners want a game on their console it's because they are beggars, but when PS4 owners do the same it's common sense because 'that game would sell better on PlayStation' ''argument''.

laughing at Sony's "ethical depart" taking over everything that goes on a Playstation isn't the same as obsession

That's literally Square Enix not Sony lmao obsessed

PS4 gets almost every third party game. There's no need to port beg on there.

Then how do you explain people begging for MUA3 to go to PS4

Ah, the key word is almost.

The reason Bloodstained's port turned out bad was because they started it much later in development and had to rush it out in time. In the case of other games the actual answer is that devs outsource ports since they assume switch users will buy it anyway.

it's ok when nintendo does it

Except it literally wasn't and Nintendo fired everyone involved with that when people got angry

wanna explain why Omega Labyrinth is just called "Labyrinth" on the PS4 then

it took them like 30 years to fire those people
the sony thing has only been going on for a year

Totally ok when nintendo does it.

Attached: 1542269128225.jpg (343x318, 6K)

for all the shit people gave the treehouse, it never got this fucking bad

Attached: omega-labyrinth-logo.png (1218x302, 104K)

So it's okay because it's only been going on for a short time? Give me a fucking break.

This, they're so dumb.

potato still means different things to different people, rich kids thats parents buy them everything but didnt buy them a new computer for ONE WHOLE YEAR think their 2 year old computer is potato with a 1060 or 1070

I have it on PC and I think it isn't the hardware the fact is they're hacks and made a janky ass game. I don't get frame drops or anything like that but there are lots of other issues.