Why should I care about doom 1.5? I already fucking played this game. It was good but $60 for seconds...

It's better than 2.

CoD will be better simply because they have more money to throw at the game. The multiplayer will actually be good too.

Shiiieeet

FPBP

You sound like a shit taste cucked zoomer kill yourself

You being retarded on purpose or what?

>money makes better games

Attached: 1479178867104.jpg (235x235, 10K)

I'm probably older than you bitch boi. I can enjoy all facets of Doom. I loved NuDoom.

Attached: 1523839846416.webm (720x720, 1.16M)

I'll never understand the meme of dropping liquids on boobs, it doesn't do anything for me, they were better dry.

lol not even you nig. its better than 64 though

>big tits
>no hips/thighs
>most likely no ass
What a terrible figure for a women too have

Why are ogDoomfags so fucking obnoxious?

Are you new to video games? Have you never heard about sequels?

brutal doom scarred them

>new weapons
>old weapons updated
>new mechanics like the dash/shotgun chain
>can even dash multiple times in mid-air
>level design looks to be vastly improved and doesn't rely upon combat arenas as much as 2016
>tons of new enemy types
>old enemy types updated visually and mechanically
It quite literally looks like the perfect sequel.

Imagine having to shift your whole torso side to side just to get that little bit of wiggle from you fake ass...everything. Sickening honestly.

fuck off faggots

BOOMERS BTFO

/thread

Attached: 220px-George_Costanza.jpg (220x293, 22K)

>I've never played a sequel before in my life

>paying $60 for FPS story games that only last 8 hours
>The MP will be dead after a week
Carried by name alone.

Attached: meowr.jpg (804x585, 25K)

>sequel means rehashed shit

Not every company is Nintendo that sells you the same shit year after year after year. Good games do not have sequels that are just the same game again. How low have your standards gone?

It's primarily targeted at people who wanted more nuDOOM, same with most sequels.

THIS

Attached: 1539592642485.jpg (960x540, 58K)

>tfw everyone seems to genuinely really enjoy nuDoom but I just can't get impressed by it
What am I missing

Attached: 1552083912409.jpg (403x432, 30K)

I don't play Nintendo games. You carrying on about why a sequel is extremely similar to its predecessor is fundamentally retarded though, especially when there are clear changes being made between the two that will affect gameplay.

Got your (you) from me, I guess.

You don't like fun.

Maybe you're playing too cautiously or on anything easier than Ultra Violence
Maybe you're not using the weapon selection its potential and swapping weapons constantly mid-fight
Maybe it's just not your thing

The stuff between fights is genuinely boring though.

You don't have to force yourself to like things.
Be your own man.

low testosterone

>playing too cautiously
At that point it's kinda the game's fault. I would play the og Dooms cautiously because I don't want to die. Even then it would get tough. If the game can be broken like that then it's kinda funnily designed

What? I'm not sure I understand what you're saying. You choose whether you play more defensively or offensively. The whole point of nudoom is to maximize the violence and ferociousness of Doomguy by making him a nearly inhuman savage that couldn't be killed while crusading through Hell. It's not that the game's broken. It's that you apparently missed the point. If you choose to ignore that and play slowly anyway, that's on you. The game's clearly not designed to be played like the original Doom games.

This, Doom Eternal seems to have significantly mechanical improvements, they've streamlined the tedious and shitty progression system, and they've unfucked the art direction, not just in terms of enemies but also environmental variety (fun fact: the fag who made nuDoom so ugly was also the art director of Halo 4/5) It's a perfect sequel, all polish and improvement and no horseshit additions, except maybe the 1-ups but we'll see.
If it has a pistol starts mode I will be s o i est boy alive

Damn, doom 2016 really does attract zoomers.

I ran through Doom 2016 all the way to the end. Felt tedious to get through. Is Eternal an improvement in terms of level design? That was the main thing that was fucking boring for me.

Well that's what I was saying about the game being designed funny. It's a bit broken if the tension crumbles when you don't engage the guys in a specific way

Attached: 4e5a638f.jpg (861x929, 167K)

Who is this zoomer bogeyman you're so afraid of?

Sure, if you choose to play the most boring possible way, the game will be boring. Revolutionary concept.

There's no denying that Doom 2 was basically a more open Doom 1 with new bad guys, and you know it.

Attached: 250px-Millennial_Mercenary.png (250x233, 55K)

The game looks great, except the HUD looks like trash and I don't like the perspective leaving the first person view.

the thread is over

Why boomers try so hard, what’s their endgame ? They’ll soon be dead anyways why can’t they allow themselves to enjoy videogames anymore ??

This video has a couple segments, it still seems to be pretty much the same thing youtube.com/watch?v=HC1u_6YiQNk

The areas are quite large and you have a lot of freedom of movement, so if you get overwhelmed by the three enemies, you can pretty much just scoot anywhere. The enemies are animated well, but that leads to them essentially doing nothing a lot of the time. I'm looking at this bit at the end and everything is spaced so far apart, and at any given time seemingly three enemies tops will be actively attacking you

Attached: Selection_029.jpg (1373x454, 343K)

They said back at QuakeCon that they agreed with the complaints about their level design, and that it was mostly a product of time constraints. One of their main goals for Eternal was improving level design. They did say they don't think the problem was that it was arena combat; they think "arena" style combat is central to the DOOM experience, but they agreed their arenas were too obvious, reptitive, and poorly implemented.

I have no fucking idea. Doom modding is more popular now than ever, if you don't like nuDoom, you can completely avoid it very easily.

I would've waited until a price drop, but with Pokemon looking like a suicidal alcoholic looking at Xanax like a banquet, I have $60 freed up.

That was my first post ITT. I think your standards are just complete and utter shit. A sequel is like the other games in a series. No shit. But a good sequel should not just be "here's the same shit you paid for last time with some cosmetic changes". A good sequel is similar to the others, but it tends to also build on it and makes improvements or tweaks mechanics and things like that. I'm not even blaming the devs. It's hard as fuck to make a good sequel that isn't a rehash and it's easier said than done. The first new doom? Great game. The sequel? It's just the same good game again. So will it be fun? Probably, but there is zero reason to start sucking its cock as if this is some innovative sequel and paragon of video games. It's Id, so it's gonna be good. But it won't be groundbreaking shit.

Doom 2 is beloved for it's modding community.
The game itself is full of horribly designed maps and mostly horribly and annoying enemies with a couple of good additions.

This is a very common and basic thing people who actually play the game agree on and the only people who say otherwise are "I was born in the wrong generation" Zoomers who actually never played it.

NuDoom might not be anything like the original but Doom 2 was just shit past the first episode.

I don't give a fuck, they're 25 years old, I appreciate fresh blood and nuDOOM is perfefctly fine

>That was my first post ITT
>no new IP
Not even gonna read the rest of your bullshit

Attached: Capture.jpg (663x539, 68K)

And again, in that case it's poor design for a shooter. There should be something providing the tension which makes it fun to simply get through the game, even if you play it slow. Limited resources, or something. Not just "run and jump between the enemies, because otherwise it will not be interesting". I don't think we'll reach an agreement, so I'll stop now to save our time

Attached: download (3).jpg (259x194, 9K)

You're retarded.

>they think "arena" style combat is central to the DOOM experience
I'm not sure where this is coming from. I can't remember very many arena type sections off the top of my head, you would run into enemies pretty steadily, in both cramped and open environments

There was no new IP because I made the Nintendo post you just took a screenshot of, and what I was referring to, you mongoloid. No wonder your standards are so fucking awful when you are so incompetent that basic browsing on Yea Forums confuses you.

no u

>user plays a game about running and jumping around blasting shit into giblets with progressively absurd weaponry
>hides in the corner like a scared bitch and wonders why he's bored
>i-it's the game's fault I'm not having a good time

Attached: 1552871332208.jpg (500x514, 209K)

>Pain elemental
>Archviles
We just need a Nu-Doom version of the Chaingunner and the trifecta for "enemies that map designers abuse because tedium = difficulty"

Attached: Swiggity swooty.gif (480x337, 2.84M)

>screenshot had your proclaimed "first post ITT" with no new IP marker on it
>N-NO that's not how it works!
Try harder

Attached: 1559338256707.gif (500x357, 358K)

I've always hated Barons more than Archviles. Archviles are fun to fight, Barons are just boring bullet sponges that got functionally cucked by Hell Knights.

big tits no ass/hips is objectively worse then small tits big ass/hips or big TnA you child. Get your irish ass out of here nigger

>combat breaks if I step behind a wall
You keep saying the same thing and I keep explaining why it's a lacking design. If you want to go in that direction, it needs to be embraced fully. You would not end up with similar issues in something like Serious Sam or Devil's Dagger, you would just die, because the environments, pacing and enemies are designed to support each others. And those are already games where you can jump in and shoot stuff down, so Doom's offering is mainly aesthetic

Attached: 1558904744692.png (250x238, 78K)

Halo IS pretty based.

I just have a deep seeded hatred of Archviles after playing so many maps where they spawn a couple after you leave a kill room and have to come back for something.
/pol/.wad isn't to bad for this.

>but it tends to also build on it and makes improvements or tweaks mechanics and things like that.
>ignores the comment from earlier ITT where a guy lists off some of the stuff that they've added or improved on, a comment that was fewer than 10 posts above his
Read the thread

>Constant game of Peek-a-Boo is fun
You have a fucked up sense of fun.

93 Doom > This /pol/-pandering bastardization. It's a bigger insult to OG Doom than Anything Disney has done to Star Wars.

>deliberately compares a violent demon invasion from hell to immigrants in the marketing to please the alt-right

If they can disavow Disney SW canon I can disavow this garbage.

The mad sprint for cover is still thrilling to this day, archviles were one of the best additions of Doom 2.

I think that line was damning corporate double speak more than immigrants themselves.

he's baiting you, user

They added new weapons,enemies and movement options while also unfucking the level design. The fuck more do you want for a doom sequel. The multiplayer even looks like it might be a bit of fun this time.

m.youtube.com/watch?v=MyciOXbsL9A

2v1 looks neato but I still hope there's a basic deathmatch mode.

Cuck onions nu male tranny OP

>This is the audience of Doom Eternal

Bitch I loved 1 but it was short and I was thirsty for more. Now I got it suck my dick

>too obvious, repetitive, and poorly implemented
youtube.com/watch?v=vrXkFJhi5jc

I'm not really interested in the multiplayer, so unless I get it as a gift I'll probably just pick it up on sale the next year.

Doom 2016 was good fun, but it was pretty short and I have no interest in autistic speedruns or max difficulty room memorization, so there's little reason to replay it. For $15 it was a good buy though.