Play Civilization
Other urls found in this thread:
luscious.net
youtube.com
cdn.discordapp.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
steamcommunity.com
twitter.com
sauce?
Civ 6 didnt really wow me when it first came out and non of the expansions seems great either. Im just waiting for the complete edition when they are done working on the game, then Ill pick it up... probably on sale. Are they still working on 6 content?
IV > V
Bumping because I’d like to know too. Is it based on a specific civilization game?
I think there might be 1 more expansion in the works. Last patch was at the end of May I think.
based
what has bugged me is they'll add all this cool shit with expansions then when they move on to the next number they strip it down to the previous games vanilla or worse just so they can sell more expansions.
nickel & diming civ dlcs has killed me on civ as well
Civ 6 lost me with their meme nations like Canada and Australia and also their "it's the current year" female diversity quota leader picks like Gorgo for Greece and Catherine de Medici for France.
Pretty much the Sims model.
Every gen gets a little prettier graphics and a new gimmik to the gameplay, but you have to wait 5 years for them to sell you the rest of the game back piece by piece but with less content each gen.
Civ5 started that trend. Arguably, Civ6 was better at launch than Civ5, but I bet that the same thing will happen for Civ7.
Brown eyes are so plebeian
nat the lich
shameless sauce
Sorry, we cannot accept such a deal.
nice thanks
thanks lad
I don't mind the meme nations since you can fill the world map more evenly , but god kill me with the shit women quota. I'd rather have three more niggas who actually were important once, than some dumb quota bitch, just because some SJW-shithead from firaxis refuses to accept the fact, that feminism wasn't a thing before the 20th century
Gay people should be purged.
I’d rather play EU4
It doesn't matter, it's not like they ever act like their real life counterparts, they're just avatars for their nations.
It's more satisfying to conquer a female leader anyway.
God damn I hate the Spanish
I want to fuck the spanish desu
God I want to be slapped by Isabella
Why? They ruin everything and they never show up for meetings on time.
I find that introducing Canada and Australia over say Portugal is complete and utter bullshit on the same level as the female quota
nope, better include a nation that has been independent for 50 years with no culture of their own over the nation that by itself kickstarted 500 years of european global dominance
My kingdom for another Fall From Heaven.
FFH was amazing, my favorite of any Civ game. If only Firaxis took the hint that the imbalances/variety in play-styles was actually more fun.
Didn't they try to make it a standalone game?
Sauce? Btw, was she a monarch who wasn't too fond of ((them))?
i want to try that vox populi mod for civ 5 with my friends but they don't want to play anymore
>people unironcly play civ6 when civ5 exists
The gameplay changes were unneeded and where added just for the sake of change not to mention the leaders.
Yeah but in Civ 6 only Jadwinga and Cleopatra are slightly attractive. The rest are uglies.
>play civilization
No.
civ 5 is alright now. Civ 4 is still the better civ game. And Alpha Centauri is still the king in the same genre.
What’s the best Civ game, objectively? I’d like to play one of them, I haven’t before.
Any other kino games from similar genre would be appreciated too
>the first game I played is the best in the series, all differences relative to it are bad
lmao every time
>he doesn't like Queen "butterface is good in cartoons" Victoria
>he doesn't like it when Victoria rolls her eyes and is disgusted with him
Hipwiga is the hottest one though. Way too hot...
GODDAMMIT CATHERINE. IF YOU WANTED TO VISIT YOU COULD JUST HAVE ASKED.
>Civilization V
>Civilization
Pick one, zoomer.
there's going to be a big patch soon, probably a few more civs in the future but I wouldn't expect another expansion
Civ V with both expansions and a few mods (faster aircraft, complete religions, ethnic units.)
I wish for new Dune mod
see Civ 4 for the best civ game and the mods
Civ 5 for beginner friendly and modern graphics
Alpha Centauri for true kino
Call To Power
Civ6 has a really big problem with its AI that makes previous civ AI look like real generals, so far none of the DLC or patches have fixed it
>Civ 6 devs tease a new patch that looks like it will finally make the game fun
>stream and hype the patch up
>the game becomes impossible to play with the knowledge that it will be so much better in the next patch
>a week passes, no patch
>couple days ago say that they don't even have a release date for the patch
FUUUCK
jungle wood mills about to make brasil a top civ
Not him but Civ 6 is shit in comparison though.
"Why did you force me to do this? I only wanted to trade"
>Civ 6 devs tease a new patch that looks like it will finally make the game fun
The last two expansions and dozen patches didn't...what will make this one so different?
*Converts all your cities*
nigga there's gonna be one more expansion added so expect portugal.
One of the biggest reason I think that Civ4 is inferior to Civ6 and even Civ5 is the combat.
Sure is FUN and TACTICAL to have those stack-of-doom versus stack-of-doom fights.
Anyway, Colonization is better than any of those anyway. Civ4: Colonization with "Authentic Colonization" mod is also pretty top tier.
i find it amusing how some games get delays and i think "good on you, take the time to perfect it", and other times it's like "fuck you assholes get to work"
worst part is that the pc patch is done and they are delaying release until the linux and mac patch is done to have platform parity
l-lewd
Why does everyone look so hideous in the newer Civ games? Why did they decide to change everyone from normal looking people to hideous goblin monsters?
IF I GO CRAZY THEN WILL YOU STILL CALL ME ABSOLUTELY BASED
More artists need to start giving their drawings actual lips. Tired of the anime 1 line for a lip meme. Make lips great again.
They look good in civ6 you just cant accept stylized design.
I always end up doing the same shit no matter what civ or difficulty I'm playing on
I bought all games and dlcs since civ4 and barely play them anymore
colonization was fun
Massive production increase across the line, mostly due to making non-hill tiles better. Lumber mills are buffed and you can build them in jungle tiles. Industrial hub buildings buffed across the line, all late game district buildings require less production to make, specialists provide more yields with later game buildings. Also massive industrial district adjacency bonuses added to aqueduct and dams. Unused great people points get turned into faith, pantheons are remade to streamline them and even include options for nations who don't want to pursue religious play, giving them a free settler or a free worker with some pantheon choices.
My main problem with civ6 was the fact that the production is so goddamn low that the only way to build anything in less than 15 turns was by juggling Magnus across your empire while chopping everything you can. This patch seems to address that.
Imagine if you do this playing as Bismark
Not him but some of the highlights:
More production & other output
Cheaper late-game buildings
A lot of quality of life improvements
UI improvements, including appropriated mods
A update infomercial that's only slightly cringe-y:
youtube.com
(You)
Have you played parts 3 or 4?
>100 gold for a flash and slap
>Not pushing for more
lmaoing at your beta ass.
>Can't make CBP Russia work for the life of me
pls help.
They look alot better in motion than in stills.
I'm more mad at the lack of Byzantium. Portugal can wait, we have Brazil
I still like playing FFH2
What the fuck is her problem? (And why does it turn me on when she berates me?)
>D-du auch
It's amazing bro
Really changes the game and makes it actually replayable, also you dont feel like you're getting cheesed on higher difficulty and every game can be close as fuck
unless you do a warmonger rush
The late game production cost in the base game was stupid. Building spaceship parts is just painful. But another big problem was the whole fresh water system making population growth so slow. Did they fix that?
Fitting, because Jadwiga was used as a cock-pocket by the Lithuanian king since she was 12 years old. That's the only thing she did of note in her short, 25 year life. She was an awful pick for a Polish leader
6 is marginally better than 5
As hown a da sphi rasdis sphi lywn.
RADAM.
Isabella didn't deserve this. She's married and produced a bunch of healthy children with her loving husband.
What if that's her husband
this is the main issue, I can't get any good wars out of the AI and multiplayer online requires you to go for subs asap. The mods that fix AI usually can't keep up with the patches and its always thrown off
Why has no one made this H-game? Just clone Civilization but add in some system where you can trade sexual favors or take sex slaves if you conquer a civ. Could have either real historic leaders, or mostly rule 63 ones, or original characters.
It's not about fresh water, it's about housing (which fresh water affects). Managing housing will be easier too, since most things that increase it also require an investment of production. And aqueducts are now less of a waste of a slot, with their adjacency bonus for industrial hubs.
Still, growth in civ6 will never be as insane as it was in 5.
There are several civs that specifically work around widened housing limits - Australia and Indonesia does for coastal cities and Kongo does for land ones with their early neighbourhoods.
Personally I like the housing system, since it encourages wide play. 4 city meta was the absolute worst thing about 5.
Those stacks take strats bro
No, he's right. Civ 6 looks fantastic.
Based and lewdpilled
Aqueducts were never really a waste of a slot, considering they don't take up a district slot. The only bad thing is that they eat a tile, but they were good enough to get you a +3 on a commercial hub, and Khmer put them to good use.
Khmer still are my favorite to play, but it sucks that they've been outclassed as the POPULATION RUUUUUSH civ by Inca, who are my second favorite now
I always wanted to fuck Isabella and Katherine, they're so fucking hot in that game especially if you destroy them, but dont eliminate them and just let them struggle all the time with their pitiful deals towards you
They fuckin knew what they were doing
>no culture of their own
REEEEEE OLD WORLD GET OUT. NORTH AMERICAN UNION NOW.
>trade open boarders
>position every tank you have around their capital
>declare war
>suddenly your tanks are teleported to just outside their borders
Explain
>paperbag.tiff
I'll accept the Bahamas, Cuba, Trinidad & Tobago, Barbados, and Belize, but no way am I allowing Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, Panama, Costa Rica, El Salvador, or the rest of the Niggerbean into our club.
>AoE2 remake adds Lithuanians to the game
>Poles are still merged with Russians under a blanket "Slav" civ
Lmao
t. never fought in a real war
I'm burned out on Civ but post more Jadwiga please, thank you.
I wish we had more Civ 6 hotties, I want more Cleo and Jadwiga, not Ugly Hungarian or block faced mongoloid.
Makes sense for every government type except communism.
Stay the fuck out of my cunt you retarded leafspawn
Ok, but we're letting in Australia and NZ as a compromise.
Sadly they went with a sjw designer, will there be another expansion?
jadwiga makes my penis the big penis
Based SMAC. True /yanggang/ rise embrace the self of group, and the self of humanity up
Are countries equipped with some kind of telekinesis magic that can evacuate enemy combatants from their countries, but only once? Please explain this to me.
?
Why not just make an Anglosphere Union to compromise. Then we could also add Singapore, Belize, and Ireland (by force).
I love Civ VI and have sunk almost as many hundreds of hours into it as V
My biggest issue with VI is the leaders abilities being too overly complex or narrowly focused on specific aspects which might not even be a factor in the game you play.
It's much more balanced at least but I prefer the leaders in V
>game has military access agreements
>no way to enforce your borders on trespassers without declaring war
>if you declare war everyone treats you like you're the bad guy
Imagine thinking V is better than VI
balance
Agreed. She's for respect.
It's just anti-cheese
You can do that "cheese" in the vox populi mod but after that you'll never get a open border treaty (most likely)
Yes.
No Ireland, No UK. Europe is a dick.
That's fine. They'd probably just vote endlessly for socialism anyways.
Soviet Russia had literally zero honor
dat kristina
>I don't know what I'm reading, but I like it
I don't have to imagine, just like running train on ur mum lmao
The guy who leaked that also leaked that there were plans for a 3rd expansion that includes Portugal, the Mayans, another "Native American" civ, and Babylon.
It already came out in like february, keep up.
>but Canada's fine
>They see your dick
>voting
No, we're going to be Bonapartist.
Canada has Manitoba, Saskatchewan, and Alberta. We just have to enact an extradition treaty for all the Chinese in Vancouver, carpet bomb Toronto, and we'd be golden.
based Mali
>pls fix all our problems for us, it'll be totally worth it lol
>mvemba gazes up to the skies to gaze upon your massive member as it eclipses the the sun
why does america have a bonus on home continent
I have Civ V with 9 hours in and have NO idea what I'm doing, same boat with Endless Space 2 and 5 hours
>starts worshiping it
>climate change is in
Civ: Woke Edition confirmed. Not getting it.
Stop sexualizing our king or hussar police will come for you
climate change was already in civ
They're a late game defensive/cultural civ
Good point, it should have a bonus on every continent
It took me about 20 hours to get the lay of the land. Just play a ridiculously OP civ on Prince and see if you can stick it out until you win.
Because of the Monroe Doctrine.
Endless Spess is a broken mess, just pirate ES2, it's an improvement in every way
>sub saharan culture is based upon dick worship
Invading North America is very difficult IRL.
I bet you don't even know what that word means
>Your armies are so BIG...
Enjoy it, the best parts of Civ are the parts where you have no idea what the fuck you are doing.
The only Civ game that I think doesnt have climate change as a mechanic in some way is 3 though
t. Corbynite.
Don't you got a milkshake to throw?
Reminder that Seondeok was a terrible leader choice.
>Good cleo porn
Please tell me there is more
Reported to Scotland Yardshirebrooktonham for not paying enough into the NHS
>Germany
>Poland
>Russia
Gets me every time.
I don't think Civ 4 or 5 have climate change in them.
What is a ridiculously OP civ, and what would make them OP?
Reread the post, you chalkboard.
expand war
yeah sure, just ask the mexicans outbreeding them atm
Civ4 had desertification in BtS
Babylon
Korea
Poland
In the base game, England and Arabia.
>The rest are uglies.
???
I just got out of the shower and haven't put my contacts in yet, I wanted to be helpful to (You) first, s-sorry
Eiyu*Senki – The World Conquest
it's raceplay garbage but oh well cdn.discordapp.com
Sure but desertification can be due to over farming and other factors besides increased CO2 emissions right? So it's not necessarily what we would typically associate with climate change like rising sea levels and more extreme storms.
Was proving his point part of your plan?
Literally irrelevant, I'm talking about a military invasion during war. Why does everything always have to be /pol/ or leftypol?
manifest destiny bitch
I just want to worship her feet while my armies kill her enemies
>citing facts now rustles your jimmies
dam son that's sad.
Tribalistic binary bullshit mentality
It had nothing to do with the conversation, you're just making yourself look like a sperg.
I mean, he's not wrong.
Its what the Muslims are doing after all.
>What is a ridiculously OP civ
In Civ V, Inca or Maya.
>and what would make them OP?
You'd have to understand all the mechanics of the game. Someone telling you to just play the OP civs doesn't help you learn that. You should actually play specialist civs to learn how the mechanics work. Babylon to learn how science works. Korea to learn how specialists work. Celts to see how units/buildings can give bonuses. Brazil to see how Tourism works. And so on. Basically, play every Civ.
But the short of it is, the Inca and Maya are the most broken because they can do anything.
The Inca unique ability of avoiding hill tiles alone allows you to get early game production boost/explore faster that push you past everyone else. Adding the ridiculous food bonuses on top of that is beyond broken.
Maya get the most broken building in the game, giving you double science and faith with the very first building you build in each city. This easily lets you surpass opponents in science while also getting religion first. Then free great people on top of that just makes them even more broken.
Both Inca and Maya can go wide or tall, go for any victory, etc. And they're not limited by needing certain types of tiles like swamps or desert. They're basically the most versatile civs.
It's just retards who can't understand the world without sorting everything into extremes and easily understood good/bad teams
I don't know what you're getting at.
Okay user I am starting a new game. I had already been playing on Prince. Any advice on say, things to focus on? I think I have some of the DLC.
My eyelashes are too long for contacts--bitches are crazy for wanting long lashes.
Well you didn't specify military invasion. Demographic replacement can also be considered an invasion you know.
>swen leader looks like a trannie
what did they mean by this?
All me btw, AMA
I miss the card crusher meme...
This is informative. Thank you, user. I was considering going with Babylon but may play Inca instead. What do you suggest?
Also the one file I have, I was randomized with the Ottomans, how difficult was I making that game for myself?
I have long eyelashes too, it's tricky and I cried a lot when I first got them, but you just need to practice but women are batshit about everything so you can't fault them for bad taste
>poor man's Sengoku Rance
No thank you
Ironic that they made the chick that is canonically ugly into the pretty one.
still better looking than the game monstrosity
Settle 4 cities as soon as possible. You don't need any more. In fact, more is detrimental. Focus on the first 2 social policy trees, and then Rationalism when you can.
Inca are good for getting the lay of the land, since they aren't hindered by hills, but Babylon is far and away the best civ in the game. Their defenses are superb, thanks to the Walls of Babylon, and they get enough science that even a completely new player can compete with the AI.
Ottomans are pretty trash, but they're fun to play on certain maps. They're completely outclassed by England, though, which is a shame.
lol loser I never cried or felt uneasy about it, the long lashes just made it ridiculously hard to put a lens in plus I have an astigmatism in each eye so I needed larger lenses to begin with very much so
Okay I will play Babylon. I prefer science anyhow.
This one looks more like the game version
>shadman
Any other settings I should change?
Just remember that even when going for a science victory, you want to prioritize production first and foremost.
Production > Science > Food > Gold > Culture > Faith
Should I buy Civ 6 for the Switch bros? It's $40. The only thing holding me back is the fact the expansions aren't out yet. How's the base game?
i plan on picking up Gathering Storm during the Steam sale
I prefer continents for singleplayer games, but that's just me.
Go into Advanced Setup and turn unit move/attack animations off. It'll make the game about 40% quicker, chopping a standard pace game from 10 hours down to 6.
Okay. I've saved a lot of this to a notepad file, will try not to suck.
>love the idea of the Celts' unique ability
>want to angle for having enough faith generation to be able to buy units with it
>all the units are ludicrously overpriced
Was extremely disappointed, at least getting first pick of religious bonuses is useful.
Base game is good. Rise and Fall was a pretty terrible expansion anyways. If you've never played a civ before, or are a veteran who is looking for something fresh after 3k+ hours, it's a good investment.
It's also pretty easy to get into, but hard to master.
Vlad the Impaler when
>Civ on console
>paying for Civ 6
Funny enough climate change isn't a big deal, the worst that happens is you lose a few coastal tiles.
Like I said, just play all the civs, trying to focus on their specialties. There's no silver bullet to learning strategy/4x games. It's just learning from trial and error.
Explain dumb wojakposter
>Giving more power to china
>thinking theres anyone of value in those shitholes
At least you got Toronto right
And specifically for Babylon, you want to use your first great scientist to found a campus. The extra science it gives early on is ludicrous. After that, it's a matter of if you have the space for it (IE, useless tiles that wouldn't be better off with a farm or a mine), and if you really want to rush an important tech.
Every civ has their own metagame within the game itself. That's what makes even the bad ones worth trying out.
BABA YETU YETU
Not even the best song in the series. I raise you one Khmer theme
Most of the female leaders are terrible choices.
Wilhelmina had no power, Dido wasn't real, Kristina never did anything, Jadwiga was a fuckpuppet for the Lithuanian king, Eleanor was only a peon between England and France to control Aquitaine.
Oh and then there's Civ5 where Isabelle of Spain and Theodora of Byzantium somehow got chosen despite being at best equals to their husbands(Ferdinand and Justinian) and both husbands outlived their wives. If they had to be leaders, at least make them dual leaders with their husbands.
With semen?
Vlad von Carstein when?
Romania never
Anyone got any hot Cleopatra art?
>considering playing a Civ game on console instead of PC
>will pay over 30$ for a shitty port of a strategy game on...console
>calls others dumb
lmao. Also Civ 6 is shit and if you're going to play it at all then get it on PC. Not also is it going to be cheaper with a steam sale it's also a game series that plays best on PC.
>buying videogames
no
Finally a king I can get behind, bend over and fuck.
A TRVE CIV FOR TRVE ROMANS
VI has the best music in the series
youtube.com
>tfw you're so ugly not even a fucking painter paid to paint you as beautiful is able to do anything about your stupid face
CIv 6 has fantastic music but I do miss having specific war themes.
That would be sexist and you know it
>Canada
>no culture of their own
Kebs would disagree with you
I’ve yet to finish a game of Civ 6 without ragequitting. Something about how I need to order stuff to get the bonuses before I can research them fucks me up. It feels worse than 5, but I felt then same way about 5 and 4, so I’ll get used to it.
this is 10/10 for Civ negroids
I am totally fucking addicted to vox populi. Every morning after I wake up I start a Deity game with a random civ. Help me.
If you get enough science/culture, you can hard research them. It happens all the time as Rome, where I have so much culture that I end up hard researching everything up until the Medieval Era, since I have too much culture and don't have enough turns to meet the requirements.
>still no celts
>still no portuguese
>still no austrians
>still no byzantine
>still no babylon
>still no revolutionary spanish-america
>still no songhai
Looks like this caesar got stabbed more than 23 times. Death by bukakke in the senate house.
Killing vampires and vampires coast is a secret pleasure of mine. If only the lore could allow the wiping out of these foul creature, who aren't even proper undead.
This was one of my largest gripes; all I want are safe borders and to keep the savages out. I am not the bad guy here.
I just feel like a failure whenever I do it. And setting up towns to build stuff with bonuses also isn’t easy. I feel I could get away with doing more bullshit in 5, while here I just have to accept I won’t have everything.
Canada's culture is "We're not the USA! We hate the USA! Stop comparing us to the USA! Fuck the USA for stealing all our best comedians and designers!" Etc, etc. In short, they're Tsun for the USA.
uncle phil
youtube.com
SAILS WILL BE CUT
SAILS WILL BE DRAWN da naa naa
THE GALLEON IS TAKEN FROM THE MOUNTAINS
>No Celts
replaced by SCOHTLAHND
>No Portuguese
Irrelevant, we have Brazil
>No Austrians
Good point
>No Byzantine
An outrage
>No Babylon
We have Sumeria
>No Songhai
Mali was a better choice. Would've preferred Ghana.
>Still no (revolutionary Spanish-America)
You mean Gran-Columbia? Yeah, it's stupid how we have Canada but not them.
post eleanor
Anyone else always play with only female AIs? I like to imagine that they offer themselves to me in exchange for their people not being slaughtered by me.
why would you want to play Portugal
Literally the most useless country to ever exist
Can't be helped. Same thing happens to me with Science/Korea. The Eureka/Civic boost feature is there for Science/Culture-lets, like Germany or the Inca.
Also, I've got the meta game for it down pretty well. I can get a good 75% of Eureka's in one game. Just produce 2 - 3 slingers at the start, then a builder, and then settle a new city on the coast, and you should be well on your way to getting most of the ancient/classic era civics.
I'm Canadian and modern Canadian culture is basically just American consumerist culture sprinkled with "diversity is our strength" nonsense. The only places you'll find any kind of traditional Canadian identity is in white rural areas.
>Civ 6
>Build a Slinger, kill an enemy with said Slinger, unlock Agoge, build 2 more Slingers, research Archery, then upgrade the Slingers to get 3 Archers
>Civ 4 & 5
>Build 3 Archers
People who think Civ 6 doesn't have the deepest gameplay yet are fucking high
Might as well put the difficulty on Settler if you're playing Babylon, Babylon removes all challenge from the game
Pretty sure that there was a roman emperor who proudly whored himself to members of the senate.
Civ is about celebrating nationality and history. I have no idea why putting Canada in would be a problem? It's not like the zulu empire could feasibly compete with maoist china but that's kind of the whole point.
Is her dress a Touhou reference?
Half of their country speaks a different language than the US.
>The only places you'll find any kind of traditional Canadian identity is in white rural areas.
And it's mostly just pining for the days when Britain or France ruled a particular area.
The irony is most of the British people got over nationalism, while it's the French group that's obsessed with keeping the divide going. Because it gives them power far beyond what their population percentage should get. By the French logic, Canada should be a English/Chinese speaking nation.
They are Americas hat
French-Canadians aren't people.
Heliogabalus?
Maori is fun to play
They were the pioneers of a "centralized" monarchy (although questionable nowdays), the pioneers of the age of discovery and were the first empire where the sun never sets. The real european power through most of the XVIth century were the iberians
Also cool ships
If not being politically partisan helps them obtain power over the rest of Canada, why should they change anything?
The problems with 6 is being able to buy units/buildings with gold and faith, the cpu not building enough commercial hubs to sustain a respectable military, and doing dumb shit like rolling up to your city with just a bombard or a horseman.
Theres nothing wrong with nationalism. I don't blame Quebecers for wanting to preserve their national identity.
I'm kind of surprised they haven't really nerfed the Ottomans yet considering how stupid OP they are.
Civ 6 is a piece of shit. Amenities and policy cards are stupid features and whoever came up with them should be hanged
It's not nationalism, they love Arabs, Viets, and Haitians, it's pure anglophobia/anti-Semitism.
Imagine having an opinion this bad
>she eyes your dick
How did they get away with it?
>not being politically partisan
>forcing everyone in politics to learn French just to cater to them
>constantly threatening to leave Canada and form their own country until politicians give them special treatment just for French citizens
>shaming everyone with identity politics
>Trudeau
The list goes on. You guys can call it "diversity" all you want. But really its a scam to give a small minority the majority of power. The French special interests groups in Canada are just like the black caucus in the US. Scream victimhood and diversity all day, while raking in millions off of exploiting their own people.
Nothing wrong with anglophobia and anti-semitism.
Also I'd challenge you on their love of Haitians, Viets, and Arabs. Sure Quebec has it's fair share of xenophilic lefties but not nearly as much as Ontario for instance.
Quebec should have power over all of Canda. Anglophones should not be allowed to vote.
explain
>>constantly threatening to leave Canada and form their own country until politicians give them special treatment just for French citizens
Nobody cares about this anymore, the rest of Canada would be happy if they just fuck off.
Based Khalida
>it's pure anglophobia/anti-Semitism
The hate (read: envy) against the proud Anglo-Semitic peoples must stop.
Theodore Roosevelt was known for BTFO'ing Central America
OLD GOOD
NEW BAD
BC should join the states
>Theres nothing wrong with nationalism.
No, there isn't.
>don't blame Quebecers for wanting to preserve their national identity.
But they're not. They've thrown it under the bus for "diversity." They literally have segregation laws in Ottawa where you have to know French to run certain businesses (and politics). But then make exceptions for these rules for all groups...except English speakers. Because diversity = everyone but White English people.
You're right, it's much better than 5
Quebec powers half of Canada, and Atlantic provinces would be completely fucked by being cut off from the rest of the country.
That doesn't mean it went away. The rest of the country does consider it a joke. But certain areas in Quebec have doubled down on the narrative.
Look at any Quebecois nationalist parties on the provincial and federal level, about half of its members are minorities.
so left elanor is loli elanor and right is mature elanor?
6 isn't even good. It's close to unplayable. Shit taste
Just say you haven't played it next time
Rise and Fall was the first step in making the game tolerable desu. Magnus chopping and being able to turn faith into production by buying settlers and workers is so huge I can't imagine playing the game without it.
Sure thing fagtron. Next time just say you don't like video games. Revolution is probably your favorite
>everyone hates the art style of Civ VI when its announced
>I don't really mind it
>game comes out
>millions of people love the game despite the art style
>I can't stand everything besides the art style
UI sucks, movement has been ruined, districts gimp city growth, removed trade/diplomacy features, AI is even dumber than before, unit spam is worse than before, a mess of unfinished ideas, music is good but the age format makes it get old real fast, etc.
Game is worse than Civ V was at launch. And these expansions aren't fixing the problems of the base game. Just adding new broken features on top of it.
Didn't koreans bitch because Seondeok
1. Wasn't brown
2. Wasn't a good leader
>Game is worse than Civ V was at launch
There is no way you played Civ V at launch if you think that
Yeah, damn shame about Magnus being the only viable governor, though, and the only good golden age bonuses prior to the Industrial Era being faith based. Monumentality especially.
The mechanics were alright, but the civs were a travesty. They had almost 0 interesting or unique mechanics. A single Gathering Storm civ has more interesting gameplay elements than all of the Rise & Fall cast.
Civ V was so barebones without expansions.
They are basically same shit as civics back in 4 and in many ways analogous to that philosophy-or-whatever thingie in Civ5.
Was Civ V literally unplayable at launch? Because VI was. It crashed constantly and still does whenever I try to play it
Yes, I did. Civ V was easy and simple, but not bad. Civ VI was Civ V with half the features changed or removed just to make it "different." And changing stuff just for the sake of change doesn't make it better.
The change to movement alone killed Civ VI. Let alone the four dozen other issues I can name.
They went on a rampage BECAUSE she was too brown. And also not a good leader. The only reason she got in is because of a historical docu-drama that was airing at around the same time. Same for Hojo Tokimune.
>UI sucks
I think it's good enough. Mods make it perfect.
>Movement has been ruined
Only in the early game. By the time you unlock Chemistry, the movement is the best it's ever been. I do think that the movement gimp sucks, and there was really no reason for it.
> Districts gimp city growth
Districts yeeting the tile bonuses sucks, but otherwise they're fantastic. It makes city planning much more interesting. Having played 3k hours in Civ VI, I can pretty much gauge how many yields I can get off of every district just by looking at a tile.
>Removed trade/diplomacy features
Such as?
>AI is even dumber than before
Blatantly false
You can have BC in exchange for taking Nova Scotia off our hands.
Yes, Civ 5 was a disaster.
I remember going to gamestop to buy a physical copy and when I got home to install it the CD only contained a Steam installer and a key. Already I was disappointed, and then I find out the game a barebones broken mess and I had to wait quite a while for patches before it wasn't dogshit.
Amenities are just not explained well, but they're basically city-based happiness. Much better than globohomo happiness like in Civ V.
>Policy cards
What's the problem with them? Too much reading? Granted, there are like 5 must-have cards, and 30 situational cards, with the rest being useless, but still.
>BECAUSE she was too brown. And also not a good leader.
Sorry, that's what I meant.
>but not bad
The combat system alone made it shit. It was terrible, don't delude yourself.
>with half the features changed or removed just to make it "different
What did they remove
>The change to movement alone killed Civ VI
Melodramatic much?
I can't stack 50 units on top of each other so it sucks.
This.
The fact that any of them are useless makes it a stupid system. Having to go through turns of anarchy to switch governments is fucking stupid. Amenities are retarded and global happiness was easy as fuck to maintain. All you had to do was obtain luxury resources and get along with city states. Plenty of policies made it easier to boost happiness as well. Amenities just make it a pain in the dick to keep your citizens happy considering you have to waste turns to build districts and add on to them to boost it. It took an already unnecessary feature and made it worse
Ah, so you're just a V-baby, got it. Global happiness fucking sucked, and pretty much everyone agreed before V became the go-to nostalgia bait game in the series.
Chess is boring and full of psueds, is Go any better?
>V has pretty and cool looking leaders
>VI has the overt cartoon caricatures like in some Dreamworks film
Yikes
VI's leaders look better and are animated really well. The only thing V has over VI is leader scenes
I just wish the VI models didn't look so mishapen. I do think they're better animated
>with the rest being useless, but still.
Has anybody ever used the card that gets you gold if put a neighborhood on top of a farm?
No, never. I've used just about 90% of the cards, though, with most of the ones I've ignored being military slots.
Anyone else play VI with the graphics overhaul mod that makes it look more like V? That is when when the update hits of course.
steamcommunity.com
>What did they remove
Diplomatic victory, in between units like great war infantry r long swordsman specifically added into later Civ V expansions because people complained of a power gap between swordsman and musketmen, some buildings, trade options, UI options and many other things I'm not even remembering off the top of my head. Some of these might have been added in with later expansions. But the fact is, removing them from the base game of Civ VI when Civ V already had them is stupid. It's downgrading your sequel, which already is using Civ V as a base.
>Melodramatic much?
When a unit goes from being able to cross a river in 1 turn to needing 3 turns because "lol you need that extra 0.5 movement points" is just fucking horrible. It makes exploration take forever. Now, take that same system and try to move a 40 unit army to an enemy city with a river. Or heaven save you, a jungle tile.
I'm not saying it wasn't a bad feature, VI just made it worse. At least in V you could just rush to get luxury resources and ally with city states and just ignore happiness by mid to late game. VI forces you to babysit it forever
I prefer the added difficulty and playing around of the movement of VI.
Diplo victory is back, and they added a load of inbetween units (Coursers, Pike & Shot, etc). Adding more inbetween units would be stupid, considering it's already hard enough to field new units before they become obsolete.
are you a retard reference?