Discuss

At least the fromsoft games look good and remain feature rich.

>fromsoft
makes acceptable game, clones said game to print money
>gamefreak
makes shit game, clones said game to print money
i dont care about either of them but fromsoft is clearly better

at least from tries to improve
GF doesn't even try

>One company gets people who have been disaffected by gaming for decades playing again
>The other is propped up by an anime
hmmm

There is literally not a single dev team with any significant notoriety that comes close to being as bad as Game Freak in terms of raw incompetence on just about every front except for maybe music and sometimes character design. They have had incompetent programmers working on Pokemon since the very beginning; RGBY are a bug-riddled mess and GSC were delayed by MULTIPLE YEARS due to programming issues that Iwata solved in like 2 months, leaving them enough room to fit the entirety of Kanto.

I've never played a single game by FromSoft and if I ever do it likely won't be Souls, but just from a glance their history has way more competent games than GF. There are 3-5 mainline Pokemon games worth playing, and you can eliminate a couple based on your preferences.

Attached: 1537756980995.jpg (800x534, 65K)

both make good n64 games for current gen

Attached: n64woods.png (534x377, 59K)

The hack studios of videogames

From Software is talented and makes great on most things except online. Gamefreak is incompetent at everything. From Soft could make a better Pokemon game than GF ever could.

OHHHH ELDEN RING > Sword and Shield

Good Games > Bad Games
It’s that easy