Is this, without a doubt, quite possibly, truly, the most greatest game of all time?

Is this, without a doubt, quite possibly, truly, the most greatest game of all time?

Attached: Bloodborne.jpg (580x724, 73K)

second after Dark Souls 3

unironically yea

Demon Souls is better

Not even close, snoydrone.

It’s one of the only truly great games released this decade

yeah right after dark souls 2

I don't know, but at least it's my fav of all time

While sekiro is far more technically better game pure factually obviously, BB just has that wholesome feel.

>HARD EDGY GAME #2368
ABSOLUTELY REVOLUTIONARY

>he only has a pc
Look at this poorfag

Attached: 1521250416436.png (1200x1072, 572K)

>games greater than Bloodborne
Tetris, Super Mario Bros, Super Mario Bros 3, The Legend of Zelda, Link's Awakening, Metroid Prime 2: Echoes, Mario64, Mario Galaxy, Ultima Underworld, Thief, Deus Ex, Street Fighter 2, Mount & Blade, Dark Souls, Breath of the Wild, Dwarf Fortress, Morrowind, Secret of Mana, HalfLife, and DOOM
That still puts it around a strong ~#20

>can only say game is edgy

have you never played this user or do you shitpost in all threads?

in all seriousness, I was absolutely livid the other day when i remembered I can't play bloodborne without a ps4.

unless you use PS Live, but fuck that, I'm not paying a subscription to sit on that game when I'm too busy with life.

Attached: 1560980411517.jpg (778x1024, 85K)

>Zelda 1 instead of LttP
fuck off contrarian faggot nobody is impressed

No but I do like it a lot

I should do another playthrough
only did one run
I liked it a lot and meant to play it again but just never have
playing sekiro now makes me want to get back into bloodborne when I finish

not even the best 2015 game

Attached: images.jpg (701x438, 36K)

yes

>LEZ
come the fuck on. I love that game to death because it was my first GBA game and I played it like crazy, but it really isn't that great
>BotW
fucking lmao

>souls shit
Nah

it's an amazing game but lacks the most important aspect that makes me not replay it: good combat

Haven't played it, what makes it so much better than Dark Souls/Demon's Souls? It seems like people put Bloodborne on a higher pedestal, which is saying something considering people already put the first Dark Souls on a pretty high pedestal

not that guy but I just wanted to share,
I cut my vidya teeth on zelda1 and when the super nintendo came out I had imagined what a super zelda would be like and ALTTP was pretty much exactly what little me thought a 16 bit zelda would be like
same with megaman, metroid, and super mario
absolutely magical times

>lied to about lighting and graphic improvement
>press square to win
best 2015 game

fpbp

I cant seem to recall anything being better. So yea I guess...

>hurr my 2 button combat
>hurr i got one shot by some giant faggot, best game ever

die fromshills

>It seems like people put Bloodborne on a higher pedestal

PS4 fan drones do this because Bloodborne is literally the ONLY non-movie, non-western, cult-fanbase game to have release as a AAA exclusive for their console.

That being said, the game is very good. But before the DLC, there were glaring flaws and issues, ranging not just from the range of great-well, rather middling bosses, low weapon/outfit variety, and samey, and often frustrating later areas. But also the Lore, which the DLC really amended by offering a sense of time and source for a lot the games underlying narrative elements (of which you'd have to at least dig into to appreciate the story, in the same vein of Dark Souls, whether that's your thing or not). The DLC also added several great weapons, a new covenant and three bosses in particular that far exceed pretty much all the bosses in the main game bar perhaps one. And only one.

Honestly, I'd say it's about on par with Dark Souls 3 and Sekiro. Although that's only because Sekiro's gameplay is far better than anything From's released thus far.

BB has a better world and characters, but Sekiro is structured in a way that RPG grinding is not possible so I do think it edges out in terms of just being a better structured game. The most grinding you can do is exploiting all of the resources in all the areas that are available to you, and those resources that permanently upgrade your character are finite and you never really get too strong for any set of areas that you have the option of going to next.

pray tell what do YOU think is good combat? battlefield? GTFO

Orbital emulator is looking good.

good combat is what happens before I rape your mother's whore corpse

Bloodborne is amazing, but I had more fun playing Sekiro.

well for one, it's original and sheds the baggage the souls combat system had up to that point. it has the most story out of any souls game. great art and setting. dark souls was like a cheap derivative of demon's souls. this game is totally new and original.

I'd say it's worth it for Bloodborne alone. I've played that game so much the damn system paid for itself. My favorite this generation so far. I'd also recommend God of War. The combat isn't on the level of Souls but it's fun as hell, great impact to the weapons. Plus it can provide a good challenge if you increase the difficulty and/or go after some of the optional bosses. There are also some other games that are well liked, such as Horizon, Vanillaware games (Odin Sphere and Dragon's Crown), Persona 5, etc.

What saved W3's combat for me is good gibbing.

lmao

I think bloodborne had a better aesthetic and tons more replayability, but sekiro had such a strong first playthrough

yeah that's what i thought. you got nothing to say because this game easily has the best combat system ever made. go back 2 double dragon brainlet

Not him, but I just went back to TW3 after not playing it since release because I never played the expansions, and despite being one of my favourite games at the time it was staggering to me how fucking horrible the movement, camera control, responsiveness of the controls, and hitboxes are. I'm not saying that a lot of combat isn't subjective, and I will definitely concede that the STRUCTURE of witcher combat is interesting, but it objectively plays poorly because of how badly it's executed. That being said, I still think it's a great game in spite of that.

the music was also really good. I didn't mean it was bad, just that it was passable and not what made me enjoy it

lmao mad

The best art direction in Souls. Also, Bloodborne is a step away from Souls and towards action games: they removed shields, revamped parrying and rewarded aggression returning some of you lost hp if you land an attack after taking damage.

some people feel that dark souls movement and combat is too slow and calculated
you can play bloodborne more fast and loose and it's a little more exciting because of it
instead of blocking with shields your main defense is dodging
but dodging isnt the slow roll like in dark souls its a quickstep move
you have a gun but that is more of a parry move than a traditional vidya gun weapon
aside from combat and mechanics the atmosphere is pretty cool, detailed victorian lovecravtian worlds with more monster type werewolflike enemies
story is pretty sparse in the same vein as dark souls, you have to put in the effort and look for it but it is there and is interesting and veers off into cosmic horror
also has some good cutscenes and moments that are satisfyingly cinematic, framed well and just give off a cool stylistic feeling especially if you are digging what is going on and paying attention to the story
it basically takes the dark souls formula but changes a few things up to make it fresh and exciting while retaining key elements of what made dark souls so good
and the old hunters dlc is fantastic as well

Attached: 1517874583665.jpg (555x800, 41K)

Diablo 2
Dark Souls
Super Mario Galaxy

Bloodborne's sitting somewhere around 30-50 on the top 100 though. You see, I know these things, I know a lot of things actually, for I am omniscient.

Only thing holding it back is the console it comes on and the chalice dungeons but it is definitely my favorite from game

this. SNES and PS2 are the 2 greatest consoles ever

agreed about witcher 3. combat is the sore spot of that game. honestly it'd be better if it was straight turn based, it's that bad. it's so goddamned bad. that's why i have replayed every souls game multiple times despite owning the entire witcher trilogy. the gameplay is totally subpar in the witcher which inevitably leads me back to souls

well said

it really is a shame, because the world and story is amazing. take the bloody baron as an example

what i like about it is the grimm's fairy tales vibe a lot of the quests have. each quest is a ministory, which makes it cool. the only downside is the clunky & bad battle system. imagine if witcher 3 had the souls combat system. holy crap, i would never stop playing.

it's funny recently someone was saying how most people would quit at the bloody baron. that's exactly what i did the first time around. i later picked it back up and played a bit more up to novigrad and a little beyond. eventually though with the stale combat it's hard to say with it. i'm thinking about playing 1 & 2 since i've never played 'em. might keep me interested better in 3, idk.

right now i'm replaying demon's souls and it's so good

It was fun, but for some reason I found it was only good for one play through. Still gave me the feelings that I expect from a souls game, so it was well worth it

between sekiro, bb, ds3 and ds1, I gotta say ds3 has the best boss fights of them. BB comes close 2nd

Why was this game so good?

have you ever played it?

Hopefully it's friendly with Ryzen

i think it has the best spellcasting because of the traditional HP/MP set up. in the later games you can only cast a spell a certain number of times which is completely lame. that and the spells are hidden in the game, just like bloodborne, making playing as a caster that much more unique.

Yeah, but I never finished it. I got to the old church area or whatever and kept getting consistently bored. I didn't have much trouble with it either and it didn't seem that hard. I guess i'm asking because I want to understand why such a large portion of Yea Forums likes sucking dark souls dick so much, Bloodborne included.

looks like the only thing it's friendly with right now is outputting a single error message to the screen. i'll keep my eye on this though for BB replay's sake. although apparently ps5 will be backwards compatible

This.

For some reason, on repeat playthroughs or ng+, l completely lose any and all enjoyment from Bloodborne basically exactly when I get to the forbidden forest. I'm not sure what causes it, but it just pains me to continue playing.

for my first souls game, about halfway through the game it clicked with me. the gameplay is really different from every other videogame. in other games, you die because of shitty game design. in souls games when you die you know why you died because it's your fault. you have much more control over the gameplay and once that clicks with you it becomes unforgettable

At most they will keep framerate the same and just upgrade the resolution in PS5

i'm completely off the PlayStation train so the only thing i have to look forward to about the PS5 is Bloodborne, unironically. My PS3 died 3x before I laid it to rest. PS4 died right after I finished BB but before the expansion came out. I can't keep paying repair costs for shitty hardware so at this point I'm just waiting the generation out

These threads are always just fromshills circlejerking. No one else cares

Nobody cares about your meme game

>story taht's all just a dream
>boss betrays you and revealed as the antagonist (wow didn't see that coming)
>guns yet can't increase amount of ammo you can hold by a decent amount
>can't dual weild guns
>doesn't allow you to play like a tps yet includes guns
>aliens out of nowhere

>samey
this still isnt an argument
essentially a buzzword

its ok cupcake. go back to your shitty sub par game while we discuss the classics

Why do people enjoy this shitty DMC2xRE4 crossover series?

>guns guns guns can't dual wield
go back to counter strike you goddamn brainlet

You thought Echoes was better than the first one?

>DMC2xRE4 crossover series

Attached: 1559520235046.jpg (540x427, 18K)

Echoes was in no way, shape, or form better than the original

lmao the amount of fromdrones circlejerking, can't even counter argument besides wojak posting. really sad desu

Bloodbabs really are a special kind of obnoxious.

Unsurprising though really, combine Lovecraft, Sony and Souls fags, three of the most irritating and masturbatory fanbases in existence and what do you get?

Attached: botw.jpg (700x913, 111K)

Confession time:

I have played the souls series, and finished them. I liked them. I have played Sekiro. I liked it too.

I put in Bloodborne, expecting to also like it. I did, until I got to the first real boss. The werewolf hunter guy. FUCK that right and FUCK whoever designed it.

You guys can tell me to git gud all day, but that fight is fucking cancer. Up until that point, the fucking pistols were worthless and did nothing. Oh, but not in this fight. In this fight the fucking things are essential to stagger him so he doesn't rape you instantaneous. How the fuck would I know that. Not that it even matters, because you fight in a fucking arena with a thousand fucking tombstones. Can you clip through them? Absolutely not. Can the boss clip through them? OF COURSE HE CAN. How many fucking times did I try to position myself a little better, only to hit a fucking tombstone and be stuck for the millisecond it took for that boss to unleash a 0 to kill combo. Too many fucking times.

Nothing in any souls game feels as unfair as the first fucking fight in this stupid fucking game. The rest of the game might be amazing. I wouldn't fucking know. I never beat the boss and I never played the fucking game again. Holy shit I have never been angrier at a game in my entire life.


Also, fuck the stupid Victorian setting too.

sekiro is better

have you tried rolling or side stepping?

It doesn't matter how I move when every time I do, I hit another fucking tombstone

I couldn't get into it. I found the combat dull, the animations far too exaggerated, and the narrative paper thin. I liked the world building and art design, but the combat really didn't do anything for me.
And before you say it, no I didn't find it too hard.

Attached: jokes-about-italians-fb__700-png.jpg (700x368, 27K)

you're an idiot. the gameplay in bloodborne is nothing like either of those 2 games

for a souls veteran, i must say, you fell for one of the classic blunders. for what it's worth, i never used the gun/stun mechanic and beat him just fine. bloodborne is different you just gotta get a feel for it

did you seriously fucking tap out at gascoigne?
and you've played all the other games?
idk what to tell you man shit, maybe look up a video of how someone else does it, not a pro no hit run streamer but like some regular ass guy
you're not understanding some mechanic or something
the tombstones are a hindrance yes but its not /that/ bad
you can do it I believe in you

lol @ that pic. the narrative is actually much richer than the other souls games as you go

I just don't believe you. I would actually go as far to say that entire post is make believe.

If you've finished the rest of the souls series, then you'd have at the very least the temperament required to get past Gascoigne. Like, there's no feasible reality within my mind that what you described could be possible unless you were drunk and thus drunkenly impatient, or had simply run past everything without levelling up or amassing blood vials for the fight.

Because Gascoigne's perfectly beatable even without parrying, which, for any experienced player, would completely and utterly trivialise the fight. But simply dodging in, spamming a few quick R1's, dodging out, rinse and repeat, would allow you to succede at the fight eventually. Did you only try like 5 times?

Best game of this generation. Though it didn’t have a whole lot of competition. Not the goat. Not even close.

second'ed. i'd throw my summon sign down if my ps4 wasn't d.e.d.

I know right. Dodge spamming and then staggering your enemies to death is the epitome of interesting combat.
Fuck off. BB's combat was shallow as fuck. Parrying was easier than ever, stamina may as well not exist because you hardly use any to dodge and it regenerates at the speed of light. Nearly every boss is a glass cannon with easily exploitable weak spots, the hardest thing about fighting most of them is maintaining control of the camera. The combat was the worst it's ever been unless you're just looking for a casual faceroll.

>most greatest
soulsfags are braindead

Here’s your (you). Now kill yourself you baitposting shitter

What an awful list.

the plot for all souls games besides Demons Souls and Sekiro are paper thin

Nameless itinerant amnesiac guy has to put an end to a crumbling, ruined society/nightmare

The background lore is compelling I guess, though. More in the sense that reading through a glossary or a synopsis of past events can be sometimes quite interesting.

>that filename

Attached: summer.jpg (1224x1124, 428K)

>lacks the most important aspect that makes me not replay it: good combat
same could be said for darkborne R1 simulators.

>If you've finished the rest of the souls series, then you'd have at the very least the temperament required to get past Gascoigne
lol, that's what i love about the souls games. players of the series share a common brotherhood, a common understanding, whereby we recognize each other's capabilities just from having passed the trials alone

I got it from Google images you cretin.

Why do we have shills for this still?

ok then, name a game with better combat. i'll wait

If it didn’t go to shit after shadows of yharnam it could have been a contender for game of the decade.

But the reality is Bloodborne never really sold well so don’t get your hopes up for a sequel. And the difficulty is too easy after gascoigne or BSB

for sure but bloodborne has probably like 3 or 4x as much story development as the other games. story in the other games is a joke compared to bloodborne, especially ds3

Just bought a PS4 for it so yeah. Haven’t really had this much fun with a pancake game in a while, have too much time being a vrfag

the fact that you saved it at all is my issue

Attached: fmp.jpg (704x532, 30K)

cringe

>15 hours
>recycled game of the same franchise
>dull one-dimension combat
No, this is not quite possibly "the most greatest" game of all time. Acquire taste, brain cells and grammatical skills.

Sekiro

Attached: 746E87AB-C400-425C-AEB7-A758827AE204.jpg (1024x576, 102K)

>Nameless amnesiac
That’s a weird criticism. It’s a blank slate character in an rpg. You name them. You make them into what you want. The characters don’t have amnesia. But maybe if you want them to it doesn’t hurt the story?

kys

Attached: 1555902554467.gif (500x376, 697K)

>pancake game
a what now?

Attached: 1493152443286.png (320x532, 52K)

Idk what to say. It's true, and I wasn't impaired fighting him. I have beaten and like I said, enjoyed, the other from software titles. I'm sure I could have cheesed out the fight by using extra healing items or whatever. And I'm also sure I could have beaten it if I tried a little bit harder. I tried for maybe an hour.

But I was so fucking offended that this fight got into the game in the state it was in that I seriously was not interested in the rest of what the game had to offer. And I'm still not. It might be one of the most poorly designed fights I've ever seen in any game, let alone a from game.

i knew you were gonna say that you absolute faggot. sekiro doesn't count because it was released afterward. i'm sure elden ring will have better combat than demon's souls but it's a pointless comparison

oh, please humor me with your definition of better combat

>If you don't like this overrated game then you only have a PC
Look at this retard.

lmao fuck off gascoigne is one of the best bosses across all of from's game. hes forever gunna be filtering casuals

DMC series.
Bayonetta.
Nioh.
Dragon Age.
Yakuza.

Go ahead, put those games in meme arrows and sperg out, won't change the fact your franchise has brain dead combat that consists of walking up to things and pressing R1, no combos, special skills or interactivity whatsoever (outside of weapon transformation that boreborne shills inflate to the moon and back because it's the only new thing they have that dark souls doesn't).

It's more relating to the fact that the Main Character in souls games have literally no relevance to any sort of plot whatsoever. There is no story surrounding them. It makes you feel more like an archaeologist exploring some old ruin rather than a character within a narrative, as was the original point of contention.

Bloodborne at the very least has the interesting notion of ascendancy to contend with, elevating its main character from self insert to vaguely, somewhat, but not really very interesting at all nameless itinerant from some land here or there.

All of this can be an interesting way of telling stories, like a history book. But I personally find the item-lore way of storytelling From employs to be a complete and utter waste of time. For me it's like buying a book with most it blanked out, then walking up the author who proceeds to tell me various little tidbits and extraneous details. It's not part of a story, there's on "character" or "voice", beyond the developer's own writing.

there is an item you can get to make the fight easier, but it is entirely not needed, just helpful
sometimes if I'm having trouble with a section of a game and I keep dying and trying a million times I will put the game down for the day and try again tomorrow
that has helped me time and time again
for example I was having a tough time with genichiro ashina in Sekiro
turned it off, went to bed, beat it first try the next day
calling it "one of the most poorly designed fights I've ever seen in any game" is ridiculous
many people have beaten this fight, sure it's challenging but it's extremely doable, you just have to figure out what you are doing wrong
because I guarantee you are doing something wrong

Attached: genishin.jpg (1280x720, 247K)

lol

>yakuza
nigger how you gunna cite yakuza as an example of good combat while calling bloodborne's combat brain dead. yakuza has some of the most button mashy, mindless babby combat, easier than even bamham

dude you are trippin' if you think those anime-tier combat systems offer you a better combat system. there's nothing realistic about flying around in the fucking air firing guns in every direction and summoning high heels to kill your enemies. gtfo

Gascoigne is a good boss. But you can hardly justify his placement as the arguable first boss in the game when 90% of the bosses that come after him are far easier. It's amazing that Bloodborne's difficulty peaks at Central Yharnam/Old Yharnam, then nosedives for pretty much the entirety of the game until you get to Ebrietas/Logarius/Gehrman.

Compare it to Dark Souls 3, for example, which starts off much easier, bosses like Iudex, Greatwood and Vordt, then progressing to more challenging content like Abyss Watchers/Pontiff Sulayvahn/Aldrich/Dancer and Ornstein Cosplayer, and finally with Nameless King/Twin Princes/Champion Gundyr and Soul of Cinder. It's a much more natural and forgiving curve.

>It makes you feel more like an archaeologist exploring some old ruin
that's what i love about. the metroid games which came before were no different. it's not everybody's cup of tea, but to me, that's what movies are for and i'm glad there's an alternative to experience

>yakuza
>dragon age
LMAO

It was less about the boss and more about the arena you have to fight him in. Those fucking tombstones.

>>yakuza
>>dragon age
>LMAO
LOL ikr. i'm dying

>he doesn't use the tombstones to his advantage
use your head user

idk i thought he was easy as crap. went down like a paper tiger. all i did was explore the whole level, which is very big, before i faced off with him. at that point it was a cakewalk. not to mention after you explore you can actually summon 1 or 2 npcs into the fight with you if you really need it

>meanwhile in R1borne

Attached: 1548157933726.webm (768x432, 2.98M)

what are you even trying to show here brainlet?

only retarded faggots only play with r1. what the fuck is all this about r1borne? there are tons of combos in this game. all of the weapons transform and the transform button also has it's own separate combo. this is nothing less than brainlets playing bloodborne with r1 and then complaining that they're brainlets and not having fun. well no shit sherlock

Attached: 1550611817780.jpg (720x736, 32K)

I feel like Sekiro has considerably diminished the challenge of the previous games for me.

I beat Bloodborne for the first time in over 2 years dying around 10 times over the game. I beat Orphan without dying. I wasn't even proud of myself, I was just disappointed. It felt a hollow victory. The parrying, especially the timing felt so much more on-point and natural, an instinctive reaction rather than a planned response. The dodging/dashing felt like a magic invincibility button.

>there are tons of combos in this game
List them, you already listed the transform attack (1 combo), go ahead and tell me about the rest of the ton of combos in your most greatest game of all time's fabled combat.

go read the wiki and lern2play you fucking brainlet. each weapon has separate movesets which combo differently depending on which order you use your moves and your timing

that's just how it goes. i'm sure some people thought ds3 was hard but for me it was a cakewalk because the gameplay hasn't changed too much since demon's souls. i still enjoy it. that's just how it is. the more you do something, if you're not a brainlet that is, the better you should be getting at it

bitch what other games, that was my first post in the while thread. this is why you negroborne are such a fucking joke, when people critics you shitty edgesouls you have nothing to counter besides wojakposting or ‘have you played it' ‘nuh game>your game' ‘git gud'. the fact that you can't even defend it by pointing out why the game is actually good, it's the most solid proof that the game is nothing but trash. you fags are nothing but a bunch of drones fanboys

Yes

why the fuck does it look so much better than all the souls game combined?

the game is primarily centered around and is made interesting by enemies have a decent list of short, long, and multi-combo moves and you as a player requiring a good understanding of the moveset and how to counter them. Even though, you only have a handset of moves, it works perfectly with how the enemies moves. I'd rather have that than fuckin memorize long button inputs and cuhrazy combos that you dont remember after a week.

and that makes you a faggot for posting in this thread. go back 2 farmville you fucking faggot

the power of the S-Team, Japan Studio

>enemies move cool
>WHAO IS THIS LIKE, BEST COMBAT EVER?

>i have no actual counter arguement so i'll act like a brainlet

Attached: 1541393450942.png (4844x1728, 360K)

>no u

Lame 2d games (non-vr)

Definitely bayonetta and ninja gaiden.

I'm about to play this game but I'm a little tipsy and I don't want to stop these old 90s Shakira tunes.

Can I play this with Shakira blasting in the background?

Some enemies have audio signals of impending attacks but drunk Bloodborne and drunk Sekiro are good times

If you're a tranny weeb then yeah

>dude just check the wiki and paly the game!!!!
As expected from a soulsfag.
I played this game way more than you did by the way, shill.

Thanks, I've been scrolling around video games and started shitposting but now I think I'll just play bb with pop music.