Reminder theres only two kinds of people mad at cyberpunk

Reminder theres only two kinds of people mad at cyberpunk
>People who dont play games and are moral policing/sitposting
>People who have unrealistic expectations for video games

everybody else is either interested or was never gonna be interested to begin with

that is all.

Attached: 20190615_203516.jpg (742x412, 133K)

Insert the "it doesn't have to be..." post here.

I just think the game looks like it's all style and no substance.

Hopefully I'm proven wrong.

pretty much any game that has "highly realistic graphics" or whatever the word have that overtone. its the price of being pretty, everyone else also wants to look good so a lot of people end up looking similair.

>yakuzafag thinks everyone else has unrealistic standards
lmao
just because your standards are so low doesn't mean everyone else's should be too

Attached: Diversity_.Neo_Tribes_subtitled_The_Nomads_of_North_America_is_a_sourcebook_for_Cyberpunk_2020._1994 (671x918, 615K)

It looks like it's going to have the substance of a CDProj game. However Cyberpunk 2020 ironically actually says that you should play the game with a view of being over the top and stylish and that style and fashion are huge parts of the world over a shell of burnt out rusted old America.

>racism is a bad thing!
fuck off kike

This. They are the kings of swallowing substandard shit and expecting everyone else to do the same and not complain about it.

What about me
>sick and tired of leftists shoving their fucking politics into games

why would anyone defend a company for free? why are you against consumers when you are one yourself?
or are you a shill?

>Books can engage with philosophical questions and be political
>Films can engage with philosophical questions and be political
>Albums can engage with philosophical questions and be political
>Theater productions can engage with philosophical questions and be political
Why can't games? Plenty of them have done this, but the whining only seems to have started lately.

The style isn't great either.

but what if I heard an opinion I disagreed with

Then you would be a better person because if it, by grappling with viewpoints you fundamentally disagree with you can reflect on your own beliefs and begin setting forth an argument as to why you disagree with others.
not that anyone whining about different viewpoints in media has the self-awareness to realize this but I digress

then stop buying games made by leftists?

Because I don't think even in the slightest that game writers can do a good political message. And I don't trust game critics either to be remotely competent at their jobs. People failing to even get the subtexts in the narrative of some games, as obvious as they are (and often are "only" being meta, referring to themselves as games), means that we're still a bit away from having competent writing and analysis of such writings in games.

this, it's important to hear what your enemy says, as long as you know you're going to disagree with them no matter what. you have to know what dumb shit your enemies are saying because if you didn't, you wouldn't know what contrary opinions to have in order to spite them.

You're unable to write a few lines long post in proper English yourself; your view and take on "game writers" is irrelevant.

>I don't think that game writers can do a good political message
Subjective opinion and dismissing any attempts on the part of developers/writers to improve this aside how else can they improve if they never try?, you shouldn't focus too much on the POLITICAL side and should instead look at the philosophies which led to politics being included. A lot of RPG's will by their very nature require looking at different viewpoints and ideologies, like Deus Ex or Fallout New Vegas which ultimately give the decision making control to the player. Thus the game is no longer apolitical but is instead letting the player make their own ideological decisions within the context of the world, which would be directly tied to the political views of their characters and thus by extension the players themselves.
>I don't trust game critics either
Fair
>People failing to get the subtexts... means we're still a bit away from having competent writers
I think that's more the fault of the audience themselves, most of whom are barely thinking about what they are doing whilst playing the game. If Slowtaku, Yahtzee and DSP can barely play through a game, is it a surprise that a lot of people barely think about what they're being told in a game?

Is this the "win at all costs" mentality? You should be prepared to change your beliefs once you are no longer able to defend them. That being said engaging with those who hold different views will as previously said, better serve you in forming both your own beliefs and then defending them from others.

I only listen to the opinions of my enemies when framed by my allies telling me about them. They do a good job of finding the most disagreeable opinions and telling me about how dumb and bad they are and then subtly implying that everyone who doesn't align with me politically shares the same bad opinion and mindset as the one extreme example they found.

i'm mad because having 20 threads about the same game - a big budget mass marketed game, at that - is obnoxious as shit.
Not as bad as the smashniggers and their fanfiction generals but still pretty bad.

Also, cgprojectred's habit of using rpg like a buzzword. they've been doing it for a while.
They're just ignoring the fact that it's not a literal term, and that it has a very nuanced definition with complex etymology.
triggers my autism something fierce

I hate how many people actually do what you are saying

>what about me?
You should go cry about this shit in the board made for it dumbass.

It's funny how the primary reason people do it is to feel better and smarter than others, when it's literally willfully being dumb as fuck just in order to trick yourself into feeling superior.

the cyberpunk genre is literally style over substance