How does a game on base PS4 look better than anything on PC?

How does a game on base PS4 look better than anything on PC?

Attached: 4w1d2udsmey11.jpg (1920x1080, 319K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=1Mxo3NWkFis
youtube.com/watch?v=5jhBMEHr9vI
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

infinite time, money, and budget

>that tail

Money. Triple A games dude. That's where the money is.

simple, it doesn't

Nintendo is better.
COPE.

That's not really true. Far Cry 5 on PC looks better due to higher refresh rate.

Modded Skyrim has better grass than that.

>900p

While it doesn't have better graphics than some pc games, it really looks incredible.

Can you believe this is actually how a game looks?
Have you seen anything more beautiful?

Attached: rdr2.jpg (1280x719, 77K)

why so blurry

>level headed and unbiased opinion
Get off my Yea Forums

PC games always look weirdly sharp or like something is wrong. They just never seem to obtain the smoothless or great look of console

Attached: reWCV5R.jpg (1920x1080, 379K)

this is a "picture" I took with an in-game camera, it's not actually blurry

5/10

That's motion blur, fuck tard

Nice try, Switcher Snakes.
We all know you pathetic losers masquerade as Xbox/PC users.

I wish I had a switch actually user

>than anything on PC?
lol

Attached: fc52.jpg (3840x2160, 2.05M)

There is not a PC game that looks this good

Attached: 82088754-54FF-41E4-BA33-CB9818506A3F.jpg (1920x1080, 201K)

doesn't look real
it's either heavily modded and runs at 15 fps or photoshopped

>One system has potentially enormous power, but a user base of wildly varying specs, and most run a heavy OS and potentially many pieces of software simultaneously
>The other is relatively weak, but everybody have the same specs, and the hardware is designed to run only game and nothing else.
>moonrats work on consoles, and have an actual sense of aesthetics. Only applies to their games of course.

KYS Switcher Snake!

youtube.com/watch?v=1Mxo3NWkFis

>infinite time, money, and budget

Attached: Soyjak.jpg (708x800, 64K)

requires 99999999999999999999 billion dollars to run at 30 fps

I agree the game is amazing for the hardware, the current benchmark

not really. i don't exactly have a space computer and play in 4k with 120+ frames

You sit far enough not no notice how horrible all that actually is. Just look at those trees closely, lmao.

Has e3 ended yet? are they bringing this to pc or what

based ResetEra

>distorted shit with blur over it
lmao

Just like most PS4 and Xbone games then?

Attached: 892931E4-7E6A-410B-A5F9-BCC755B87A98.jpg (1024x576, 105K)

turn that shit off console pleb

Windows 10 being a resource hog by default is nothing to be bragging about

hardest cope itt

Attached: American.png (479x351, 284K)

>be pclet
>spends literal thousands on hardware
>can't even achieve the level of graphical quality a $200 chink shit can
no wonder pc gayming is dead

Attached: 1513035764887.png (307x318, 119K)

>screenshot is 1080p

unboxing videos are dumb but that's a kino ps4

>PC GAMIMG IS DEAD
>MORE GAMES OF SONY ARE IN PC NOW

1 game dont save a console fag

>ubishit

Well there's a few reasons. RDR2 first off had a 6 year dev cycle with about a bajillion dollars of budget. Secondly it runs at 30fps with constant drops. There are PC games that look better, far cry 5 comes to mind.

It doesn't. Rdr2 is all barren landscapes and fog to hide the hardware limitations.

Yeah PC games need more blurry TAA like Consoles, less sharpness please

do ps4 games run at 40+fps?, im thinking on buying one

Attached: 1556568044079.jpg (800x789, 94K)

Not even close, red dead 2 for example will drop frames so constantly in combat you literally have to turn on auto aim to hit anything. Luckily for you the game is designed around this, dead eye is basically free and just wins the game for you

>that shit
>good looking
someone didn't play call of the wild yet, or battlefield, or battlefront etc.

Attached: 1415260078312.png (588x409, 13K)

Just look at one comparison pic/video of pc ultra vs base PS4. You will see that PC gaming is a meme

Some do, but most of the time you'll be playing at 30 fps.

Because they took their time instead of bring EA or Ubi chucking out 3-4 games every year

Attached: 3512277-0969290310-ezgif[1].gif (1200x675, 1.2M)

looks like shit

weak bait, apply yourself

Far cry 5 looks like shit

Attached: games.jpg (2704x2028, 865K)

>Playing RDR2 on PS4

Attached: nigtendo.png (617x812, 223K)

>$2000 vs $400

youtube.com/watch?v=5jhBMEHr9vI

Dude, frame rate is everything. I have consoles and a top gaming rig and when playing RDR2 all I could keep thinking is wow, this game is so fucking wasted on a console, it looks great but it runs like absolute cancer. It belongs on PC, just wait.

Post a picture of your chin with a timestamp.
Prove to me you aren't onions, or I'm ftering your IP.

Because you don't never play PC games.

cope

>taken with (((photomode)))

>My god the post processing is so nice fuck all the shitty textures!
I swear I understand being a basic bitch but you can't be this basic.

Its like the people who claim RE4 looked good for the time period (graphically it was actually pretty shit.)

Attached: 1560547499205.jpg (400x388, 27K)

>goal posts.

I own both a gaming PC and PS4. And I honestly have to say that RDR2 looks absolutely breathtaking, in some ways it does look better than PC. I guess it's just god-tier art and lighting direction.

>RDR2
>PC

Literally never EVER. Just like RDR1

Something wrong, poorfag?

post processing is the most important part of making a game look good, which is why PC games still look disappointing on Ultra

tfw low iq

Attached: qy9dajsz9l321.jpg (1920x1080, 281K)

PS4 RDR2 is objectively one of the worst versions

Enjoy your 4K + post processing Tomb Raider 1 then.

Attached: 1529224922019.png (545x492, 221K)

Attached: red-dead-redemption-2-screenshot2.jpg (3840x2160, 732K)

On console every setting is specifically calibrated to get a certain look. Even on PC when you set some things higher it can make the game look off because its not what the developer intended.

A video game looks better than a PC? what?

Attached: red-dead-redemption-2-screenshot3.jpg (3840x2160, 1.9M)

Pretending to be retarded, nice.

Even as a PCfag this actually true.
Nowadays (in some regards not as much) but game have always had their optimal presentation on consoles, its why the game running on low on console sometimes didn't matter since console always tried to deceive and hide shit like that.

Its part of why I don't get other pcfags when the talk about obscenely high resolution that just make the game ugly.
1440p is as far as one should go nowadays.

Attached: 1529224982059.jpg (981x755, 77K)

Who is bragging? It's a detriment

It's not, you are just not very intelligent user
PS4 Pro & Xbox X offer different settings & resolutions

CHELONIAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!

That's a barren landscape. Also how soon after you took that screenshot did blinding fog reduce the render distance so your ps4 wouldn't fry?

What? 4k looks great

Attached: gh5a77.jpg (3840x2160, 1.2M)

Not only that but if you get your binoculars out, the view distance for npcs/wildlife exceeds almost every PC game

Attached: 1559119145382.gif (1920x1080, 2.46M)

>tree simulator 2018

I've got a good PC: i5 4690k @ 4.6 ghz and a Vega 64, and also a PS4 pro.
I have yet to play a game on PC that is as breathtaking visually as RDR2 and HZD, though they both run pretty shitty.

Forza Horizon 4 in 4k @ 60fps looks awesome though, probably comes the closest.

Consoles are honestly better if you just want to play non competitive games without hassle.
PCs are way more diverse, and let's be real - playing competitive shooters on consoles is a joke.

The "PC has way better graphics for cheaper price" meme should just die though.

Hello darkness my old friend..

Attached: 72F1431B-CBA2-46D3-8FB8-29536C31ACE4.jpg (750x477, 76K)

Can someone already post some PC screenshot and end this man's whole career?

Attached: meulin3.jpg (1080x1350, 109K)

RDR2 ON PC WHEN

>PS4 Pro & Xbox X offer different settings & resolutions
I don't know what implied I didn't know this?
Unless your misinterpreting what I'm saying, I didn't voice any console out specifically. I know they run things differently but I can't see in what way your trying to target what I said.

Some games it passes off fine yes, but a game that comes to mind for me is RE2R in 4k. Its not that it looks like shit you begin to notice more flaws or things that flat out just make the game look cheap visually. Some games can be okay, not everysingle one is utter crap with obscene resolutions. But I would say that vast majority don't work with the high resolutions, to me it just looks unprofessional. Its a bit like if you tune up the resolution on a PS2 game, to a certain degree it looks better but eventually if you keep going it will look worse and its flaws will be more exposed to you.
As I said it doesn't apply AS much nowadays but cases of the visual problems are still a thing.

The horse is taking a massive liquid shit.

>1280x719
HAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHHHHAHHAHAHAHAHA * wheezes* WEEEEEEEEEEEEEW HEHEHE AHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA

Attached: 1544817355724.jpg (258x245, 32K)

Good team, management, budget, and talent. Having infinite budget aint gonna cut it.