Is this game good now?

It is the same shit as the last bunch of games. there are no stales and nothing you do matters so ot gets boring really quick. it doesn't have fast paced play for a bit gameplay either. but if you liked BF1 you will like it.
Hardline was the only good BF since two and I am sad it never panned out.

No they completely fucked up the game modes and somehow made a WWII game where tanks and planes aren't fun.

Call of Duty with bigger maps

GAMERS

RISE UP

You can play it for free whenever there's a trial for their shitty 3 bucks a month service. Not worth $20.

>for $20
Nope, way too much. They have already given it away for free some time ago on Xbone.

You have to be the most bottom feeding, dumbed down casual to enjoy this game.

>least casual Frostbite battlefield
>it's for casuals lol
can't wait for BF6 when everybody circlejerks about how BF5 was better

Attached: 1455891929353.png (1022x731, 643K)

Why couldn't they just fucking make popular maps that people actually want to play instead of showing us less famous stories and shit.. nobody gives a fuck about them for a reason. GIVE ME D-DAY.

>Game has now visible recoil pattern therefore its not casual!
Thanks for your opinion

ask me anything

Attached: BF5 hours.jpg (887x589, 105K)

>All these DICE/BFV apologists

Attached: 1526404291006.jpg (314x405, 21K)

You're right, regenerating health and mash-Q-to-dorito was so much more skill intensive

why do you have no standards?

>This casual piece of shit is slightly less casual than these other casual shit stains

When did I say anything about the other battlefields?

Absolutely based retard

whats your favorite class?

Attached: 1556633757235.jpg (347x347, 74K)

I watched the cutscenes for the german Panzer DLC and that commander has the be the biggest smoothbrain I’ve ever fucking seen. Literally none of his choice make any fucking sense either realistically or even just thematically.

but I love all kinds of FPS games.

support is my most played, assault was more fun before reddit got to it

How far are you into your HRT?

>female soldiers

are only not OK when dice does it

>assault was more fun before reddit got to it
Elaborate.

rocket and grenade launchers used to be fun then they got nerfed to shit

then they got nerfed again because if reddit (which is where the devs hang out and get most of their feedback) had their way then battlefield wouldn't have any explosives at all

>is this game good now?

No, stop asking. It will never be good.

How do you feel about the new map

>removing tank counters

>used to be fun
Yeah it was super fun watching vehicle betas be unable to do anything at all because they'd get swarmed with anti-vehicle gadgets in seconds. Cherry on top is that Assault has the easy mode noob guns and access to the strongest gadgets so everyone played it, so no matter where those poor fools that actually wanted to use a vehicle went they were fucked. That's what I call a healthy meta, put all the power in the hands of the easiest to play and most accessible class with the strongest guns turning everything into an infantry shitfest, fucking reddit amirite.

Attached: miho shell dodging.gif (300x276, 190K)

the damage nerfs against vehicles were warranted but making anti-infantry rocket launchers do virtually no damage against infantry is stupid.

> series turns to shit when devs listen to youtubers and reddit
Wow what a complete suprise

>implying jack, flak, and levelfap aren't all on DICE's payroll

>needing 7 rockets to take down a tank they can just repair anyway
>despite tanks being the safest and easiest method for killing infantry
>calls it warranted
You and this game deserve eachother

youtube.com/watch?v=TaVMVXBUFXg

It's singleplayer is a trip.

Attached: 1491042837998.png (525x611, 418K)

Why has DICE fucked the Support class so bad bros?
It started in BF1 when the only good gadget for the class was the Limpet mine. In the BFV beta it was this half engineer abomination that was just so fucking bad.
The BF3/4 Support class just felt so much better to play in my opinion. I had almost twice as many service stars in that class than all the other ones probably combined.

Attached: 1402863412994.png (1021x746, 89K)

>despite tanks being the safest and easiest method for killing infantry
not at launch they weren't, it was genuinely easier to solo armor than it was to solo a single assault while in armor. Vehicles need to function or the entire formula falls apart.

DICE's ideals with balancing are this. 1, few one hit kills. They want players to "battle it out" like a fighting game. Reduce the amount of instances where players can get one hit without fighting back. That's why snipers have glares. 2, reduce the "no chance" encounters. A easy example is plane balance. It can be very hard to kill players in planes on the ground. It is also very easy to kill planes from infantry.

Only if you were stupid enough to drive in the middle so you can be repeatedly ass pounded from any direction. Now you can just do that anyway while rolling into an objective and freezing their capture forever.

nah, tanks are fine now, in my experience the top scorers usually aren't even tankers, that distinction goes to assault or airchavs most

Play BF4.
It will actually have a player-count in a year.

Yes, so get it. I play BF5 more than I do Call of Duty.

Literally untrue. You constantly see people going 42-1 and you know just exactly what they have been doing. Almost every game.

People get that score by sniping with tanks. Sitting back like cowards and being useless.

This is an issue because DICE decided to gut the fuck out of planes. Planes are supposed to pressure sniping tanks cause usually they're very exposed. Planes can't do that now cause the whole air design was deisgned by someone who has never played a BF game.

>they won't remove unpopular cosmetics from BF5!
>okay, they did, but it's gonna be pay2win!
>okay, they didn't, but they're gonna backpedal on DLC being free!
>okay, they didn't, but BF5 won't get any support after launch!
>or after the holidays!
>okay, it did, but BF5 won't get any new theatres!
>or any new armies!
all these DICE=DOOMED predictions falling like dominoes, and people still keep making more. Don't you ever get tired of being wrong?

I actually Pre Ordered the Deluxe edition and the game is ok, but its Boring!
Thank fuck they are finally adding more maps and raising the max rank in game, i mean, 50 being the max? Wtf.
I wish there was a bf5 premium, so i'd atleast be sure i'd be getting new good content

I don't even think about it at all

>paywalling maps
premium was shite, it killed matchmaking for DLC.

How does bf4 manage to have almost as many players as bf1 after all this time? How many people are playing V? I got it with my gpu, should I bother playing it? Last battlefield I played was 3 and really loved bc2

Honestly, it feels like the same between 4 and 5 in terms of player count. I mean they're different time periods, so you can reckon that 4 still has so many players since it is a modern warfare game.

That being said, 5 does have Firestorm. So there may be more players thanks to that. But based on servers along, they seem close.

because it doesn't, simply put
all the servers have a fake player count, and bf4stats is not updated accordingly

How does someone manage to take something that should be inherently funny and kill it with overused memes and terrible timing. Wtf happened to making funny videos now