Why did I move here?

CW > TBoGT > V > IV > TLaD

Attached: 1522157773648.png (640x372, 148K)

mission variety is fucking overrated. the best missions in the other games are the traditional shooting missions anyway. when they get "varied" is when they start to fucking suck with their gimmicky shit.

IV has the best missions in the series. not even close.

Yeah because its so fun and interesting to do the same thing over and over again in slightly different brown/grey abandoned buildings.

>To provide most forgettable GTA expierience
VC? GTA IV is the only time after 3 that it feels like a good criminal simulator.

>>Niko keeps talking about "muh loyalty" when he kills 90% of the people he works for
Dude is a hypocrite, he makes it clear early on.

yeah it is fun to go through an area, shooting enemies. thats the main concept of the game. i'd rather shoot my way through a hotel, or a museum then ride a fucking submarine or drive a forklift

Based

based

are you too fucking retarded to save before missions?

also >dying in gta 4

you fucking suck.

So how common is it to move to New York and then realize that everyone you've ever fucking known moved there too, even if you moved there to escape those people?

He's loyal to his family and himself.

reminder that IV literally has the most creative missions in the series:
>bike chase that ends up on the subway and you have to avoid oncoming trains
>job interview where you can escape in multiple ways
>mission where you have to snipe the guy in his apartment with different options
>a fucking SCOOTER CHASE in middle park
>strip club mission where you take out the three guys in any order and have to prevent them from escaping
>mission where you have to chase the train across the city
>mission where you go into a hospital and turn off someone's life support
>most epic bank heist of all time

not to mention, a cool aspect of IV's missions is how a lot of them are going UP a building, like a hotel or factory, which gives a neat positioning to a lot of the shootouts.

>a bloo bloo the main character is like, broken, and a hypocrite and stuff.
These characters aren't even tragic. I know we've talked about this a million times before but what the fuck is the point of a character like Nico? The game is dishonest in portraying him as a real person or having a real character, because they do act like it and pretend he's like Tony Soprano or some shit.

Based bugmen

>pretend he's like Tony Soprano or some shit
Micheal the Cuck from GTA V?

But that didn't happen. He didn't run into anyone, he was looking for someone.

Arthur Morgan is so much worse. Which is why I don't get all the love for him. He makes Niko look pretty normal in comparison. Arthur is so whiny all the time

>start playing IV again yesterday
>up to mission where I take michelle out
>after completing I spend about 30 minutes just driving around and checking out the map
>load up V after
>experience feels worse
IV's map feels more authentic with the enclosed neighborhoods and reduced traffic speed. there's also the realism of seeing the police actually driving around, instead of them magically appearing when you fuck up.

I can't say that IV is better than V, since V's gameplay is smoother and offers more to do, but there's just something special about getting into a vehicle in IV and having it feel like i'm driving my grandfather's 1970's caddie.

Who the hell moves to New York City besides rich people? Most individuals I see about are trying to escape the city.

>Niko constantly going on about how he NEEDS MAHNEY.
>Can't buy or mod cars.
>Can't buy businesses or properties.
4 was fucking awful. Boring as shit.

From the old country he only knew Roman and Florian (both being the reason he moved in the first place)
Bulgarin came to New York after Dimitri tipped him off Niko was there. I dont think they ever explain how Bulgarin and Dimitri know eachother though.
Also understand how immigrant populations in a big city work. Tight community with close connections to the region back home.

90% of the people he works for are scumbag pieces of shit.

It's called nostalgia, it blinds many people.

Niko was never about the money, he was just telling Roman to stop fucking with loansharks and gamblers. Plus Niko had a mission in finding out who sold him and his friends out.

now, only the rich. at some point back in the day, immigrants would land there and make a living. but thanks to gentrification, I doubt a bunch of taiwanese could afford it.

My complaint is that he really putzes around finding that man until it is basically dropped in his lap.

>90% of the people he works for are scumbag pieces of shit.
He's jumping from connection to find that special someone.

funnyly enough im moving out of the city next month. city living is fucking garbage in this country. maybe unless you can afford an amazing apartment in downtown, but for everyone else, it sucks

big american titties

Get the fuck out of here.
IV>GTA1>London 61>SA>Gay Tony/LaD>IV>III>VC
Didn't play Chinatown wars and onlyna bit of 2 on dreamcast

You niggers never complained about 4 this much before. What fucking e-celeb told you it was shit, huh? Be honest.

The heist isn't even impressive compared to SA's heist

HAHAHAHAH

FUCK, the second IV was supposed to be V

I think people got tired of people parroting about crowbcat video.

Yes you can fix that problem by not being a fucking zoomer worm and playing the game in 2009.
>plays game 11 (eleven) years after release
>expects it to be polished to modern standards

Attached: 1561242292409.png (383x257, 171K)

youtube.com/watch?v=Fj46e5LALc0

>GTAIV is 11 years old

Attached: 1561560224633.jpg (272x272, 19K)

That fucker isn't even an eceleb.

>GTA 3 10th anniversary
>We remastered the game and port it to smartphones so you can play it on the go!
>GTA IV 10th anniversary
>we delet the soundtracks

>>GTA 3 10th anniversary
>>We remastered the game and port it to smartphones so you can play it on the go!
I never even got the chance to get a Claude figure

Did I imply that? All the threads about IV always devolved to comparing it to V using the video as an example.

So is Niko.

"modern standards" are trash
dying on old gta games was never frustrating because you could always unlock weapons spawns and pick up that armor spawn near a hideout and just go get them instead of befriending jacob, calling jacob, meeting jacob, going through the process of selecting each gun in his trunk to get ammo, etc. not to mention old gta had fun stuff like rampages to do. newer gta games sucked out all the fun.

why does the lighting look so orange

Attached: 12210_20190611165154_1.png (1920x1080, 2.33M)

>just go get them instead of befriending jacob, calling jacob, meeting jacob, going through the process of selecting each gun in his trunk to get ammo, etc.
>he doesn't have go-to area for respawning armor and guns

liberty city much like real life is lit by sodium street lamps which produce orange/yellow light

Niko is a man with good intention but kept making shitty decision and awful actions, because he's a criminal by design. It doesn't feels forced in the context of the tone of the game
>The game is dishonest in portraying him as a real person or having a real character
Do more random pedestrian missions and you will know his character

people have been calling out IV for being shit since it came out newfag

>people have been calling out IV for not being SA 2.0 since it came out

cringe

give me break. after the new graphics new console honeymoon was over 4 was rightfully criticized for removing so much stuff in favor of turning the game into a movie. apologists then come out of the woodwork and claim none of the previous side activities were fun because they're bad at video games.

>turning the game into a movie
lmao this isn't MGS4 faggot

>>half the missions are either chase somebody or escape somebody
>>chase/escape sequences often involve slow as fuck trucks/vans, the chase isn't fucking exciting when everyone is moving at 15 miles per hour
>>game loves to slap you with a scripted wanted level to artificially extend the mission length
Wow. Just like V and RDR II and every future Rockstar game.

>none of the previous side activities were fun
this but unironically
they were never anything more than requirements in a 100% checklist

>Just like every Rockstar game.

The only good parts of the game were the Nico/Roman missions and story.

sure, if your iubto that gamefaqs mentality of checking off boxes in a video game. either way doesn't change the fact that rampages and vehicle missions were fun. only people that bitch about it are people that still think demolition man and supply lines are still too hard.

>vehicle missions were fun.
Only vigilante, and that was perfected in IV.

>BEK TEETEES

Attached: lel.png (1368x1080, 1.61M)

why is there no vigilante mission on V?

Cause R* is dumb.

Not him but i always enjoyed the previous games especially SA a lot more, IV took a different direction in some mechanics that a lot of people didn't enjoy.

Trevor's bounties is that

>V>III
FUCK YOU.

ITT retarded zoomers that suck at GTA and just want a Saint's Row clone, get good faggots.

>This is the dream