This is just lazy

no they're jpeg artefacts retard

lol

name 10 2019 indie games with fun gameplay

True.

Attached: wildlife ai.webm (758x422, 2.69M)

YIIK

Captured it well enough

Attached: 5540EC62-5E72-480F-9C3B-513C912707E9.jpg (600x431, 82K)

You raped OP's corpse set it on fire, buried it alive just to dig it up and rape it some more.

Your point being?

Why is bottom fox so ugly

Name even one AAA game that isn't a soulless cash-grab that doesn't run at 30 FPS and have 100+ dollars of DLC.

see

D44M on PC

not an argument, don't even give me or my son a (you) ever again, fag

>pay 60 bucks for a poor imitation of life, instead of making something fantastical

Yikes. This is why I dislike BOTW and RDR.

Its what foxes look like IRL dipshit

Top: requires actual artistic effort

Bottom: lol just make a realistic fox

go fuck child, christcuck

Yeah, if only botw had locked several upgrades and rewards behind an arbitrary number of kills, all which go through lengthy pointless animations, on top of rarity system that renders most of your kills obsolete, along with random chance drops, then it might have looked like they put any effort into their game.

Top: soul
bottom: soulless

Thank goodness both games opted to lock crucial game elements, like difficulty modes, behind pricey DLC packs. For a second I was worried that Nintendo and Rockstar weren't getting enough money. Phew.

I agree, what a lazy and weak bait of an image.

It looks like it's stuffed.

Agreed, Rockstar really needs to update their game design

You wash your fucking mouth before saying modeling a realistic fox dosn't require effort, jackass.

Bottom looks like a wolf with a fox skin. The head is too small

I don’t think they get the look of IRL foxes.

Attached: A0F0C231-C7E9-4946-8B4F-E9E888A38DC1.jpg (400x269, 22K)

Still assblasted about BotW three years later. Yikes!

Attached: 1555967554017.png (1485x900, 320K)

Yeah, Lord forbid you're absolutely required to min-max through the game ever time you play it, it's not like there's a built-in system to decrease your health and turn off several overpowered abilities.

>crucial elements
>difficulty levels
nigger what the fuck are you on about
I understand DLCs are bad and all that shit, but difficulty levels aren't 'crucial' to any fucking game, the vast majority of games that came out until now don't have any difficulty slider and that doesn't make them shit games

fucking neo-Yea Forums and your fucking pseud absolutism is cancer

Real life isn't a compressed jpg of graphics that really aren't that detailed with flat as fuck lighting, but I guess that's what you "normals" enjoy huh?

Seriously wtf. Is this how they look IRL?

Attached: 9D23766E-2C26-4B51-A707-D566DE307B1F.jpg (644x362, 46K)

top soul
bottom soulless

Yeah no

Attached: D0ARWkCU0AIsuXr.jpg (4000x3000, 1.2M)

God, this game already aged bad. Realistic graphics were a mistake

>I understand DLCs are bad and all that shit, but
I'm gonna stop you right there. There is no "but" in this situation. All paid DLC is bad, no exceptions.

best fox here

Attached: 1556494207301.png (1280x1280, 1.16M)

What the fuck is this even suposed to mean?

Video name

BotW animals have a better ai than horizon ai

I don't give a fuck you double nigger, because that wasn't the point I was making and I pointed this out exactly because I knew you were going to use that rhetoric to dodge the subject, because all nu-Yea Forumsirgins think and act like you

absolute brainlets

rent free

Attached: 1561327764849.jpg (700x913, 111K)

God is the creator of everything there is, including our world
God is all knowing and all powerful, a perfect being.
A perfect being cannot create imperfect things unless by design.
Therefore our world is the best there is and we perceive it in the ideal way upon creation. Any deviation is imperfection.
The best thing artists can do is imitate reality, straying away from it is straying away from God's ideal.

This also applies to historical accuracy by the way.

Never ever

Is "this didn't aged well" the new lazyass excuse that Yea Forums has found to endless shitpost about videogames?

That RDR2 doesn't even look real, no matter how much they advertise it like that so capeshit watchers get interested in your videogame.

That it's lazy to not even animate fish properly like Horzion doesn't do it? This whole thread is retarded

Horizon ist he laziest most generic non interactive SJW tranny open world game of the generation

/kys

Attached: cut grass.webm (758x422, 2.59M)

it's really sad EU propaganda got this sheep astray

>don't even give me or my son a (you) ever again, fag
if god didn't want us to create art and deviate from imitating reality, he would've made it so we couldn't

stop trying to larp as a christian if you don't understand shit about it, faggot

>Bottom already looks dated
Yeah that is seriously lazy.

Pretty much this. BotW is a better fucking video game, simple as that.

OP is a child.

No shit, its a videogame. Also, after 25 million copis sold, I think "capeshit watchers" are ALREADY interested in this videogame.

>I don't give a fuck you double nigger, because that wasn't the point I was making
But it was user. You were trying to think of some retarded justification as to why a 60 dollar game has day 1 DLC, when the company behind it is already obscenely rich and isn't exactly hurting for money. Your argument was the equivalent of "get a job you poorfag" except with a few more words.

Counterpoint; god also made us with vivid imaginations. If he wanted us to just blindly imitate what we saw, we'd be nothing but thoughtless robots.

Funny

People in this thread believe the game in OP is Horizon, that's how generic western open world games are, they all look the same. Meanwhile everyone recognizes BoTW.

Yeah, not developing a style is a sign of laziness and graphicswhores are a plague on the industry.

>still missing the point and using a strawman to hide it
B R A I N L E T

I didn't. It was obvious to me that it was RDR2. Art styles.

>arguing over whose shit looks better

Attached: 1513007429793.jpg (1280x544, 91K)

>Nothing is perfect, but on purpose guys I swear!
Imagine trying to justify your several mental deficiencies this way, don't worry one day your autism will allow you to act similar to a normal human.

NINTENDO

Why are nincels so insistant that games must look bad and absolutely cannot progress technologically?

I don't believe op bottom fox is from Horizon, and to be honest i don't have any idea from where the fox comes, but i was speaking about the botw vs horizon ai video

DON'T

Rockstar has never been that great with models. They always look kind of off.

Attached: 70CF1E40-B533-467F-9E1A-2F3F4005CB84.jpg (540x720, 46K)

You mean your point about how Nintendo is a tiny indie company and needs to charge 60 dollars for games, AND day 1 DLC? And if we don't support them, then they'll go bankrupt any day now? Stellar point.

>still putting words into other people's mouth to try and act as if you won an internet argument on some anonymous laotian image hosting service
yikes, you're a walking meme

Bottom looks like a retextured dog.

Yeah, this. Doesn't mean Horizon or RDR2 are bad games, you can still have alot of fun with them. I know I had. But BotW is still better.

>Still refuses to make any points and only whines about how he has to pay for innocuous things.

>he's still white knighting a super rich corporation for absolutely no reason whatsoever

Cripes, can't you just come to terms with them being greedy and charging for something they didn't have to? Do you really have to defend every action they do as a benefit for the customer?

>when you don't know how to make your own fox, just copy a real fox

>>Cripes, can't you just come to terms with them being greedy and charging for something they didn't have to?
no, because that's not the point I was replying to or making

you're just digging yourself further and further down the hole, it's kinda sad

why are young male foxes so cute

Attached: 1497245471439.png (540x624, 221K)

I'm not defending shit, I didn't see any value in the zelda dlc so I didn't buy it, I'm actually talking about the game I played instead of bitching over the ethics of a corporation that have no bearing on my life whatsoever. I get it, you hate dlc, stop bitching and putting words in people's mouths and actually discuss the /videogames/

>no, because that's not the point I was replying to or making
Then please link me to your point in our reply chain. What crucial element did I miss?

>stop complaining about anti-consumer practices, just purchase product and consume next product

And to think this is coming from someone who previously attacked this very mindset when it came to normalfag games like Horizon or capeshit. But now it's okay to be blind consumer. Very thought provoking.

They all look sick or something

Attached: 9143DC90-48E3-486C-BF3A-D1814B69E37C.jpg (620x349, 53K)

>All paid DLC is bad, no exceptions.
So an expansion pack created months after release, that doubles the size of the game, and costs one penny, is bad?

Is this the famouse 'cope' I hear so much about?

>isn't even capable of following a 7 post reply chain
learn to read, or stop posting

also I notice you believe there's only one person discussing with you and calling you out for being a retard, which proves how new you are at this
definitely stop posting and lurk some more

>So an expansion pack created months after release, that doubles the size of the game, and costs one penny, is bad?
Name one (1) [一つ] game that does this

Pretty obvious the comparisons to Horizon came from the video about enemy AI that this user posted, not because of OP's image.

Yes, as a matter of fact. Games should be made for the sake of passion, and profit should only be sought if you're on the binge of being poor and couldn't make the game otherwise, like an indie game. And even then, good indies go right ahead and make mountains of free DLC.

With that said, riddle me this: which indie game mentioned in this thread has gone above and beyond the call of duty by making 8 years of free DLC, which has QUADRUPLED the amount of content in the base game? Now which AAA games have charged top dollar for unfinished pieces of shit that needed to have day 1 DLC?

THen for the sake of clarity, I shall address those points more clearly.

>but difficulty levels aren't 'crucial' to any fucking game,
Yes, they are. Without difficulty, games are nothing but walking simulators aka movieshit. Shouldn't be tolerated or accepted. Difficulty levels make games infinitely replayable. They are mandatory.

>the vast majority of games that came out until now don't have any difficulty slider and that doesn't make them shit games
Are you kidding? 99% of the industry is pure F grade garbage, often directly the result of not having any difficulty or difficulty levels.

>Yes, as a matter of fact. Games should be made for the sake of passion, and profit should only be sought if you're on the binge of being poor and couldn't make the game otherwise, like an indie game. And even then, good indies go right ahead and make mountains of free DLC.
>
>With that said, riddle me this: which indie game mentioned in this thread has gone above and beyond the call of duty by making 8 years of free DLC, which has QUADRUPLED the amount of content in the base game? Now which AAA games have charged top dollar for unfinished pieces of shit that needed to have day 1 DLC?
though it does matter to me, this has nothing to do with out discussion and it's only you trying to force you memes onto me
suck a dick

this must be falseflagging at this point, I refuse to believe someone is this dumb.

That effort isn't necessarily attached to only graphics and developers can put effort in other areas besides that.

Stylistic > realistism

>And to think this is coming from someone who previously attacked this very mindset...

I don't think you even know who you're replying to anymore. Did you miss the part where I said I did NOT buy the dlc? Where I found no value in it? Lack of contempt does not equate to support.

yeah, it's also pretty easy to recognize minecraft when you see it

Yes but it’s soulless and emblematic of the west’s fascination with realism over everything.

Art is supposed to be the world through the artist’s eyes, not a replication of reality.

Attached: 59CAF6B4-1DBE-4C8C-BF33-A6C544E28954.jpg (552x337, 16K)

All I'm saying is that a game with a decade of free DLC is infinitely more soulful than another AAA title touted and paraded about because of brand recognition.

>Lack of contempt does not equate to support.
As a consumer, you should hold contempt for these kinds of practices. Trying to handwave them away as minor issues, when they vastly hurt the actual game itself and the entire game design process (by encouraging people to cut content out and resell it later, in particular) it only spells disasterous precedents.

Not one penny, but Paradise Lost for Postal 2, came out like a decade after the base game, costs 2 bucks on the companies website, and doubles the size of the base game(5 new days, in a game that originally had 5, plus new weapons, locales, a whole new plot, bosses, all kinds of shit)

>god
LITERALLY WHO?

>pointing out something you don't like is coping if I disagree with it
Cope.

>All I'm saying is that a game with a decade of free DLC is infinitely more soulful than another AAA title touted and paraded about because of brand recognition.
nigger, I don't care what you're saying because this wasn't the conversation I was interested in having with you
though you lost any credibility a long time ago

Gameplay > graphics

Who let the door to r/atheism open again?

>don't you dare point out facts that make my AAA game look worse, otherwise you lose credibility

I guess I was in the wrong. I should just blindly defend corporations as an apology for doing something so silly, like pointing out facts.

>delusional brainlet who pretends his imaginary friends are real thinks he's the one that belongs here

Attached: 5a8.jpg (650x635, 29K)

I don't know user but I sure like you
I just got banned so I can't post more foxes right now, but I'll be back soonish

>>don't you dare point out facts that make my AAA game look worse, otherwise you lose credibility
>I guess I was in the wrong. I should just blindly defend corporations as an apology for doing something so silly, like pointing out facts.

>he's still doing it
holy shit, it's meeting people like you that makes me feel better about myself
have a good one, faggot

Attached: lol.jpg (480x360, 22K)

Is it acceptable to sell PS3 games for full price in 2019?

Attached: disaster of the wild27.jpg (1920x2161, 2.59M)

le tip

Attached: mfwatheistspost.jpg (550x550, 41K)

top: a videogame fox
bottom: a moviegame fox

>calls non-religious sheep
>when their god calls himself the shepherd to humanity's sheep

It looks bad, moron.

Bottom doesn't look like a fox.

Attached: wildlife_fox.jpg (750x493, 207K)

And here you are, trying to argue how free DLC is bad because the corporations need more money.

Attached: 1436284767739.jpg (512x512, 83K)

Fedora meme died too fast. They're already swarming back.

Attached: fedora.jpg (500x557, 40K)

>As a consumer, you should hold contempt for these kinds of practices.

Alright fuck off with your self-righteous bullshit. Money talks, and I do with mine. None of your internet bitching, message board-posting, petition-signing tirades mean shit. I spare the world of insufferable faggotry like yours while holding the same powers as a consumer. If brainlets want to spend $5,000 on mtx and gatchashit then by God almighty do they have every right to. I don't have time to baby every person that would make bad purchasing decisions. If games continue to be shit and eventually crash and burn then so be it. My money will only go to games I find worth my time.

if it's fun yes

That's a nice little rant you've got there, but that doesn't quite explain how free DLC is bad, let alone inherently worse than paid DLC.

does minecraft have foxes?

their horses proportions are fucked, not sure what breed they used for references but it look like they took a small breed and scaled it up, giving it a bigger head than they should

Unironically more soul than both games.

Attached: Fox.png (480x340, 20K)

>Completely dismisses any points to be made in favor of moving goal posts and whataboutism.

Holy shit dude, get over it. Acquire some reading comprehension.

>the soul meme

And your point about how you don't care about the industry being completely obsessed with profit to the point of detrimental game quality, all because you want to make people mad? That was so much more worthwhile, right?

Nintoddles are insecure doofuses. What else is new?

Attached: g4ueylm80c631.png (1920x1080, 1.94M)

>ugh this game aged sooo bad!
Is this what Pkeks do in order to cope with the fact that RDR2 is NEVER EVER coming to PC?

Yeah the horses in 2 are weirdly fat looking

Does anyone else think the horse animation in rdr also kind of sucks. It looks weirdly choppy

idk Minecraft is the 2nd highest selling video game ever for a reason

Top: Cartoon fox
Bottom: Corgi with a long bushy tail and the wrong shade of fur

Fun fact, if you're gonna go realistic, you're competing with reality. Any divergence from that and you're already losing points.

And this looks like a photoshop. Why did you choose such an ugly picture ?

Horizon was a good game, I had more fun with it than RDR2
BotW dabs on them

and the reason we constantly hae these threads is because this board is filled with underage cucks who think graphics>atmosphere and story

it's the same guys who think SA was better than Vice city because of muh map

dicks

>being butthurt about having no fish ai

>Soul
>Soulless

>Dark Souls is "walking simulators aka movieshit."

First highest selling game, actually

yeah I wasn't sure since some ""sources""" say Tetris sold more but w/e

Botw will look great for many years like Windwaker, while RDR will look ugly as more realistic graphics are introduced

Ironically, the top image is shaped more like an actual fox. Rockstar can be surprisingly bad at realism even when they try so hard at it.

Agreed, imitating reality is the laziest style choice you can make.

Yes, god has already perfected that artstyle and emulating it is literally a waste of time.
If I want to see nice looking foxes I can just browse photographs. I don't need a videogame.

which game did He make?