Why did ps1 games age better than n64 games?

Attached: crash 2.jpg (1792x868, 406K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/pFwQ0z-Naiw
youtu.be/q_zMioKnYaQ
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

More soul

I dunno mate they both look pretty awful

Attached: s15c93c9312e288ff10847a73f5eea0dd.jpg (450x371, 32K)

The one thing that really sticks out to me is the video quality.
N64 games played on proper hardware with no mods just look terrible nowadays. Even mods such as the UltraHDMI don't help much.
Playing PS1 with RGB or through a PS3 you rather good.

N64 games didnt have textures or geometry that looked as good. It was just flat out uglier, even today nintendo cant compete with Sony in hardware.

Because Nintendo is not good.

Sure thing bro

Attached: 1459062725308.jpg (640x960, 119K)

soul is a meme

They both aged super poorly

>Emulators

>radar doesn't show anything beyond the fog
What's the point?

Counter example

Attached: 1408676618258.jpg (1968x786, 421K)

It isn't.
youtu.be/pFwQ0z-Naiw

I wouldn’t say so. N64 games generally look better

Attached: 6FA8BA16-584C-4EE6-8114-7159E255C17B.jpg (480x360, 15K)

>coping

Careful user, soon the horde will arrive, talking about the same five games they always talk about.

Attached: 1561067890232.png (683x490, 19K)

>Get pozzed.

should I play the original Crash trilogy or get the N. Sane Trilogy?

The PS1 had more 2D games
At the same time, I guess Crash and Spyro look better than any 64 game.

N64 could do better screen resolution and more polygons but their textures was limited by the hilariously low ram. Had the system had more of that the games would have looked much better. The expansion pack was basically a RAM upgrade and you see how good DK64 and Majora's Mask looked.

Developers put more effort and soul into PS1 games because Sony didn't treat 3rd parties like absolute trash like Nintendo did

>why did this turd come out shinier than the other?
It's not really much of an accomplishment is it? They both end up being shit. One is just slightly more polished shit

Probably because Sony was the one developing the disc system?

>mate
Eww gross an anglo

Ah yes, crash aged so well people still speedrun the shit out of.....oh wait no, that's Mario 64,donkey kong 64,ocarina of time,golden eye.....
unironically,retrofags don't really give a fuck about ps1 games

>There will never be a company as great as PS1 - PS2 Sony again
>Nowadays I own more Ninty consoles than PS consoles
Where did it all go wrong

Attached: [email protected] (400x302, 176K)

>speedrun
Tranny cancer

oh yes, speedrunners, the mark of quality.

Attached: a handsome kind of disgust.jpg (712x707, 60K)

>Speedrunners
>People
?

This

Fuck off

What does aging have to do with how much people play it
Okami has better art direction than grand majority of games yet few people play it
Mario is Mario, that's why people give a fuck about it, not because it looks better

OP is a fag. Rare games for the N64 looks better then any ps1 game

cope harder

Attached: conkers-bad-fur-day-04.png (800x600, 408K)

Not even 64 kids think Donkey Kong 64 is good, and they consider every 7/10 game to be a 10/10

Well there's more Nintendo systems than there are Sony ones.

They didn't.

That screenshot is not from an original ps1 lmao

Because the Saturn wrecked them both.

Attached: cb26250d27727e2a5e1288a3e32b245d.jpg (670x930, 66K)

>Nowadays I own more Ninty consoles than PS consoles
And that's supposed to something shocking? No other console manufacturer puts out as much systems as nintendo the average lifespan of their systems is like 3-4 years

Nintendo didnt treat them like trash. Nintendo wanted a traditional gaming experience for their system while 3rd parties will pushing for big budget cinematic experiences for the playstation

years later Nintendo was proven right.

>the Saturn
The what?

Conker looks terrible and plays even worse

Attached: 625735-conker-s-bad-fur-day-nintendo-64-screenshot-tail-life.png (640x480, 876K)

OoT and MM look so much better than almost any PS1 game.

they run at 20 fps. Look like shit.

They better do, the n64 has a three times the processing speed of the ps1

The fog gives it more soul.

Yes, that is why arcade games like Street Fighter were on the Playstation or the Saturn, because of the "cinematic experience".
Stop rewriting history. Nintendo lost third party support because
A) They asked for a costly proprietary price
B) The 64 flopped in Japan
Take Enix for example, they tried to stick with Nintendo for as long as they could, but they just couldn't release the new Dragon Quest on the 64 because they would have to do it using peripherals, of a console that already sold below the Saturn in Japan.

sharp vs blurry textures

Her console, user.

Attached: sakura-shinguji-project-x-zone-2.18.jpg (210x240, 15K)

That is why Nintendo said no to Resident Evil, right?

>dont being an idort from the very beginning and enjoying all sources of videogames

Attached: 1500946539092.png (970x711, 770K)

Never heard of it

I'm a psxfag but mostly because of jrpgs and 2d games in general. In my opinion 2D games held up better because modern games aren't directly comparable to them. Also 5th gen was the peak and essentially the end of 2d games.

This. Take the occult shit to /x/

the dev matters more than the console
both have ugly as sin games both have great looking games

N64 would never be able to handle FF7, nuff said

Yeah I don't get where rarefags get off. The rare games specifically have held up the worst and are probably responsible for a lot of the retrospective hate n64 gets.

Play both

It completely raped the n64 in Japan and gave the ps1 a run for its money....dont tell me you forgot about the Saturn bros?

Attached: 166993-magical-night-dreams-cotton-2-sega-saturn-front-cover.png.jpg (800x794, 161K)

Doesn't ring a bell...

Just better art and code even though the n64 was more powerful
Also the ps1 had no texture filtering, n64 games look like smudgy shit

Conkers bad fur day which is maybe the best looking game from that gen also sort of looks like smudgy shit

Based /vr/ poster. I like my saturn for a few jrpgs and vns but I admittedly don't play it all that much. But there are whole genres I don't play because I have a dreamcast and arcade mame machine for fighters and shmups, which is a decent portion of the worthwhile saturn library.

this proves nothing

>Conkers bad fur day which is maybe the best looking game from that gen
The best looking n64 game is ogre battle

are you joking on me my friend?

Soulless

Attached: raidou.jpg (1920x1080, 379K)

>the average lifespan of their systems is like 3-4 years
That's bullshit. It's 5-6 years.
What's more this used to be the standard, and the last generation has been the ONLY exception to this, and yet you people act like it's the norm and only thing acceptable nowadays.

The green face in the top left looks like hes holding in a laugh, I would too if i was playing this

Attached: J2.gif (400x310, 579K)

I don't get it. Are those tiny trees real or plastic?

The low draw distance actually helped the PS1 contrary to what would make sense. There was so much tiling in that era, that the low draw distance helped by obscuring it a little. Where as alnost any N64 game is ugly as fuck because you can see the same texture repeated over and over a ton.

I'm going to beat the soul out of you if you don't shut up.

That's emulation, im not a nintendo fan but N64 had proper 3D models without jitter & no texture warping

PS1 only got that recently with newer emulation

The best looking games like Spyro had big draw distance
Its about about good code and good art, games on both systems could look very good and have good draw distances

based

the graphics on that are broken, what shitty emulator is that

I like how both look

Worse tech, but better software design around that tech.

Well not even worse cuz the n64 cartridges were obsolete in the CD era.

> Rare games for the N64 looks better then any ps1 game
> responding to a picture of motherfucking Crash Bandicoot 2

Nobody is this deluded.

Attached: 2604527-crash[1].jpg (799x536, 154K)

It's probably one of the best looking games on the N64. you need to get your eyes checked

They were faster than cds

hard to think of any games of this era that needed full remakes LESS than these games desu

Good PS1 games had to load for 10 seconds, whoop de doo.

The trade-offs on the N64 like the lack of voice acting and texture variety are much more severe.

zoomer

ganecube
GBA
GBA SP
DS
3ds
WII
WIIU
Switch
2ds
3dsXL

vs

ps2
ps3
ps4
ps4 pro
psp
vita

>Nintendo didnt treat them like trash. Nintendo wanted a traditional gaming experience for their system while 3rd parties will pushing for big budget cinematic experiences for the playstation
Playstation 1 was the last era of jank games, no name devs, and mid budget development studios roamed the market. The PS1 library is filled with tons of one off games and studios that never took off after the war, but laid a ton of fun and new games before they left the market. Everyone list the came fucking 10 games when they talk about their favorite N64 games. PS1 list always have some fucking wild card you may have never gotten around to or even heard of. This horseshit that they only wanted to make movies is not fucking true and you fuckers need to stop rewriting history.

Yeah, having 2000 shovelware games that at their best are 6/10 is "having games".


Ps1 is the most overrated console of all time, you keep pretending that menu excel fights in rpg's are fun.

>PS1 list always have some fucking wild card you may have never gotten around to or even heard of.
Based. This is also true for the Saturn. The only games worth a damn on the n64 are the ones everyone already knows. And playstation was easily the best choice in gaming until the ps3 came around.

Attached: 176745-Nekketsu_Oyako_(Japan)-1491746389.png (1120x840, 81K)

Emulation is not how the real thing looks mate.
Ps1 was a garbage mess of fake 3d and retarded textures.

Attached: Ps1 is for weeaboo fags.jpg (225x225, 7K)

>Rare games
they also run at 15fps

>Shows upscaled emulated screenshot as evidence.

Lmao, PS1 looked like wobbly pixelated shit.

Attached: batfink.jpg (245x206, 14K)

Rare was better at developing for n64 than nintendo. Besides Rare games ps1 had better looking games

>comparing a hallway to an open game

Attached: 1436464888143.png (640x480, 384K)

never forget
by far the best looking game of the generation was on PS1, but that was more to do with good art design and clever pseudo-shader effects rather than hardware. vagrant story's art style would never have worked on N64 cause the texture filtering would have blurred all the detailed texutres into a mess

Attached: csb79.jpg (480x360, 28K)

Only 1.4 mil units sold

???

NES -> SNES
>6 years
SNES -> Nintendo 64
>5 years
Nintendo 64 -> Gamecube
>5 years
Gamecube -> Wii
>5 years
Wii -> WiiU
>6 years
WiiU -> Switch
>4.5 years

In what world does that average 3-4 years?
Also for comparison's sake.
PS1 -> PS2
>5 years
PS2 -> PS3
>6 years
PS3 -> PS4
>7 years

Xbox -> 360
>4 years
360 -> Xbox One
>8 years

Notice how only the last generation sticks out.

Do you even know what Anglo means?

Speedrunners are not retrofags.

fuck vagrant story is gorgeous

Attached: ccdaa1fb8bf1a847ff87ede7fe310fc1.png (1920x1080, 2.92M)

Let me guess, you weren't even born in the ps1 era.

2001...Sony acquires Naughty Dog

Need I say more

>PS1
+better textures
+better framerate
+better resolution
-texture warping

>N64
+no texture warping
-everything else

>mentions shit like gba SP and 3DS XL without mentioning the slim variants of sonys consoles and handhelds and the psp go shit
Wanna know how i know you're retarded?

They didn't and you are autistic.

Literally add a shader or two and N64 games even still look amazing today.

Attached: 878787.png (1624x961, 3.01M)

>quantity over quality

Because it has more 2d games and early 3d was and remains ugly.

Early 3d has soul and is very appealing in a dystopian kinda way.

>dystopian
???
Don't use words if you don't know what they mean.

Late 2d has infinitely more soul than early 3d. Not even close.

Dystopian = a society where everythings shitty
If you were too retarded to realize what I was saying, i was saying it looks good in a grungy way. The same way dystopian societies are very grungy and unkept. It's my fault because I shouldn't have figured an idiot like you would piece together what I meant.

Sure thing fren

Attached: mi.jpg (1107x305, 106K)

>using clever engineering to use more polygons is cheating

PS1 has aged poorly, every game feels like theres a mini earthquake during gameplay due to shifting polygons

both emulator shots
both real hardware shots

>aged

Attached: Png.png (420x420, 144K)

God damn, I hated that game but still played the whole thing.

i'd take a mini earthquake running closer to 30fps over a myopia simulator running at 20fps any day of the week

Attached: Gex.jpg (662x1149, 133K)

Stick to just saying soul/soulless, you clearly don't know any other words

Isn't that the 3DS remake, though?

Let me guess, you are a complete zoomer fag who only cares about sales for their console wars shit argument. Ps1 fags pretend they were full of exclusives when there were full of multiplats and downgrade arcade ports.

The best games for the N64 are the peak and shape of 5th gen gaming in my opinion. The thing might have less games but the best ones were game-changers for the industry and years to come.
You would never have a fully fleshed experience like Majoras Mask, Ocarina, Perfect Dark or Super Mario 64 on the PS1. They always had to use gimmicks to make games longer like fmv's, tedious turn based shit for hours, use of 2D graphics to low the cost's and limited 3D areas because the hardware was weak. Fuck off.

You sound like the typical weeaboo who plays and falls in love to rpgs characters of a snes game. What a fag. Low poly 3D is a humanly thing of beauty

Attached: Lmaou.jpg (226x223, 13K)

Better textures. The jiggly polygons and afine texture mapping are pretty hard to look at these days though.

I'm a nintendofag generally but no n64 game comes close to pic related

Swing and a miss gaylord. 2d platformers crush 3d platformers just as an example. Early 3d was shit. And the trendy game to make at that time, 3d collectathons was fucking dogshit.

>Dystopian = a society where everythings shitty
That's genuinely not what it means.

the "successful" saturn got a mere handful of games in 1999, in it's own territory

it was a third rate playstation

>while 3rd parties will pushing for big budget cinematic experiences for the playstation
Holy shit nigger just say "I'm a fucking underage nitendo console warrior" and be done with it.

Shit man, N64 devs WERE the big budget developers as developing for the N64 was more expensive. Every fucking body and their mother could develop for PS1

>n64 being a shit console to code on means it's big budget console therefore the better console

What kind of 4d mental gymnastics are you applying to convince yourself this retarded logic? Jesus fucking christ

Attached: Perfect Dark.jpg (877x479, 75K)

Coding? Who the fuck was talking about coding?
I'm talking about nintendo nigger:
>A) They asked for a costly proprietary price

N64 era marked the beggining of the Nintendo Bonus.

Crash 2? You’re right.

bottom has more soul

They were generally better

lol when ninceldos cope

>Why did ps1 games age better than n64 games?

who cares about some furfag mario knockoff lmao sonygros

No one cares about ps1/ps2/ps3 games anymore

Soulless

Crash 2? no PS1 comes close to that pic either

PS1fags and especially N64fags live in a magical world where their systems output at HD resolutions and their image quality was cleaner than a Dreamcast VGA

Attached: native resolutions.png (836x236, 214K)

As a kid everytime I went over to a n64 kids home they always had the same 4-5 games. Yaay, can't wait to play Ocarina, Goldeneye, Mario 64 and Perfect Dark for the millionth time... Good games but n64 seriously lacked variety. Psx kids on the other hand always had some hidden gems you never knew about. The psx library was fucking massive.

Someone forgot about Lara Croft and her box titties

>trying to play N64 on a LCD
Found your problem shitter.

Said no one ever

>that aspect ratio on PS1
>native resolutions.png
HMMMMMMM

why would anyone give a shit about speed runner opinions?

PSX textures look a lot cleaner. Low res, but they're not super muddy.

I still think MGS1 looks amazing, the look sets the mood.

This!
History is being rewritten by emulation screenshots.
Some ps1 games looked detailed and interesting in magazine screens back in the day, but were often a mess in motion.
N64 games could look blurry in magazine scans but beautiful in motion.
That being said, both were great consoles. Mario 64 is the best platformer of that gen. There isn’t even anything close to it on the ps1.
The ps1 has a better variety of games like jrpgs, racing sims, and fighting games.

Attached: 14B97E74-A0B9-40AD-89C2-F353F580E982.gif (500x363, 320K)

It's not that they aged better. It's that there were fucktons more games on PS1 than on N64 in the first place. So even if the same proportion of PS1 and N64 games age just as well/poorly as each other, that still means a fuckton more PS1 games that aged better.

Attached: 36smyq.webm (512x404, 2.82M)

Banjo-Tooie is the best looking game of its generation.

>be the ps1
>try to render textures onto a 3d surface
>they cant sit still

>There isn’t even anything close to it on the ps1.
Spyro

this is direct capture. I see no jittering.
youtu.be/q_zMioKnYaQ

Nintendo speedrunners turn into tranny faggots. Playstation speedrunners based

Attached: caveman.jpg (480x360, 11K)

Retrofags and jrpgfags are practically synonymous at this point, and ps1 has the widest and probably best jrpg library ever. N64 retro fags are just nintendo fags.

Show me a hallway N64 game with comparable graphics.

>The conker screenshot being referenced is also an emulated screenshot
>The jaggy 2D sprites that make up half the graphics stick out like a sore thumb for it
N64fags

I think that is his point

I think they did a little more than adding a shader or two in that game.

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 93K)