photorealism is shit. If I wanted to look at realistic trees I would go for a walk in the woods.
artstyle > realism
Photorealism is shit. If I wanted to look at realistic trees I would go for a walk in the woods
Other urls found in this thread:
Based user, sadly the vidya industry is full of postmodernist fags who make everything either lablight realism or brain aneurysm legoshit
Truth, when I was a child I hated windwaker for being cartoony. Now, as a fully grown manchild, I realize the timeless beauty of the art style.
>pic
oh okay guess I'll go scribble at a paper then lol
A video game isn't a movie. How good, or realistic the graphics look don't matter as much as the gameplay itself. And even then, he wasn't talking animation or cartoons, he made movies using a camera that captured the real world. You retards need to understand the things you're talking about before you try to use them to confirm your biases.
what's rdr2 then if not a realism sim with all of its long ass animations trying to mirror realism?
high end graphics and realistic presentation usually limit gameplay
A not very fun videogame that was collectively forgotten by everyone after two weeks outside of funny horse glitch clips.
It's still a video game, and a bad one. The graphics and the animations don't make it a bad game, the uninspired gameplay and shitty story do.
No, they don't. They often let you do more gameplay-wise, it's all in the hands of the developers. Good graphics aren't some malevolent force that are beating developers up for trying to make good games. You people sound like a bunch of cavemen who are afraid of fire.
Photorealism doesn't exclusively mean a game grounded in reality, it can still be entirely fictional while maintaining a photorealistic presentation.
That's like saying Hitchcock films are bad because they're live action and not animated in a stylized cartoony manner.