Why the Loot Box Law Sucks

>The statute is not off to a good start — the supposed “children only” bill has a much wider sweep than intended and, if passed, would apply to all video game content. But that’s not all. The statute’s definitions of loot boxes and pay-to-win are incredibly overbroad. The statute defines a pay-to-win transaction as one that “eases a user’s progression through content,” “assists a user in accomplishing an achievement” or receiving an award, “permits a user to continue to access content of the game that … has been made inaccessible after the expiration of a timer or a number of gameplay attempts,” or that “provides a user with a competitive advantage with respect to … users who do not make a transaction.” The problem is that each and every one of those factors is vastly over inclusive. Consider a normal arcade cabinet or pinball machine. Those games — which have been around since the 1970s, and since the 1930s in the case of coin-operated pinball — end after a certain number of gameplay attempts but allow users to pay additional money to keep playing.


Seem that the new loot box law will ban more then just lootboxes
escapistmagazine.com/v2/2019/06/13/why-the-loot-box-law-sucks/?fbclid=IwAR2lZI_0vd1aTzHfjf6KygaOBQdvMEIjr1XaolSFUEixJcpYBx60jlaGeFA

Attached: index.jpg (310x162, 5K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=G2y8Sx4B2Sk
youtube.com/watch?v=RHJ7imYzvgk
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Well this just sounds fantastic. Not only targets lootboxes but direct p2w dogshit as well.

What is the problem here?

Do you like arcade machines? Well they are illegal now

They're really running out of arguments now, huh? Fucking arcade machines? They haven't been relevant in decades, and making them 18+ would be a good fucking move.

>Arcade Machines will be banned
Unlikely as they fall under a different ground in a lot of cases and most of the time the profits made on them these days do fuck all in actually funding developers/pubs.

Attached: 1559938169958.jpg (500x320, 47K)

Yes because the part everyone loved about arcade machines was spending money every time you died.
faggot

ALL THESE TURBO-FAGGOT CORPORATIONS RUINED MY HOBBY

I AM GOING TO RUIN IT FOR THEM TOO

FUCK OFF SHILLS
FUCK OFF SLAVES
FUCK OFF RETARDS

Attached: ap,550x550,12x16,1,transparent,t.u1.png (413x549, 113K)

arcades are dying in america anyway, dave and busters can do go karts and shit

Read the link

get fucked you corporate cunt this is a good thing

Arcade games are dead desu

>it is now illegal to credit feed

Its fucking great news, even better than initially hoped.
Fuck recurrent user spending, fuck games as service, fuck shareholders.

based republicans and democrats making underage ancaps seethe

I am pretty sure there is a difference between p2w and arcades

Not under the proposed law

Every time I hear news about this bill it just sounds better and better

Attached: 1552114986890.png (583x720, 273K)

Fuck arcades, fuck lootboxes and fuck pinballs. Also, fuck gacha.

Literally going
>hey, fellow gamers, i hate lootboxex too, BUT....
Can that shill be more stereotypical?

>the supposed “children only” bill has a much wider sweep than intended and, if passed, would apply to all video game content

And thats a good thing

Arcades are already dead in america so might as well put the nail in the coffin. This wouldn't be happening if anyone thought that the industry would self-regulate, anyways.

The best law would be to just include video games, gacha, and lootboxes as gambling and tax the gacha accordingly, but with all the support it sounds like another industry is trying to shut the case on this once and for all. Probably the casino industry? They're probably sick of having the competition.

Modern arcades don't have shitty pay-per-life models anymore. You just pay once at the door.

corporations turned our hobby into a soulless shitfest, might as well fuck up their profits in return. video games really can't get any worse than they already are so I don't see any ramifications of this legislation for consumers

Attached: 1559041413639.jpg (640x678, 39K)

>escapist
Oh you mean the magazine that advocates for cuck porn being included in games? Yeah nah shill

I did, doesn't change what I said

1. Why do amerilards make it so hard to find your legislation
2. Why does it look like it was written on a fucking type writer.

Line 22 of the bill specifically excludes payment for access to the service. This would cover arcade and pinball machines.
Not to mention there's always an intention of the legislature argument, I'd wager this has no Hansard yet but from the text of the bill it's blatantly obvious the legislature has no intention of this applying to arcade cabinets.

Good
They were always a scam

They're already dead anyway

Why is he talking about pinball? Pinball isn't a video game. Pinball video games exist, but pinball on its own isn't a video game.

Imagine being such a bootlicking shill you actually make up shit to defend your corporate overlords. I sincerely hope you're getting paid for this, but you really should kill yourself either way.

Attached: 1459324865659.jpg (628x676, 40K)

I hate lootboxes and Ill push for regulation just to piss you lootbox fags off.

Is this happening or what? When will it go into effect?
I cant wait

Because user this is a shill thread, probably by the ESA in a coordinated scare campaign to try and turn people against the bill so their donors don't lose money.
They why the posted blatant lies which would be immediately obvious to anyone who read the bill, see .

daily reminder to ignore shills
the bill targets P2W and lootboxes

which will inherently be good for everyone

Attached: microtransactions.png (1946x1052, 212K)

The house always wins, baby

Attached: 320px-FNV_Real_Mr_House.png (320x240, 115K)

>muh corporations
kys
only the same kind of retard who gambles in the lottery falls for lootboxes anyway, they're irrelevant

You're now aware that this will kill F2P games. Hope you're happy, Yea Forums.

>they're irrelevant

>lootboxes
>irrelevant
yes, I am

They need to be regulated the same way gambling is

>games journos who are in bed with the publishers hate it

Must mean it's good for the consumer.

Name a single good F2P game with microtransactions that affect gameplay.

Laws about "saving people from themselves" are inherently retarded, people who want to burn their own money shouldn't be stopped from doing so.

I am
Ive never been happier in fact
I cant believe vieogames are going to be saved with such a simple measure
Everything looked doomed not long ago, now I can see the future of games being bright again

>backpedaling

>this will kill F2P cash-grabbing trash
>this is somehow a bad thing

Attached: 1552238055774.gif (500x500, 1.65M)

They're all bad, so yeah that sounds fine.

How is it backpedaling? Retards who burn their own money are very much irrelevant.

thank god, now that all the boomers are dying off we can finally put authoritarianism to good use, ubi here we come

i don't give a shit about the subhumans who pay for lootboxes, i gve a shit about my favorite game series being raped by greedy publishers because of said whales

The only F2P-with-mtx games worth playing are Dota and TF2 and neither of those fall under any of the bill's definitions. The most that would happen is that TF2 would have to take the weapons off the Mann Co store but fucking nobody buys those anyway.

First American bill I've heard of that genuinely makes me jealous. Hope the EU follows suit.

inviting the government to regulate video games might be a bad idea... who knew?

>95% of the revenue
>very much irrelevant
youtube.com/watch?v=G2y8Sx4B2Sk

didn't belgium ban lootboxes as well?

>i gve a shit about my favorite game series being raped by greedy publishers because of said whales
OK so now instead of lootboxes you get games fragmented into Paradox-tier 500 USD worth of DLC, happy?
Yes it is irrelevant that people are playing gacha shit and burning their own money. Why should I care about them?

>journos so seething they have to literally make up fiction to try to push a narrative
lmao

>instead of
They're doing that anyway.

Anything that will nuke the garbage AAA industry is A-OK with me in theory, but giving papa government more power is counter to my principles. I guess expecting ordinary people to display restraint and to not open their wallet to shitty business practices is too much to ask.

Doubtful, games like fortnite make all their money off cosmetics.

Ace Combat devs made a free to play cash grab game as a way of getting funds to make a real buy to play sequel, and then shut it down once that happened. I guess everyone else has to do that too now.

the bill bans pay2win mtx as well, so devs would be forced to put complete games, paradox would die the day this shit gets passed

Who gives a fuck about arcades?

Yeah but that wasn't enough to save everyone else. This is more wideranging and we're so cuturally dependent on the US that we'd probably copy the whole thing not long after.

I'm guessing you didn't read the part of the bill that clearly indicates it excludes arcade machines

OH THANK GOD

>Why should I care about them?
Because the profit those people create incites publishers to put that shit into any other game they can fit it in? Because literally the only reason EA is able to stay above water is because of Europeans playing the FIFA Ultimate Team gacha? Because the tactic of "just ignore it lol" has led to this shit getting into dozens of major releases that aren't just phone games?

The way this journos are sucking the industries dicks is awesomely bad. I mean, I guess they want to score a job in PR or localising shit, but, seriously. Comparing a pinball machine to adquiring COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE over another player? That's some serious mental gymnastics over there, pals.

Vermintide 2 has a "lootbox" progression system. Instead of paying money, you get boxes from leveling and completing missions. They basically are loot boxes with all the pretty lights and sounds, only just apart of how you advance in the game. My question would be; will the proposed law look unfavorably towards lootbox-like systems even if you're not spending additional money?

If I have to sacrifice Warframe to hope lootboxes and p2w get exterminated forever, I will take it

FUCK EA

As long as they are not called loot boxes they should be ok.

Arcades aren't affected by this, at a cabinet in an arcade you are paying the store owner to play their cabinet, you're not paying for any kind of ownership.

kill yourself you corporate bootlicking faggot

This will only kill lootbox abusing, P2W shitfests. I'm all for it.

Attached: 1559550975772.jpg (1024x1024, 161K)

What will the buglords of Japan and China do when their gachas are banned as well?

It doesn't matter whether he read it or not, he's not here to actually provide information, he's here to drum up clicks by posting sensationalist fearmongering.

This IS an advertising thread, by the way. Make sure to do your part.

Attached: 2019-06-17 10_46_09-Rules - 4chan.png (342x59, 3K)

you buy the cheapest item to get a premium account

Oh shit, maybe if people actually did their fucking jobs this wouldn't have happened

t. Goldstein

this law also ban mobile games with mandatory wait so its misogynistic.

>in one sweep ''pay to win'' gaming dies
>every western dev seething
ABSOLUTE KEK

>Because the profit those people create incites publishers to put that shit into any other game they can fit it in?
If it's not that then it's going to be turbojew DLC, and if there isn't any alternate way of making bank then those games just won't get made. There are plenty of good, non-bullshit games being made today outside of AAA jank who cares about that shit? Banning shitty business practices won't improve games, it will simply remove the ones that currently do it and the other decent games will continue existing almost exactly as they do now, maybe slightly worse off due to a worse market overall and that's it.

Reminder that a law is only as good as it's worst interpretation, a few obtuse judge rulings is all you need to build legal precedent. Also you zoomers don't think it's possible for a company to sink itself with bad practices.

Attached: 1560699434151.png (800x673, 886K)

Works for me. I prefer games I can enjoy from a single purchase if it means buying a giant bundle of DLC on sale.

The law specifically has a subsection protecting payment for service

Attached: 1389234821745.png (300x300, 148K)

>a law is only as good as it's worst interpretation, a few obtuse judge rulings is all you need to build legal precedent
The absolute state of Angloniggers and their common """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""law"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""".

Good, fuck loot boxes

Attached: 1560699819914.png (708x1000, 118K)

THINK OF MY YACHTS

Attached: 1542920231138.png (1200x700, 1.11M)

If a company values it's product as free, it's inherently shit.

>then those games just won't get made
Uhhh, good? There's not a single game worth playing that's shredded up into a billion DLC pieces.
>it will simply remove the ones that currently do it and the other decent games will continue existing almost exactly as they do now
And how is this not a massive net improvement? If all the garbage gachashit games die and the decent games keep going as they are how does that not cause the overall net quality of the industry to skyrocket? Companies will be forced to either make decent games or die if they can't overmonetize everything to shit.

Attached: 1460854798723.png (561x561, 158K)

Man, the people who play the Japanese versions of those games are going to be smug as shit if that happens.

>how does that not cause the overall net quality of the industry to skyrocket?
Not in a practical way, the existence or inexistence of gachashit has zero actual effect in the good games that exist. They're 2 separate classes of things.
> Companies will be forced to either make decent games
No, they won't. They'll either find another way like having DLC out the ass or the money will just leave.

Get fucked EA shill. Stop with the lootbox p2w bullshit and accept you overextended with them by thinking non normalfags will take the cook up their ass as normalfags did with FIFA for years.

>I don't know what "net" means

It's amazing to me what you can not only grow accustomed to but grow to depend on when you've probably never known anything different.

youtube.com/watch?v=RHJ7imYzvgk

smug about playing casino simulators?

>like having DLC out the ass
see Doing a Paradox or Netherrealm and dicing your game up into a billion pieces and forcing you to buy everything to be competitive is a great way to get audited.

user if all the gachashit games are gone while the good games are untouched then video games as a whole are better
this is not a difficult or complex concept

That all sounds great though

Attached: 1240393095655.jpg (639x595, 76K)

I thought Escapist was officially dead and only existed to host Yatzees ramblings

>ha, gaijin are so foorish not giving corporate masters arr there money
Fuck bugmen

Attached: EF9EB687-6BE8-4496-8BC9-2F0895E12CAE.png (895x896, 798K)

So you admit to playing garbage?

Wasn't giftapult the cheapest?

Well, yeah. There are plenty of people here who are playing gacha games. Some of them are playing the NA releases, some are playing the Japanese ones. If the NA ones all shut down then yeah, I expect the people who can still play to laugh at the ones who just got shut down.

Post yfw
>EA
>Ubisoft
>gacha games
>Warframe
>Overwatch
will die in your lifetime

Attached: 1461782847285.png (664x766, 782K)

I am paying for a service when I put money into an arcade cabinet, not hoping for a specific outcome that is completely out of my hands.

Attached: abe yatta.jpg (980x552, 115K)

Looks fine to me, this needs to be made into law right now. Fuck these corporations, fuck all of them in their greedy assholes, they deserve this, I hate what gaming has become in the last 20 years. Fuck all of them, I hope the fucking industry crashes again, because we need another one to clear out all of the fucking trash.

Their old editor regained control and started rehiring people although I think blob got a gag order on his political opinions.

Attached: 1501682104803.gif (267x495, 831K)

Why do you think they are working on ow2? They are going to bypass this law.

Then they simply won't make games. And either way how do you even argue what's "competitive" in EU4 single player for instance?
Actually, no. Nothing changes in a practical sense if retards are burning their money or not while I play good games.

Go shill somewhere else for less consumer rights faggot.

>Then they simply won't make games
G O O D
O
O
D

HOW RETARDED ARE YOU THAT YOU CAN'T REALIZE THAT IS LITERALLY THE EXACT OUTCOME DESIRED

Attached: 1559168395415.gif (520x520, 414K)

stop arguing with shills

except I get what I pay for when I play Groove Coaster. 3-4 rounds of any song and I try to get a highscore.

Gacha games can survive without the US market though. Look at Idolmaster, none of those games are officially available outside Japan, and it's not like they're dying. It'll hurt but gacha will survive until Japan and China outlaw it too.

Go shill for Marxism somewhere else, kike

My life won't be improved by not having retards burn money into gachashit.

He's shilling to maintain the exact same amount of consumer rights, if you wanna get technical.

arcades are for skills,not for features.

nobody cares about your life, you dumb nigger.

>linking directly to the site
I wish reddit would fuck off

Every day I come here I am proven that zoomers are the most retarded generation to steal oxygen from useful humans. The only kikes here are you bunch of faggots that think loot boxes and predatory sales and marketing practices are a good thing. Go fuck off back to your little desert shit hole chaim.

Attached: 1528500335111.gif (651x481, 467K)

Nobody cares about your life faggot

Looks like MMORPGs are dead.
>permits a user to continue to access content of the game that … has been made inaccessible after the expiration of a timer
>ie. subscription

Warframe is fucking shit. I'd gladly boot the game off a hill into a fire and piss upon the ashes just for some control over the outrageous bullshit gaming companies are getting away with.

line 22 specifically says that is not the case

You will need to explain the differences then because video game is a very broad term, especially when you have fringe examples like that one interactive episode of Black Mirror. What makes pinball, where there are scores, lives and other video game aspects, different from a normal video game?

Only good f2p game is dota and if it meant i can buy the set i want jnstead of loot boxes id be extremely happy

>zoomers actually citing Black fucking Mirror as legal precedent
you can't make this shit up

Would this law prevent meaningful expansions? I hate cut content, but could oppsing force of ballad of gay tony be sold if these laws were applied back then?

Modern corporations have practically 0 chance of failure due to the sheer amount of people around. Back maybe 80 years ago, sure a shit product would ruin you, but now there are simply too many people to support even the shittiest of ideas. Look at all of these sports games, all of them are borderline gatcha shit these days, but fuckstain dudebros just gargle that hot load of EA cum and swallow it down and beg Big Daddy EA for more every year.

Prove me wrong then. How is a CYOA game not a game? What makes that different from say a VN or a walking simulator?

>WAH WAH BIG DADDY GOVERNMENT SAVE ME
No fuck you, commie. The money you niggers steal for your hand outs won’t last forever

Video games have video involved. Pinball does not.
That wasn't hard.

No, the writer is pretty much lying and proving himself wrong in the article

>mobile games with mandatory wait
what?

only the actual company shills have a problem with this

Good, fuck all of that shit. It is a good day for games when all of that trash is removed from it. It'll be like a huge cancerous growth being excised from a dying patient.

Attached: 1281916695054.jpg (1201x918, 136K)

Won't these games just get bumped up to an M-rating because they have lootboxes though? Will it actually change anything? It only affects sales to children, right?

>permits a user to continue to access content of the game that … has been made inaccessible after the expiration of a timer or a number of gameplay attempts
Fug does this mean limited use demos are banned now and now must be unlimited uses?

Attached: 1444274654900.png (305x316, 50K)

Most pinballs have display screens that does just that user. What kind of antiquated pinball are you even talking about that doesn't have that?

Sounds good to me. Don;t like it? Cope harder

>demos
what year is this?

ESRB has no legal relevance. The bill has a much wider definition of for minors

Good luck getting parents to buy Superhappy Funball kids games with that big fat RATED M FOR GAMBLING on the front cover.

It looks like they bring the old method - 90's demo style. Meaning they have to create two games (full version and demo version).

Do you really think continuing to act like a retard is going to serve you well? You keep talking about niggers and so far you're the only one who is acting like one. It's not about being saved by the government. It's about the creation of digital consumer rights which need to exist. Without the government your melanin enriched faggot ass would have been in a coal mine from the age of seven. Go howl and scream like a stupid fucking monkey somewhere else.

pinball machines still involve you working physical levers to manipulate a physical ball.

Let's be honest here. This is never about the minors and anyone saying otherwise is a filthy liar.

There's still no such thing as too big to fail except trusts and monopolies. The thing is EA isn't the only source of games, the big boys have to deal with a ton of indies and the modern ease of game publishing. Misapplied regulation could even squash mass amounts of competition.

Bills involving minors almost never about them, just the easiest way to market it.

I LOVE GOVERNMENT BOOT
SAVE ME FROM THE EVIL CORPORATIONS GUBMINT!!!!!!!!!!! HELP ME HELP ME HELP ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I DON'T REALLY CARE ABOUT LOOTBOXES I JUST FUCKING HATE SJW CORPORATIONS AND WANT TO STICK IT TO THEM

Arcade games may have been bullshit, but they were also tests of skill. Loot boxes are just gambling.

this isn't misapplied regulation

>There's still no such thing as too big to fail
Yeah, except every time one of these giants fucks up and is about to go broke, the gov't comes out and saves their asses. There are plenty of corps too fucking big to fail, and thats bullshit. It's rewarding them, they need to fall off and die like the trash they are.

What about unique event hats and mmo timed gear?

But they're not primarily based around those screens. You can have pinball machines with no video at all. You can't have a video game without video.

Unironically this.
Ancaps are retarded and deserve to be hit with the cold water of reality.

HELP ME TRUMP

>Not a new IP
lmao

Which is then converted into a digital singals to keep track of scores, lives and other video game related things. This is no different than using an analog controller for a video game.

If it turns out that a judge interprets this as including cosmetic stuff I'm gonna cream myself

>but muh based freemium cosmetic-only company
Can now go back to making buy-once games again. Perfect for all involved

Okay you know what
Go take it to court, good fucking luck

Notice how it's usually the government propping these bad companies up. The same government being asked to save people from dlc and loot boxes.

>Can now go back to making buy-once games again
they'll just stop making games. not like Yea Forums wouldn't be happy about this

please don't pretend to be retarded, its only going to attract actual retards like OP

Imagine being this desperate to fearmonger and protect your corporate masters.

But most pinball machines does have that feature. An actual pinball machine without it is so incredibly rare that it's most likely a collector's item than being played.

WOW! Can't believe they're banning a way to support developers. It makes me very depressed! Lost all hope in humanity.

imagine writing this garbage. can´t even imagine what a massive Corporate whore this "journalist" must be.

Wouldn't you be happy if EA fucked off?

I wonder if it would block DLC for challenges that give you a power boost like the trial of the sword DLC for Breath of the wild.

oh no, what a shame

Thats how it works. Sometimes the gov't saves you, sometimes is fucks you in the ass. This is true of any gov't.

But it's still clearly not vital. Therefore pinball must not be a video game, since video is a vital part of being a video game.

nobody makes games for fun, they make it for profit. if the profits aren't big enough they just will stop making games and move entirely to mobile, or another service

Well it does say that gives an advantage so unless they give the timed items trash stats i don't think it would work. Not like it matters most MMOs will just move servers to some other English speaking country and just release in the US so they can claim to be under the law of their country and that US players are just accessing a game made for the other country.

>none of these are new IPs
They really do think they look genuine, don't they?

Attached: 1506482895355.gif (420x360, 1.86M)

a stupid law like this could pretty much destroy big budget AAA gaming entirely is that what you want retards?

Good

Yes

Attached: 54684565415311454.png (2828x456, 1.11M)

So true. What will companies do if they can't get money from loot boxes or microtransactions? They will stop making all products and just die.

There will always be another to fill the void. You like some megafuckstain corp like EA, Actiblizz, or Ubi leaving the business wouldn't be good for EVERYONE, you fucking mindless shill.

God, I wish

Attached: imagine.jpg (760x718, 72K)

>>All the sudden the only way to turn a profit now is with asstons of microtransactions, DLC, lootboxes, etc.
Yeah no.

>big budget
Try anything that isn't derivative pixelshit. This won't just kill AAA, it'll kill anything that isn't made by bored rich kids in their spare time

How is it retarded? If having physical controller that uses lever and shit is enough to classify something as not video games, does that mean hardcore flight/driving/tank/whatever simulator that uses realistic controllers would be the same?

Honestly speaking, thats not really a bad thing. Though I also sincerely doubt that'd be the case considering Gaming is one of the biggest industries in the world at the moment.

Companies that can only survive via lootboxes are ones that aren't really making products worth playing on their own merits. Ones that can, will likely just change their tactics rather than stop making games all together. Cause even if you remote lootboxes, games are still ridiculously profitable.

I can't believe it Yea Forums. My favourite Japanese casino game will disapear. Do you have any idea what this means? Owner-san won't be able to feed his family, HIS FAMILY ! A good part of my existence has been for the benefit of owner-san and now he, and his family, will be on the streets thanks to this. Fuck you.

Yup, fuck games so large in budget they have to be incredibly bland to avoid alienating anyway.

It's about microtransactions though. If the item is only available during the event and then becomes unavailable that's allowed. It'd be illegal to have a way to buy the hat after the event was over, but if there's no way at all to get it after that point then it's fine.

Okay, good? Indies are plenty fucking profitable as is. Go ask Team Cherry, Dingaling, Yacht Club, Toby fucking Fox holy shit, WayForward, Ice Pick Lodge, Supergiant, do I have to keep going?

Attached: 1447803392924.jpg (847x866, 169K)

We will see EA being acquired by CDPR.

>being an indieshill for trash games

Absolutely.

Fuck you faggots. You're killing the free market

>nobody makes games for fun
Holy fuck. I mean yeah if you look at anything recently I would absolutely agree (besides the few exceptions). But if you look at gaming history, it was usually not strictly for profit, if you look at older games and older teams.

Funny, companies seemed to make massive profits the entire time by releasing complete games for all of these years. It's only in the last 10 or so that lootboxing has become popular, I wonder why? Could it be outright greed? NAAAH, NO COMPANY WOULD EVER CUT QUALITY FOR MORE MONEY, RIGHT FRIENDS?

Attached: 1552335311952.gif (498x268, 1.79M)

Boo hoo.

Is this law an out-of-season April Fool's joke?

I hope this cucks Todd Howard.

>arcades
>p2w

Nigga you retard or a shill, fuck this industry. It deserves all the government cock they are about to get shoved in

But it is vital. Without the ability to keep score, lives and such, can you really call it pinball?

What arcade machines? ;_;

Arcade is mostly dead in the West so who cares fag

>not a new IP
They really do think they're clever, don't they?

Attached: 1536540580228.png (250x273, 25K)

Please god yes.

Attached: 1559842840744.jpg (1064x574, 227K)

will someone pleaase think about all those good indie games that Yea Forums never talks about or plays

This is a stupid comparison. This is like saying cause you can press buttons on a microwave it should be classified as a computer.

see >t. bootlicker

He just need to release more skyrims and fallouts, the lifeblood of bethesda

You kidding?

Enjoy your state regulated cucked censored games you massive fucking loser

The free market killed the free market, because you can't trust humans with any degree of power without heavy regulation to ensure they don't pull a Disney, Microsoft, telecomm company, etc.

>oy vey the law might force an AO rating instead of an M rating!!
That's literally this guy's gripe. That and:
>regulations are a monkey's paw
So if they include loot boxes, it'll be AO. Big fucking deal.
Must be a slow news day.

Good. I'm tired of AAA gaming nowadays budget being used primarily for making textures and advertising. If i could get 360 graphics and good gameplay i'd be happy with gaming.

Attached: 1409815155958.jpg (552x562, 58K)

Not half-ass it, otherwise, he would be a poorfag as fuck.

>but giving papa government more power is counter to my principles.
Sometimes to defeat your enemies, you have to ally with your enemies

>I guess expecting ordinary people to display restraint and to not open their wallet to shitty business practices is too much to ask.
Yeah that was definitely expecting too much out of people

Let PSO2 run in the states for a year before you kill it :(

Greed is good, commie

The free market has encouraged that kind of bullshit. Its only by the grace of the first amendment that corporations haven't entirely pandered to anti free speech lefties and chink insects.

oh NO this might cause arcades to die

also there's an easy solution to the arcade """problem""", door tickets

Oh here you commie libcucks come again advocating for literal state sponsored autoritarian regimes over video games. You make me sick

>Not half-ass it
skyrim is the pure definition of a half assed game tho

Sounds good to me

I would sacrifice a thousand PSO2's to shit upon one EA.

SHILLS FINNA SEETHE

Attached: 97brrz5aj5j21.jpg (500x500, 45K)

Greed improved which game?

>Direct link

Fuck off shills

Boo hoo pussy

Very unlikely. many will probably do what granblue does and make an inhouse translation team and only release in one country to avoid getting certain rights for out of the country.

Attached: ClCVeQFWIAErcqN.png (916x1200, 793K)

then he would retire after that game flop.

Greed is the root of all evil what the fuck are you talking about

Attached: 1552364927830.png (360x271, 235K)

Okay, and? Microtransactions are a cancerous anchor to inherently cancerous practices and game design. I say good riddance. As for arcades, they're alright nostalgia trips but have been archaic for decades now. These days, that's honestly a pretty small price to pay.

>all the zoomers and shills ITT having a meltdown because their lootboxshit is doomed

Attached: 1448341445185.jpg (428x510, 66K)

>why yes, I did support government regulation of entertainment media in the US because I can't say nigger on Overwatch without getting banned. why do you ask?

Attached: 219729184729481241.jpg (700x933, 58K)

Fine with this.

>Companies that can only survive via lootboxes are ones that aren't really making products worth playing on their own merits.
Exactly. If they're only held afloat by one of the most predatory and manipulative monetization schemes out there, then they don't deserve to survive as an entity.

>this again
you already posted this bait, what do you plan to do with all of these (you)s!?!? ANSWER ME

It's a literal slippery slope you idiot

If jurnos and big corporations hate it or are mad about it, you can be pretty sure it's something good for the common citizen.

Yes. It was called pinball back in the 30s way before the concept of video games existed. Video isn't necessary. It may be ubiquitous these days, but it's not strictly necessary. Therefore not a video game.

Arcades aren't even in danger, that's the thing, it's the journo deliberately misinterpreting and obfuscating the truth to fearmonger and protect his corporate overlord.

So now all the AAA companies are going to switch to a subscription model?

People need jobs to feed themselves and their families. You need to pay these corporations so these innocent folk can live

>not a new IP
Oh no no no

When did Yea Forums start identifying with normalfags so much?
>supporting your bullies

I don't think anyone liked arcade machines. They were fun to play, but being ball-bustingly hard for the sake of killing you so you drop another 25 cents for an extra life is exactly the kind of thing that shouldn't be happening, especially in games that are $60 to even boot up and play.
Mobileshit will hopefully get weeded out too since it's literally just a handheld arcade machine/slot machine.

Greed is the main driving force behind innovation and economic growth, the singular reason we went a poor third world shithole worshiping the idol of socialism is because our society had understood this point. It’s only recently with the rise of millennial snowflake culture that people have deluded themselves into thinking that capitalism is literally the devil itself

>coporate cocksucker website upset about loot box ban laws

Oh no, how terrible.

Don't tempt them

God this is such a horribly written article, when I read the first 4 paragraphs, and still don't know what your article is about you need to quit writing.

Imagine unironically pulling the sekrit club card
>yes goyim this giant corporation is /ourguy/

It literally won't. The bill has specific exemptions for arcades and MMO subscriptions. The author is ignoring them.

Abso-fucking-lutely. AAA has been a blight since around 2008.

>Saying nigger in a videogame is worse than exploitive and manipulative monetization schemes, like loot boxes.

Arcades just needed to adapt. Dave & Busters did by making one fee for unlimited non ticket games for a night and then being a bar.

He's quoting a movie.

You're a fucking retarded newfag and need to lurk moar.

Funnily enough, that's when microtransactions started.

Arcades with an entrance fee are way better than pumping in quarters.

How is this supporting bullies

pretending to champion for people's rights because you're still assblasted over goobergate makes you an insect

because EA is literally /ourguy/ and really cares about the vidya, Yea Forumsro

t. chink

What is exploitative and manipulative about lootboxes? Hyperbole much?

>muh common man
Normalfags are evil. Stop pretending you care about them.

>not a new IP
hmmm

Good point. I should be on my hands and knees tooth raking the smegma off corporate cocks like a good little consumer.
Maybe if I'm a good little bitch my asshole will only get torn open a little when they go in dry.

Your kind has no power here paid shill.

God the more whining I hear about this bill, the harder my dick gets. I think the only game that could possibly be affected by this bill that I care about is Warframe and honestly if that's a hit that I have to take to assure no more fucking microtransaction and pay to win bullshit in my games then I'll take it.

>they'll just stop making games.
good, then all the business they throw aside can be picked up by more talented people who make just those buy-once games.

Think about it like the recent shit with TV/Movie streaming services.
When it was just Netflix, it was fine because everything was in one place for one monthly fee.
Now there are loads of streaming services, piracy has come back because no-one wants to pay $100 a month to access all the things they used to be able to access for much, much cheaper.
But with Games as a Service, you NEED their server, if everything went subscription model then the average playerbase of those games will drop dramatically.

>HAHA NORMALFAGS ARE EVIL CORPORATIONS ARE YOUR FRIEND

lol what

Doesn't cover a fee to access the service in the first place. The only way it would is if they offered a free go for a prize and then paid subsequent rounds. Even then an exemption likely exists or will be made.

This also does not cover DLC such as new levels, skins or other such content that is not a competitive advantage provided they simply sell the content normally.

Now get lost, shill.

corporations make the games you like, your face when you get less content because the devs have less money to make games

A smart microwave is really no different from a computer nowadays. Hell, you can play Skyrim on a goddamn Alexa. Look, at this point I want to make one thing clear. I am not against anti-Gacha bills as so much as the current implementation of it. The bill is simply too broadly defined, not for the gacha terms, but for the definition of what a video game is. With technology constantly improving and the line between video games and other forms of media blurring, making them define what is a video game is the least they can do when it comes to a bill about gacha in video games.

>Then they simply won't make games
that's a good thing, if they only make games to jew the fuck out of people then they shouldn't be making games in the first place

I'll take Chad and Stacy and their Facebook "memes" over Shekleburg Goldstein any day.

>People need jobs to feed themselves and their families. You need to pay these corporations so these innocent folk can live
why pay the companies that take 99.99% of the profits instead of the smaller devs that will need tons of workers to pick up the slack big companies left, which will pay more of the money you spend anyway on the actual people who need jobs to feed their families?

Defining everything listed in OP would be a hilarious and delicious clusterfuck since gambling laws are so different state-to-state. In states like Alabama, for instance, p2w and lootbox games would be straight up illegal if defined as gambling games.

Journalists are paid mouthpieces for companies, if they are forced to kill their cashcows journalists will be among the first departments to get defunded.

corporations publish the games I like
they don't make jack shit

The average normalfag is little more than cattle. Selfish, greedy and evil, they deserve to be raked across the coals by the elite.

>muh manipulating kids!!!
>muh ethics!!!
>muh morals!!

Preached by people with zero ethics and zero morals who also manipulate children for political or social reasons literally every day. To think that Yea Forums is some kind of bastion of humanity against "le ebil corps" is turning a blind eye to how horrible you actually are.

Stop screaming about shit people taking advantage of other shit people. Everyone is shit, and they deserve it. I will support corps fucking people to the ground for every nickle and dime because if they fall for the scheme, they deserve every second of it

based

With a subscription model you know what you are getting when you pay for it

Actually the lottery has more merit to lootboxes, because theyre not expensive, and instill a sense of hope in the buyer. Everybody can think about winning the lottery and feel a little better in their shitty life because they know there is a chance to not have such a shitty life. Getting a skin in lootbox doesn't do that.

>The average normalfag is little more than cattle. Selfish, greedy and evil, they deserve to be raked across the coals by the elite.

Attached: fedora4.jpg (600x309, 33K)

we'll kill you all one day, God willing.

Attached: DCL_5305_square.jpg (600x600, 56K)

Arcades aren't real retard

Who's going to stop just because you tell them to?

You can't be serious. You know how some people have gambling addictions? Imagine that but in the safety of your home, or really wherever you take your phone. You'd have to be a straight dumbass not to see the possibilities, and how many headlines have there been of individuals spending tens of thousands of dollars on microtransactions again?

In the span of this thread I've seen the shills switch to a billion different tactics after getting BTFO, it's kinda embarrassing. Also it's really interesting how almost none of these posts are new IPs and the only ones that display new IPs are ones shitting on it, meaning there are likely about 4-5 posters tops defending the article.

>making shit up and willful interpretation to fearmonger

>claiming this will kill all F2P games

>trying to write off gachashit and lootboxes as something that doesn't actually exist or affect the industry

>buzzwords and claiming "muh worst interpretation"

>claiming it will totally target pinball too guize

>calling anyone in favor of it a commie

>crying it'll kill AAA, please feel sorry for the corporations

>trying to relate it to le goobergate

>nah they're not THAT bad

>nah these corporations are actually /ourguys/, they're helping us in the war against le normalfags

Attached: 1475230121426.gif (250x194, 47K)

My libertarian instincts are telling me this could be bad, but my hatred of modern game company's exploitative practices makes me want this.
Ultimately games should just be monetized through either a single one time purchase or reasonable monthly/yearly subscription fees for MMO like games. Expansions are also fine, since they allow more content over time.

Good thing this doesn’t affect me because I don’t pay pig my way through content. I just enjoy the game I’m playing after buying it or downloading it for free and if I want something I spend the time rather than putting more money in to cheat my way there because the games I play are fun, unlike the MOBA/Battle Royale garbage everybody else plays these days.

This saves the arcade industry. Good talk, everyone.

Based

corporations fund the developers you like to make games, do you think the money comes from thin air, fucktard

>going to an arcade in the current year
yikes

You're libertarian instincts are correct. Game quality, consumer happiness and worker happiness are subservient to the profits of the company and the free market

I hope whole fucking industry crashes and burns, all this p2w microtransaction riddled preorder stuffed bullshit needs to end.

Unironically based and useful autism on display

congratulations on your first grade reading comprehension, little dude.

>people will make good games if they're allowed to and not restrained by greed
>THAT'S WHY WE NEED THE GOVERNMENT TO LITERALLY FORCE THEM TO STOP BEING GREEDY

So we should ban something because a minority of users use it irresponsibly? (something completely their fault) We should ban video games, they're too addictive and people are wasting their time on it.

You're actually fucking retarded

Where did you copy this pasta from?

Attached: 550x369_047.jpg (550x369, 69K)

Parents don't care about that, they'll buy anything if it gets the kid happy

Attached: one chuckle.gif (250x250, 992K)

Based fucking shillsniffer

no

parents dont care

Imagine new games with loads of characters where you actually have to unlock them.
Imagine cosmetics unlocked through gameplay, so you could feel impressed again about wearing or seeing someone wear a cosmetic because you know they got it with work not cash.
Imagine never being outdone by some wallet warrior again because they bought so many advantages over you.

Fucking bring on the law.

BASED

congratulations on failing to understand that the corporations you hate pay people to make games, without them it wouldn't be as lucrative

No, we should ban it because it's a predatory practice that only "benefits" lazy people, and even then it only does that because 9 times out of 10 their playing some brainless timewaster with a grind wall of some sort that's just faster to pay past, aka they're playing a shitty game not worth salvaging in the first place.

>but the law says this
The US has a branch of government specifically for interpreting laws. You would know this if you passed highschool government class. The bill is not aimed at arcade machines

yes, you can repeat people's points back to them, that's nice.

>he actually thinks games will have a resurgence instead of dying off completely

you can have both systems in the same game, it just takes effort

GamerGate was based and redpilled tbqh

My god yes equalize it all. eEven the small amount of microtransaction is a major annoyance in devil may cry because of that death screen. Remove it, remove it all. Remove Devil May Cry if it means no more microtransactions, destroy everything franchise i love and save videogames.

Attached: 337575431355.jpg (579x329, 25K)

90% of internet ancaps are under the age of 17

Cry me a river corporate bootlicker

Attached: bang bang boom.jpg (602x923, 394K)

Thats exactly what we want, you absolute imbecil. Stop using reddit shilling rhetoric, it wont work here.

you fail to realize that the boogeyman you hate is part of the reason you even have games to play, without them developers wouldn't have the resources to make shit

theyre easy to spot arent they

Attached: 1560128341530.jpg (1080x1350, 330K)

Nice. Shills on suicidewatch

Attached: 1555344187417.gif (498x372, 723K)

>people should work harder for less money!

>imagine
I want to go back.

Attached: 1539356510516.gif (500x281, 499K)

Imagine being a pathetic corporate shill, dead inside knowing that all the retarded shit you say is only in service of some money hungry CEO who would happily fire you at a moment's notice.
God, I can just imagine you sitting behind the screen typing away the responses your higher management gave you while everyone here just hurls insults and defeats your """arguments""" with the most basic research.
And you tell yourself everyday, "N-no, this d-doesn't get to me"
But it does. The words cut deeper each time, just as you cut deeper into your dwindling supply of shill money each month.
And sometimes, you think about ending it all, letting some poor fuck find your putrid corpse hanging from the rafters.
Do it faggot, it's the only thing you'll ever do that has any real conviction behind it.
Do it.

Gacha doesn't need America to live

No it's shit. Accepting any microtransaction is like accepting a little bit a AIDS inside your body.

The lootbox defense squad just shows what subhuman pieces of shit Journos are.... again.

>stadia will be illegal before it even comes out
OH NO NO NO NO

accepting that publishers are a necessary evil doesn't mean i should suck their dick, or give them the credit for the actual work of making games.

And you're completely relying on middle-to-old aged judges who spend more time reading law cases than playing video games to rule on those cases. Do you honestly believe they would know how to define what a video game is without sounding like an idiot? God forbid it's gets to the Supreme Court, and they get to determine what is and what isn't a video game.

some retards like to buy skins, I'm not going to stop them if it funds the developer to add more content at some point in the future

I would never pay for skins

People I don't like wield governmental powers against my own interests. This is why many people yourself included have an unfavorable view of the government.
You're saying that I shouldn't attempt to do the same but in favor of my interests; why? Because it's a weapon an enemy would use?
You're a guy who, when challenged to a fight and the other guy whips out a knife, would refuse to dig the switchblade out of your pocket out of some kind of principle.
Your enemies will always win if you refuse to fight on the same level as them. And that makes you a cuckold.

Attached: Queen of Roanapur.jpg (2063x2281, 654K)

Gaming was just fine before this shit, frankly if a large portion of the games industry died off because it's propped up by freemium shit then nobody would mourn for a second.

Effort that almost nobody is willing to put in, and why would they when there's every incentive not to? Expecting industries to self regulate with no oversight is like putting the fox in charge of the hen house.

what a god

it didn't seem that you accepted that publishers literally fund the developers you like, so you can actually have games to play, without them you might not have the outer worlds, or insert whatever game you like

Remeber how good that worked when there was 50 mmos a year?

Why would Anya be happy about her game dying?

>There are no paid shills on Yea Forums
The fucking FBI gets aid to post here

Attached: 8887.jpg (657x587, 138K)

Why are shills even shilling in the first place? It would be one thing if they were getting paid but I think there are shills legitimately mad that people want lootboxes and predatory DLC to die. Why? Do they just not know of a time before?

It easy, we make our own games

Attached: melissa octopus.png (294x276, 13K)

>ancap libertarians supporting government regulating the market
>authoritarian communists fighting against it

Honk honk

>corporations publish the games I like
>they don't make jack shit
please point out where i said publishers weren't necessary

why do jews conveniently sidestep the fact that this is aimed at children?

They mostly come to /pol/ though, and it's pretty obvious

Attached: 1541833972194.jpg (956x720, 397K)

black ops 4 has a system that gives you cams for headshots with weapons, as well as a black market for skins

both can be in the same game it just takes some effort

same could be in a fighting game, you get 500 wins with a character it gets you an outfit, yet there could also be micro transaction skins

you get the recognition for your skill and normals get to waste money

I will stop them. No one buys skins. NO ONE.

Attached: 1556336467084.gif (267x267, 226K)

Just ban video games so the neets will have to go outside or read a book

It's like watching a terminally ill family member suffer. I don't want games to die, but it would be better than living as they are.

Based. FUCK the video game industry. I hope they get raped into anal prolapse and mass bankruptcy by this.
They had the chance to self-regulate and work their shit out for the past 20 years.
They chose greed and maximum profits instead.
I hope that law rapes Activision. EA, Ubisoft & Co. to death.

Attached: alt-right incel nazis showing his symbol of hatred.png (533x476, 415K)

That's cool bro but meanwhile the rest of us who don't give a shit about any of this and just want to play games are getting fucked over by the corporations appealing to those people instead of just making enjoyable games you nitwit

Remember that guy claiming to be an FBI agent on the local /pol/ and he called political news years in advance?

Once again, not a single new IP is among any of the posts listed below. All of these posters have posted AT LEAST one other post in this thread.

>fearmongering capsspam, also implying gachashit and lootboxes are good

>claiming that corporations need the money from gachashit to make games

>a repeat of "it doesn't actually affect anyone, we shouldn't touch it"

>banning gachashit will literally kill the industry guize

>if you don't buy lootboxes it hurts the lowly workers making the games!

>no there's a risk of misinterpreting it so we can't allow this law to pass!

>another "you're a commie if you don't buy lootboxes"

Attached: 1487053504476.gif (200x200, 831K)

Fucking good
Publishers have been pushing the bar lower and lower very slowly over time and pretending everything was fine, first with shitty DLC, then Online Passes, then with MTX and now with Lootboxes

Nothing would make me happier than to see them get kneecapped and forced to square 1, if you can't make a profitable video game without relying on this garbage then you shouldn't make video games

le evil corporations, you tried to make it seem as if publishers weren't nessesary by diminishing their role in the games industry

Last I checked, Nintendo was doing fine as were plenty of indie and smaller companies who do not participate in p2w

you're right, the bill is bad, instead the government should just take all the money people that buy lootboxes have and hand it out in gibs for niggers

and just like that EA can no longer hide behind their sport games

Buying skins is fine. Spending money for a chance at a skin in a slot machine like fashion is not.

see you at shabbat shill :)

>You get the recognition for your skill
No, everyone thinks you're a filthy p2w who bought the skin.

why did you give your kid the credit card, don't you realize they could waste your money

>another "you're a commie if you don't buy lootboxes"

I literally said the opposite.

based

>le

Attached: 1445725450464.gif (250x250, 1.16M)

>I don't think anyone liked arcade machines.
You are incorrect.
Frankly, Arcade games being difficult did not even register to me until years later. I just had fun playing cool, exciting games.

That said, the market is very different now. Arcade games came during a time where access to video games were limited, and Arcades were often on the cutting edge. They were also very straightforward: Pay 25 cents to a dollar, and you get to play. Newer games, like Mobile and AAA, are not only much more deceptive and inclined to user trickery, but exist in a time where anyone with a computer and the internet can play games. You notice when people are tricking you easier now because you've experienced honest games.

>please corporate overlords shit in my mouth
You retards just need to go to a real fucking casino instead of buying lootbox shit.

This sounds excellent. Losing arcade machines is a small price to pay for saving the video game industry. Do arcades even exist anymore?

incredibly based
backpedalling over the fact you can't read
sad

If you can't run a profitable business of making and selling games without relying on p2w and lootbox mtx then you are bad at running a business.

not realizing how much money it takes to make a game, if you have less money to pay a developer you get less content

Nintendo saw the writing on the fall so that's why they insist on treating their mobile garbage as ads for the real games so they're ready to pull out once it gets banned.

I think he meant that you can have skill based skins and shitty paid skins in the same game.

Then why do AAA games tend to have such little content?

It doesn't affect arcade machines. By OP's logic video arcades would be subject to the same laws as actual casinos.

oh my fucking god you're right

Attached: 1485441451790.png (960x720, 488K)

I agree and I don't waste my money on them

but people are willing to waste their money, regardless

B A S E D

And who cares this is a good thing

there are many games on the same level of quality as big AAA titles that have nowhere near the same level of budget bloat

>greedy publishers will die
Yeah this is win-win scenario for me.

They they can only have to make it if it sells well via the road map meme and drop it if it tanks like Anthem.

So this will kill mobile games?
Bye bye Activision lmao

Name a single Western AAA game in the past decade with as much content as something like Hollow or Shovel Knight.

Attached: 1536470859870.png (500x616, 108K)

Sports games make more money than 99% of AAA video games and they don't have that much more content than they did 10 years ago

there would be only one way to unlock the 500 win skin or the 300 headshots skin, then there would be other skins you can buy

this system is already in black ops 4

Like 80+% of a AAA game's budget goes to marketing. You're fucking retarded if you think the overinflated budgets are actually at all related to the amount of content in a game, or more likely a shill.

Even better then. I see no downside to this bill whatsoever

Not it's not fine.
In-game rewards belong in the game for either displays of skill or dedication. Because that's what a game is. You've been flubbed, powder in your eyes, lootboxes is the tip of the tentacle shave that off and the whole putricide remains behind it.
If you think it's not as bad as before you'll only be suckered again in small increments.

Why are so many people celebrating when the government restricts they options with an excuse to defend the little children?

far cry 5

>back when we were shitters
>pocket money was physical money
>knew how much or little you had
>had to get off your ass to spend it
>nu-shitters today
>got their own goddamn credit cards somehow
>no grasp on how much or little money they have
>easy as fuck to spend it online on games, dlc, streamers, etc
Looking forward to 10 years from now when the current shitters have grown up and need to get an education but have no savings at all.

Attached: 15699423388.png (459x502, 193K)

This is amazing. You're actually trying to present normalfags as bad guys but at the same time shilling for corporations.

>actual literal reskin of the past two games
far cry 5 has objectively zero content

>end after a certain number of gameplay attempts but allow users to pay additional money to keep playing.


False comparison. They end because you don't on the device. There's nothing stopping you from buying a pinball machine and playing as many rounds as you want.

I won't expect millennials to understand this concept though.

If that's the price we need to pay to rid gaming of this evil, I'm all for it.

>90's demo style
Yes

Attached: 1491496376097.gif (500x500, 289K)

you made it seem as if developers don't need publishers, by saying publishers don't make games, yet they allow games to be made, you tried to win on semantics yet you failed

>not a new IP

sounds fine. they can include a clause to make arcade machines exempt, or not because i don't give a fuck about arcades.

>when the government restricts they options
Fuck off ESL.

We should ban it because it is shit and contributes to lazy game design that is affecting the entire industry

YES PLEASE

Attached: HIS DONG GREW THREE SIZES THAT DAY.png (343x432, 278K)

They did, OP is literally lying to fearmonger.

>tfw this bill won't touch the actually good western games

Attached: 1559768264020.png (565x541, 157K)

How can F2P games make money then? The only other alternative to selling cosmetics is pay to win monetization

Shill harder, faggot. Only retards would rather pay for a loot box than unlock an item through playing a game. The government is restricting corporations like EA, Ubisoft and Activision from fucking up the industry. This is an extremely good thing, just not for money-grabbing corporate shills.

do you know that number for a fact or did you just make it up

This in no way prevents any level of advertising, including the ability to have a premium, no ads version.
You know, that thing that funded TV for decades?

>Buying skins is fine.
user, I know it's been a while and the medium has shifted so much that it's hard to even remember there was a time like this but did you know once upon a time, there was a little DLC package that charged money for Horse armor that was ridiculed for how ludicrous and cash-grabby it was?

And that was just horse armor. In 2006

Attached: horsearmoroblivion.0.0.jpg (1200x800, 171K)

It's in the area. Varies on a per-game basis, obviously.

That's less made up than "more money = more content"

I agree sports games are pretty much a blatant scam at this point, but I wasn't referring to sports games

Its incredibly stupid, and it was better when it was all unlocks and codes, but at least having cosmetic skins for purchase doesn't, usually, make a non paying players experience worse.

How did they make game before? It must have been impossible.
F2P dies, everysingle one of them is a bad game anyway.

Attached: brudda.jpg (480x360, 10K)

no idea, I had no desire to play it

how much does the content of a 2d sidescroller cost to make, how many weapons can you use

I'm not impressed by the content of hollow knight

incredible how the thread slowed down once this nigger popped up

The fact that sports games are a blatant scam while also being some of the biggest money makers in the industry refutes your entire argument. A game company making a shitload of money from microtransactions does not necessarily equate to more or better content.

>when the government restricts they options
Options nobody wanted

Yes! Fuck it all to hell.

God I hate you idiefags so much.

I pay you guys to shill to these fucking retards, and this is the best you can do?
You're fired.

>How did they make game before?
Monetizing cosmetics
Video games aren't TV shows though. Not every F2P game can rely on advertising for revenue.

Hire me i need some money you faggot.

I think in some cases it can, it depends on the developer

there is a significant portion of people who don't buy sports games as they know they are a scam

Hollow Knight is entirely hand-drawn and animated, 30-odd hours long before the 3 free DLCs, costs $20 maximum, and was developed on a budget of about 150k by two guys over a couple of years.

>not a new IP
Cope.

Attached: 1536629229320.gif (400x475, 334K)

2020-2023 will be the turning point. If the bill passes, vidya will be temporarily saved. It all hinges on this moment in time.

The best selling games every year are almost always sports games. You're not helping your argument.

Fuck off zoomer faggot. Nobody likes you. Fucking numale

>not a new IP
cope

Attached: 1536628571070.jpg (675x675, 50K)

We only hire transexual black women for this position.

>I think in some cases it can, it depends on the developer
In most cases it doesn't. You seem to think the point of microtransactions is to maximize content, when in reality the goal of these companies is to maximize profits

but only zoomers defend lootboxes

It explains why they're shit at their jobs.

maybe the games that don't sell as well need that income from skins to make content that keeps players

Seems fine to me. This shit needed to go.

Only numale powerbottoms shill faux retro indiegames

Good. Burn it all to the ground for all I care. I want to see these fucking cunts out on the street for what they’ve done.

Or maybe the income from skins doesn't translate into content.

>anything faux-retro about Hollow Knight
?

They're trying a new tactic now where they shit on "zoomers" for liking indie titles

Name one non-F2P game for which is the case.

>retro

Attached: stupid.jpg (500x378, 25K)

That explains why the games that do sell well and don't need the income from skins to make content to keep players the most abhorrent microtransactions.

>148 IPs
and today about 140 anons realized we have paid shills here
all in all, a good thread

Trying too hard retard

Ignore him. There's a line in the bill that specifically excludes arcades

>game ends after a certain number of gameplay attempts but allow users to pay additional money to keep playing
Lmao, pinball doesn't even offer a reward. What the fuck is this boomer thinking?

>side scrolling platformer
>2019

Attached: 155653512489.jpg (591x530, 114K)

user, do you know what a powerbottom is?

Post some cunny before we hit the end of thread to drive away the shills.
Cunny is the enemy of the normies.

yeah, you're the one who should find his place in the trash

it can maximize content in certain situations, or would be better than the alternative

let's say someone buys 500 dollars in skins, that's equivalent for 50 people paying for a map pack or expansion

these expansions keep the playerbase alive and entice people to spend on skins

without these expansions people will move on to other games

also making an expansion free or a map pack free kept the playerbase together


all because someone made a questionable desicion to buy skins

this is a benefit to the vast majority of gamers, and no one forced one person to buy 500 dollars of skins he did it of his own volition

Not enough people are bringing up the fact that it's an actual shill article too

Says the faggot playing the same games going on 20 years

>WE LIKE FORTNITE WE LIKE FORTNITE
lmao cope

This. The intent is to maximize income while minimizing resources put into it, meaning their entire goal is to literally put in as little content as they can put out without overtly pissing off their playerbase.

for some games it needs to to keep the playerbase

user stop speaking in buzzwords, I have no idea what you're saying.

Can you cite a SINGLE example of this that is not from a game that's already F2P?

i don't even understand where are you going with this. do you?

God bless America

BING BING WAHOO

It is a pure slippery slope.

>will move on to other games
oh no
what horror

>it can maximize content in certain situations
The point of microtransactions, specifically lootbox microtransactions is to mazimize profit on content you already have, not the otherway around.

>let's say someone buys 500 dollars in skins, that's equivalent for 50 people paying for a map pack or expansion

Which in your mind incentivizes making map packs and expansions, instead of more skins. Despite the fact that the latter is what brings in profits.

>this is a benefit to the vast majority of gamers,
Tell that to sportsfags.

Good. I hope they do it for DLCs too

What are you even talking about?

>no user you don't understand we need those lootboxes or else we won't be able to give you another round of skins and one new map every eight months
I really hope you're being paid.

Attached: 1460403408166.gif (250x194, 13K)

Just bringing up the fact that your taste in games is akin to nintendies.

No it isn't. At least not the P2P ones.

>oh no think of the poor arcade machines
no one plays at fucking arcades anymore
kill yourself retard, you've probably never used an arcade machine

Most games with cash shops and microtransactions still charge for expansion packs though.

is free to play not a good enough example

why did you just brush off the biggest evidence

Consider me fully baited. Why do you put bad thoughts in my head. i'm sad about young people who's first game was a free to play mobile app that shits meaningless rewards at them for pressing anywhere on the screen. This wrecks the development of the brain.

Attached: 1381493908871.gif (295x211, 1.73M)

>you get less content because the devs have less money to make games
Any dev who would pass those costs down to consumers is already offering such a weak value/$ that nothing will be lost. You'd think, after the crippling of mainstream piracy, the effective death of video game rentals, the massive growth in the market, the normalization of paying for online service etc., we'd have more content in a $60 game but the opposite is true. You get less than you did 15 years ago PLUS real money shops in $60 video games.

If you think you should be considerate of their bottom line you've got a mad case of Stockholm Syndrome.

Attached: 1543669124989.gif (200x250, 2.65M)

>why did you just brush off the biggest evidence

how did you come to that conclusion? i don't even play platformers much, but shouldn't you take a step back when disregarding entire genre? maybe take a full walk, this place gets you wrong

Because then you'll inevitably cite TF2/CSGO and try to be smug because there's no real way to disprove that despite it being fairly obvious those games are funded by Steam's profits instead of their own.

if retards buy a shit ton of skins you might not have to pay for map packs or expansions

does that make sense

name a single example

No it doesn't

I've been wanting this for years

Attached: 1560714086977.jpg (1000x775, 302K)

Any publisher*

If a game is so shit that the faggot players need a new costume to dress their character up in every week to keep the game alive, then the lazy cunt developers should not be given the opportunity to create such an effortless piece of shit and be rewarded for it again.

it means there is a chance for you to get free content

the people who sell micro transactions need you to play their game, if no one plays the game there is no one there to buy the cosmetics

they need to make content otherwise people won't stick around to buy the cosmetics, this in turn funds more content

>No Casino

Wtf. Imagine gambling your millions in black jack and roulette or poker.

Attached: 59e5efeb5bafe304c4426c47.jpg (323x433, 55K)

If I list all their points, then they are all wrong!

that isn't always the case, why do you have to exaggerate and not be logical about it, you lose in the end

Still asking for an example.

>not a new IP

In reality it means the content will be tilted in favor of skins, because that's where their money comes from

unnesasary distinction, it can work in both systems

maybe try playing a different game once in a while

It's the case more often than not.
>why do you have to exaggerate and not be logical about it, you lose in the end
This applies to you more than it does to him.

No it's shit content made to keep the trademill going forever. I don't want it, i want one game with everything in it and later we get another game which is a different game and so on.

amazing how literally none of them have a response to this

>unnesasary

Why is it always the ESLs who are the biggest shills for microtransactions? I mean imagine being so retarded you think there's no meaningful distinction between games that are free to play vs games that people are already spending money in order to even play them.

baka I wont even take the bait just go back

Attached: 1560441682152.jpg (360x394, 135K)

meaning less indie shits and less garbages

sounds good to me.

I could cite fortnite and pubg as well that has quite a lot of content

the microtransactions fund the content, which incentivise people to keep playing which in turn, incentivises them to buy more microtransactions

Most games with lootbox bullshit aren't indie though.

>Why is it always the ESLs who are the biggest shills for microtransactions?
EA is literally, unironically funded by Germans and other europoors buying lootboxes in FIFA. They could give away every game they make except FIFA entirely for free and still make a profit because Europeans just buy that many lootboxes. Euroshitters - not Japs, not American whales - are the biggest gachawhores on the face of the Earth.

They're the biggest gacha suckers and waifufags. There's no way they can give up ungodly amounts of money to a single thing for almost nothing in return and not feel like utter trash without godlike mental gymnastics.

neither of those games have added any content but skins since release
congrats on proving yourself wrong retard

>quite a lot of content
>literally all just skins

look at some of the biggest games in the current climate

doesn't take a fucking genius to realise fortnite gets pretty substantial content

and I haven't spent a single cent on it

How so?
Hilarious if true

look at the top 10 games by playerbase

>Ubisoft, EA, Activision and KrMMOs will die
Fixed that for you.
We used to have a healthy middle market of small Devs and publishers in-between the bedroom coders and AAA giants. This will hopefully bring back that market share without having to rely on crowd funding as without microtransactions a lot of more modest investments look appealing once more.

You would realise this if you actually understood economics, were born before the 90s and didn't get all your arguments from meme ball comics.

Fortnite is free to play and doesn't have loobtoxes. PUBG has made so much money from sales alone that they could fund development for the next 5 years and still make more profit without lootbox jewery than the average AAA game.

Google would discontinue it like they did to other google products.

And you play shit games and that's a problem.

Attached: 1388473982728.jpg (848x480, 29K)

they need to make more content to make sure you don't get bored with the game, people don't play to buy skins

no one is buying skins for pong right now, as it has no content to keep players engaged

Pong is a +40 year old game. What kind of retarded argument is this?

fortnite and pubg have added more weapons and maps

HAHAHA shills BTFO

Attached: 1554270782491.jpg (820x1206, 233K)

>Sony hiding in a corner
>Square Enix, Microsoft, and Nintendo all revealing a shitload of games
>THQ Nordic buying up a bunch of old IPs and remastering, remaking, or continuing them
>Lootbox ban on the horizon and shills out in full force with pure terror
It's a great time to be alive.

I'm engaged when i play Pong. I don't need to be playing pong everyday what's wrong with you?

They only need to make the bare minimum of non cosmetic content to keep players engaged, while the vast majority of content ends up being skins because that's what makes money.

literally wrong

>WE NEED LOOTBOXES BECAUSE FORTNITE HAS MORE PLAYERS THAN PONG
unironically what the fuck dude

Imagine being this retarded.

It's good that it is broadly defined. Give me one legitimate reason why there shouldn't be laws against gambling and gacha, I know it's Japanese for something else but it literally sounds like "gatcha moron, try again gimme more money if you want that sonic doll to show your frieeeends :::)" fuck you

He's not wrong though. Majority of Fortnite's post release content has been cosmetics.

Attached: 1529800183955.jpg (434x405, 24K)

I haven't played them in months it's just an example of what's possible with a cosmetic system

Who gives a shit about a 1970s pinball cabinet? Just charge by the time they play, not per game

see:

it isn't getting updates, so no one wants to play it, starting to make sense now

So capitalism is bad now? This bill is blatantly anti capitalist. If you don't like loot boxes, then why not vote with your wallets? Oh wait, could it be you're a minority in the consumer market? Call me a corporate shill if you want, but this is reminiscent of what happened when a vocal minority (feminists and sjws) pushed their will on everyone else. You all are a vocal minority, and are pushing you will on others.

Can we expand it to cover ALL microtransactions in games targeted to kids?

Girlfriend's 12 year old has spent over $500 on Fortnite.

Are you literally retarded?

>one map with a few different guns
>a lot of content
Holy shit are you even 18?

>not a new IP

If Fortnite is enabled by a cosmetic system then a cosmetic system enables shit ass game that never end. Fuck this shit.

Seethe, bootlicker.

25, would you rather pay for a 10 dollar map pack or let retards buy skins

So underage gambling laws are also anti capitalist?

I'd take the fucking map pack. Also Fortnite doesn't have map packs, it has exactly one map.