What were they thinking?

>what were they thinking?
It was HER turn

Attached: hillary-clinton-what-happened-book-discussion-fort-lauderdale-usa-shutterstock-editorial-9111998e[1] (1000x1500, 140K)

NO TITS FOR DARK QUEEN NO TITS FOR TIFA MWAHAHAHAH GET SHAT ON REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>Crazy dangerous woman
Who would get smacked to the side for an actual final boss. Shit, she doesn't even look like she commands anything.

They want to exploit nostalgia but have no clue how to do so.

Both designs are pretty bad. Look at the left's arm.

This right here. The right looks like she'd ask for the manager if you glare at her hard enough.

youtu.be/5PVs891BzNk

>zits is the tech guy so he gets shitty robots and scifi transformations
okay I can accept that
>pimple gets more buff stuff but again its retarded looking
>rash the iconic one the one in KI with almost all his transformations intact
>gets fucking changed to retarded gross out humor

I get the other two, it fits their characters, they look like shit but fit the characters, but Rash how did they do rash so dirty taking the "cool" one and making him be the gross out mikey of the group

Pic related is what one guy with a computer did in less than a day. People should stop hiring women.

Attached: 1560355283367.png (2048x1280, 651K)

Attached: INCEL FORCE.jpg (1058x366, 84K)

>its better because it has its tits hanging out
Into the trash

fuck off shill

>mixing two trash designs together gets you trash
Not surprised.

>negative reception on the trailer
>not showing any fucking gameplay
>people saying its hard like the classics
>leaked gameplay from e3 shows its not its just that the people playing are idiots
>ignoring valid criticism because people like OP keep posting about the dark queen.
I just want them to scrap the art style its been in development for only 10 months look at the Avenger game they are scrapping their faces because of how bad their mocked I hope Ms does the same and demands the art be redone

Change the 1991 to 1994

Wow that is some actual seething coming from that artist. She got all her industry friends to jump in too. That's fucking hilarious

You can smell the onions here.

Attached: 0gL4oxd.jpg (994x745, 162K)

the problem is the outfit change is coming we need to accept that, what people should do is keep the new design but draw it competently, that way we can show its not just muh boobs its the fact that the whole artstyle is shit

I think it's an improvement personally. I hate fanservice, and the less of it there is in games, the better.

Attached: 1554666579795.png (455x337, 300K)

t. resetera

fuck sony and cnsorship

gamers rise up

Fantastic retort. Well done.

they could literally keep her exactly the same design wise just draw her fucking better, the games artstyle looks like fucking shit, its going for a E10 plus rating but the artstyle looks like the people who do blues clues

Unfortunately, not with their penises, because they dont have one anymore.

I mean what the fuck do you want, you have a shit opinion I tell you where to voice it if you want approval

that's what you want, right

It's true to the original, you ugly trannies. She was always just boobs, she is not a character and that's fine. Why you so scared of female breasts? Cause you will never have them?

Attached: 1560380192290.png (700x700, 432K)

the new design looks better unironically

>dominatrix
>a stripper
Wrong

i was born 40 years too late

Jesus modern videogames fucking suck. Politics ruin everything lol

Dilate

>you have a shit opinion
Why? Because I think games should be about more than how much you can jerk off to them? My favorite battletoads installment was the SNES version of BattletoadsvDoubleDragons, and I didn't give a rat's ass about the queen's titties. Infact, I forgot the queen was even in the game, considering you never see her until the final level. It's just such a trivial thing to complain about.

good for you

>t. resetera
you are fucking retarded you are giving them ammo saying shit like that, do the right fucking thing and fix the artstyle and say hey your game looks like shit. If you retards just keep posting your redesign that look like the classic design they will just go "sexist pigs only caring about tits" and you lose you huge fucking retard, but I know your just doing it to make us look bad so its okay

>a shitty redesign = politics
This is your brain on /pol/

fanservice? evil people always dress like that, go to a rock/metal bar and youll see every girl like that too

No we don't you fucking faggot. You can accept fucking off and never coming back here because you clearly don't belong.

I didn't see hitler dressed like that, or Stalin or Mao. It's ok for a villain to not look like a stripper.

Not even reading your retarded drivel further after a single glance at it. I can already tell you're absolutely incoherent and retarded. Good thing you will never reproduce.

>t. resetera tranny

I think you might be dumb

'she'll' turn out to be just an evil robot programmed by a white male the whole time when you beat the game. screencap it

Keep the dislikes coming and maybe the studio owners will get the hint

Damn she's hilarious

I just noticed how fucking rectangular her fucking face is. What the fuck is that face lmaoooo. This guy's design is nice though. I like the old one but this one (that he may in less than a day) is very cool too.

Good comeback :-)

Fuck off back to the shit hole you came from. We like big breast around these parts. Flat is ok too but you best keep your mouth shut boy.

They're both products of the time.

What is there to say? The artist is so hilariously bad the only possible they reason they could have picked them is for political reasons or nepotism, which I doubt is the case

If they were going to use that artstyle, they should have gotten Ian Jones-Quarterly to design her, he makes them thicc.

Attached: Silver_Spark.png (435x646, 121K)

fpbp

>2019
>No boobs

>spins at you

I dunno man, she had some personality in her quotes. She wanted you fucking dead and the stages were proof.
>turbo tunnel
That is just the beginning of hell. See me in rat race 2 players

>Reminder that the developers on Twitter know we don't like it

Attached: EXPOSED.png (2396x1486, 748K)

what's it like being gay?

>Crazy dangerous woman

But you can't hit female characters. That's not heroic doncha know....

Attached: CalArts.jpg (612x426, 53K)

>Pic related is what one guy with a computer did in less than a day. People should stop hiring women.

Don't pretend it's just women. Yes women are part of the problem but there's a LARGE number of emasculated male beta losers who are politically correct who work in entertainment media in general (not just gaming).

>you only think it's better because its sexier

I dont have words

It is. Sex sells to normal people. GO dilate.

I have no idea where the pic is from and as such have no stake in this game. However, I find the outfit on the right more interesting and appealing as a main suit, preferring the actually hot physique on the left. Left's outfit works better as a special treat and not a mainstay. Never dilute sex appeal.

What even possesses people to think like this? Oh, right, it's a double whammy of Twitter and CalArts for this one,

Attached: d7b.jpg (442x650, 85K)

have sex

women have tits, sorry tranny you will never ever be a real woman

its because their :"artstyle" is number 1 right now.
if it wasn't, they would be fucking praising bluth

Its a kids game you dumb fuck.

>bad artstyle but good costume
>good artstyle but bad costume

>cheesy out-dated overflowy
they're just mad that his work is miles better then their low animated noddle arms LGBT inspired shit

Attached: 1476660770211.webm (1329x720, 2.93M)

don't ever post dragon ball shit again if you're going to say something as faggoty as you just did
that show had sexualized underage bulma you can't use him as a reaction image mouthpiece for your retarded self

They changed their logo to the faggotmarketing shit before for a reason

it always was a kids game you dumb fuck.

Ok faggot, then why was the original pic fine for me when I was a kid, but now they have to look like they were made in a Muslim country?

The artsy style is still bad but a least the user made legs instead of pointy pegs

>Woman

More like teenager,she doesn't even look like an evil emperor

You're peering down the furrow of a very deep rabbit hole. What you'll find at the bottom is unpleasant, but revealing. The short answer is "many human beings have only the smallest possible souls". The long answer is one that I'm not prepared to elucidate in a random Yea Forums thread for a game I've never played, but which becomes understandable with much perceptivity, research, experimentation and encounters with the horrors of mass humanity - "humans as yeast".

Attached: 1543602014934.jpg (562x419, 34K)

>You can't make this shit up.

Attached: western artist.jpg (640x627, 74K)

Fuck off back to R3ddit you stupid niggerfaggot poltard

show me an historically evil female empress to validate your opinion that she doesn't look like one

Flat is justice

Holy shit a western loli that doesn't look like ass. Actually cute

An important part of the modern pursuit of a craft is making up excuses for why everyone who's better than you doesn't count.

It's a shit loovking villain for any game or cartoon, much less Battletoads. Don't give a shit about how it's not sexy like the original, but at least make her fucking menacing looking, not a Dollar Tree version of Sam from Danny Phantom.

My mom

LMAO I guarantee if any of these women ever play that game they'll do it for ten minutes tops. The notion that women like unattractive female characters is a fantasy narrative encouraged by self-perpetuating marketing, and if you want proof, look at what they play in MMOs.

I want to fuck Miki and Gizmo

she is cute!

Attached: 1556948988947.jpg (3000x2380, 373K)

Based

MICROSOFT HIRE THIS MAN!

i like the old lady that LOOKS like an old lady
that is a fucking better design that Ana anyday

Because its true
Just because a design is sexy doesnt mean its good
That said the old design and unofficial And official redesign are shit.

I'd like to see the long answer

C

>using the word pizza anywhere in your profile bio
Fuck off.

Attached: 1539750604907.jpg (355x440, 130K)

>That nobody actually cared about ________
Not this shit again

These people always say this when they fuck up a nostalgic property

Whats next? Street Sharks, Biker mice From Mars, King Arthur and the Knights of Justice, Gargoyles?

Attached: shark.png (486x360, 306K)

P

I can't stand this calarts shit.

>and if you want proof, look at what they play in MMOs.

Why hasnt anyone done this?

why would you say the big G?
you KNOW disney won't touch it again or rerelease it to watch....

>you only think it's better because its sexier
I think it looks better because it's ACTUALLY BETTER DESIGNED. It's far more appealing on the eyes and simply looks much better for an action game.

be grateful that at least the gameplay is remained more or less the same to the original game.
Meanwhile us commander keen fans get a great new artstyle cheerytop served with a huge pile of dogshit gameplay on a bullshit platform plate.

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 129K)

the redesign looks miles better and is more faithful to the original character

actually kill yourself

>Wants body fat
>Posts a Muscle emoji

Attached: help.jpg (395x375, 69K)

>That said the old design and unofficial And official redesign are shit.

Show us what the design that comes close to how you think it should've been

Because people who maintain the fantasy narrative are either journalists, marketers, or trend-chasing pearl-clutchers with lemming brains, and none of those groups play video games.

>"I have never played a Battletoads game"

Thanks for your blog post.

If any of you think this would work you guys are delusional as fuck, not saying the real one is good it fucking suck but a leotard for her doesnt work anymore, give her the titties sure but she would need some pants

and dont give me the "uuuhuh pants look bad" bullshit, they can look awesome and even sexier if done right.

Attached: Mortal-kombat-x[1].jpg (700x466, 100K)

>Draws herself as some kind of disney princess.
>Wants every other character to have flaws.

>be grateful
How about we not do that? How about we instead criticize BOTH games for having questionable design decisions, whether that be gameplay or artstyle?

Who cares,where's the porn?

I sort of agree. Her original design is very plain and lacking detail and the only thing that makes it memorable is how sexy it is. The new one is both boring, unsexy, and therefore not memorable at all so the old one is still better.

My mom sewed me a street shark Halloween costume one year, it was amazing.

>can't be taken seriously
wow sexist much? you can't take women seriously unless they dress the way you like? i thought the left was against this?

They thought no one would notice her appearing for a split of a second....but we did

Attached: 1560362312858.jpg (555x475, 88K)

exactly. most likely not a woman either.

It's better because it's like the original design, you tranny neogaf refugee.

I had this toy, it was the best.

Attached: Street-Sharks-Mecho-8-shark-evil-robot-figure[1].jpg (300x400, 18K)

i'm more fucking baffled rash has an aoe attack using a loppy fish. a fucking FISH

this

>Nintendo brings back a Banjo-Kazooie for Smash, doesn't mess with the character design or appeal
Everyone's happy
>Microsoft brings back Battletoads, makes a bunch of changes fucks up their appeal
No ones happy

Attached: garbage.jpg (1200x629, 155K)

This dumb faggot implying third wave feminist politics isn't responsible for this shit.

>right
>good artstyle
nigger what

why is the tech guy more buff than rash. if he relies on tech why the fuck does he look a bit more swole?

Yes, if she doesn't take herself seriously by dressing in a way that makes sense she can't be taken seriously.
Dressing like an eyecandy for men is a sure way to appear weak and not in charge. This is why fantasy sucks unless they have realistic armor.

I believe it's impossible to complete a relaying of the long-form answer in this particular thread (or if there is a way then I do not see it at this moment - knowing the limits of one's own perception is crucial to truly mastering it). I'll begin anyway and see how far it goes - hopefully a partial coverage won't cause any damage.

Why are you alive? What about anybody else for that matter? You've heard these questions before, and they seem as trite as they are ineffable. Surely we're alive "just because" and that's it, right. An accident caused proteins to develop some time ago, which due to simple chemical properties gradually became self-replicating organisms of increasing complexity. Life is just one inevitable peculiarity among the manifold eventualities of this inhuman and uncaring cosmos, culminating in the impreventable heat death of the universe and with it an end to all things. Nothing of anything has meaning and there is no true deeper value. You might as well just watch some Rick and Morty.

All but a very few human beings read or hear this statement and feel anything other than a deep, profound negativity. There is something terrifically wrong about the assertions it contains, even if grasping wherein the contradiction or missaprehension lies is beyond most. Even the very feeling itself is hard for most people to grasp. Most do not observe their own feelings at all, and believe only what they are told by others. So some come to believe that the negative feeling is a type of fear, or a sadness at some promise being lost. Even an anger at a universe that has let them down or betrayed them. And these emotions are further directed at abstract entities and not anything real. The emotion that the modern world does its most to leave unaddressed and undefined is loathing.

Attached: 1557333229772.jpg (1024x768, 242K)

Probably
>uuummm... guys, gals, and nonbinaries, how can we, like, design her to not be so... just... ugh?

I remember bringing that point up and having the person move the goalposts so much you'd think soccer was capture the flag. Invoked the XIV census by shitaku that involved actually asking players what they played and it included by player gender and female (and presumably "female" trannies) all overwhelmingly played au ra, miqo'te and then hyur. By casual observation as well as metrics we have women will overwhelmingly prefer to play a pretty and attractive character.

>Gargoyles
Funny you mention that...

Attached: 1526930918025.png (1066x861, 1.07M)

>women fighting
>realistic

Rare really gambled wrong when they chose this studio to carry the Battletoads license.

You can think that all you want but the game's artstyle is an incoherent eyesore regardless.

rule34.paheal.net/post/list/Commander_Keen/1

Attached: 1552343379429.jpg (1000x1000, 374K)

yeah it was. you dont revive a series years later and expect it to still hold the same format when you bring it back for nostalgic fuckers who are now mid 20s to early 30s and think its okay.

kids play fortnite now retard

SOUL

Leotard, cape, AND BOOTS .......b-but thats IMPOSSIBLE

That's actually kinda sexist and body-shamful

Loathing is the root emotion of boredom, disgust and hard rejection. At the core of all communities oriented around a meaningful hobby - including this one - there MUST be a shared sense of how fucking boring the world would be without something of meaning, of value. This is true of all superior culture, in fact - if the terms "superior" and "culture" can be used in one sentence that is. Culture is in many ways the definition of the inferior, of something that is sustained and retained for reasons other than its quality. Culture is for bacteria.

Why do we play video games? This is a more powerful and pertinent question than "why are we even alive?". Because most of the answers provided to that latter question are non-answers, and they run aground the moment they happen across the fact that we play video games. Why on earth would the most powerful, smart, intelligent, observant and perceptive species on the planet go so far out of its way in time and effort to create nothing but small, simulated worlds with contrived challenges to play through and master? Surely that's nothing but a tremendous WASTE of life?

If you feel in your gut that such a notion is inherently stupid, then you are more honest than those who either do not or pretend that they do not. Many are bent on internalising the notions that life is a meaningless accident. And those that do not commit a grievous error by answering "Life exists to self-replicate, dummy!". After all, they may follow, all life is defined by its propagative nature, absorbing raw materials in order to growth and reproduce. Nevermind all the other natural phenomena that can be termed a part of this, or how utterly arbitrary the dividing line rests.

By this standard, us humans are the least "alive" of any animal to have ever existed. We pour so much of our efforts into writing fictional stories, building statues and monumental architecture that have no value in increasing grain yields or farming returns.

Attached: 2Pwb8Uz.gif (550x550, 13K)

>Garsoyles

they almost designed this game for you to figure out math equations like 2+2 on the loading screen. thats the vibe i get from this game.

they were thinking that you would do exactly what they thought you would. Give them free publicity through outrage which will make them look the victim. Good job, viral marketer.

Attached: 1542479737994.png (378x396, 170K)

>be grateful that at least the gampeplay is remained more or less the same
thats the issue here. we have the technology to get the fuck away from beat em ups

Attached: KI_08-04-15.jpg (600x338, 201K)

my mum sewed me a power rangers costume and I wore it to karate class, then got kicked out because I headlocked another kid and wouldn't let go.
Parents that make costumes for their kids are the best.

If it's upper management's fault, it's because they looked at the original design and said, "this is too sexy, if we release this game with her in it, people are going to be upset and it won't sell." This is wrong (only a vocal minority of people who weren't going to buy anyway would be), but marketing vampires have no capacity for mental self-generation and can only operate with the information that market research focus groups directly feed into them. A human being would recognize that the people who play Battletoads and the people who get upset about boobs on Twitter are not overlapping demographics, but marketing vampires who make every decision based off of general-audience focus groups and occasional headline-skimming only know that sexy women make some people upset, so they can't be in the game.

OR

If it's the art team's fault, then everyone in the art team is either a sniveling, cowardly hack who would rather have all their creative decisions made for them by their Twitter followers because that would guarantee the most retweets and upvotes or a bitter trendy anti-artist who hates beauty more than genocide and will do literally anything to eradicate it.

i had the shark on rollerblades. remember them coming in metal caging packaging.
fucking shows marketing for toys am i right? at least transformers are cool

>Basedtoads
>Tears of War 5
>Bleeding Edgy
But it's okay when based Microsoft does it!!!

>watch toads in introduction
>wart just does a simple punch
>zit just fucking teleports?
>fly by .5 seconds of dark queen

This isn’t real right

You mean something being very corporate, and therefore coming off as uncool.

It's real.

>nobody actually cared about the Battletoads property until they picked it up

Attached: 1547824164419.gif (150x125, 466K)

Airs next summer.

the feeling i get from battletoads is not cool but more like i'm a fucking toad beating random rats mashing buttons and axes, flails, and hammers coming out.

Comparitively, there is no bacteria or fungus that would perform any operation so wasterful. Such tiny microorganisms are ruthlessly adapted replicators that waste no consumed resources on anything not very immediately useful to their survival and propagation as a species. They are aggressive, swift, resilience, pragmatic and adapatable. And they are uniformly disgusting and rancid, nasty and horrible to a fault, embodying everything awful and unpleasant about the universe. They are the gnawing chaos and entropy that works to tear down all things and reduce the world to a uniform, indistuingishable goop-form, naught but a sea of slime mold for leagues around.

Why do we (and I say we, but obviously from the direction and premise of this impromptu essay not all are able to feel this) - why do we sense something so terribly dreadful about the notion of a world with nothing distinguishable? No landmarks, no colour, no variations, no nothing? In this vision, disgust - visceral and nauseous at a disease - and boredom - the sense of social folly and incoherency that leads to tedious blandness supplanting better uses for our time - unite as one. It becomes apparent then that things which make the world less boring, must inherently resemble and in fact overlap extensively with things that make the world less revolting. That animals and life-forms which are not inherently disgusting, like a beautiful tree or a jaguar or an antelope stag, share some connection with human passtimes, with building beautiful statues, with flying RC aeroplanes, with designing and playing the hell out of video games.

Even imagined scenarios that we may define as aversive in other aspects may still notably fit within this band of fulfillment. Consider a fiery hellscape full of nasty daemons. Such a situation may still intrigue and excite. Some versions could be more repetitive than others, and some could have more revolting daemons.

Attached: 1532127610938.gif (277x350, 663K)

doesn't mean people are still going to buy it.

>Give them free publicity through outrage which will make them look the victim.

Nintendo doesnt need to use outrage for nostalgic characters.

Not him, but no way, I thought that pic was just a parody.

I like psychedelic kramer

Was the new Dark Queen modeled after Anita Sarkeesian or something?

A street sharks beat em up might actually make me care about street sharks

>tfw they accidentally made the new version look like a grumpy Hillary Clinton recolor
Fuckin pottery

because as well known as battletoads is, it's not fucking mario

you might not, but normals will. They'll see this and go "oh hey battletoads! what a cute design!"
Yea Forums is the minority here, even if they're correct

anita would rather wear the leotard though, if she could get away with it.

Almost had me

Both desings are shit. The most bland villain in vidya story

>Yea Forums is the minority here
Not among customers.

no. beat em ups are so fucking niche now dude. the only real reason they are alive is because of late early 90s kids.

beat em ups are an old genre because of restrictions. look at how fps games evolved from doom. we dont need limitations when we have the graphics and technology to go from 2d-3d planes

Is that's going to be peoples drive to play a game, then let them. I don't think that will be a great habit to rely on in the long term.

>you might not, but normals will
No they won't. This isn't Mario or Sonic or something. Battletoads was always kind of niche. Most normals think the turbo tunnel is hard when it's really not that bad. They got there, gave it a few tries and gave up.The only people interested in the battletoads franchise are some of the older, hardcore gamers and retards who know it from the gamestop meme. Normals don't give a fuck.

Yet no matter, in small doses such environments are exciting and in fact life affirming. This demonstrates that nothing is necessarily inherently boring, just as nothing is necessarily inherently disgusting. Most of us can relate to a moderate fascination with dirty things during our childhood for instance, like poking dead bodies or watching maggots. Yet we can also sense a natural loathsome "potential" if you will. It is obvious from the nature of mold that, if left to its own devices, it will spread fast and rapidly reduce everything it encounters to nothing but more mold. Ditto flies and maggots. These insects are ruinous and dirty, so even if the odd fly may be interesting or exciting, one wants to drive them off anyhow.

Is there an analogue to boredom? It's not that Fire Emblem is a bad game series, but how many more reps does Smash Bros. need? No-one dislikes Piranha Plant, but why on earth did the development time, focus, effort and resources necessary to create an entire playable character - what is colloquially referred to as a slot in the roster" - end up spent on such a non-entity? A lot of what people refer to as "meme characters", or as "meme features", "meme choices" and so on relates to this property of loathing potential. We can see how a memetic feature can spread and become overly prevalent as a trend. "Isn't it WACKY?", the purveyors of such a notion and the sort of audience that would swallow it, run the collective risk of sinking what could be beautiful, glorious games with swampy entries like a playable Armos or just more generic FE swordsmen. Even if no old characters are lost, we can sense that something still has been "lost" in this process, a squandered potential for something greater.

What makes something greater than something else? We return back to some of the more philosophical issues raised earlier with a new key datum (singular for data): differentiation.

Attached: .... HELLO.jpg (480x360, 22K)

>not realizing that news sites can write articles based on ONE post
If you don’t give them ammunition, they make some up.

Fuck off, chuck.

they actually are, with this target demographic.
Yea Forums loves to think that it matters in the big picture, but really it's full of niche gamers and pirates. Normals buy games and they love this kind of design and hate Yea Forumsirgins.

yeah and those early 90's kids will have the buying power to get this shit. zoomers might not be playing these but woke 20somethings will.
it's not, but this lets them cheap out on the marketing budget because there's a chance this will end up twitter trending or some horseshit. ready for thirsty Yea Forumsirgins to take the blame again?
this is more likely to get this in the eye of normals. outrage is fun for eveyone, including this
fun guy right here. it's all so tiresome

Attached: 1536081851446.jpg (988x1595, 316K)

Occasionally I'll see a thread asking about reboot's I like or things I'd like to see adapted into a movie or game and I don't even mention them because I fear these results. I think it's better as a memory or forgotten altogether than shit like this , which happens more and more often.

SSSHHHHHHHHHH Don't tell nobody

Attached: 1462687696179.gif (260x179, 2.37M)

Mistress Cheesecake vs. Dr. Tumblr

Transcendence, humans, in their reason, come up with something beyond life.

>Soitoads
>Tears of War 5
>Bleeding Faties
Yea Forums: But it's okay when based Microsoft does it!!!

>yeah and those early 90's kids will have the buying power to get this shit. zoomers might not be playing these but woke 20somethings will.
the name battletoads alone wont sell this shit because even digging an inch into to the surface of this game they can see how fucking terrible it is if they were interested.
they can easily emulate the arcade battletoads and get much better experience from that. fuck they could even just boot up castle crashers so they are fucking late to that boat if they wanted to even cash in on any profit

>Crazy dangerous woman
is not even that. If they were going to cover her body because politically correctness what ever.
They could have made her look more interesting.

Also her head is really wide, they couldnt even respect a thin head.

Attached: kisspng-yugi-mutou-yu-gi-oh-joey-wheeler-yami-yugi-seto-k-bye-felicia-5ac86f69540504.039719401523085 (900x740, 106K)

At least they can never take the original game from us although they certainly can shit on its corpse as OP's image implies.

You're confusing normals with the far left/SJWs/whatever you want to call them. They're just as much a minority as Yea Forums. Most actual normals don't even know what Yea Forumsirgins are and find both groups to be nutcases.

>miniskirt
>fetish footwear
>fetish gloves
yuck

I would love when some of this people remove breast from a character, they show her Mastectomy scars

the only thing missing from nuqueens design is a hitler hat. thats it. its clear what they were going for

Anne Marie was my childhood crush and waifu. The original. The irreplaceable

And yes, believe it or not, westerners could actually draw appealing things many years ago. But that's long gone now.

It's actually Bob Dylan, but the mental image of LSD Kramer is worth picturing anyhow

What does differentiation mean? A short answer: more than just "novelty". Piranha Plant for instance is a "novel" character. When was the last time a Smash Bros. character was a random enemy, not even a hominid or civil one but a plant, randomly modified to be vaguely playable? Everything about Piranha Plant runs completely counter to the principles that have gradually evolved around what gets into Smash. He represents a polar antithesis in sheer normalcy terms with the Fire Emblem reps. Yet he is just as awful for exactly the same reasons.

Take a look at a higher organism, like a leopard or a healthy human being. Such a creature is tremendous differentiated. This means that on many levels and in many different aspects there is much to distinguish each part of a leopard from the rest of it. The front left leg is distinct from the front right, the back left and the back right. It shares many tissue structures, but those tissues are themselves very different from each other - muscle, skin, tendon, fur, bone. Blood vessels and nerves come into play on a microscophic level. And even these differ from the internal organs, the sensory factors of eyesight and hearing, and the manifold structures of the brain.

Yet introducing a completely random new element like a metal pipe sticking out of the poor beast's abdomen wouldn't do anything to improve it. People have long thought about weird additions, alterations and hybridisations of animals, but the ones that stick always hold some "sense" to them. Eagle wings, a goat's head and a snake for a tail seem to work when tacked to a lion. Biologically it would be a challenge to engineer, but at least it's not awful like simply jamming random objects into a penguin and calling it a day.

Attached: 1553751589966.jpg (1920x1080, 109K)

>dark queen now has no tits and is fully clothed to the point of no skin but the face
That's deliberate contempt for the source material.

Attached: 1559844816535.jpg (776x635, 36K)

What's calarts?

it need a little more than a hitler hat.
The entire face should be different, with stronger features, instead of looking like some kim possible girl.
a longer face making her look like an adult instead of a wide face.

>But that's long gone now
it sucks man

Attached: lf.jpg (2026x2205, 171K)

I hate how the trailer started really promising with the pause theme and that good looking logo

>We hate it, but we are creatively bankrupt, so we need brand recognition to carry our work.

34 years old here. Back then Battletoads was a joke; it was just another Ninja Turtles ripoff with extra edge; also, the game being unnecessarily difficult without being fun (unlike games like the NES Ninja Gaiden games) turned a lot of people off.
I don't understand why you guys are complaining so much about the reboot of a mediocre product being mediocre. In fact the simplified art makes sense given how it's ripping off modern cartoons and their horrendous art.

well i mean shes the only human character and they just had to make her look super irregular for some reason.
its a rush job though. they better fix some shit up or else i'm not going to have anything else to talk about.

Attached: Dark_Queen_redesign.png (3000x3000, 1.01M)

More like
>Rare can't make any game themselves besides DLC for No Man's Sea
>They outsourced the Battletoads game and we underbid all the other competitors
>Making good animation isn't in the budget, but we did work on a flash series once so it'll be enough

That was an interesting generation..

Attached: 1549652100759.jpg (1023x713, 320K)

LOL 30 year old here. you found fucking NES turtles fun compared to battle toads?
or were you so fucking stoked that a cartoon with pizza eating turtle ninjas so awesome that you forgot about it?

Attached: D8vSU8AXkAAwNC6.jpg (2047x1028, 208K)

Any game with music like this deserves some fans:

youtube.com/watch?v=xUhQs01DSjA

Close, very close, but a more precise answer forecomes. We'll see if we can reach that in this thread.

The two sides of disease relate to the violation of these principles. Sometimes a given animal has a foreign intrusion that is destroying its format. Other times there is an overload of one tissue type, such as an excess of skin that resultings in horrible rolls or creepy double-musculature in overbred cattle. Both disrupt what some have called the harmony of the organism. The "principles" of how a jaguar... *is*, require a rich and complex balance of different tissues to be assembled into a set of organs and extremities that form a coherent whole.

Resilience-wise, a jaguar has nothing on slime-mold. Slime mold has no need to differentiate beyond the contents of its cellular organelles. No skin-muscle-bone distinction, no limb-organ distinction. No devoted sensory apparatus, no brain, no mind. Just endless reproductive exertion.

Yet our world continues to be full of jaguars, and a myriad of other equally awesome organisms. These organism in term form complex interconnected networks, often termed "ecosystems" or simply "nature". It may be more accurate to refer to them as "meta-organisms". That is, the totality of all the present species forms a kind of rich, nebulous organism all of its own.

Within those standards, the resilience of some dirty wasteland full of pond scum and scavengers outstrips anywhere else, yet again the world is not completely wasteland. The very principles of "life" stated by the imperceptive should mean that the world is full of miserable spore-swamps by now. Higher organisms such as humans and flighted birds should be devolving into water-borne pathogens and germs, and not what we observe to be really more the other way around. Is there actually an impetus to drive things in the opposite direction?

Attached: 1550248423809.jpg (800x988, 110K)

Attached: D8qmi_4WwAIK0jD.png (642x598, 332K)

This is all right, still feels tumblr-y somehow but she's not in sharia mode. Needs more emphasis on the tits though, for sure.

based

you should add that the left one was only in the trailer for 3 frames

Attached: D8zCcTRVsAAnnV8.jpg (619x953, 51K)

The art program you use likely has a select menu at the top. If you go from there, click on 'expand' or 'grow' or 'modify' selection. Use this to expand your selection of the places you'd like to color by 2 or 3 pixels. That way you get rid of those white pixels between your coloring and borders.

No it wasn't. I'm older than that and loved it as a kid and all my friends enjoyed it. Even finished it. Once in co-op with a friend after a lot of attempts. People loved it for the diverse and fun gameplay. And for many, the challenge, even if it's really not as hard as people today say it is.

Attached: D8ziXFNUwAAxEaf.png (1200x1067, 745K)

too much. keep it in relations with the frogs
more simplistic.
lose the shoulders, belt and staff

She's showing her face? Fucking whore, cover up for gods sake.

big improvement

it was

Attached: 1556945983965.gif (300x249, 2.13M)

Best one so far.

i do not know why people downplay the fact its a turtles rip off. it had no source material and it was freshly generated because it had no cartoon show to go off of.
all the levels were diverse and didn't have annoyances like footclan vehicle segments and respawning enemies

Nice.

The frogs themselves look like shit too, and it's got nothing to do with 'body-positivity' or whatever. Microsoft is just really shit at reviving old properties with the time, investment and love required to do them right.

Good work user. Sometimes you guys can try.

SOI
SOI
SOI

anne marie and cecilia nuthatch are prime why does my peepee feel funny material
when cecilia gives louie the fuck me eyes holy shit, I am but a man

Attached: 1445286408161.jpg (672x434, 73K)

the old clothes are retarded. fix the drawing of the one in regular clothes and youre golden

add pippi to that

Attached: 12409432583214.png (719x515, 123K)

Consider the depth and profundity of the feelings discussed thus far. Let's take anger for instance. Anger is felt when something truly lets own down. When someone lies to us, or when a vaunted and invested effort does not pay off, we feel a sense that there is a terrible injustice somewhere in the world and a debt must be repaid. Many attempts to explain this feeling as having "survival value", and relates it to monkeys getting revenge on other monkeys or some such. But that's not what we really observe in humans or animals alike concerning anger. Revenge is not opposed, but merely perpendicular to anger as a concept. And on a deeper level, one can understand a lot of revenge as being petty and unjust, just as some suffering or loss or let-down may be well earned. Feeling angry for ANY let-down is childish. There is something deeper going on; that rather, no matter the material stakes or odds, there is a profound wrongness when someone truly lies or makes irresponsible claims and messes with people's expectations. Human anger, which is ultimately the highest and purest anger, seems the most metaphysical and most powerful among the forces encountered in the world?

Why haven't germs, a far greater survival and reproduction agent, destroyed the "inefficient" human race by now? Because humans are motivated by a higher principle. One can conjecture about this being one or more gods or such like, but it's only of at best tangential relevance. The observable principles matter, which is that:

a) Survival, reproduction and propagation of living organisms is frequently reduced by the drives of evolution, and in fact the chief effect of this phenomena

b) Organisms are produced with great differentiation, with their bodily tissues subdividing and specialising to form limbs and organs that operate as a coordinated whole, and multiple members cooperating as individuals in a group

Attached: Coily Woily 1.png (591x599, 300K)

Nice

Attached: CanIGetUhhhh.jpg (184x184, 7K)

This. If the dark queen was the only issue this wouldn't have blown up. She's just the worst offender of a drastically downgraded artstyle.
Fucking Pepe the Frog looks better than Nu-toads.

Attached: ladypepe.jpg (771x676, 196K)

Attached: D8si8zFXkAAdDuo.jpg (687x1000, 115K)

THIS
They were so ashamed of her design that they hid her in the trailer

Nobody cares about it being a turtles rip off in terms of characters. People who cite that as a criticism against Battletoads obviously don't get it. People liked it for the game. That's a big part of why the cartoon never took off and only got a pilot before being cancelled, because nobody gave a shit. The games were fun for the more hardcore audience who didn't have awful motor skills/didn't give up too soon and got past level 3 and that's all that mattered.

Maybe they're giving actual characterization and motivations behind being a generic female comic book supervillains and that's why the new design doesn't use fanservice as a crutch.

>you'll never have a daughteru this cute

Attached: 1556947164860.jpg (730x500, 72K)

I had this one growing up along with two Mask toys, one with him in a purple suit and Milo with The Mask on. Thanks for bringing back some memories.

Attached: wLooseSLashn.jpg (600x524, 87K)

>even don't

>When we didn't get a battletoads with this kind of character design

Because the story of why a space queen wants to kill 3 anthropomorphic toads is so important, right?

Yeah man. How do you feel about if Battletoads went off in a new direction aside from just traditional beat em' ups like turtles in time?

I mean they tried it with Mutants In Manhattan but that fuckin blew its load. But I feel like they really could have 1-up'd the competition by doing their own sort of style with better graphics.

Attached: mim.jpg (1280x720, 114K)

>characterization and motivations
It's fucking Battletoads. Nobody ever wanted a complicated story and character motivations in Battletoads.

c) The more differentiated and organised such a species, the "higher" it is, such that it evokes more desire and appeal from other species and less disgust and revulsion.

d) Even the inherent propensity to spread like wildfire and infect other things, increasingly in numbers and reducing the differentiation of the world, is seen as inherently disgusting and suspect.

e) Species that are higher are remorseless in their castigation of lower species, and lower species are ultimately willing to be tamed and domesticated by highers and put to use. See i) surplus killing by predators of prey-species, involving the toying with and killing of certain species with no interest in consuming the carcass; ii) bovine cattle, yeast cultures in brewing and cheese-making, and so on.

f) The single most differentiated species on the planet is also the supreme species.

g) These principles extend beyond life and to everything else, including random rock formations, views of the night sky, observations of the celestial bodies and atomic chemistry.

h) Humans go out of their way to make new things - statues and hobbies and all sorts - for the express PURPOSE of adding more differentiation to the universe for the sake of it. Other animals do this as well in their own small way.

This brings it all back to the problem that is often referred to as "onions" by virtue of Yea Forums's lovely filter. In a way, this filter served to counteract an annoying and overused trend in Yea Forums's own lingo - and so even though we all agree that "zoi" to use a minor respelling is a real phenomenon, we're still happy with the word being filtered because all the underage redditors and polkiddies were spamming the original a lot.

What is "zoi"? How is this phenomenon a thing? Some humans are either so imperceptive, or so thoroughly "memed" upon by the homodoxies of today, that they devote their lives to chasing their own "advantage" in the moment.

What if, Cal Arts style aside, the game is actually a good beat-em-up?

Microsoft and everything under their umbrella gambles everything wrong.
Except Cuphead and Ori

What made Battletoads unique was that it started as a video game series. It didn't start as a comic like Ninja Turtle or a cartoon to rip them off. That puts it a step above all the other wannabees in my opinion.

Even back then a lot of the Ninja Turtle ripoff cartoons were hit or miss with me, but Battletoads were a great series that I loved even if they were hard as fuck.

>fat ugly character gets added to game
>"omg like its totally me!"
bruh..

>what if it's good if you ignore the art style
If you took a good movie and added the sound of a running vacuum cleaner to its audio tracks for its entire duration, it could be the best movie in the world, but no one would sit through it and no one would like it.

>daughteru
haha nope she's catching the d

Now post the animation cel they made of her with a cameltoe

Attached: 1556948110662.jpg (3000x2472, 1.55M)

These are the people that don't understand the purpose of "hard modes" in video games. Consider how deeply averse it is to the very purpose of video games, their existence at all as a hobby, to render them as "easy" and "accessible" to play as possible. One can render compassionate arguments about options for the disabled and such, but after a certain point the advocacy becomes .... "soulless". Demanding for an easier time extracting "pleasures" from a video game, seems to pervert the nature of a video game itself. Railing against the obstacles to victory undermines the meaning of said victory. And surely demanding an every-increasing "accessibility" is exactly the kind of language and thought process that a yeast would enunciate in its drive to colonise more foodspace.

Survey the state of contemporary visual arts. Why should students aiming to make works of beauty need to listen to the words or examine the examples of just greats as Don Bluth, when his hackneyed, "cheesy" works of detailed, expressive, vivid feeling take SO MUCH EFFORT for the animators when some cheap blobby noodle limbs and meme faces would "do the trick"? Why sculpt wonderful figurines when a generic Funko-Pop!(tm) sells well? If Fire Emblem characters = more sales, why should Nintendo give a shit about anything else?

Understanding the root feeling, the primal sense that humans are gifted with but few ever come to understand master, that there is purpose and meaning to this world related to our feelings of loathing and its antithesis, glory - understanding this feeling will lead to the eventual resolution of so many questions and curiosities about the nature of modern industries, civilisations and their trends, and the arts. When Nintendo was a small fish in the video game entertainment sea, it exhibited more creativity, spirit and vision that it does now as an internationally lauded giant.

Attached: composition-wyndham-lewis-1913.jpg (1206x1536, 203K)

Thanks.

kek

Really good!

Left: Most generic female villain design possible
Right: SJW shit
Both make me snooze

Why.
Muh boobs are part of the design.
Men evolved to like them and women evolved to like them.
Boobs are objectively good female character design if you want to make the female attractive.
They are just as important as the outfit, if not more.
If you deny boobs you are already on your way to letting them walk all over you and tell you what you can and can't enjoy.
Be a fucking man and stand up for yourself if you actually give a shit.

shut up you autistic nigger

they shouldve hired this guy instead.

Now if he can fix the enemies

Attached: Battletoads - E3 2019 - Gameplay.jpg (1267x667, 525K)

This fixes the flaws of both designs

Nobody in their right mind thinks Beat Em Ups are good genre. They were fine when that's all we fucking had back in the day and arcade machines were guzzling our quarters but today that shit isn't going to fly. They're basically mobile games at this point and I bet you can play most of them on a goddamn phone.

If someone wanted to jump into the genre you'd tell them to play Dragon's Crown, which would fucking ruin all Beat Em Ups for them forever as that is as far as the genre has gone mechanically speaking. If they want to go "old school" you'd hand them Gold Axe: Death Adder's Revenge or Simpsons. And then they're done.

The only appeal the stupid genre has left anymore is the bullshit insane aesthetics, again, see Dragon's Crown. If you can't be bothered to bring back the aesthetics for Battletoads, which arguably were it's most redeeming feature, then what the fuck are you doing? And when I say the aesthetic, I mean the arcade game or Battlemaniacs on the SNES.

The fact they didn't bother making Dragon's Crown: Battletoads Edition and instead made this fucking dumpster fire, is probably the surest sign nobody attached to this project knows what the fuck they're doing.

Get rid of the stupid staff and it's perfect.

I love beat-em-ups but they all basically play the same way so you might as well just play one with more appealing graphics.

Why is a wealthy, moneyed, saturated-in-accolades and status corporate powerhouse acting in a way that can be at the MOST generous, described as "survivalistic" - making decisions on the cut-throat arithmetic of maximising profit, the succour of business endeavours - that it did at a time when it was unquestionably more vulnerable to any such survival risk? How on earth is that justifiable? The answer is that Nintendo made the transition to a large and successful franchise by making a positive impact on the world. In making creative, rich and well balanced games, titles which still provoke thought, comparisons and discussion to this day, Nintendo enriched lives in a meaningful and lasting fashion. It increased the net glory of the universe. Nintendo is no longer in any such state because its rate of enhancement has become neutral. For every worthy title, an equally bland and pointless rehash is released. Many games are engaging but frustrating - take Breath of the Wild for example, a game of great mechanical potential yet riddled with imbalance, and for all its pelagic breadth was ultimately as shallow as a puddle. Now Nintendo is merely neutral - which is still better than can be said for a great many corporate giants in the world, which are ruled by a naked spirit of yeastiness that rivals middle eastern despots.

Attached: Dante's Inferno - The Circle of Lust.png (1600x1227, 1.54M)

So now she looks like a shitty Kim Possible villian.

you're welcome

Attached: All Chaingunners go to Plutonia.png (1224x1084, 1.07M)

not the user you replied but i am gay and i say it needs bigger tits and ass

>what were they thinking?
this game isnt meant to sell but just to exist

I mean, it IS nice to sometimes have fat and/or ugly women mixed in with pretty women, because variety is good. The problem is when they want ugly designs to be the norm rather than something to make things less homogenous, and then we get shit like turning the Dark Queen into... that.

It is a parody.

We can look at Maslow's hierarchy of needs for a simplified concluding moment to this essay which I'm pleasantly surprised to have completed. Maslow's model of human needs is simplistic, not entirely accurate, solipsistic in ways and needless to say outdated 30-40 years on. Yet it still rings a certain truth about organisms pursuing "survival" needs and "actualisation" need seperately. What Maslow's hierarchy and the followers and purveyors of it failled to apprehend is a distinction between survival and its inverse, which is sometimes referred to as "thriving". A cute rhyming contrast - survive vs thrive. But thriving is in truth just the state of a survivor with material abundance to spend. Mold growing on a row of cheeses is "thriving" as it spreads further into the stockpile. Maslow's term of actualisation is better, but still vague - is a mold spreading as optimally as possible not its fundamental "actualisation"?

And most tellingly of all is the simply propensity for certain kinds of people in the world to simply never raise above the "survival" stages of the hierarchy. These people can be rich in material wealth and finances, endowed with status in a safe society, and yet with all the allowances and largesse of time, mind, space and civilisation permissiveness, they won't think to do anything with it besides make more money. Spending money on a meaningful hobby, or creating anything of true value, is incomprehensible to them, because they are what is often called "small souled". They fail to see how loathsome it is to do nothing with your money, your company, your trademarked franchises than to employ them in making more money, and how bad it is to drown out the world in this creative slush, or the injustice in its purveyors getting any disposable wealth at all. Lots simply don't get it all. May you understand the nature of this spiritual lowness, detect it and resist. Fin.

Attached: Constantine_York_Mini.png (818x618, 1.3M)

The new design doesn't look like a villain at all. She looks bland, forgettable, and not intimidating in the slightest. The original design might as well just be a leather swimsuit, bit it at least sorta has a villain aesthetic going for it, rather than looking like some kids cartoon character.

>those cute feet
What the fuck happened to us? Imagine if we evolved with these aesthetics. Imagine animated shows and movies now if they'd kept at it

>beat-em-up
>cal arts
It's actually impressive how unappealing this is to me

>What the fuck happened to us?
that's a good question

Attached: am.png (397x461, 306K)

You leave my nigga King Arthur and his Amazing Intro Theme out of this

Observe the much adored and venerated character from the Rayman series, introduced in Rayman 2: The Great Escape, Polokus, in his original incarnation on the left of this image.

He just oozes soul, with a hat clearly tailored for some sort of magician despite the character not having any other magician like aesthetic traits, an atmospheric set of pants and a charming lack of a t-shirt, indicating to us, the mesmerised audience that he, the dreaming, powerful thing in Rayman, is often in scenario's that don't require a T-Shirt, like being in a bed and going to sleep, It's pragmatic, functional and tells us clearly, exactly what sort of being Polokus is supposed to be, and exactly what sort of role he has to play.

Look at his long arms, those are the long arms of an entity that reaches beyond the means of lesser creatures, us, the mortals. We are dealing with a beast that can physically alter reality through its own dreams, and that straight line mouth and eccentric choice for pupils just adds to that "dream" like quality.

Now observe "Polokus" as he is seen in Rayman Origins, a game I think rudely abandons the enduring classic visual identity of the Rayman series.

Firstly, he has a great long, creepy beard that has no place on a clean shaven dreaming entity, as that manner of facial hair would cause at least some minor irritation whilst sleeping, then look at his eyes, those are the typical "Soulless", "Beady", black eyes, it's as if they were actually trying to make him look this way. Look at the top of his head, look at his lips, there's no magician's hat, there's just a tuft of orange hair, we didn't even know if Polokus had hair in Rayman 2, he was just that mysterious and ethereal, and those lips are stretched into the most simian gormless spread I've ever witnessed. Fuck. And then there's the extraneous details, oh what, an umbrella, a pipe, some pillows? A pedestal?

The point is, the original Polokus didn't need those, and he did just fine.

Attached: Polokus.png (1790x896, 1.32M)

CLEARLY GOOBLERGATE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS

They’re shit too

holy fug muh dick

This is going to blow up into a thing now isn't it? We're gonna get kotaku articles and non-apologies from Microsoft aren't we?

>be indie
>tank your youtube ratings and marketing because you wanted to be a faggot
I hope for their own sake they got a big fat check from MS, because these people are genuinely fucking idiots.

Only Dark Queen was nerfed (and severely, at that). All they did with Tifa was give her more underwear.

Attached: Tifa Comparison.jpg (1288x1083, 820K)

I thought Polokus and the Bubble Dreamer were 2 different characters given that Rayman barely has a canon.

Good but she doesn't need a staff, she's not one of those cowardly spellcaster villains. She fights hand to hand like a true chad.

Hello do you carry assault amphibians?

This is what happens when we give shit drawings a passing grade.

Sorry we only have riot frogs

Honestly, they should've roused JollyJack from his icy prison to do the art.

raymanpc.com/wiki/en/Polokus#In_Rayman_Origins

The fact that you do not know of his relegation to the "Bubble Dreamer", a name I greatly abhor, is indicative enough of the tragedy that has befallen the character of Polokus through the iniquitous means of Rayman Origins departure from the series otherwise golden standard.

Truly, I doubt this injustice will ever be rectified.

Bang bang

>wants every woman to be ugly, fat, and flawed
>draws idealized art of herself
These people have no fucking awareness of how stupid they are.

Attached: 1502931738181.jpg (702x672, 68K)

You're mostly right aside from your first paragraph arbitrarily shitting on beat-em-ups. Beat-em-ups CAN be good, even today. I still play Ninja Warriors on the SNES every so often because it's a solid game, albeit short. The problem is that while it's tricky to make one that's decent, it's incredibly easy to make one that sucks. There are hundreds of awful arcade beat-em-ups as proof. We haven't seen any "real" gameplay so far, so it's hard to tell where this is going to fall.

Also for the record, I hate the look of this thing as well. Even without getting a first hand feel at the gameplay it looks like it's going for style over substance, hoping the wacky animations and designs cover for shitty programming.

It's vanity disguised as concern. No women in games or comics can be more beautiful than the person pushing for the ugl-- I mean realistic bodies.

ugly people are delusional, more at 10

Third-wave feminists being simultaneously for and against sexual liberation will never not be funny

Videogames are usually about able bodied characters.

Fat women and old ladies are generally not able bodied people in real life.

don't do that

Attached: 1560046051883.jpg (320x320, 23K)

26 year old here. Played Battletoads on one of my uncles NESs when I was a kid and thought it was the hottest shit since sliced bread. The only good Ninja Turtle game is Turtles in Time.

>Male sexuality is evil
>So women must cover up even in fiction
>And men should feel guilty
Modern feminism.

They were never for sexual liberation. Only "gender" liberation, with gender being a made up term that has no bearing on anything, and furthermore purely in the context of "identities", which are the red flag behind all poisonous movements.

Attached: rarerevivals.png (1148x560, 863K)

Sauce please?

>That animation at the beginning.

youtube.com/watch?v=tWHVvXUw-RU

what happened to today's comics/cartoons, bros?

sexy is powerful

“Human pizza blob”. These people are mentally ill

The sad part is is that the animation is pretty good. The character designs just fucking ruin everything

This. There's a reason she looks like a dominatrix.

>Nu Dark queen
>Nu Tifa
How a fucking shity new pokemon game make hot girls?

Attached: nessa.jpg (765x1045, 105K)

youtu.be/CjI0TdvVbqI
Golden age of cartoons is over since 04

You can't be serious, even most resetera trannies are calling you out for being a fag

I honestly don't mind the new design. Looks cute .

>left soulles
>right soul
Battletoads is trying way too hard to be cool and retro. Look at that fucking overused "retro" color scheme. Compare it to something that has a similar graphical style that's also a retro revival of an old beat 'em up, Streets of Rage 4, a game actually made by competent artists that don't have to cover the game in "style" like overfrosting a bland cake with the sweetest, shittiest grocery store frosting available
youtu.be/Nw42STDQKbA

Low T beta male

I want you to know, user, that I read your essay and appreciated it. I will be screencapping it for preservation.

>it's fan service unless the woman wears a burka

It could work if that's actually her daughter.

Resetera is with us on this redesign being shit. That user is just a misplaced beta fag

How does Microsoft keep fucking up this generation? They hype up a big return to a franchise that hasn't seen a game in 25 years, and then hire a bunch of nobodies that seemed to have designed a flash game with the aesthetics of a late 90's/early 2000s edutainment title.

They've already killed the Crackdown series, why did they bring Battletoads back from the dead just to kill it again?

You never seen her because you are trash at video games and couldn't get to the last levels you fag

>"UHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH"

>It could work if that's actually her daughter.
this, they still have some time left to make the change

It could also work if it's her concealed state.

In the final fight she transforms into the curvy design we all know and the devs blow out all the haters (not going to happen)

Another day, another off-the-cuff dissertation for Yea Forums's eyes only. You're welcome, user.

Attached: 1557293196934.png (456x456, 7K)

>onions
top kek

Third-wavers are only for sexual liberation if men don't enjoy it or if women gain something from it. So if they can get a bunch of obese, wrinkly, or deformed women naked on the street and it makes men uncomfortable it makes them happy. If a woman gets naked for orbiters on snapchat and they pay her then she's empowered and in control of her sexuality.
If a man ogles at a woman on the street it is a sin because the woman gains nothing from it and the man potentially gains pleasure from the sight. That's why they are especially against video game designs being sexy, because men enjoy them but women don't profit never mind the fact that a bunch of jap games have female artists making sexy designs, they don't think about japan because it is evil

Attached: 1556720422544.png (1080x1920, 2.55M)

Pulled the gf over and asked her "which one is designed better and which one is drawn better"

She said "obviously the left" to both. Real women like other real women, fuck boob-hating sjws

Attached: 1552164304581.gif (250x188, 2.75M)

The ultimate point, which I didn't articulate, is that the genre can basically be summed up comprehensively by playing three games. Dragon's Crown is one of them and we can spend all day debating what the other two are. That's all that's needed for someone to fully explore the depth of the genre, which goes to say it's not particularly deep and we have to admit that to ourselves.

I don't disagree that good games can exist in the genre. I just don't have any hope that someone with a brain is going to make something that reflects that.

>They don't think about Japan
Probably because Western and eastern sensibilities are completely different culture-wise. Not defending them of course but still, it gets annoying when I see some cute girl being about empathy towards others. Seriously, who still does that these days?

My nigga! Same here user

Head shape is still awful, that goes against proper antagonist design

Shoulders and belt are good design, you just have autism

We want the Call of Duty audience.

Gross mismanagement at the start of the generation, and arguably still today.

By the time the One was rolled out, MS had relegated several of their already limited amount of studios into Kinect shovelware factories, and had designs for a massive netflix-like enterprise focusing on Microsoft original tv shows. Phil Spencer became head in a flurry of firings and scrambled enough together to make Microsoft's E3 2014 slightly interesting with several new projects, which were mostly cgi trailers, several of which have been cancelled. The Master Chief Collection was perhaps the culmination of this rush job, being handled in a grossly short period by several unrelated studios, it was an absolute disaster.

343 failed to deliver again on a Halo game which had the worst story in the franchise and a multiplayer that, while good, couldn't compete against the likes of Destiny and felt fragmented in focus with Warzone. As a consequence, they've completely skipped the rest of the generation to develop a new Halo engine and a new game for the start of next gen, giving up on the One for now entirely. Gears of War 4 was bland and safe, much like Halo 4, and now the sequel looks to be the directors pet virtue signalling project. Crackdown 3 was mishandled massively during development and overpromised/failed on the cloud systems part. Sea of Thieves took far too long to become a complete game and State of Decay 2 was amateurish.

It says a fuck ton that Microsoft's greatest achievements this gen are Forza Horizon 4, a racing game, and Ori an indie-esque metroidvania platformer game. They've done some good work though, the BC/Emulation initiative, the PC games initiative, and they've recognised their faults enough to admit that they seriously needed to get their asses in gear for next gen, so they've acquired a host of studios.

Basically, they fucked themselves so hard that by the time they really started putting an effort into fixing it, 2016, it was too late.

twitter.com/IggyBomb/status/1138534313257971712

they where thinking to the far left.

>1968

Attached: acsaveta-jovanovic.jpg (600x599, 199K)

Much obliged, friend.

>capable of sending men into the kitchen

This is why I'm still here. Every now and then someone comes along with true insight and it will never be noticed outside of this thread. Thank you.

Lmao shego is still hot even if she not wearing skimpy

fuck it! someome ask those mattel guys to let Wayforward borrow the license for a minute. we need a Street Shark beat em up to fix this fiasco

Uggggh, Why do feminists hate sexy women?

Attached: Battletoads Dark Queen.png (480x360, 43K)

>Human pizza blob
>HAHAHAHA LOOK HOW SILLY AND QUIRKY I AM!

>Alex Jones was right about the frogs

Attached: 8bit chuck chuckles.gif (404x416, 204K)

>befriending a based homeless man for life
that ship has sailed

Attached: flat,1000x1000,075,f.jpg (1000x584, 84K)

You are like a baby

Attached: 1474405166460.webm (608x448, 537K)

what the fuck

Attached: i am so fucking mad.png (164x202, 4K)

nuke california

BANG
PULL MY DEVIL TRIGGER

Attached: BANG BANG BANG.gif (888x430, 464K)

>if anybody's kissing anybody.... you should be kissing me.

Attached: 15134523452.png (357x407, 103K)

thanks mr.samurai

Onions milk is fucking gross. There's literally no reason not to drink almond milk instead.

>I have retarded awful taste!
A trenchcoat with a cape is just stupid.

Attached: 1555531745623.jpg (223x226, 8K)

I'm skeptical about all kinds of beans, nuts, seeds and lentils. Just normal milk for me please.

>lactose intolerant
Seems to be a case of damage gut lining from other irritants, which leads to the milk issues. If fixed, milk should become re-edible.

Unironically this. Fanservice has killed every game I ever loved by turning it into a waifu lootbox gacha piece of trash. I condemn everything with a sexy female in it as a result.

Regular cow milk may be the tastiest, but it goes bad in like, 2 weeks.

There is no flaw with the original design you twat

Attached: am2.jpg (1080x1080, 139K)

That shouldn't be a problem. I buy about 12-16 pints of milk a week and drink it all before expiry date. Anything "long-last" = preservatives, and all preservatives are poison. Some more poisonous than others.

He's a goddamned legend and the fact that he isn't canonized as a patron saint at Cal Arts is practically a crime against humanity. It certainly is telling of the state of the commie pigdogs palm greasing their way to graduation. Jesus Christ the talentless hacks these days.

BIGGER

Attached: 1560285545704.gif (200x150, 3.11M)

>tfw whoever the fuck that loli is gave me a lifelong fetish for dark colored stockings.

boi you can by lactose free milk at costco

What happened to JollyJack?

Looks better but why in the world would you show the cheek bone?

One certainly can but I was addressing the broader topic anyway. Besides, here in England many shops still only have a small "free-from" section. And lactose has benefits, if one can fix one's digestive system to accept it.

Sometimes I would lose on purpose so that the Dark Queen would talk about eating the Battletoads

no. lose them. why would a dark queen ruler of a bunch of fucking pigs dress MORE?

>Dressing like an eyecandy for men is a sure way to appear weak and not in charge.

But I thought it was empowering when women dressed the way they wanted.

Attached: 1414978253315.jpg (433x380, 26K)

Me too!

The new toad designs are good

but a woman made the better looking remake tifa model

Attached: incrediblefanmadetifa_2460193b-1.jpg (1920x1234, 241K)

>says the faggot who supports Ben Shapiro

enjoy your porn ban when he's elected.

*HO HO HO HO*

Attached: 1559880049330.png (1154x1062, 871K)

I would just like to interject that these inherently meaningless activities and bizarre quirks we seek to introduce, while almost always recognizable for their high potential for being failures, are just as important from a logical developmental standpoint. In the same way as an algorithm sometimes throws everything at the wall to see what sticks (Particularly when talking about genetic algorithms), so too does mankind daydream about things that scream out absurdity in the vain hope that everyone's missing something and it leads to further developments.

In a sense, all these works of art, the worlds that man creates of his own design, hell, video games in general, is man attempting to go beyond his confines of common preception of the logical and stepping into the realm of the illogical. The vast majority of these attempts wind up as curios at best and abject failures at worst, but on rare occasions, they serve to spark something in reality and push us forward.

In that sense, I'd say that art fits nicely with the idea that we're to multiply like any other living organism, as when taken as a whole, such things do lead to an overall improvement in the status mankind despite the many missteps taken on the way there.

For example, take this video game art. While certainly cool to look at in a vacuum, it was only created once the artist put some logical thought into meeting beings unlike our own and how man might interact with them. While the knowledge is not useful to us currently, it places our minds on a development trajectory towards attempting to understanding a situation we might one day encounter, be it aliens from another planet, artifacts we can't explain, or situations we haven't otherwise encountered in the realm of reality yet.

Attached: 1553892532610.jpg (1321x717, 682K)

/pol/ is an example of why free speech no longer works and only allows stupid garbage to be said.

Attached: 1466957548016.jpg (989x559, 182K)

That's a real woman not a post modern feminist idiot.

Attached: 1559417966808.png (703x727, 826K)

>hire a bunch of british faggots that use Shezow and Johnny Test as their inspiration
>turns into dog shit

literally thought the game was being made by canadians at the trailer

I don't get how everything Microsoft does now turns to shit. Xbox under Mattrick and the guy before him did a much better job.

I revoke your right to use Dragon Ball Z you fucking baasedbooy

Attached: 7e5.png (333x653, 180K)

I see there is a man of good taste in this thread.
youtube.com/watch?v=USUucZVnno0

Isn't this counter productive since they know it exists but have stated it's bad?

I read it too, thanks.

So the morale of the story is tax the rich and kill them if they resist because they are holding humanity back.

they were thinking
>We're going to capitalize on an old intellectual property but then make it unlike that old intellectual property
It works every single time

Attached: 1545223767359.png (468x595, 15K)

murdochmurdoch.net/video/?play=The Rabbit Hole
Rise above, brother!

dilate tranny piece of shit

For stuff like beans or honey, they're long last but without preservative. Back in the days people knew how to keep some stuff for later without it rotting.

Jesus your ilk are so deranged

pretty sure this may be feature at least as an Easter egg in Thundercats Roar

The point you're angling towards is the nature of experimentation and the expansion of information and perception, and in this quanta it is correct. Almost all errors of reasoning can be traced back to overly wanton hurling into the abyss of uncertainty, or a total lack of exploration.

However, this is a seperate phenomenon to the stable, functional differentiation largely expounded upon in that previous 11-post sequence (I find it hard to believe it occupied as much). One perpendicular, which can function as an aspect of, as well as a vector for, higher and lower principles alike. Consider the scattershot nature of many organism's reproductive tracts. Issuing many tiny offspring in a million directions is a fit for the experimental variety phenomenon. But it certainly also results in a saturation of the environment, and thereby a de-differentiation on the whole. From the perspective of the low-level organism, ideally there'd be no "experiment" involved - each offspring would successfully mature in whichever direction it issued, bear more offspring and repeat. This is a manifestation of the mold phenonemon, which directly inspires a sense of deep imbalance, a willingness to restrain and restrict the species in question, and ultimately a sense of disgust.

A higher organism can also follow the principle of experimentation and come to a completely non-revolting conclusion, by exploring many different aspects of an artform as you so outline. Rather than spamming a million intermineable offspring in every direction, instead a number of carefully crafted and thought out variants are produced. Some may not carry any deeper potential and won't be furthered, though still keep on the backburner as a curiousity. Ultimately the "ecosystem" becomes richer from the fruits of the experimentation, with more end differentiation and not less.

Many do not grasp how mainstream scientific endeavours, as well as sociological and psychological movements, political theories

Attached: 1498264638481.png (904x768, 612K)

Honey is basically pure sugar, which is sacred. Beans are heavy in polyunsaturated fat just like seeds, so by-weight they're substantially preservative.

Source, please? Is that Amazon?

>Now if you’ll excuse me I’m gonna go cry over my copy of Battletoads for NES and daydream about a better future where a nontumblrized reboot happened.
Cringe as fuck. Don't link your twitter.

Amazing. Completely ignoring the fact that they look nothing alike, you can't even reasonably argue that the character looks like a villain.

Attached: 1540323757705.png (500x500, 178K)

Attached: 1555670992240.png (785x731, 279K)

and economies, manage to fall so foul of basic sense and reason, and a more thorough understanding of how to truly expand and improve perception is most enlightening, so I thank you for bringing this up.

Not at all, but then I hope this comment is tongue in cheek

OG is still better.

NVM, found it: exhentai.org/s/de3bb86965/734292-28

>Cuphead
isn't an MS IP you idiot

Attached: animatorsurvivalkit.png (1752x6796, 1.31M)

I's true, unless you do things to keep the rich in line, they will continue to accumulate wealth and power at the expense of everyone else.
The idea tht you need rich people because they are the ones that keep society moving is pure bullshit created by them to justify their pillaging of society
Just look at how things have gone to shit in the US and UK after policies went to helping the rich over the people.
theguardian.com/inequality/2019/jun/06/socialism-for-the-rich-the-evils-of-bad-economics.

>He doesn't know Disney's Alice in Wonderland
>The OG Lolita

There's got a dark color pallet, looks mean, and is striking an intense villain pose. Still a shit choice but don't go full retard.

1991
>badass goddess of beauty
>Doesn't give a shit about what society thinks, dresses how she wants to
>So powerful she doesn't care about jealous failures calling her a slut, powerful enough to kill anyone that opposes her
>Dresses to garner slaves, not to appease men that she would kill
>Absolute dominatrix of tyranny and oppression
2019
>Generic cartoon female villain
>Wears pathetic purple dress
>Generic villain hairstyle like Jessie from Pokemon
>Conforms to societies norms, cowers to them and how people see her
>Stupid ugly face with stupid childish head shape

Everything that could go wrong, did go wrong.

>overflowy
Their heads is overflowy with retard

Attached: 1485489408872.jpg (539x552, 30K)

>looks mean, and is striking an intense villain pose
More like determined and doing a flying hero pose. Switch out her palette and not a single thing about her otherwise looks villany.

>Hillary Clinton fighting a team of frogs.
These hate symbols must be stopped!

>No tits again
Yeah no fuck off nigger.

I don't disagree that the masses need something to keep them in line and see that we actually get shit done (Because humanity's greatest motivator, the thing that gets you up in the morning every day, is that you aren't happy with something and want to see it change), but I abhor the current leadership which seeks to enrich themselves at the expense of everything else. It speaks to them seeing themselves as the end goal rather than something more.

You heard it here first, folks. Blacks are evil because they have a natural dark color pallet.

Left is pretty hot but I'd rather see Right get fucked in the butt.

Stop trying to bullshit. Artworks are one thing but this is how she looked in-game. And in FMV it was even worse, her tits were ridiculously big.

Attached: Tifa_Victory_Pose.gif (480x335, 3.05M)

Still looks stupid. You just don't seem to get it, society wants women to put clothes on, but a villain wouldn't give a shit, they would wear what they want and kill anyone who opposes them. That's what made Dark Queen cool, she dressed to seduce men into being slaves or outright killing them.

This. Capitalism is great, but "free market" leads to that "vote with your wallet" mentality that sounds great on paper and actually functions well under certain circumstances, but it will always mean that the rich and powerful get more votes. People theorize that anyone with socialist leaning ideas or anyone critical of going easier on the wealthiest among us just want the nation to be poor doesn't understand the basic concept of capitalism's end goal of resources owned and controlled by fewer and fewer as the prices get higher and higher. The price of gas has gone up from about a dollar because gas companies sell their product to each other back and forth to give the illusion of demand to circumvent regulation, jack up the prices like they want to, and leave everyone with less money. Everyone wants to leave you with less money while paying you less.

There are plenty of people throughout history and even in this present era who, having plenty of wealth and recognising this fact, proceed to utilise their societal largesse in the pursuit of creating more wonder and beauty, more majesty and glory, and in general raising the higher principles of society outlined earlier on in this thread. This includes almost everyone posting here in this thread, in fact - since everyone living in the western first world is intensely wealthy and of high status by global and historical standards.

Meanwhile, there are vast swathes of people of below average wealth and standing, many even in poverty, who if given a total largesse of wealth would do nothing of glory or lasting value. So simply reducing it down to "the current rich vs the current poor", or "whoever is presently rich vs whoever is presently poor", is totally missing the point. Even a guy like Karl Marx didn't make this point, although many of his later adherents would dishonestly simplify or misunderstand it as such.

The problem with so many of the really, REALLY ultra wealthy today is that they can't stop ACCUMULATING wealth, in spite of their enormous reserves. It is a problem of attitude, interest, perception and focus first, of income and revenue second, and static wealth only more distantly thereafter.

It is terrible how corrupt our political, busines and financial situation has become. But target the mere moneyed or rich won't address the core issue, because there is a hungry myriad of presently poor and low status people across this planet eager to fill the shoes of decapitated millionaires and proceed to be even filthier in their practices.

Attached: 1518468019755.png (500x697, 186K)

You mean the problem was allowing pesents to vote

>Redesign a literally who nobody cared about from a meme series known for its gameplay
>Election tourists virtue-signal about censorship as if they give a shit, shitting up the board further
Summer never ended

All they did was copy Shego poorly when she is mean to have her unique design that screams this is Dark Queen.

>moving the goalpost
stop trying to bullshit

The problem is the current leadership runs on the policies of the link I posted and work only for the best interests of the rich, yes there are some outliers who want to work for the common man, but they are marginalized. America is a great example where the only people who want to work for the interests of everyone but the rich are labeled as communists. While the populists on the right just create phantom elites who aren't the rich to attack them and let the wealthy do as they please.

The only way to break the system is to break the rich. Yes, people need motivation, and culturally things have gone to shit because it's not enough to just do a good's day work, you need to do what you can to scam and cheat your way to the top so you can be a millionaire and screw around., Which is why you see so many poor people try and find the easy way out.

And even if all your needs are met, you can follow Maslow's chart to self actualization of self improvement or pursing the arts to contribute to society in a meaningful way. That's not happening due to how society is designed today due to how the rich have influenced it to keep themselves in power.

The problem is the rich who have accumulated those billions of dollars tog the system and until you break that system it will persist and get worse. You can't blame the politicians when they are just beholden to the billionaires.
Of course just breaking the system is not enough, you need to make sure it doesn't create a vacuum where new people take their spots and you need to reform the culture.

So eliminate the billionaire class because they are unnecessary and a cancer while at the same time pushing for societal reforms that give everyone enough resources to thrive while at the same time not teaching them to be complacent and lazy by looking for an easy way out.
Targeting the rich alone isn't a cure all, but you're attacking the root of the cancer and unless that's done, nothing else can be solved.

>Capable of sending men to the kitchen

Attached: Current 4chan users.png (992x1102, 644K)

The guy said that tifa wasn't nerfed, she was. There's no moving anything.

This. I played Battletoads and forgot about her. I asked my friends who played Battletoads and I forgot about her. I've been here for a decade and the fucking first fap and waifu threads were devoid of her delicious 90s titties. She wasn't important in the game or memorable and that actually shocks me.
Don't get me wrong, I like the old design and wished they didn't change it, but maybe they were looking for this reaction and marketing.

That's a fat arm emoji tho

>So eliminate the billionaire class
Which is a great idea, but they can leave the country and be billionaires somewhere else.

Thought this was some free Flash game from Newgrounds or like a Disney website or something. They're actually selling this shit lmao. Well hey at least it's non-threatening to fat ugly feminists.

Attached: 1539229926464.jpg (512x512, 26K)

>eliminate he billionaire class and redistribute the wealth!
How do you propose to do this when the billionaire class leaves the country long before you get the chance to even begin the process of seizing their assets?

Had all the street shark toys. Lost the Arcade Jet vehicle and Killermari.

>think of the children

Attached: 1345276586264.jpg (1024x1024, 166K)

extremely based post

Is that one on the right from the fucking kids show where a boy has that power suit he uses that turns him into a trap trans freakazoid looking "female" hero show?

The number one policy helping the rich is mass immigration.

And it just so happens that every mouthbreathing socialist wants to flood the country with even more of the parasites.

They somehow think that they can legislate supply and demand out of existence. That the reason rent is so high isn't because you've flooded the city with people so a landlord will always be able to have a tenant who will begrudgingly meet his demandst no matter what they are, but because of some intrinsic values? Some policy? That the reason an employer can offer a low skill worker pennies ISN'T because there's 10 more dullards lined up behind him who'd do it for them anyways? If NOBODY ELSE would do it then they would HAVE TO give a BETTER OFFER. That's not even economics. It's fucking basic fucking reasoning.

Do you never stop and fucking think why Disney, Nike, all of these multinationals, seem to be on the side of you socialist scum? Every time they make a social statement it falls in line with your beliefs? Are you really so delusional that you think the "1%" are your allies in your eternal struggle against the "1%"?

Your stupid article draws conclusions from nowhere. It says X is true so therefore Y is why X is true without any reasoning to back it up. It ignores the fact that viewed over time, the correlation between X and Y is clearly not there because Y is here NOW and X is here NOW and I LIKE Y so it's because of Y.
Yes Britain is an outlier. Because if you look at London after 1979 compared to say, Berlin after 1979 (until very recently) you'll see something very obvious. Wow, it happened RIGHT after Amnesty Raegen, must be because of his caused "change in thinking". Fuck off you absolute buffoon.

Attached: yAjFgqMGG9K7JtcJFOioyTdpM3K.jpg (780x1147, 135K)

As soon as I saw the Dark Queen blink by in the trailer it was like "lol they know this design is going to cause a shitfit but someone told them she had to be in it." This still shows that there were a million ways they could have done the redesign that makes her more palatable to modern audiences, keep her recognizable and not like some PBSKids-tier whatever the fuck they have currently.

>waaahh muh sexy out fit that makes me feel inadequate because she is a perfect cartoon and I am a real blob.
because of that

>1991
crazy dominatrix woman
>2019
Canada flash cartoon

I'd love to see Gruntilda's beautiful form get Femcel'd and then have the downgrade lampshaded.

Fuck is that called and is it still on air!?

>Do you never stop and fucking think why Disney, Nike, all of these multinationals, seem to be on the side of you socialist scum? Every time they make a social statement it falls in line with your beliefs? Are you really so delusional that you think the "1%" are your allies in your eternal struggle against the "1%"?

Honestly I have to go back to this point because it's so fucking mind boggling how fucking stupid you fucks are. Like look at this shit Spent an entire post talking and hasn't said a fucking thing. "Societal reform that lets people thrive... etc". Vague feel good meaningless nonsense. Essentially just a vague point that "society should be better man".

It's fucking amazing what they've done. They've creaated the perfect consumer. Disney can release a feminist movie and have socialists freelance campaigning to tell you that seeing that movie made by fucking DISNEY is your moral duty.
Every single time a big million dollar company alludes to a character being gay you'll have self avowed communists fucking squealing over it and making sure all detractors of it are shamed. You'll see it here on Yea Forums all the time.

The perfect fucking consumer. All you have to do is throw them a bit of lip service and they'll live and die for you. All while thinking they're your worst enemy. Absolutely insane.

Femcel Grunty is just Magica de Spell

>Billionaire apologists who think they're untouchable.
There's plenty of ways to deal with billionaires even in a globalist country that isn't heavy handed like sending the military after them or freezing their assets if they choose to flee the country.

Having worker friendly policies would be a great first step. Take a strong pro-union stance, repeal right to work laws, pass legislation that requires contractors to be treated as employees and other policies meant to empower workers against corporations
Raise taxes on them where they're forced to actually reinvest their earnings into their company rather than hiding it away in tax shelters. You know, like they did in the 1950s.

If they decide to flee the country, punish their company with tariffs or help support rival companies that play by the rules. America is a giant market and even in a global economy, only a spiteful idiot would give up on it.
Freeze out their businesses so they can operate in the country. And you can easily play economic hardball with whatever country decides to harbor the billionaire or their businesss with stricter trade policies that target them.

There's this delusion the objectivists have that the rich can just run away, the problem is they don't have anything but their money, and unless you have other resources you aren't going Gault.

And to be fair just fucking them over and forcing tax heavens to fork over their money would be much easier. Not like those pieces of shit are using that money anyway.

I can broadly agree with the need to alter and in some respect "break" our current systems, but I'd extend to you the points raised in my post with the dynamite-throwing man picture as to why the reasoning and proposed methodologies involved need work. Much of the thinking involved in this post is blinkered by terminological spooks that need deeper analysis. Thinking of a "billionaire class" for instance will cause measures to miss the woods for the trees, and the trunks for the roots.

It's kind of like those 100 CEOs that signed a petition about the states making abortion illegal. Going on and on about "woman's rights," while literally lobbying lawmakers to allow them to service places like Saudi Arabia. The internet has turned activists into goldfish.

>Mum immigration
And who's the people who hire those people in the race o the bottom you retard? It's good to see you're a puppet of the billionaires as well and are falling into their trap of blaming everyone but them. You want to deal with the housing problem in certain areas? Have more low incoming housing and stop gentrification which is one of the chief reasons you're seeing prices skyrocket. And guess what, you do have people lining up for shit jobs because of this race to the bottom your side has created.

The article is spot on about how the government supports the rich instead of letting them fail while creating policies that punish the poor and middle class. Compare how America and the UK did after World War Ii up until the corporate conservatives took over in the 1980s. Income inequality is not an X happened so Y is true. It's a fact.

The fact you're blaming immigrants instead of the people who hire them, ahem the billionares shows you're a fucking idiot attacking everyone bu the people you should. And that makes you a glorious useful idiot for the rich and part of why things are shitty.

Now why is that? Have you fed into the delusion that you'll be one of them one day if you just work hard enough? The myth that life is a meritocracy, or you're actually stupid enough to think the self made millionaire isn't just a lottery winner who had the right idea at the right time and was cutthroat enough to get head?
Come the fuck on, you're a corporate cocksucker who pretends to blame Disney and Nike, but doesn't lift a finger or give any examples on how to reign them in other than mum immigrants.

The billionaires are one side of problem and the root of the problem, but people like you and your cultural cancer are the other part of the equation that needs to be eliminated if you want to see this country thrive again.

Also I hope you cheered those socialists you hate for driving Amazon out of New York because they're helping keep rent down there

Women could vote back in 1990 too

Unless you start somewhere all you have is handwringing and retards like who fall for the distractions and think dealing with issues the billionaires and corporations create will solve the issue.
In this case, go right for the roots. As I said before, it's not a cure all, but it's a great start to improve things.

Disastrous policies don't have immediate effect. Even suddenly changing the electorate to be 50% irrationally emotional is gonna take some time to rot your society.

Collapses are slow. Just look at Cali.

Shezow and sadly not cancelled...

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/SheZow

I'm not who you are responding to, but the problem I have with people like you is that it really doesn't matter how good you have it so long as there are others that have it better than you. It doesn't matter that more than a third of the world's population lives on less than 2 dollars per day, and that you, in comparison, absolutely wreck their shit. It doesn't matter that today you have access to things that the richest men in the world didn't have access to 100 years ago. No, you give a shit only about the people above you, and whine about how it isn't given to you, and push for socialist policies that have never worked because it's easier for you to do that than it is for you to admit that you're just a fuckup.

>Have you fed into the delusion that you'll be one of them one day if you just work hard enough?
Something a useless communist could never understand:
Even if its usually impossible for an individual to reach the heights of success in a single lifetime, you CAN improve your situation and set the stage for your children to achieve that level of success.

Of course, you degenerate retards only ever think of yourselves, so this never occurred to you. Hence why you always whine about, "B-b-but I'LL never be a billionaire!!!"

they made tifa even better though

Cal arts refers to the California Institute of Art and also to the "Calarts style" which I can't really describe in a single post. Just watch this video and when he starts showing the gif depicting the SAME FUCKING SHAPE being used for a dozen characters you'll get why everyone is sick of it. youtu.be/VkK6FYIcN-M

Most of the staff are white men.

Fun fact: The Brookings Institute actually said that you only need to do 3 things in order to live in the middle class.
1. Graduate High School
2. Get employeed and stay employed
3. Wait until marriage to have kids, wait until after age 21 to get married.

Doing those three things will give you like a 94% chance of making it to the middle class, and that's coming from a left-leaning think tank.

So? Allowing women to vote destroyed the basic and vital premise that, "These people are irrational and their opinions don't really matter".

Validating and normalizing female input has caused retardedness even among men.

Her VA was murdered at the age of 10 by her own father :'(

Attached: 1558320501090.jpg (640x631, 36K)

tl;dr

things that are done to "transcend" what has existed before or during and not according to any aesthetic contradictions of underlying principles such that the resulting sum of what we perceive with our senses is greater than the specific reality or just reality in general (which speaks to a humanely order) = good, "differentiated", artistic, soul

things that are done for the sake of mere self-propagation without any seeming real purpose or thought behind it or just mindlessly following hardcoded patterns or random "trends" (which speaks to a bacterial chaos) = bad, samey, boring, soulless

At least that's what I get from user's impromptu dissertation. If I didn't know any better, I'd say you were a lawfag.

Attached: hoy.jpg (1280x720, 64K)

That's heavy. Is she the same girl who did Ducky in The Land Before Time?

Of course here are going to be people who live better lives, he question is, when does it become excessive and detrimental? When you have people homeless and starving in the streets can you hay you have a morale society when you have billionaires?
That goes for the entire world, but you got to clean up your own house first before you can try and address global poverty, although those might go hand in hand due to corporate exploitation of poor countries.
The other flaw there is you're seeing policies that go against the rich as a 'tear them down out of spite' and not what they are, a way to level the playing field to give more people a chance. Otherwise you create deludied idiots like Who thinks he can be apart of the club.
The current system is rigged and the tables are turned against you. The question is do you want to make it 'big' on the billionaires terms or create a wold where more people can thrive because the few don't hoard everything?
Because you have created this strawman that it's all about taking money away from some people and giving it to others like a robin hood, when I said before that alone wouldn't fix things since we have the cultural cancer where people have been taught that scamming and cheating is a virtue. Look at America where the current president is at least a tax cheat, if not worse. And when confronted on that he said it proves he's not an idiot for being a tax cheat. And his followers see that as a good thing. That sort of thinking needs to be eradicated.
You need to take down the billionaires and the culture they have created while not falling for all the division traps they have also created to have people fight among themselves.
You can at least agree on that, right?

No, I'm blaming who needs to be blamed. Yes billionaires are to be blamed, but billionaires cannot work alone, not in a democracy. They still need mouthbreathers like you to get them what they want, because at the end of the day you decide the politicians. And you take far more of the blame.

And you proved my point. You somehow seem to think that there's something other than supply and demand at play here. That you can somehow create a system with a mass oversupply of unskilled labour that still somehow benefits the unskilled labourer. That's fucking stupid. No matter what, the only thing that can stop Schlomo giving Pedro more than the BARE MINIMUM is if there isn't someone else lined up who WILL.

"That's fine, we'll just make the BARE MINIMUM higher so Schlomo has to share teehee", well WEW guess what. Because you've driven the barriers to entry so high to "stick it to the billionaires" suddenly there's no such thing as small business anymore. Because due to the economy of scale, large businesses get more value/cost than small businesse. So now that you've forced employers to give unskilled workers a "competetive wage", suddenly Mom and Pop's One Stop Shop can't afford to stay in business, because that wage cuts far deeper into their margins than it does into those of Walmart. So now your policies have effectively given them a monopoly because it's literally impossible for anyone to overcome the regulatory barriers you've set up, well done, you sure showed them what for.

I like the fact that you completely waltzed past how all the megacorps support you, I would too if I couldn't think. You don't have to THINK about how these megacorps encourage this immigration at every turn, you can have your income equality AND your immigrants, fuckit you can have a pony and a blowjob too why the fuck not?

The absolute perfect consumer. A legion of retards that everything that benefits corporations is their moral duty, and doesn't even realise it.

>Pizza
Sooooo, child porn or child rape? Which will it be Mr. FBI agent?

Women could vote in 1991 retard

No billionaires need retards like you to defend them and fall for their wedge issues.
You want to know what would stop those problems you state? Government regulation to punish the billionaires and corporations for those actions and this race to the bottom your bitching about.
You're supporting the people who keep the statues quo and you stupidly vote for them.

>Mega corporations support those who want to break them up.
Now you're a special type of retard I see. As I said, you're part of the cancer holding society back. Thanks for proving that in your post of strawmen.

Would you perhaps care to describe these govermnet regulations you talk about :-DDDD?

Punishing companies that hire undocumented workers and ship jobs oversees for starters?
Are the people you voting for actually advocating that? ^.^

>When you have people homeless and starving in the streets can you hay you have a morale society when you have billionaires?
Assuming you make minimum wage, you are making more per hour than over a third of the world makes per day. You are not in a position to throw stones, and I don't see you doing anything to fix that imbalance. But it's ok when you do it, because there are other people who do it worse, right?
>The other flaw there is you're seeing policies that go against the rich as a 'tear them down out of spite' and not what they are
Yes, they are. It is incredibly easy to make your way into the middle class, but that's not good enough for people like you.
>a way to level the playing field to give more people a chance.
A chance to do what? Live comfortably? You can do that, according to a leftist think tank, by doing three simple things.
brookings.edu/opinions/three-simple-rules-poor-teens-should-follow-to-join-the-middle-class/

The correct place to start is actually understanding why people do what they do, and why the world works the way it does, by observing. There are far too many lazy and frankly second hand assumptions in the current block of notions you're putting forth. I would suggest listening to a more diverse set of content than the one podcast/animation series you linked earlier in the thread, in fact I would recommend reading over mere watching, and steadily improving one's perspective.

Based as fuck

Who is this Semen Demon and what happened to her?

Rayman 2's Polokus looks fucking stupid. Even as a kid I thought this design looked fucking ugly as hell and not designed as well as the other characters.

>You can take that 6 year old's drawing on the right seriously

HAHHAHHAHAHHAHAHHAHA

Actually a decent summary, I didn't use the word aesthetics since I feel the language has become somewhat clouded by those who equate crude visual appeal (eg if it has a bright colour it's good, if it has titties it's good, if it it's popularly voted as looking good it's good, all of which are failing to understand deeper principles and context) but to a pair of ears that understand that term in the older and non-obfuscated sense it works. Remember to note that mindless novelty (eg Piranha Plant in Smash Bros) is as bad as mindless spam (eg Fire Emblem reps) for the same root reason, and bacteria expanding into new areas is not a good kind of expansion or exploration. This is good to go.

Many, many people have suggested that I become a lawyer if that's what you mean. Sometimes I think about it.

Attached: 021d37fbd36a568cabd007e012961902--japan-art-cowboys.jpg (560x376, 23K)

lmao'ing at all the marks getting worked by this based heel user

battletoads antagonist. Dark Queen, and she and Professor T-bird would talk shit before each level. Trolling when trolling was in its golden age.

Yes.

But if we go back to your early vaguely mentioned policies, we can pretty look at California for a real time analysis of what the implementation of them causes. With so much workers and tenatns rights and legislation to protect the little guy, surely it's a paradise by now, even with all that immigratio-no there's homeless people shitting on the streets, declining small business, and thus massive inequality due to that fact and the destruction of the middle class. Fucking right wing how could we let them do this to us. I can't believe they're only 9th on the list of states by union representation, that's ALMOST at the bottom.

But of course your "policies" (I'll humour you and pretend you actualy have anything substantial rather than vague appeals to "workers rights man" are different. TRUE wealth redistibution has never been tried and if you were in charge by Jove you'd have it.

you take a child like drawing more seriously than an evil stripper? Strippers know people, they can get you fucked up.

CRINGE

>Crazy dangerous woman
Nigger with a body like that I could TKO her with my Dorito and Mountain Dew powered breath attack. She's a push over not a threat.

LITERALLY TURNING THE FROGS GAY

her 2019 design doesn't look crazy OR dangerous
she looks like a boring ass single mother

I wonder if it just a butthurt furfag that wish he worked on movies beloved by millions around the world instead of two shit shorts nobody cares about or if his claim is true.

>Hand-wringing argument to delay action

>If you aren't like the people you advocate for, you're a hypocrite.
The go to argument for people who defend the billionaire class against those who act, god fobid, altruistically and advocate those who got screwed more by the system then them. Let me guess, you're going to say raising the minimum wage is bad too and are going to cite the myth that it will cause inflation when data shows that that's not the case?

>It's incredibly easy to make it to the middle class
Is that why America's class mobility has dropped like a rock in recent decades and they've caught overestimating their data?

>And what?
As I said, it's a cultural issue of living within your means. A problem the billionaire class you defend created where you see a spike of people wanting to live opulently.

>mum commiefornia.
Still the 5th largest economy in the world and , also they are moving forward with reigning in the gig economy by trying to pass legislation that requires contractors to be treated as employees. Progress is being made even if there are flaws.
Oh and they have a surplus even with all those social programs.

Hmmm... How's that right wing heaven Kansas doing with their great trickle down economic experiment? I mean giving all the money to the billionaires must have jump started their economy, right? Riiiight?

>Finally, a chance to make my Kim Possible OC a reality

Attached: image.jpg (1080x1620, 211K)

>Hand-wringing argument to delay action
He's very politely telling you that you're a childish idiot, user.

You should play the Ace Attorney series and SMT series sometime, I think that'd be fun for you.

And i'm correctly telling him he's an idiot who wants to keep the corrupt status quo.

It looks like they're breaking child labour laws.

WEW

I don't think anyone who read the substantive amount I've posted in this thread would characterise it as "hand-wringing", and if any honestly would then I'll understand them when they address it in specifics.

Separate to this: no-one is going to trust a word of what you have to say if you constantly agitate for a vague "action", and when others bring up points you dismiss them without reason and mouth at accusatory motives. No-one has a "master plan", in fact believing in and chasing "master plans" is precisely how messes accumulate in systems such as our current one. I don't, certainly you don't, other anons don't, and neither does your imagined foes "the billionaires". If every user with the best of intentions is telling you the answer is more complex than that, perhaps trust that more than one podcast you listen to, long enough to stop and take stock.

>Is that why America's class mobility has dropped like a rock in recent decades and they've caught overestimating their data?
Yes, I'm sure it's the left wing think tanks overestimating their data.

>As I said, it's a cultural issue of living within your means. A problem the billionaire class you defend created where you see a spike of people wanting to live opulently.
That's not a problem to those who live their lives responsibly. What you've just done here is move the goal posts. Implementing socialism doesn't help with that problem. If anything, it exacerbates it, because it rewards stupid, irresponsible, and/or unlucky people with money, without teaching them how to live within their means.

Feel free to keep trying to straw man me. I don't care. You obviously aren't interested in a discussion, but rather a lecture. Which isn't a bad thing unless you don't know anything in regards to what you're talking about, which happens to be the case here.

>what were they thinking?
>We are going to fix the wrongs of the past but only in fictional media, it's okay for women to dress this way if they choose, it's empowering.

Why didn't they just let Yacht Club make it?

Attached: battletoads_shovel_knight.0.0.jpg (1200x800, 141K)

LOOL, I hope the Magatoads are the enemies. GIRL POWER!

MODS?

she's a loli you idiots. if anything the porn will get better

I'm curious how you've come to the conclusion that there is any alternative to corruption.

I mean, when the opportunity is presented, even if you overthrow the establishment, the people you replace them with will be the same sorts of bastards, only insinuated into your own camp.

ok, now i'm mad

Attached: 1396678624771.gif (320x240, 969K)

It's hand wringing since your entire argument at this point is. 'Do nothing, you need to just look around more' When the problem is right now and getting worse. You could have said the same thing 20 or 10 years ago, but the difference is things have gotten much worse.

>Strawman
Good way to start off your post.

>If only people live responsibly, everything would be fine.
See everything I've already posted on this subject where it's a cultural issue and hard work isn't enough if people think that means cheating to make it.

>mum strawman
I just correctly posted that when you do everything to help the rich, it takes the economy. You're the one that brought up California, so i'm obligated to bring up a counter-part, which was Kansas. The fact you're using a fallacy fallacy is just more prove that you know you were boxed in.

Somebody post that Walt Disney Jungle Book image. You know the one.

This is what Disney used to do.

Attached: shanti2.gif (245x245, 1.4M)

The things I described would be far reaching and the current interests are entrenched to make it a bitter fight, it would require people who put socity first. Which is antithetiacal to how people act today with their 'I got mine fuck you approach' Will it be easy? Of course not.

What I'd like to know is how would you deal with the current problems that aren't strawman issues like immigration. Do you think it's morale to have a billionaire class with widespread homelessness and hungry?

Silverhawks was underrated.

>she looks like a boring ass single mother
But user, that is truly the most evil of all beings in the known universe.