GTAIV

>how DARE you have fond memories of this game!!!

you old fucks bitch too much

Attached: 1532279042321.jpg (935x935, 80K)

The co-op missions like Bomb Da Base II were really fun. Sad no one ever played the Cops and Robbers game mode

Which was your favorite car in GTA IV?

/BLISTA COMPACT/ here.

Attached: BlistaCompact.jpg (1252x694, 210K)

>Money was completely worthless
Like in every GTA?

I never said it was "peak R*" you dumb faggot. I just remember having fun in a video game, unlike you who is so jaded.

Attached: 12b.png (1199x630, 1.19M)

O TEBEEEEEEE

youtu.be/1uY-goxZ-tc

Attached: Untitled5.jpg (1920x1080, 289K)

The story of what happened to RDR's multiplayer is truly fascinating and it isn't talked about enough.

>tfw remember all the dialogue when you ride in Roman's taxi with the Indian driver
There was so much depth to GTA IV

Why does RDR1 feel so much more atmospheric? I don’t think it’s just nostalgia because I went back and played it and still feel it.

>gta iv comes out
>Yea Forums shits in it saying that gta San Andreas was the best gta ever and iv is SOULESS
>gta v comes out
>Yea Forums shits in it saying that gta iv was the best gta ever and v is SOULESS

they're both right though, each game has comparatively less soul with V being the most soulless

Isn't that the one were you play as a shqiptar?

art direction

Soul in R* died with GTA 4. Vice City remains the most soulful game they ever made.

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 162K)

My favorite car is the esperanto

Attached: Esperanto-GTAIV-FrontQuarter.png (1600x900, 1.52M)

>puts shitty filter over game that blurs HUD and runs it in widescreen
>thinks he knows what soul is

lmao typical faggot

>Properties
>Cars
>Various different weapons, rather than the choice of sub-machine gun A vs sub-machine gun B
>Car modifications
>Businesses

didn't modding clans get pissed at eachother and they broke the game with the undead overrun glitch?

Yeah, then Rockstar made it backwards compatible on the Xbone, and the glitch carried over. They knew the multiplayer was broken but did nothing about it.

Can’t wait until it becomes fully emulatable

GTA IV has the greatest intro in the series. Arriving on the boat, driving with a drunk roman in his shitty cab, to his shitty apartment and finding out he lied to Niko about his life.

I love it.

>going autistic over screencaps from Google
Really nigger?

This. Now we can all agree that V was the best GTA

I think it's the music and desolate landscapes.

>mode: free roam
>area: airport
>weapons: RPG
>police: off
>friendly fire: off
>whether: rainy

Attached: 1445913136579.gif (645x623, 7K)

I also ran into people who had undead weapons in free roam. They would freeze your system if you got killed by them.

I feel like GTA IV was the last game I had a childish adoration for. I'm rewatching clips from it and I''m reminded of just how much time I spent in that game doing nothing.

I played it for hundreds of hours, yet I never 100% the game, because I felt no need to "do stuff" when I played it, I just had fun, I had my favorite landmarks on the map, I loved just spending time in the world, I never got tired of it. I didn't need a purpose to play the game, didn't need to be doing anything. I could just drive over to the Burger Shot near the highway and spend time pushing people down the little gap for 30 minutes and have fun watching euphoria doing its thing.

Attached: Carson-Street-GTAIV-Longshot.png (1600x900, 2.5M)

Attached: 13FB2FC1-F6C1-45D2-89DD-D20D92FED6E8.gif (400x400, 389K)

Vice City was great and the most memorable GTA story for me but SA was the best in terms of literally everything else.

>shootouts:the game

>police:off
gay

i was pushing npc too but in broker above brucie's garage. good times.

watch this webm you fucking zoomers and then tell me again that RDR2 has good gunplay you fags

GTA IV is the best GTA ever made.

No rockstar game apart from Max Payne has good gun play. I don't understand why they didn't just port it over to their open-world games.

Probably because people fast traveled a lot less due to the horses going 200mph

Max Payne gunplay is vastly overrated. In fact, RDR1 has much better gunplay.

This, I had a whole crew in GTA4, we made our own fun like having boxing matches on top of skyscrapers. GTA:O everyone just cares about getting money so they can buy the next big thing to kill you with. While GTA4 freeroam was still a generl deathmatch, it wasn't as unbalanced as GTA:O unless you joined a server with someone who was really good at annihilator strafing which took a degree of skill.

The point was that it was a deathmatch but you could only kill people with physics i.e. running them over with cars or blowing them over with an rpg (the explosion won't damage tham but fall damage from getting BTFO by an rpg will).

>spend time pushing people down the little gap for 30 minutes and have fun watching euphoria doing its thing.
my nigger

Attached: eEM2cy5lwzU.jpg (864x1080, 259K)

D-Don't post pics like that!

Attached: 51.gif (367x265, 565K)

youtube.com/watch?v=Vhn8CgnovpI

comfy sounds to get drunk to under the train tracks

Attached: ny broadway 1915.jpg (1920x1080, 595K)

>Can't wait to see threads about how GTA V and RDR2 were peak Rockstar in 5-8 years when the zoomers who grew up with them are old enough to post here.
Honestly, in terms of atmosphere, story, world RDR2 is by far the peak Rockstar. As for GTA V I doubt that many people consider it among the best entries in the franchise.

oh okay... im sorry...

Attached: IMG_0469.jpg (1080x1350, 119K)

>Liking a shitty CRX knock-off.
At least pick a RWD car.

HE SAID STOP

Attached: 6 - KZyT8Dt.gif (80x100, 10K)

RDR2 has improved euphoria physics my contrarian friend

Attached: 2019-06-11_8-30-00_AM-x0aidexh.jpg (3840x2160, 1.52M)

Name?

Never cared for sports car, and FWD is straight up cooler.

it's the opposite. people who played 4 as teens couldnt appreciate the mature themes in it and say san andreas was better because they played that one when they were 13. disliking 4 is a mark of zoomer.

I agree with everything except
>The vehicles handled fucking awfully.
It caught me off guard for sure but it ended up being pretty fun. Can't say the same about pretty much every other aspect of the game. The missions in particular are gutter trash in IV.

The radio skits are the best part of any modern GTA.

Attached: 123123354354.jpg (500x616, 77K)

The Uranus.
>hoonigan boyz

I think 1s atmosphere was a lot better. 2 can feel kind of bland

>imagine believing that shit

lololol physics are shit in RDR2, everything is floaty.
Don't get me wrong, I love the game but you're just a blind fanboy.

>The missions in particular are gutter trash in IV.

story and missions are WAY better than in V, though. Also you had choices.
Missions in Vice City were better, but that's a very high standard.

When it comes to shoot outs it's objectively improved over 1 though I don't know how you can look at that example to try and argue that 1 was better in that regard.

While not my favorite R* game, RDR2 is far superior to 1. RDR1 has got to be one of the most overrated games I have ever seen. It's basically just a glorified ubisoft game.

In many ways it ruined the series now they focus on the pointless friend system and put very few activities in the world, it's the opposite of San Andreas.

Now go a-vay! Head dick!

2 feels more like an Ubisoft game than 1 does

As a SA fag, I can't fucking wait for the V kids to grow up and torment the IV fags

The fortune-teller and courtroom drama in IV and almost every Weazel News alert in V are top-tier audio comedy

>story and missions are WAY better than in V, though
That's a lie. I can't remember a mission from IV that wasn't drive-shoot-drive back. Even if they were linear, missions in V had you doing weird shit and even when they featured heavy shootouts, they kept mixing up the environments and circumstances. The importance of choice is completely overblown anyway because no one other than a handful of autists did the cute way unless it was on accident.

as a IV fag, I fucking enjoyed watching shitty overrated SA get forgotten by all the zoomers pretending to be millenials in this thread.

I like how IVs missions were mostly just shooting guys, it fit the games more serious nature and the shooting was satisfying. It was great going through an area like the museum or sprunk factory

Same/

Shootouts are shit in RDR2 because the controls are shit, there are way less guns than in RDR1, the firing rate is off for a lot of the weapons, it's unresponsive and the ragdolls are much less real.
The only thing that's a vast improvement is dead-eye.

I agree. I wish more missions used the hand to hand combat though. R* has a bad habit of designing brilliant hand to hand fighting systems and then rarely using them.

>there are way less guns than in RDR1
this is a positive though, too many guns in 1 were completely redundant

SA isn't overrated it's a special game that was the biggest sandbox of its era with a 90s setting and actors and rappers out the ass all coming together perfectly

Attached: 1559761518322.png (493x529, 174K)

Even if the shooting mechanics were improved, I would still say the extra input lag when moving around makes the game a lot less fun overall. It feels like Arthur never moves as responsively as you want him too

>more choice is redundant

are you retarded? If you don't like some weapons then don't use them that doesn't mean less weapon choices are better than more.

>not realising that SA was the start of simulation style elements by introducing RPG elements and a dating system

IV just picked the simulation elements and decided to double down on them. I like it a lot-- I'm actually torn as to whether VC or IV is my favourite GTA.

lmao stick to fortnite.

Attached: 015.png (434x327, 37K)

>tfw can't decide between replaying GTA IV + EFLC or replaying RDR 2 + 1

Attached: 1517864707838.jpg (311x278, 14K)

it was a good game, I'm just bantering - just not my cup of tea - I dislike the whackyness and randomness even though the game had its moments.
Someone in this thread said that GTA IV was literally the opposite of SA and I agree.

I like both games for what they are but IV is just exactly my lane.

It's scope is impressive to this day, but I wouldn't say it came together "perfectly". There's a lot of inconsequential fluff you could cut.

RDR2 has a bigger range of weapon mechanics though. You're just arguing for meaningless divisions

how is a useless choice not redundant? what is the point of having 20 weapons in your weapon wheel at the end of the day when you use two at most? you fucking zoomers need to learn about restraint and benefits of lean design.

>Do i fit in yet guise? XD

what does that have to do with anything you retarded newfag

go back to RDR1 gunplay + controls are vastly better than RDR2s. That's a fucking fact. Literally the only legitimate criticism about the game was unresponsiveness and shitty controls and floaty and wonky physics - which is exactly what impacts the gunplay you meme-spouting underage subhuman cunt

that's a man, baby

No there isn't

>RDR1 gunplay + controls are vastly better than RDR2s. That's a fucking fact.
No it isn't, stop crying zoomer.

RDR2’s controls have more precision, this is a fact that has been proven.

>which is exactly what impacts the gunplay you meme-spouting underage subhuman cunt
Yeah, it makes it less like fortnite, which is apparently the only game you've ever played because you're a little squirt, heh.

Attached: bb3b8bdd101a19d72c8a67e16a73c3881df81bdfr1-380-349v2_00.jpg (380x349, 26K)

Saint's Row continued the legacy of SA, while Read Dead continued the legacy of IV. It seems fairly balanced.

RDR1 wasn’t considered a fast game at the time. RDR2 is just so ungodly slow, unresponsive and sluggish that it makes the first game look quite rapid in comparison.

>what is the point of having 20 weapons in your weapon wheel at the end of the day when you use two at most?

>me! me! me! Everything is about me!
>Don't give other people choices to use what they may prefer, they all have to use MY favorite 2 guns

you sound like a retard desu

but almost all of them look and feel the same

>RDR2’s controls have more precision, this is a fact that has been proven.
Shill. The only criticism about the game was controls are you delusional?
>RDR1 is more like Fortnite than RDR2
wow, what a great argument and comparison

You're the one trying to argue that RDR1 has more variety than 2 despite that variety largely boiling down to cosmetics whereas 2 has more mechanically and getting butthurt about it lol

Mine fav car is on OP pic.

all 8 pistols had different calibers in RDR1, all felt different. There was an anti-tank rifle, a blunderbuss, a buffalo rifle, lots of awesome shit.

When have you last played the game? I went through RDR1 directly before playing 2.

>RDR2 is bad because it's less like Fortnite!

lol okay kid

Attached: dab.gif (931x682, 426K)

Hardly anyone criticized the controls, the vast consensus was that they are a huge improvement over 1, which they are.

never disputed the fact that RDR2 has more mechanical variety (crafting different arrows etc) but is that really what matters?
I said the gunplay was shit, if you remember where this conversation started.
Also I said RDR1 had more guns than RDR2 which is still a fact.

not rdr1horse user, he's a little autistic.

The schofield doesn't feel the same as the SAA it packs more of a punch and you can feel it

>Hardly anyone criticized the controls, the vast consensus was that they are a huge improvement over 1, which they are.

alright, you're trolling.
8/10, had me good.

Attached: 1514226465262.png (326x160, 27K)

The LCS and VCS are slept on as well.

>but is that really what matters?
no of course not, being able to say you have more cosmetical variety is what truly matters when we're talking about gameplay diversity and choice

>I said the gunplay was shit, if you remember where this conversation started.
Yeah, and one of your "reasons" for this was the better selection you got in 1, which is wrong.

Good damn, euphoria is beautiful thing

But GTA4 was shit compared to SA and VC it was a huge fucking disappointment.

Black sentinel

Attached: 274173-2015-06-26-00001.jpg (1680x1050, 81K)

The only criticism was that some of the prompts were annoying, that’s it. But basically everyone acknowledges that moving around and horse riding allowed for more precision and control than 1

you named guns from three different categories so of course they feel different. what I'm saying is that you could cut revolver, repeater, and shotgun categories in half and no one would be able to tell the difference.

Attached: Sultan_(GTA4)_(front).jpg (1238x685, 158K)

>BMW
>
>Lexus
>Toyota

>But basically everyone acknowledges that moving around and horse riding allowed for more precision and control than 1

Your "opinion" made me laugh out loud. There is no way in hell someone actually believes this. You're either being paid to shill for Rockstar and other companies on here or you're trolling.

The controls are almost the same actually but 2 has more shit going on. The L2 button now interacts with people all you could do was tip your hat in RDR1. You tap X to ride horses in both games and they have more stamina in 2

It's just different. It wasn't trying to be like VC and SA in the first place.

>try to have a melee fight
>get shot in the face with a shotgun

so much soul
youtube.com/watch?v=vnw1SAMlUrU

Good taste. Mine was Blista Compact and the Sentinel.

worked on my machine. ;)

People have posted webms to prove it. 2’s controls are more precise

wow the game has a bug, I guess it has zero soul now.

Sabre, every game

Fuck, this thread makes me wanna play it again. But the PC port is so dogshit that I'm not sure if it is worth it.

>People have posted webms to prove it. 2’s controls are more precise

When the game was released everyone was shitting on the controls. You are retarded. Just because some fanboys managed (a year after release) to nitpick some good webms doesn't mean the controls aren't shit.

You are delusional or have never played a game in your life if you think RDR2 has good controls.

Which safehouse was best? Playboy or Middle Park

Playboy loft was nice because you killed a bitch nigga for it, but the high-end apartment in Middle Park was classy as fuck.

Attached: 1560647387015.png (1366x797, 1.14M)

You could get a nice little pile of people at that spot. Especially the fat bikers.

Pirated a version with both DLCs 2 years ago, played it on a toaster (win10) with 50+ fps. Don't know how the game reacts to new hardware though.

Playboy loft is soulless as fuck

Attached: 1530429378194.png (1920x1080, 2.17M)

V never managed to outdo this station
that blonde shit is alright, but this station had jams that had you gun ready during those missions.

I know a lot of you will disagree with me, but VI needs to return back to Liberty City. VC is gonna feel too much like Los Santos.

Attached: 1558901139401.png (703x457, 99K)

Bohan, every day. I love Bohan so much.

Attached: SouthBohansafehouse-GTA4-exterior.jpg (1280x1024, 253K)

yeah, because you removed his soul from it. wish the hoes stuck around after you pushed him out.

Here are the webms that prove it. Compare this...

Attached: 775F9D05-9CED-4964-B91C-8C61AB332448.jpg (125x70, 2K)

>mfw takin' that bitchy materialistic nurse there to doggy that mami cunny on a ratty mattress after she ragged on my shoes and ride
never got old

Attached: 1543577991045.jpg (640x633, 42K)

This
The shittier apartments had a lot more personality
My fav hangout was the biker bar in TlaD

Oops, I meant this

Attached: 1560898531087.webm (640x360, 1.74M)

The steam version keeps bugging out. Why?

That's where you should stop playing

And compare it to this. As you can see, 1 is much more imprecise and awkward

Attached: 1560898596940.webm (640x360, 2.86M)

Middle park east because its your own (well actually romans) home

But killing the security in playboys safehouse's lobby is always fun

>input lag and imprecision is the same thing as the characters animation taking some time to turn around

you must be completely stupid.
go PLAY rdr1. It's responsive. It's direct. It feels good, headshots feel good.
Then go play RDR2.

The controls in 1 are better.

To this!

Attached: havesex.png (498x561, 268K)

San Andreas is still the best GTA game. Even though you play as a nigger

i wonder who would survive a firefight, sprinty mc slow-turnaround or chad marston

wow look at how much higher the FOV is in the original. Looks so much better.

>based CJ who got his family out of the shitty hood and made a business man of himself.
>nigger

VCPR and KCHAT are the best though

>tfw instead of this we got that chinatown turd

Attached: LosSantosStories.jpg (494x762, 39K)

The only mission I remember from IV was the one where you chase the bikers which are bulletproof until you arrive at your destination. Bunch of fucking bullshit.
GTA IV killed the fun in the genre.

Vice City Stories

my nigga

you're honestly correct, in hindsight.

Sultan RS

Attached: Sultan_RS_(GTA4).jpg (360x450, 27K)

You don't remember the Point Break/Heat mission in GTAIV? It's basically the only good mission in the whole game.

rdr2 is better than 1

Not even close

ok kid

Because you played it as a child little zoom zoom.

this. I used to drive around the city and fuck around because driving felt so good and the peds would react in so many different ways, watching traffic was fun too, GTa 5 didn't have this for me as much.

I'd consider SA more memorable, but respect your opinion, even though you are a straight busta.

>NEWS AND SPORTS, THAT OUR SPONSORS AGREE ON
>WCTR
>TIGHT END ZONE WITH DERECK THAAAACKERY
>MARVIN TRILL
>THE THING ABOUT MADAWG IS, I'M THINKIN ABOUT BECOMING A SUPERSTAR
based.

Futo GT

Attached: 1533239140432.jpg (1024x576, 109K)

Nah zoomie, people who like 4 are the kind who jerk off to obshitian games because they're sooooooo deep.

Not him but is that Three-Leaf Clover? It's the only one I remember, part because it was actually decent for once and part because I kept failing it over and over thanks to bloodthirsty cops spawning behind me just as I'm done clearing an area

my fucking nigga.

GTA IV was the most disappointing gta Rockstar ever released. I remember everyone hating it, but still playing it cause at least it was newer.

Attached: 59295042_2278566562358366_6988106764927369216_n.jpg (694x760, 81K)

Yeah, that's the one. One of the few times in GTAIV I wasn't bored shitless.

Imagine still liking the 3D era GTA games in 2019. Those games have aged like milk. They looked like shit even back then. The ragdoll physics in IV onward spoiled me as well.

What's their peak in your opinion you high and mighty little bitch?

You're thinking of 5.

No, by far 4. The level was shit, the vehicles were shit, the game felt too realistic and clunky, and the whole thing was overly serious. The humor also fell flat or was super dry. And the color, holy fuck you can only stare at brown for so long.

Game was a terrible direction of the series and I'm glad Rockstar did a 180 with GTA V which became a monster success and the best GTA ever.

Attached: jVy6kuZ.png (701x670, 687K)

By making room for it by leaving out fun.

no, you mean 5

okie dokie Mikejay

Attached: 1554443036403.gif (360x360, 1.5M)

controls like shit and characters are bland steriotypes

I'd much rather have a serious GTA game. Rockstar's style of humor is reddit tier garbage, and it REALLY showed with V. I don't remember a single thing from V because every shitty joke was like a the men in black memory wiper.

>GTA V which became a monster success and the best GTA ever.
You were 100% right until this bit.

lol nah

RDR, sure. GTA IV was a dour mess.

GTA V was a monster success because of the online mode. Nobody gives a shit about the story.

4! It's 4!

Attached: based picard.jpg (1280x720, 39K)

Do we have to post more examples? Look how this looks...

Attached: 1560898100082.webm (960x540, 2.8M)

>GTA IV was a dour mess.
shitty taste. the story was better than 5's

GTA IV was peak rockstar
go play Saints Row if you cant handle it

Attached: 1538873338325.gif (320x454, 1.93M)

Compared to this. Notice how the controls in 2 are much more fluid and precise

Attached: 1560898164522.webm (960x540, 2.89M)

Are you saying GTA V isn't the most popular game ever, and still teaches top viewership and player counts?

Shut up, you left nipple!

Attached: the-four-lights-6.jpg (1000x764, 44K)

Red dead redemption for pc when?

GTA 4 was boring. Fucking grey and concrete everywhere. Even the park areas felt dull like that.

Only zoomers prefer gta4 because that's the one they grew up on

You're thinking of GTAOnline, that is a separate game to GTA 5.

>V is the best GTA ever
>no it isn't
>are you saying V isn't the most popular game ever?
you wot m8

Name? She looks like someone I know... just wanna make sure

>Only zoomers prefer gta4 because that's the one they grew up on
but you're arguing the newer version is better, which is definitely the one zoomers prefer...

I think the park areas in IV actually feel especially cozy

That's not a compliment. The game was an aimless slog, the driving mechanics were broken, the city was the worst in GTA history, the engine couldn't draw fast enough to keep up with the player.
It was a bad game from a technical and narrative standpoint. You can keep making these threads every day, it's obvious you can't help it, but that fact doesn't change.

>she

>Only zoomers prefer gta4
pretty sure you mean contrarians and fedorafags

They're exactly the same thing.

I thought a lot of the missions were pretty good. Not all, but it had a decent ratio. Definitely better than its main competition at the time, Saints Row 3.

...no? people only play online - no one gives a fuck about GTA 5's story, characters, or location. :)

>It was a bad game from a technical and narrative standpoint.
And 5 isn't why exactly?
>3 characters no one gives a shit about
>a story no one remembers
>fast cars need to be slowed down so the engine can manage to keep up with you going above 50
get fucked kiddo

Playboy's. I have always killed him for his place.

My nigga.

The horses in 1 were designed to go from place to place as fast as possible. It’s shocking how much faster the horses in 1 feel. Makes it more fun to ride.

V being bad doesn't excuse IV being bad

GTA IV sold tens of millions of copies years before online was released.

I'd say that the first third of the game was great at the time because of the novelty, then it hit a snag for the entire middle part and started dragging in all regards, and then it all picked up toward the end when the story started ramping up. The missions were still pretty much the same but at least there were some stakes.

but if they are both bad why are you arguing so hard for one over the other? Unless you have some particularly strange love for the trash fire that was 5.

>this fucking trailer
youtube.com/watch?v=kOZ8bRAO7YQ

Attached: Dolan hng.png (726x1024, 926K)

weren't we talking about gta5/gtaonline? wtf does 4 have to do with it? the bottom line is no one cares about GTA 5, even the zoomers, they just play GTA online and fuck in the RP servers. Name one memorable moment from the story. I'll give you one from 4, the part at the end when you shoot the guy in the head up on the crane or whatever, and you could choose to spare him or not.

>You tap X to ride horses in both games and they have more stamina in 2
The tapping in 1 was way less demanding, you basically tapped like once every 4 gallops to keep the speed up and this made stamina in irrelevant. Meanwhile in 2 it feels like you have to mash and mash, feels like twice per gallop at least or you really slow down.

horse riding in RDR2 is pure sex
especially with slender arabian horses

my FUCKIN nigger

>piss off 20+ taxi drivers by punching their windows
>"STUPID MALAKA"
>climb on top of car
>watch them try and punch me only for them to punch each other
>jump in the crowd and try to fight them all

Attached: IMG_2879.png (321x335, 76K)

I see this sort of shit posted here constantly and the posts reek of the "old good new bad" meme. Genuinely im curious in what way is it better?

JAI JAI RAM SIYA RAM
JAI JAI RAM SIYA RAM
JAI JAI RAM SIYA RAM
JAI JAI RAM SIYA RAM
JAI JAI RAM SIYA RAM
JAI JAI RAM SIYA RAM

Cognoscenti and the Schafter with black rims

Attached: 1453334403_sunny.jpg (1920x1080, 1.22M)

Playboy

I was hoping someone would post this
youtube.com/watch?v=Ws29mtfOgHQ&t=344s

what r* did with gta 4 can never be replicated
too fucking good

test

Soul/soullessfags need to be eradicated.

Max Payne 3 is more memorable imo.

Because you're a faggot.

shooting is much better in rdr 2, as are hit reactions. The input lag is annoying but rdr was laggy as fuck too if you played it on a ps3

GTA VI legitimately need to bring this back. It's next gen, they have no excuse

>youtube.com/watch?v=Ws29mtfOgHQ&t=344s
KINO

youtube.com/watch?v=jqE8M2ZnFL8

I obviously meant 5,retard.

t. kid who never did story missions in any gta and just dicked around

I suppose it’s because 1 feels a lot more like a spaghetti Western in its presentation, not to mention the overworld music was a lot more pronounced and catchier. I’m honestly kind of confused how people like you act as if this is complicated. 2 has a very different atmosphere.

Mallorie gave me a fetish for Brooklyn/Bronx accents. Because of her I cum buckets to Arianna Knight

You see soul.
I see an accurate pastiche of America, in all its soulless wonder.

GTA4 is overrall worse than SA but anyone complaining about the handling in 4 needs to git gud

pure kino

i think IV and SA honestly have different strengths and weaknesses. SA is more arcadey thanks to the engine and roots, IV is more "grounded" (sorta) and realistic (sorta). different strokes for different folks, but neither are inherently worse than the other.

I liked Playboy's because you could leave via the balcony, and enter via the fire escape

GTA 4 is for StoryChads

San Andreas and GTA 5 are fun themeparks

Vice City is for based boomers who want to roleplay as Tony Montana and listen to 80's music

Attached: Boomer city.jpg (1280x720, 124K)

didn't you always go back to the girls place?

The Alderney safehouse

Attached: 740B5FB5-C62F-4A75-9D99-724C508045E2.jpg (1280x725, 178K)

I grew up with GTAIII.
Get fucked.

>GTA 4 is for StoryChads
The story was fucking shit

fuck off brainleet zoomer
youtube.com/watch?v=3f48tEnIzHg

>Car modifications
>Cars
>Various different weapons, rather than the choice of sub-machine gun A vs sub-machine gun B

It was exactly this. I only missed properties/businesses, but they are same things to separate them.

Attached: 1534832597186.jpg (320x300, 19K)

it doesn't matter, you know, story never was about this guy or Nico's revenge.

Almost everyone on Yea Forums likes RDR2 better than the first game

Hey OP you accidently posted 4 instead of San Andreas

Attached: 1559156654740.jpg (3000x2997, 729K)

Completely agree.

Vice city was the most soulful
San Andreas was the most fun
4 was like the colour brown, just boring
5 is the most impressive