>people are upset over cartoony graphics in a zelda game
oh look, it's 2001 all over again
People are upset over cartoony graphics in a zelda game
Graphic faggots are probably the worst thing to cross gaming.
>Nintencels are whiteknighting a shitty soulless $60 3DS game
Oh look it's the Wii U dark ages all over again.
NPC Link
I no rite
Just like ugly NPC-Earthbound characters
Because it's $60 plus tip and the only new content is a Zelda Maker tech demo and removed content.
they had a point two decades ago when everyone was hyped for a realistic zelda and got cat eyes instead
now the only thing they should be mad about is that they're charged more than 20 dollars for a remake of a gameboy game
The difference is that Wind Waker's graphics were based off of anime. WW was trying to capture a specific style that would fit the "adventure with a surprisingly dark underbelly" theme.
The LA remake looks like fucking Thomas the Tank Engine for no reason, and there aren't going to be darker themes.
>cartoony
if only it was cartoony/anime
>A literal Funko Pop
OH NONONONONO
game looks fucking great not sure what Yea Forums's problem is on this one.
Everything looks like it came from a capsule toy machine, I really like it.
It's not often that you see posts that are content negative.
OH NO MY KIDS GAME LOOKS LIKE A KIDS GAME REEEEEEEEEEEE, you faggots will still buy it anyway.
The awful Unity graphics are bad enough but paying full price for a short remake lmaoo. No wonder Nintendo can get away with pushing out shit alot of the time.
Having a cute artstyle isn't the problem, having a fucking Funko Pop shit artstyle is. This looks like it should be 1/3 of the price but Nintendo lapdogs are going to eat it up for a full 60 only to find that it's a fucking Game Boy game that only lasts like 12 hours at most, and that's if you collect everything in the game
Reminds me a lot of Little Big Adventure. I skipped out on LA back in the day because it just seemed like a ALTTP asset reuse game. but the style change makes me want to check it out.
Agreed, have always hated the Funko Pop style like they do in Earthbound.
I'm only annoyed with it being a $60 1:1 remake of a short gameboy game. If it was a budget title, I might pick it up.
That's not the issue..
It's probably going to be a decent game for people that haven't played links awakening before but just the die hard fans are looking and seeing how easy of a cash grab it is
Im actually mad that this wont be available for 3ds
>could've had a great looking 2D remake looking like minish cap
>instead we get some glossy claylike funko abomination
>namefag
I agree, posts like yours are subhuman. Thanks for the filter btw
the graphics in this are fucking great
Yeah you mean that Super Nintendo game from like twenty five years ago? Slam your head on a knife you dumb cunt
Look at it this way, don't expect FunkoPop!Link to be in smash anytime soon.
Yeah that's the game, the funko pop style is really off putting.
Earthbound's artstyle is based off of Peanuts dumbshit.
and it looks exactly like funko pop, disgusting style.
Anyone saying the game looks like funko pops is a zoomer. I refuse to believe anyone under 25 would think this art style is bad. I love it.
Wind Waker deserved the backlash and so does this. We wanted a edgy Zelda and what we got was a step backwards. A damn shame people flip flopped
Earthbound predates funkos by at least 15 years you subhuman zoomer
People that bitch about art style shifts with Zelda at this point can all toss themselves on a pike.
I'm more upset over the fact I have to spend 60$ for a GB remake.
Wind Waker was pretty edgy actually. You kill Ganondorf by stabbing him in the forehead.
It's the old lesson of don't judge a book by its cover.
Wind Waker style had soul. That one does not.
This should be the only complaint. But I still get 20% off from Best Buy until December. So only $48 for me.
there's probably a small minority like myself who grew up loving Link's Awakening and feel turned off by how different it looks
still looks like funko pops
>nintendo releases a handheld title for their handheld console
How are you missing the point this hard
Edge is mostly image. Cute cartoon characters killing each other is shocking and funny. When realistic characters do it it’s brutal and edgy.
It doesn't look like Funko at all, boomers just seething.
>Cadence of Hyrule looks better than LA Remake
Lmao
Wow guys you're seriously going to complain just because it looks like a funko pop and is extremely low effort? Nintendo put a lot of work into it.
You could make the argument funkos look like earthbound. Not the other way around. That’s how time works retarded zoomer.
So by your logic Happy Tree Friends isn't edgy?
Yeah, that's an extreme example, but I'm just following your own words.
And Peanuts looks like Funko pops. Things can be co opted and change meanings including art styles. Time can make things look worse
Give me my Marin Amiibo already.
>You kill Ganondorf by stabbing him in the forehead.
That one instance does not make the game itself edgy.
Yea not real edge. Happy Tree Friends was like that from the start. When I think pure edge I think Bomberman Act 0
Funkos have no mouth or personality. They’re only vaguely similar to each other. Beady eyed cartoon characters have existed since the creation of cartoons. But being a zoomer, you wouldn’t have any idea.
>people are upset
fucking where user? who's upset? everyone looks ecstatic to play this. And 16bit CG link is cuter than ever
But nobody likes Act 0
these things doesn't work by time. they work by popularity. funko pop is the reference everyone will get, not everyone have heard of earthbound so the style is now associated with funko pops not earthbound.
Wish amazon still did this. Its 10$ off, but 50$ is still way too much for a game like this. I'll wait for it to go down to 40$.
Only the austists here.
A true Zelda would be playing Cadence of Hyrule
That shit is Classic Nintendo hard if you suck at rhythm games
Everyone knows who Charlie Brown is though.
>Funkos have no mouth or personality.
This is the biggest thing. Also their heads are disproportionately huge and soullessly blank. Link definitely has a personality. You can see his determination and sense of purpose in his Amiibo pose and determined frown. Marin is clearly very happy-go-lucky with lots of swaying and smiling. It's cute and nothing like funko.
>its another outrage over a nonissue episode
the only problem is that its priced at $60, but if they added extra content then the price is justified (they probably haven't so it really should be $40)
Whether you are old enough to remember who did it first or not, it doesn’t change the fact that funk pops was not the first toy or cartoon character to do beady eyes. I’m sure they’re probably one of the first to do beady eyes with no mouth. But that’s not what this remake is.
The difference here m8, is Links Awakening is a GB game with a fresh coat of paint and Wind Waker was still a GameCube game.
That’s like the difference between a moped and a Car. And you’re sitting there still trying to sell me a 1993 Moped with a new coat of paint and an air horn attached for the cost of the car.
They better not ruin the animal village.
>HD remasters must have new content!
I mean it's nice, but definitely not a requirement.
Having all of the graphics and music redone is enough to make me want to re-play it.
nobody's upset about it being cartoony, most people are annoyed by the lack of detail or how it isn't a more accurate rendition of the photos from DX
>head isn't a square
>eyes aren't perfect circles spaced as far apart as possible
>nose isn't an isosceles triangle
>has a mouth
>level of detail between head and body isn't incongruous
How is it funkopop?
he looks like an emoji, that's my only hangup.
this sums it up. except I would have said that 30 currency units would be a fair compensation for a game which just improves graphics while keeping the same simple mechanics of the original. plenty of hobby devs already cloned that game because of its simple nature. so there is no way to justify 60 currency units.
no, they are upset because it looks plasticy
Imagine being such a fanboy shill that you would pay $60 for a Gameboy Color game with no added content or improved mechanics.
I would say having the sword and shield equipped at all times thanks to more buttons to map them to is an improvement. An obvious and expected one, but still counts
>Redbox are getting Switch games
God bless, I aint paying 60$ for games I can finish in an afternoon
is that the fucking thinking emoji?
>He's trying to use Soulless as an argument
Oh look is another day on Yea Forums again.
Also the bracelet and pegasus boots will be equipped at all times. I wish Roc's Feather had a dedicated button as well.
What about an official rendition from a year ago?
Im more pissed that this artstyle isn't being used for a earthbound remake.
>and removed content.
What did they remove? Just the camera house, right? They even bothered to bring back the Color Dungeon despite the fact its gimmick is no longer novel.
Fucking hate how Mickey was a funko pop figure in 1928.
With the amount of buttons on the controller you would think they would do that, maybe have it set to ZL/ZR or let you carry up to 4 items
I have very few problems with the artstyle
>DOF is a little too aggressive
>Would prefer if the game was cartoony rather than imitating looking at a diorama
>Apparently it's 30fps outdoors with frame drops and 60fps indoors?
If they don't fix the 3rd then I'm skipping this game. Really fucking bizarre that these graphics are so taxing on the hardware while in docked mode. Personally I'd rather a 30fps lock than having the framerate switch all the time.
>and the only new content is a Zelda Maker tech demo
this seems like a pretty big deal to me
I'm shocked people are still trying to peddle the whole 'Soulless' angle after the footage they've shown. There's plenty of attention to detail in the game, the characters seem pretty expressive in how they move and they've seemingly kept in almost all of the little details from the original like being able to steal from the shop and being blasted by the shopkeeper for it. You can still hate the artstyle, sure, but it's disingenuous to imply there isn't any care being put into it.
it's not worth it with how limited it is
>can only place pre-made dungeon rooms and not make your own
>can only arrange them in pre-made shapes instead of making your own layout
Soul/soulless posters don't actually bother looking into those details, their mind is made up from the beginning
I'm taking a wild fucking guess the people complaining and upset.. never played the first game. CAuse that shit was cartoony as hell.
If you don't see what's wrong, your a fucking idiot. There's nothing wrong with cartoon graphics, it's that this doesn't even look cartoon - flat, detailess textures, bloom up the ass, and horrible character models.
Minish cap looks better, and it's a gba game. Hell, OG LA looks wayyy better.
They thought DUDE FUNKO POP LMAO and ran with it. With that being said, the lighting/palette/bloom could be a lot better, at least in the grass/beach areas. And $60 is pretty shitty for a GBC remake.
>your a fucking idiot
Based retard
Those are all the exact same complaints people had when Wind Waker got announced. Stop being retarded.
A game with that style would look like complete garbage and you're delusional if you think otherwise.
Yeah, I would personally do it like this:
A - Use/Talk/Pull/Pick-up
B - Sword
X/Y - Equipped items
ZR - Shoot Bow
R - Jump
ZL - Shield
L - Pegasus Dash
D-pad Up - Ocarina (press it, select a song, hit A to play it)
Then there would only be 6 items to assign to X and Y: Magic Powder, Hookshot, Shovel, Boomerang, Fire Rod, and Bombs.
This looks like hitman Go graphics
People will shill of course, but I don't have a problem with a different artstyle. I have a problem with the top-down Zeldas always looking ugly and like toys since the 3DS. A toy-like look fits a game with no charm or point like Link Between Worlds, but Link's Awakening deserved a lot better.
The old style graphics in Link's Awakening worked because the limitations were harsher and as a result more ambiguous. It's easier to get pulled into the world and care about things This new aesthetic makes it impossible to get invested beyond "lol so cute" because now it's intentionally toy-like and defined.
fuck off retard
That's UE4 on the Switch for ya. I'm pretty sure they'll smooth it out tho.
toon link was fine, this is garbage
earthbound was an ugly game with a bad artstyle. I never liked earthbound.
this are style is as shit as your tastes
you're an unironic subhuman
Fuck off zoomer. Your opinion is shit
comparing a modern anything to anything 90 years ago. high effort defense force
Please tell me the exact points in the game when Link is supposed to make these faces and the camera is supposed to zoom up to show them. Because otherwise the art style is dead on
my opinion is as shit as your tastes
that time it was a new game, not a remake you dumb fucking faggot
Sounds pretty perfect to me, for any traditional Zelda game
A Link Between Worlds had plenty of charm though
It's his soulless eyes I don't like, otherwise I don't mind. Looks like a Funko Pop
Ultimately it's a meaningless debate because zoomer Nintendo fans will just vehemently defend the game up to a week after release then move on and never talk about the game again because it's just a stopgap release.
I can find examples of beady eyed cartoon characters from all time periods. Funko pop did not invent beady eyes you retard zoomer. They did invent a toy with beady eyes, giant melon heads, no personality, and no mouth.
>soulless
no it looks full of soul and that's why it's a problem for you faggots
the camera already zooms in on Link and NPCs during dialogue as well as item gets and death animations, there's no excuse for the lack of detail
Hang yourself zoomer
>tfw one of Yea Forums's favourite series stars a Funko Pop
>It's his soulless eyes I don't like
Wouldn't be so upset if they didn't bait and switch fans with that trailer so hard. Also the music fucking sucks. Not quite as bad as new yoshi island, but I hate that shitty remix of what was one of the most powerful songs in the game and how it has no energy at all to it. I'm a lot more pissy about the music than the graphics.
learn english before posting you retarded spic
It's a fucking 1:1 remake of the Graphics, what do you fuckers want?
>there's no excuse for the lack of detail
Other than the fact that 99% of the time in a top down game it would be completely wasted
no one cares if they invented it, it looks like shit either way
Yea Forums is full of children that haven’t experienced life before funko pops so every beady eyed cartoon character is funko pops to them.
I can feel the tears behind this post
yes, yikes police? i have a nintendo boy here frothing at the mouth while defending his favorite franchise. what can i do to convince him hes a sad faggot?
Thank God tho, I love dressing ChibiLink in red and blue
So is Zoomer just a buzzword now? It used to refer to Generation Z (people born in the 2000s), but now everyone who has a different opinion is a Zoomer.
If anything I'd think Zoomers would like this artstyle, since it's appealing to children.
Having a couple dots for eyes works better when the whole sprite is a few pixels tall.
Looks like a playable Funko Pop game, my wife's son will love it!
Then don’t buy it whiny faggot. I think it looks great.
>what can i do to convince him hes a sad faggot?
said the faggot in the same thread thinking he's above it all
wind waker is still my favorite zelda game look wise.
this one is just a cheap cash grab
I appreciate what they did with their limited palette there. I don't get this meme at all. They were constrained in the past so they have to make things ugly now so it lines up? I can't imagine how else they would have represented his eyes on the Gameboy. user, companies aren't your friends. They're out to make money. There's nothing wrong with that but you don't have to have your mouth firmly around their dick 24/7.
so it's appealing to children, like all video games because video games are toys for children
>children unironically can't see the difference between the remakes style and funko pops
Holy fuck the zoomer gen is doomed.
Seriously, if you are over the age of 15 and still can't see the difference, take some design classes and get an eye examination asap.
>It looks just like my funko pops so cute haha so much soul!
Dilate
marketing departments have the science that annoying people/controversy works best in raising awareness about your product.
Yes it looks neat.
But it's virtually the same thing going on in the remake, I mean, it IS a remake after all. He only faces the camera 25% of the time for fuck's sake and those times, if you're actually playing the game instead of fixating on his eyes, you wouldn't even notice it.
It's actually $60? What. It looks like a budget game.
if you even know what a funko pop is there's a good chance you're underage or a faggot
>indie game characters be like
Comparing the characters to funko pops implies you’re too young to know that cartoon characters have always have had beady eyes. So a zoomer.
Grand Theft Auto?
Silent Hill?
Dead Space?
There's plenty of games that aren't even a little appropriate for kids, bro.
imagine being this worked up about media
>that blur
Jesus christ, stop with this shit Nintendo
>upset
It just looks like shit, that's all.
then you have garbage tastes, like i originally said
its ok to like something that many people agree looks like shit, but theres no need to get so defensive about it, it makes you look pathetic
and youre one of them. Ill bet my left nut you werent even born when the original Links Awakening came out you repugnant fucking zoomer child. Go shove this remake up your ass
People complaining about not liking the art style have all the rights to do so.
People that complain that this artstyle is lazy or soulless are just retarded, not to mention those who think the game costs too much because "it's cartoony" regardless of the content it offers.
If you actually watch the Treehouse gameplay, you can actually see with how much care the world was modeled: every inch of the village looks unique and full of personality.
I wasn't convinced of the art style too but after seeing that gameplay I changed my mind and I absolutely love it. The only thing that bothers me is the blurry edges effect: I'm afraid it will be annoying, especially in handheld mode.
lmao just look at this
zoomers hate everything thats stylized differently than fortnite or is try hard realistic, there is no room for other styles or inbetweens.
Imagine owning a ps4 and getting upset over toy made by Nintendo.
You fags really need some videos games.
No one cares zoomer. The game looks great. Not everything needs to be edgy. And it’s going to sell millions.
I Played gta as a kid you dumb fuck
Nintendo does put their games rather pricy (it is a remake of a GBC game after all). It would be fine at 40, but 60...
>if you dont like x you like y
good arguments, all around, but at no point did i say what it should look like. this bubbly plastic looks like cheap chinky mobile shit and you're in denial
zoomers don't care about zelda or links awakening you retard. they're too busy playing fortnite or some shit. the only people on either side of the dividing line are manchildren (including me and everyone in this thread)
Yeah but most Zoomers hate anything that existed before the 2010s, so that kind of goes without saying.
If anything they would love the LA remake due to the soulless artstyle and the fact that it's new.
>soulless
>fully dedicated to an artstyle that it knows will be divisive, showing a commitment to a creator's vision
That just means you had parents who let you play GTA. But GTA is without a doubt not intended for kids, hence the M rating.
You'd be surprised to know that Link's Awakening has about the same scale and playtime as Link to the Past
My issue is that under the face lift (whether you like it or dislike it), there's still an ancient GB game with GB-tier production values and GB-tier content depth and length. It's not a $60 game.
Nintendo has no sense of a value proposition, and they get away with it because they have fans that are literally adult bodied children who have no sense of it either.
Yet M rated games sell the highest with kids
That looks like shit
Not even remotely
Samus Returns was 40$ on 3DS and it was GBC remake too. I'd say 50/60$ is a fair price considering Switch game usually cost 70$.
anyway I got it for 45€ on Amazon so
The only thing that disgusts me is the horribly overdone depth of field effect
Actually shit tastes, never post anywhere ever again
No, the people who like this shitty blurry funko pop remake are falseflagging zoomshits like you. I like how you pass over my comment of you not even being a sperm in your whore mother's womb when LA came out in 19 fucking 93 because its true. True fans are ignoring the fuck out of this remake when it comes out. You zoomers on the other hand are starving for games on the Switch like your cuck brothers did during the Wii U so any shitty little game looks amazing to you. You are SO fucking malnourished that you fail to see this game for the 3DS port that it is and u ironically defend the lazy funko pop art direction. I wont repeat myself again so Ill say it one last time: Die. Uh. Layte.
autism
>Switch game usually cost 70$
Not remotely (only the big ones like Smash or BOTW) and still not okay at all. Come on, it hasn't been a decade since the top top pricing of games was 60 bucks.
hes right though
I get your point, but shouldn't we wait for the game to come out before making assumptions on its value? We still don't know how much content it actually has.
Looks really good, reminds me of Little Big Adventure and makes me wish for a new LBA game more than anything.
>Samus Returns was 40$ on 3DS and it was GBC remake too
Samus Returns is not Return of Samus with a visual face lift. It is a complete reimagining of the basic premise.
Has Nintendo even suggested it might have additional gameplay or content aside from some clearly tacked on filler?
If you want to complain about the general price of games I agree with you, they're getting fucking expensive. As for this particular game, I don't think it's that much overpriced compared to other games on Switch, but again we should probably wait for the game to come out before making assumptions.
Yet still played by kids.
Dungeon builder
>aside from some clearly tacked on filler
I can agree that it is a more general problem with prices on Switch (in that they're fucking expensive and don't go down). It is reasonable to stipulate that there should be a wait, but Nintendo likes to put almost everything at 60 bucks, even ports like Tropical Freeze. The only games I remember distributed by Nintendo phisically that are not 60 bucks are Toad and TSA.
>not even using the right octorok design
soulless
All they added to the core game was a couple of new mechanics (the counter and Aion) and a couple of extra boss fights. Every other difference is in the graphics and the transition from 2D to 3D with the addition of in-game cutscenes, something they added in the Zelda remake too.
Honestly the one thing about this game I'm uncertain about is the movement. All gameplay I've seen Link snaps his movement on a grid, or diagonally. If it's not full analog movement like Link Between Worlds or something that's just brain-dead. Grid movement with an analog stick is just clunky
Have you played both of them? Calling SR a 1:1 remake of RoS may as well be calling BotW a 1:1 remake of LoZ. It's that fucking retarded. I'm not even replying to you if you continue this line.
The only people who are upset about this are pedostation 4 owners.
They never suggested there wouldn't be any additional thing too. That's why I said it's useless to assume. We literally saw this game twice.
>pedostation 4
>when Chadny is the only company banning pedoshit from their console
At least get your shitposting narratives straight, Nin10dicklicker
When the game coming out?
>We literally saw this game twice.
What we've seen indicates it's a 1:1 remake with a face lift and nothing to indicate otherwise. Why should I give them a benefit of doubt when Nintendo is one of the most transparent developers there is?
this one is acceptable while toon link is a fucking abomination
September 20th
Nintendo has been all about streamlining and standardizing all their designs in their main franchises and it sucks. They'll probably even call the L2 Sword the Master Sword and make it look exactly like the OoT master sword just like they have since 1997.
Yes I did, and your comparison is stupid as fuck. Would you not consider Zero Mission a remake of the original Metroid too because it changes the map layout and adds new gameplay elements? Just like Zero Mission and Samus Returns, this Link's Awakening remake is more than a visual face lift. That would be a remaster.
So you're just assuming things, okay.
Cool. Long enough time to get a switch
Why do people seriously still think graphics = quality
>thread is just a bunch of children name calling
The fake bokeh effect is just awful and those item icons look like something you'd see in a fan HD texture pack of OoT
This is the most NPC post I have ever seen.
I've been playing LA on my Vita for the past few weeks on my lunch break and this isn't remotely true. You can get through a LA dungeon in under 30 minutes, and most of the playtime is actually just navigating around the island because it's designed to take you a million years to get anywhere. Had to stretch out the length I guess.
It's a fun game but if the only added content in the remake is the gimped Zelda Maker, it's nowhere near worth $60. $40 would be an alright price point, but even then ALBW blows it out of the fucking water with how much more content it has.
can't fucking wait for after release and this whole board totally backtracks and without a hint of irony says it's the greatest game ever and that they always loved the art style.
yeah man, you know often people here agree on everything, dipshit
All I want is the option to adjust the camera so I don't have to see half the damn map slightly out of focus.
underrated post
Just got this for €79
wow bro im jealous
WELL, EXCUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUuuuuuuuuuᵤᵤᵤᵤᵤᵤᵤᵤSE ME PRINCESS
jelly, I'm paying like €100 for mine probably
Nobody is even mentioning the biggest thing. It looks like it plays like ass. One, it's no longer grid based, because of this, Link can face diagonal. But none of the layouts were modified to accomodate this, so it's going to be easy as shit to hit enemies. Enemies that you had to flip with the shield or use hookshot to remove their shield will also be a pain. Two, which is actually the biggest thing. It's slow. I would say they actually over animated things, slowing the game down to a crawl. Why does every single action take forever to do? Why does this happen when even PH had snappy controls? Nintendo can do better then this for 60 bucks.
It's part of the cycle.
>here's your Oracle remake Link, bro
Fuck me that looks like absolute shite.
no retard, the big problem is that is full price for e-shop quality being marketed as a big game
that being said, a 3D Zelda that is designed after LA would be based but then again part of the LA charm was the quirky handheld features like the 2D sidescoller segments
yes when is a remake of a game you can get for like 8$ it does warrant new content if it charges full price
You just know they are gonna remove the Goat catfishing Mr. Write, the Hippo posing nude and the Mermaid losing her bra
Nah, Sony isn't remaking this.
inb4 Wart is homogenized as something else
>the Hippo posing nude and the Mermaid losing her bra
Those were already removed in the American release of Link's Awakening on the Game Boy.
Funko simplified the styles of the original cartoons in the early 20th century. This new link's awakening sort of brings it back from that oversimplification
This really should have come with a second/master quest with remixed dungeons. Its hard to justify paying 60 bucks for an 8 hour gameboy game with no replay value
No, I'm upset they have the audacity to sell this shit for $60.
It's a $30 game, $40 max.
Style can only make up for graphics if the style is actually good, moron. Enjoy your play doh adventure
>quality well thought out cartoony 3D art style
>generic indie phone game tier sprites
Canada doesn't get anything besides the base game. I'm assuming they don't want to have to reprint everything in french
>Zelda Maker tech demo
it's not a zelda maker at all, it is a puzzle where you create a dungeon then play it to get a reward for solving the puzzle and then the dungeon.. calling it zelda maker is just setting people up for expectations that will not be met, you sniveling rat
Thought it was a phone game when they showed it at the direct
Also 60 dollars for a gameboy remake? I'll pass
But you can make your own dungeons and upload them online, so yeah it's Zelda Maker except it's just shitty and limited.
Gane looks goods, the price is the real problem
pre orders were on sale on Amazon. I got it for 65 rather than the 80 they usually charge
you can make your own dungeons but you can't upload them
>One key facet to Super Mario Maker is the ability to share your creations with others online. Unfortunately, Aonuma can't talk about a feature such as that just yet. "Maybe another time I can present a little bit more for you," he says with a laugh.
They haven't specifically de-confirmed that, actually.
It looks like Charly fucking Brown and Emojis.
Wind Waker was shit too, only nitenbabies pretend it was any good or forgivible.
Back to resetera senpai.
This
Which is fine by me, I love Peanuts
link's awakening is even older, dipshit, what's your argument against that?
He CUTE
Me too but in Zelda, they shouldn't have shown off that anime trailer.
>finally get a Marin amiibo
>no massive homegrown farmgirl tiddies
He looks so dead.
Wholesome
That's probably the opening cutscene
He looks happy.
The soul is gone, his eyes are dead.
maybe if you're a soiboi sjw cuck
>plap
Looks pretty soulful to me.
>Implying he won't be a Toon Link echo fighter
>Implying there isn't going to be 8 different Links in Smash 6
>Just the camera house, right
that's my favorite part of the DX game
>people seething over this
He CUTE and BASED
>By charging home console prices
Reminder for you zoomers that while Wii and Wii U games were 60 dollars, DS and 3DS games were 40 dollars, and with the Switch Nintendo found a way to justify to their fans charging console game prices for what are basically handheld titles (see also Kirby Star Allies and Pokémon)
I hope they at least balance the color dungeon tunics or give you the option to remove them. They were so fucking game-breaking in LADX.
no one outside of retards on Yea Forums is complaining about this design
it's kind of amazing desu
People were complaining about it even outside of Yea Forums. This isn't a special place with unique opinions at all. A lot of people find that plastic world repulsive.
I hope they give you the option to wear the tunics but turn off their powers. I also hope power triangles and acorns no longer ruin the soundtrack and no longer interrupt you with the same fucking text pop up every time.
Dumbest post in this terrible thread.
Reminder that the difference in content and quality between handheld and console have evaporated within the past few years, with games like Monster Hunter and SMT releasing their main installments on handheld despite the expectation that you'll play them as much as you'd ever play something at home.
you can wait for sales
>People were complaining about it even outside of Yea Forums
prove it
They've shown the pieces of power and guardian acorns. The text is only 1 box long now, so it's easily skipped through, but I don't remember if the special music plays. Link gets an aura around him to indicate that the power-up is still active.
makes sense when you consider japanese people play games on trains and such more so than at home. A home console is completely pointless in japanese society, especially with the rise of smartphone games.
>makes sense when you consider japanese people play games on trains and such more so than at home.
Not to mention that Japanese apartments are tiny as fuck so even when playing at home it might be easier and more comfy to play on a handheld than on the TV.
It looks more like Bob the Builder really.
It's a fucking kids game who gives a shit.
I wish we could get rid of this stupid law nobody speaks French I've never met a single person who does
Even when I travel to Quebec I use English only
GOOOOD GRIEF!! *SLAM*
>shitters waste months trying to convince me the game looks bad
>tell them I think it looks great
>get laughed at by shitters
>E3 comes around and all anyone can talk about is how gorgeous the game looks
>shitters still shitting, trying to angle new ways of attack and dismiss the game any way they can.
>my fucking face when I know the game is going to be fantastic and get rave reviews regardless.