PS5 specs

Jesus christ look at this shit, all for probably 499eurodollars. This console is a monster and to get something similar on PC you need to spend like 1500.

Attached: CXN8ERy.png (1094x800, 571K)

Other urls found in this thread:

developer.nvidia.com/vrworks/vrworks-audio
semiaccurate.com/2013/09/03/xbox-ones-sound-block-is-much-more-than-audio/
youtube.com/watch?v=a9baMglr1io
youtube.com/watch?v=UwqB2uxEY4k
youtube.com/watch?v=dwrp9hndH_U
svg.com/156504/project-scarlett-rumored-to-be-compatible-with-oculus-rift-s/
mashable.com/2016/05/25/xbox-one-scorpio-rumor/?europe=true
theverge.com/2015/6/11/8766917/oculus-rift-xbox-one-controller
pastebin.com/b3dSRsuH
support.rockstargames.com/community/200025576/360002250347
youtube.com/watch?v=1Qsb7s_knsQ
youtube.com/watch?v=1La4QzGeaaQ
youtube.com/watch?v=pjbx6-KQoRg
youtube.com/watch?v=DH6FCgqQB_s
youtube.com/watch?v=JxUPJdcChzE
youtube.com/watch?v=5yJUNyOS95o
youtube.com/watch?v=9OE2iI7OLh8
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

If I can play Taladega Nights day one then I'm in.

>graphical gimmicks and vr shit
they truly never learn
it's about the GAMES
make good GAMES
I'm just going to wait two years and buy your shitty console with all the half decent exclusives for $200 off craigslist if you don't immediately have GAMES

You're legitimately mentally retarded if you fall for this marketing.

>8gigs of ram guys!

which is more than enough for vidya

No, it isn't, 12 is the minimum nowadays you stupid nigger.

16GB is perfect for multitasking while gaming, but 8GB isn't so little that some modern games will run out, like Final Fantasy XV, Arkham Knight, DQXI, etc.

>multitasking
>console

Yes?

You can do more than one thing at a time with modern consoles.

I'd rather play on a toaster than give Sony more money. Buying a ps4 was a mistake.

all shit

its more like 700-800 for a pc on the same level.

up to 8k (*)

(*) scaled from up to 1080p(**)
(**) more likely from 20p with raytracing

>zen 2
coming to pc in a few months with 16 cores. 8 cores is so last gen.
>navi
coming to pc in a matter of weeks and will actually be fully clocked unlike consoles which will reduce the clocks by 40%
>3d audio
lol
>8k
lol
>ps4 back compat
pretty embarrassing really considering their 2 main competitors being pc and xbox already offer at least 3 gens of back compat
>blu ray
lol
>REAL-TIME RAY-TRACING
*on select surfaces at 1080p 12 fps
>SSD
oh shit it's 2006
>PSVR
PSVR will be DOA if the rumors MS are going to support oculus rift. it just makes PSVR sound like proprietary to lock you in.

>8K
>Still only 60fps at best
Also isn't the whole idea of a console that you care less about graphics and more about simplicity? What's the point of having all this advanced epic gamer tech that'll be out of date within a couple years of launch if it's still going to have bullshit UI and large day one patches and all the cancer of the current console generation?

You lol at 3d audio when its the most interesting detail they've given. Audio has been shit on all games for years and this could really move things in the right direction.

Maybe in a year or two the components will be available for that.

"3d audio" has been a thing on pc for years (since nvidia 900 series in 2014). developers are just lazy to take advantage of it and the benefits of 3d path traced audio are only realised with high end surround systems. this stuff doesn't come for free it has massive computational cost too.

developer.nvidia.com/vrworks/vrworks-audio

Thats exactly what I was alluding to when I said years. Having hardware dedicated to this in a console means devs will finally, hopefully start giving a shit.

Both the PS4 and the Boner have the same Tensilica DSP that is in all of AMD's other APUs and GPUs now. Its a feature that is virtually never used because no one wants to spend the time on it.
TrueAudio has a great feature set and its never going to be used.

they won't out of select exclusives, most likely VR, from both sony and MS. path tracing has huge computational costs.

the xbox one had a really good audio block for kinect but devs never utilised it

semiaccurate.com/2013/09/03/xbox-ones-sound-block-is-much-more-than-audio/

Sony, Nintendo, and Microsoft all suck fucking dicks

You wish. Devs will just keep making sub-1080p games, scale them to 1080p, and run them at 30fps because it's easier to add shaders and polys than to actually make the game look good through better, optimized assets.

Wasn't it confirmed 16GB for games already?

no
ape
escape
4

That used to be a godsent on the Xbone. I get why they got rid of it, but I miss it.

>Blue-ray Disc
youtube.com/watch?v=a9baMglr1io

If you spent 1500€ on a pc you can actually play 4k 60 fps i doubt the Ps5 will be able to do that

4K upscaled at a silky 20-40fps with frame smoothing.
2025 will roll around pretty quick and you still won't have games with 60fps as a minimum.

There's already PS5 8k footage
youtube.com/watch?v=UwqB2uxEY4k
anti-sony cucks will go to any lengths to seethe

It'll be 4k@30 FPS with drops, or 4K upscaled.

Upscaling is easy though, I can run games on PCSX2 upscaled to 4K and I only have a 1050ti.

Im going to buy two ps5s just because of you.

Of course PC needs more RAM cause 100 programs are running in the background. Consoles have less shitvrunning so don't need as much ram

Do you think consoles don't have background processes?

PS4 can already do 1440p 60fps, not hard to go up to 2160p 60fps for a new generation

I spent 1500€ and I can play at 1080p 60fps not even in ultra settings at best

It does 1440p badly, I doubt the performance will be any better.

ms wont be supporting vr because of the kinect. sony already won.

I said less shit in the background, not no shit in the background

>Sony
>Trusting trailer footage

Pick one.
youtube.com/watch?v=dwrp9hndH_U

Look at this user and laugh

Move to a country that isn't third world, my PC is around $600 and I play at 1080p maxed out.

1660ti
2x8GB DDR4
1TB HDD
250GB SSD
i5 9400

>8k
>ray tracing
the new standard is going to be 15 fps now!

Attached: 1560018937766.gif (256x171, 1.06M)

Actually yea it is, considering the 5700 is a lot less powerful than everyone expected 7nm to be and the consoles are guaranteed to have a pared down version considering the 5700 is $380

The PS4 Pro and Xboner 1X can do 4K, or relatively close to 4K upscaling and deliver 20-30fps. Its always a matter of how many polys and particles are on screen at a time. The level of fidelity that devs want to display is going to be the limiting factor, and things aren't going to change this gen. Studios will fill scenes with as much visual flair as possible and maintain frame rates around 30fps because thats what normies will tolerate.

>they won't be supporting VR because of something completely unrelated

svg.com/156504/project-scarlett-rumored-to-be-compatible-with-oculus-rift-s/

A computer may be expensive to build, but by the time the PS5 and Xbox Scarlett come out, they'll already be outdated enough that even regular consumers will be able to play what they output on PC without needing enthusiast budget tiers.

Attached: i came here to crow at you.gif (268x325, 1.96M)

>bloodborne 8k 60fps
We've already won next gen.

Attached: 1560271798250.png (633x874, 56K)

8K yet not even 4k bluray

Attached: dw.jpg (2000x1000, 124K)

I have the same specs except for an i7-7700k and a 1060 6b. I'm not from a third world country, I live in Italy.

>It does 1440p badly
That doesn't even make sense
>I doubt the performance will be any better.
You doubt performance won't be better with a new CPU that's way better then current consoles, yeah ok dingus

mashable.com/2016/05/25/xbox-one-scorpio-rumor/?europe=true

lol

>8k
>when they barely handle 1080p @30fps
lol

>what is upgrading

>2016

cope

seethe

you're the one getting buttblasted at the fact MS are going to support VR next gen in some capacity. you replied to me. cope.

>PS4 can already do 1440p 60fps, not hard to go up to 2160p 60fps for a new generation
It's not even true 1440p for most games, and even less of them have 60 FPS. The Xbox One X can hit higher resolutions on average, and even that can't actually hit 4K for many titles, much less 60 FPS. Sony and Microsoft seem dead set on grabbing a metric ton of powerful hardware and RTx and jamming it into their shit, but then 8K support at 60 + raytracing? Not even a top of the line gaming computer can cough out 60FPS at 4K in that scenario.

seriously stop eating buzzwords up like flies to shit

>being able to change the resolution and get a better framerate
You're a fucking idiot.

you seem to be upset that rumors dont mean shit. seethe

>rumors don't mean shit
>meanwhile it's a fact MS have been working with oculus for years

cope.

theverge.com/2015/6/11/8766917/oculus-rift-xbox-one-controller

Pretty much dis. OP is obvious tech-illiterate. What do you expect from typical snoyggers?

It isn't a trailer it is an in-engine test. That KZ2 thing was a CG render meant for internal use only but the Sony higher ups used it as a trailer for what was to come. Ironically, several elements in the final game ended up looking better than what was in that CG trailer, so that isn't actually a good example.

I heard a rumor PS5 is more powerful than next Xbox. Shall I assume it doesn't mean shit?

the computer I already own does all these things, minus the blu-ray drive

>1500 in some APU rig
kek

More like $1000 cuz most components are from China. Sony needs to make money and want to pass the costs of tariffs on to customers. $1000 sounds right to me.

>making the controller is the same having vr on your console
>meanwhile the last time there was a rumor xbox was supporting vr it got exposed as false af
seethe harder

>rumor based on "The big guts-level upgrade for this new Xbox One is said to be a beefed-up graphics card (GPU) with enough horsepower to support a VR headset."
>vs rumor of someone actually making the claim reported on a neutral VR podcast who say he is reliable

cope

I guess if xbox has vr than its a fact ps5 will be more powerful than the next xbox. Sony wins again.

>3d audio
nice buzzword, and PC has it for more than decades - Creative Labs Sound Blaster SBX, Super X-Fi, etc... oldest tech.

Digital foundry said the next xbox will be better so I'll just buy that instead
Also
>sony censorship
Not on my watch

Theyre both still rumors

seethe

You didn't answer my question

every console spec looks "incredible" when they announce it, but in the end it's all just different shades of 30fps

MS going with a 3rd party headset is pretty clever. means they don't have to bundle it with a console since its a 3rd party peripheral. from what i've been reading about ps5 it's going to be bundled with a vr headset so it's either going to be really expensive or they had to skimp out on hardware specs.

Nope, xbox has vr and will be weaker than the ps5 since rumors are always true.

Cool thanks I'll get the xbox then of the VR rumours are true. Having Oculus which can be used on PC and console is pretty sweet and I think Oculus has the best PC support of all headsets.

>I think Oculus has the best PC support of all headsets.
it does. everything else it SHIT

Thats great news, however i'll be getting the worlds most powerful console ever made, the ps5, since its definitely more powerful than the weak xbox. Games play best ps5.

new leak. thinks keep getting worse and worse for ps5

pastebin.com/b3dSRsuH

Holy shit, blu ray AND 3D audio?!?!? Man this is some high-tech shit. my samjeet balls are tingling

How naive, you'd have to be a third world spic/nigger or street shitter to believe this shit.

>from what i've been reading about ps5 it's going to be bundled with a vr headset
I can't not laugh at brainlets of this tier. Source?
Why would they do it any differently than they did it with PSVR?

Everything is going to be censored anyway for the same price as the real version on pc/switch

Based. NextBox it is then. Wouldn't want those inferior ports.

I have 16 but I've never used more than 7 or so, with some shit running in the background
why would you be multitasking while playing, if you're playing at most you'll have a browser with a couple tabs and a voice chat program open on the side, what the fuck else could you need
8 is honestly fine if you don't run tons of shit while playing vidya

MS has wmr and I'd be surprised if they don't start pushing it more.

Funny. Everyone who has actual dev connections are saying the PS5 is better.

sony can use hard drive space as ram in an emergency processing for games.

I’ve had a 4.2 i7 and 16gb ram since 2012

All I have to do to continue getting 60fps (double the frame rate) at 1080p (not “dynamic resolution” aka often as low as 720p) is buy a gpu

Well, in my case I multitask with work.

I'll get a notification that I need to do something work related, pause the gane, alt+tab over do whatever it is, go back to the game.

Firefox usually uses 1-2Gb of RAM with just a couple tabs open.

With this kind of thinking we'd still stuck be on the nes, shut the fuck up poorfag.

Devs have said its 15% more powerful than scarlett. Thoughts?

source on dev saying which is better? you're not going to spam that IGN retard or that twitter rumor again are you because both backtracked hard.

>3 gens of back compat
You mean the shitty emulation microsoft provides? half the games I want to play have some sort of glitches to them that make it useless.

That's a terrible idea, are you retarded or just a shill?

Drives are slow as shit, they're terrible for virtual memory.

No PS3 backwards compatibility?

Enjoy mark zuckerberg selling the data on all the VR porn and hentai waifu shit you comsume

SEETH

Yes that's called swap and has been a thing for decades and is slow as shit.

Read that post again. Slowly.

Who needs backwards compatibility? We can just make a slapped together remaster where all that changes is the resolution in a couple of puddles of water, you'll still pay $60 for it :)

The back compat on Xbox is flawless. WTF are you talking about? Digital Foundry has gone through most of them and said every single one is flawless. I haven't had a single issue and don't know anyone with a single issue. Give me the name of a game and I'll check Digital Foundry or other YT analysis.

>Still no 4k bluray
DOA

so where's the source?

It will.
You're describing Nintendo policy, not Sony's.

>buy game for steam from third party site for $1.50
>get it’s remaster for free which consolefags have to pay another $60 for

Undead nightmare is literally unplayable because the current patch(that you can't remove) causes npcs to do weird shit

not unless they want it to be $800. it won't have ps3 back compat or they just made psnow obsolete.

For what this time.

Can't find anything online relating to that. Video proof?

3D audio is the only interesting thing. Real-time ray-tracing may be cool as well.

Devs saying which one is faster through people with "dev connections". see

i heard that the first exlusive to PS5 will be Taladega Nights 2

>PS5 not confirmed
>posting specs

Attached: 1549399603635.gif (200x200, 948K)

SEETH

>to get something similar on PC you need to spend like 1500.
Yeah, 1500 pesos

Oh but you answered that already here >you're not going to spam that IGN retard or that twitter rumor again are you because both backtracked hard.
He only backtracked about the dev he talked to retracting his prior statement because he was reminded that the hardware they are using now is not final hardware. The target specs from the first round of devkits were better for the PS5 or so the rumors said. But even if you don't believe that guy then Digital Foundry said the exact same thing.

>not confirmed
>Mark Cerny himself has publicly spoken about it and talks about some vague specs
Who are you foolin, guy?

>people genuinely think any dev would strive for 8k
i, too, cant wait for next year to see how everybody who falls for this marketing bullshit for the forth time start backpedaling on their words

No he hasn't. He talked about the "Next gen Playstation"

Its just for media playback, user.
Same thing with how they advertised 4K support before the start of this gen.

So you're telling me nobody knows about final 2020 spec. Right.
DF also never claimed either console was better. They've not even mentioned any Xbox inside info at all relating to developers and/or devkits.

Oh shit, you right. Everyone knows its gonna be called the PS6.

>REAL-TIME RAY-TRACING
???
Even the latest GPU struggle at 1080p

>DF also never claimed either console was better.
They claimed that what they had heard was that PS5 was more powerful which was what I said was the rumor going around from the people who have dev connections.
> They've not even mentioned any Xbox inside info at all relating to developers and/or devkits.
Except from the 1 is stronger than the other.

Yeah, then 16gb is useful. I usually close whatever I'm not using actively since just having the icon in the taskbar irks me, I like having the bare minimum open at all times, so RAM is rarely an issue for me.

support.rockstargames.com/community/200025576/360002250347

>They claimed that what they had heard was that PS5 was more powerful which was what I said was the rumor going around from the people who have dev connections.
Nope. They never said this at all. Show me they did. I'll wait. They haven't mentioned Xbox devkits or developer performance at all.

>Except from the 1 is stronger than the other.
Which no one has claimed to know. Cope.

>page not found

>problem with game itself not the console or its back compat

ok

try using the url.
I literally said that. Can you not read? The problem is since everything is software emulated on the x1 you have no control over it. So you can't delete patches. You download what they want you to download. This is why it'll never be as good as native BC.

Attached: fuckoff.jpg (1870x1345, 333K)

>real time anime boobs censoring

>8k output
zen 2 cant run anything at 8k not even video even the best intel CPUs cant handle 8k well so i assume they are either full of shit or just throwing that in to impress idiots

as far as me getting a ps5 not a chance till it has dual monitor support so i can watch youtube while i play oh and universal keyboard and mouse support of course

>not a chance till it has dual monitor support so i can watch youtube while i play oh and universal keyboard and mouse support of course
that's called a pc, was that the joke?

CPUs are not GPUs, guy.

It'll support 8k you retard and things will scale to 8k, but it won't be true 8k. Like how the ps4pro does 4k but most games run lower than that.

ok so its pointless then

consoles could dual monitor easily if they wanted them too but ill stick with PC for now

and CPU is still part of the equation if the CPU cant run 8k then the GPU doesnt matter

Reminder that that a console hasn't been comparable to a gaming PC since the Original Xbox came out, the OG Xbox was the only console to give gaming PC's a run for their money back when it was released.

Reminder that it's a specially tuned SSD that Sony patented so only they have the technology and it's way faster than even PC SSDs. Current PCs will struggle to run mulitplats for at least 3 years for games developed for next-gen.

No, thats not how that works. Resolution has nothing to do with CPU performance, the workload the CPU handles remains static. When resolution scales only the GPU load changes.

Don't try talking out of your ass.

>and it's way faster than even PC SSDs
>what is NVME

Dumbshit consolenigger detected.

a CPU has no relation to resolution you melt

that is how that works if you run 8k video on current CPUs they will max it out meaning the machine can do nothing else
it absolutely does

oh and by the way the blueray disk is a joke right?

>I'm just throwing words together
Stay retarded, user.

they did mentioned the xbox a bit like in their 2 scarlett videos they said the xbox and ps5 ssd are identical and when he mentioned the xbox ssd he said it has "high level" and "low level" developer access.

im not though i have seen the CPU fuck up 8k video playback its just not a feasable thing right now ands thats notr even getting to the fact their is not a GPU on this planet that could run 8k at any acceptable speed

>still have literally no idea what I'm talking about
>going to keep up the charade anyway
Video decoding is handled by the decoder ASIC on the GPU, only if a specific codec is lacking will a CPU decode it in software mode.
You literally don't know a single thing about this topic, and you're talking out of your ass like that pokemon kid on the playground pretending to know how to get Mew. You're embarrassing yourself, kid.

Remember when the PS2 was supposed to be so strong that it could simulate Pixar movies? Remember when the PS3 was supposed to be able to simulate a nuclear reaction?
I remember, I think I'm gonna get the Scarlett instead, which is more powerful anyway

>ps2

youtube.com/watch?v=1Qsb7s_knsQ

still makes me laugh to this day

The only time resolution messes with the cpu is when there is too much frame rate. Lower resolutions like 720p with very high frame rates will show a cpu's bottleneck. The lower the frame rate there is literally nothing on the cpu's end that the gpu isn't responsible for.

im telling you i have seen it happen the ps5 having 8k output is a nice sticker on the box at best it will in no way be able to run anything in 8k maybe upscaled but upscale looks like shit wer are just BARELY getting the hang of 60 FPS 4k there is no way in hell we are going to be able to do 4 times that at 30 let alone 60 FPS

>I'm still going to keep up the ruse even after all this
Sure. Whatever, kid. Just push the truck out of the way and Mew is right there. Totally.

You don't even understand the difference between software video decoding and a GPU rendering a scene real time. You're full blown retarded and no one here is as dumb as you, which is really a feat. Continuing the same tirade of pathetic retarded desperation won't earn you any points.

I have 7700k and I can rune frame scaling on games that output image higher than 8k just fine. The fuck are you smoking?

tell me do you honestly think the ps5 wil be able to play ANY games in true 8k?

hardware on pc and consoles works differently, so does coding for said hardware, even when both share the tech
only a retard would compare the two as basis to argue "power"

id pay 1500€ to turn of blur, chromatic shit, TAA, dof and whatever else there is

>trying to deflect now
lmao. I said flat out that 8K is only being touted for media playback, you sad, sad soul.
Its not my fault that you're legitimately too retarded to understand any of this.

>play ANY games in true 8k?
Literally no one said that or thinks that. We've all said it'll output 8k though. Just as the ps4pro handles 4k currently.

so like i said a nice sticker to slap on the box that is ultimately meaningless ya ill stick with PC im not giving up mouse and keyboard and dual monitors for "media at 8k"

This isn't an emulation issue, Rockstar put out a patch to Undead Nightmare that fucked up the NPC's behavior on some machines and it's never been fixed since. Personally I've had no issues with Undead Nightmare on X1X, but this wasn't an emulation issue in the first place.

why do you thijk i should give up everything just for 8k output?

I'd be convinced to get it if it had at least PS1/2 BC

Except that's wrong, you colossal fucking retard. kys

Good to see you just talked in a circle, retard.
Why do little autists like you refuse to admit you're wrong, or just keep your mouths shut when you have no idea what the fuck you're talking about?
Why even bother piping up when you know you're going to get called out for being dumb and wrong?

What the fuck are you even on right now? No one said to give anything up you dense idiot. Just that the next PS will be able to support up to 8k. No one ever said to run out and get an 8k but in the next 5-10 years 8k will be as cheap as 4k is right now and people will enjoy having their console already support it.

>still using disc
Man I can't wait to install 3 blurays for those games with over 100GB with a 20GB day one patch.

They should seriously start with at least 2TB instead of 1TB.

because you try to convince me to buy shitty consoles and give up everything for them for stupid pointless reasons like "8k output" the onyl time a console will matter is when it can completely replace my PC

>>still using disc
Oh yes lets take away physical support so BC is just not a thing. That will literally lose all microsoft's current selling point.

actually each disk can support 100GB if they are triple layered

great, i can watch BORING garbage in 8k now ON MY 24 INCH MONITOR AS IF I'LL SEE MONEY WORTH DIFFERENCE..

AND SHIT WILL LOAD FAST LIKE IN MY 100$ SSD IN MY 2005 LAPTOP....WOW.... normalcattle console peasants are really easy to impress.

wagecattle and normalcattle do deserve to be fleeced of their shekels.

Attached: D10D42A.jpg (3023x3023, 1.38M)

F7 remake wont even be on this why would i care about it?

I'm not convincing anyone of anyone. Stop trying to deflect away from the spastic diatribe you just had.
Video playback at high resolutions is a very simple matter of updating a dedicated hardware video decoder.
Rendering a scene in real time at high resolutions does not increase load on the CPU.
You tried to shitpost about both of these topics simultaneously, very poorly at that.

Why even start in the first place? Why do you have the need to show people how retarded at actually are? I genuinely want to understand why people like you do these things.
Personally, if I'm not sure about something, I don't go out of my way pretending to be an authority about it. Then again I don't have autism.

how large is that SSD?
just curious

Everyone keeps posting these stats around as if it will somehow do 8k, and 60fps, and ray tracing at the same time. My guess? 8k at 20ish avg FPS (or upscaled to 8k at 30fps.) 4k at 30fps, 60fps on some titles. 2k at 60 fps consistently. ray tracing at 30 fps at 2k, 60fps, but with dips, at 1080p.

The new consoles will probably be 20-30% faster than the current ones in real world performance.

samsung 500 gigs for 90 USD that i put in my shitty laptop and it does make a big difference.

because i saw it in a youtube video where they tried playing 8k and something about the CPU made it run and track like shit 8k will not be viable for decades and even then no one will care about it that much not until we require cable companies to move away from shit outdated 1080i or just die like they already should have

now a days that same price will get you a 1TB SSD

Resolution demands on hardware are not linear. If you can run 1080p at roughly 60fps you can legit forget about 4K, it just won't be playable, and I doubt even the next gen will get even close to outperforming the current midrange hardware PCs, so 8K might be a hardware support... for videos only. There will not be a single game that will run even remotely close to 8K on budget hardware like these consoles will certainly be.

I can play 8K video on my fucking 2500U laptop without stuttering, kid.
youtube.com/watch?v=1La4QzGeaaQ

8K video samples have been on youtube for *years* ever since RED released a camera with an 8k sensor in it. You just flat out have no idea what you're talking about when it comes to anything.

>real time rat tracing

I'm having flashbacks of radiant a.i again

youtube.com/watch?v=pjbx6-KQoRg

Attached: Oblivion.png (791x475, 808K)

>8k at 20ish
if you are lucky i might do it at 20ish i have a feeling this is going ot be push pull the system to get one thing you will need to give up something else in exchange so devs will have to choose between ray tracing and 1080p and 4k at a decent framerate for example
and i think the scarlett will be the same so dont start that shit

By the time it's out PC prices on comparable parts will be way down.
Zen 2 is excellent, R5 3600 benchmarks show it barely slower than the higher end i9 9900k.
Navi is currently not impressing anyone with the new card reveals, they don't actually support hardware raytracing.
This implies either the next batch of Navi GPUs will be far better, which is what is intended for PS5, or that PS5's "real-time ray-tracing" is a lie, something that will only be implemented for audio or stills.
You can do ray-tracing in software but it is a much greater hit to performance, not realistic for a console.
8k is a pipe dream.
That's x4 as many pixels as 4k, I'd be impressed if even Rocket League could run at that resolution on PS5.

i dont know about that its stuttering pretty bad on my 6700k/1070 PC when i set it to actually run at 8k from the gear icon

To be frank the resolution / FPS game isn't going to have a dramatic shift. 8k are a distant thing that aren't getting the push 4k are right now, and that won't change by the time the next console gen rolls in. Sony just want to throw big numbers out there arrogantly without understanding how implausible it is to run 8k 60FPS. Even worse, next gen they want raytracing in consoles, and that already has a massive performance hit to the current RTX lineup that might as well be fucking experimental rather than industry-changing. If game devs start forcing raytracing into console game, not a goddamn thing is reaching even 4k without massive blur and upscaling that would make the Switch look downright artistic by comparison.

Ryzen 1600+gtx 1060 6GB, it doesn't stutter for me.

Browsers are not exactly optimized for this kind of stuff. You can probably do it just fine on dedicated software. Fucking smart tvs with android can handle this kind of shit when it's just playing videos.

its possible its something to do with linux and youtube but im not installing windows to find out

>implying I throw away my old consoles

as if I'd "pay" for a game that I already own decades ago

Attached: Battlefield 1942 Clone for Console Players Multitap Support not Included.png (2394x928, 3.9M)

actually good point let me try in chromium

This. Also fun fact chrome caps shit, so anything watched on it looks objectively worse.

Sony has said they are focusing on LESS games.
PS5 will still struggle to do 60fps.
Censorship.

I'm done with Sony. I had a ps1, ps2, ps3, psp and ps4. Only ps1 and 2 were great.

Attached: 1323587084037.jpg (600x800, 65K)

THIS,I've never dipped into this gen on account of the entire start of the PS4 & what Sony's stance was on taking on BC but given what's been going on I don't see any reason to your better off grabbing a PSP Go or Vita at this point

Attached: PSP Collection for PS1.png (1380x1240, 2.44M)

>8k has nothing to do with CPU i swear

Attached: 2019-06-26-193054_804x532_scrot.png (804x532, 285K)

anyone else concerned they might not actually call it the PS5 and pull a vita?

>this low IQ retard once again confusing software video decoding with an actual rendering workload
Why do you keep talking in circles, autist?

every console gives pc a run for their money considering you need to spend at least $1000 to match ps4 performance, double for ps5

ok so where do i download the video so i can try it on something other than HTML5 playback?

>SSD fizzles out and stops working after ~2 years
S-Sony always wins, bros...

So games would still have their soul unlike literally EVERY game past the 2D era? Count me in.

>Zen2 8-core
They're releasing in like 15 days for 300bux, PS5 comes out when, next year? Low-mid tier stuff.
>Navi
Says nothing, no shit it's gonna use the current architecture it would be more expensive not to.
>3D audio
I remember having this in 1998, nothing new.
>up to 8k
Means nothing.
>PS4 BC
Well yeah this should be a given if you shit out consoles at this speed.
>BD
Duh?
>RT
Means nothing, how many rays? My old GTX670 could do RT too.
>SSD
Like literally every PC since 2012.
>VR
See BD.

>please spoonfeed me so I can continue to talk in circles and demonstrate that I don't understand these two separate are actually separate types of workloads

Its pretty impressive that you don't realize how pathetic this looks.

>considering you need to spend at least $1000 to match ps4 performance
A 750ti and an i3 outperforms the base ps4 bro.

Attached: 1561126147313.jpg (1327x1536, 268K)

youtube.com/watch?v=DH6FCgqQB_s

youtube.com/watch?v=JxUPJdcChzE

>literal garbage bin tier pc's outperform ps4

O I AM LAFFIN

>I'm not from a third world country, I live in Italy.

no at thi0s point i just want to see this work im trying youtube-dl but im not sure it will grab the 8k version

lmao same story every gen, also talking about the initial cost is dishonest when you need to pay to use the console

those are old games. new games run like trash on those pcs

Imagine be a consolefag and take same bait every generation.

They run like trash on the ps4 too, those new games run at ultra-low(which means lower than the "low" settings on PC games), if you were the change the settings in those new games to the ultra low preset of the ps4 versions the PC would still outperform it.

you can also get those pcs for $50 now

I don't follow consoles at all, have consoleniggers finally reached 60fps at 1080p or do they still have to pick 30/1080p or 60/1080p (upscaled from 720p)? How about 1440p?

All I know about consoles recently is their awful upscaled "4k" that looks worse than 1440p and still runs at 30fps (with dips to 15).

>This console is a monster and to get something similar on PC you need to spend like 1500.
You mean like the PS4, PS4 "Pro" and the Xbox One X?
LMAo, stay deluded, consolefag.

30 with drops - forever

so many lies

>The PS4 is a super charger pc guys
>Using a 2 year old(at launch) mobile CPU

Attached: ECDF8727-3C3C-4E81-AA81-3BA10715E9CF.jpg (1024x682, 70K)

nigga games were running trash on ps4 even all those years ago. if there is any modern game which somehow runs better on ps4 than on that hardware it's because devs are cutting back assets so hard.

Attached: 1442238996229.jpg (1552x2000, 825K)

>it's all a lie!

Attached: 1423151039237.gif (580x578, 474K)

If they are lies than refute them, i'll be waiting.

>ps4 back compatible
It’s not gonna be what you think it is. Sony will fuck it up

Attached: 7954BE56-42A1-4009-824D-5901FA0F69BE.png (1624x1020, 1.62M)

>468157567
lolol

It will be trivial because it's all standard PC hardware. You will be able to play any last gen game for only $39.99

>those are old games. new games run like trash on those pcs
Lel, Cope more faggot. Consoles are shit. A fucking Rx 470 runs Witcher 3 at 4K better than an Xbox One X does.

youtube.com/watch?v=5yJUNyOS95o
youtube.com/watch?v=9OE2iI7OLh8

Attached: 1546294474776.png (1243x2127, 3.16M)

how do console kids keep falling for the same marketing tricks generation after generation lmao
DO THE MATH!*

can anyone unironically defend 8K being a useful feature

>le future proofing
but in reality this shit probably isn't even gonna run true 4k either

well it will be for when 8k TVs cost less than your arm and leg

>They're releasing in like 15 days for 300bux, PS5 comes out when, next year? Low-mid tier stuff.
It allows Uncharted 4 level ai and physics at 120fps. That is pretty much all that is needed. Rumors have it that the PS4 CPU was heavily bogged down on instructions related to the GPU that can be offloaded to the GPU on PS5 so even more than 120hz (as a measure without counting graphics performance or resolution).
>no shit it's gonna use the current architecture it would be more expensive not to
It isn't current yet. It hasn't even released. Also, we don't know if it is the first iteration of Navi yet.
>I remember having this in 1998, nothing new.
Yeah the software technology which isn't used by anyone. This time around it is supported by hardware so anyone can use it very easily.
>Means nothing.
It means it is future proof. They are already selling 8k TV's now.
>Well yeah this should be a given if you shit out consoles at this speed.
But it isn't a given. Consoles haven't historically been BC at all.
>Means nothing, how many rays? My old GTX670 could do RT too.
It only means nothing to you because no games are built around it from the ground up.
>Like literally every PC since 2012.
Except they are heavily bottlenecked in 10 different ways so the sustained transfer speed is only like 200mb/s instead of 10-20gb/s.

>cheap as fuck on pc
>gimmick
>gimmick
>gimmick
>shit
>cheap as shit on PC
>gimmick
>cheap as shit on PC
>gimmick
Get a cheap fucking PC and you'll have the decent shit from that and so much more, not to mention the ability to play on a fucking platform that isn't locked down and limited as living fuck.

How much could you get for something like 400$ or 250$?

It's going to be forwards compatible though. I'm feeling really good about my decision to skip the PS4 now.