Will I need to play Halo 5 to understand the story?

Will I need to play Halo 5 to understand the story?

Attached: halo-1174388-1280x0.jpg (1280x718, 112K)

Other urls found in this thread:

halowaypoint.com/en-us/news/discover-hope
youtu.be/bb-Igsmk9-I
youtube.com/watch?v=c9ji3b0ziqI
youtube.com/watch?v=5yHuuBZgif0
halopedia.org/Nanotechnology
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Nah but it is free on Microsoft Game Pass TM

Not on PC

they literally said it's a soft reboot that allows new players to jump in, fucking educate yourself before killing threads

Source?

The way the teaser was I thought this game completely omitted 4 and 5 from the series and the marine found Master Chief drifting in space after the events of 3.

Sounds too good to be true

Attached: (You).png (398x531, 207K)

holy fuck you still can't find the simplest piece of information? it is literally on their front page.
halowaypoint.com/en-us/news/discover-hope

It’s in 2561
Couple years after 5. The game will most likely babysit you about what occurred making 4-5 not important to play.

>rebooting on the last entry of your trilogy

Incredible

>4 and 5 were just a vision the forerunners showed to master chief
I wish they retconned everything just like that

Nah. But if you have time and want to see how much of a shitshow 5 was check this out: youtu.be/bb-Igsmk9-I

The last halo I played was 3, and the trailer still made sense, so that's pretty cool

>watch an autistic butthurt rant from an autistic butthurt moron
No thanks.

And genuinely, why the fuck would you watch SOMEONE ELSE'S BUTTHURT OPINION about a video game? You should look at trailers and reviews and then decide for yourself whether it looks interesting. Then play the game. Especially since Halo 5 is so cheap these days.

If you listen to butthurt idiots making butthurt rants on the internet and you take their opinion verbatim instead of forming your own, then you're a fucking idiot.

>And genuinely, why the fuck would you watch SOMEONE ELSE'S BUTTHURT OPINION about a video game?
Isn't that Yea Forums in a nutshell tho?

>Chief is out of his pod and Cortana is missing
>makes sense

Unfortunately yes. The number of fucking idiots on this board who will lap up whatever circlejerk opinion is going around instead of forming their own opinions is astounding.

It would be so smart to essentially make this a case with a soft reboot. Unfortunately there’s no way to do this easily because Cortana became the big bad guy in 5

No.

Isn’t reading reviews also looking at someone else’s opinion?

Reviews are meant to be objective, and even if you don't agree with a reviewer, they should feature some good gameplay footage in there.

If you would rather just watch gameplay footage then do that instead, of course. But reviewers succeed or fail by their ability to be objective - which isn't to say they're perfectly objective, but it means that if they aren't at least somewhat accurate in their assessments, they probably won't continue to have a job, since their audience will fade, or they'll sully the brand of their publication.

So yes, you shouldn't take a reviewer's opinion verbatim either, of course not. Reviews usually give you good gameplay footage and cover the main features of the game, though, so you can then make your own decision about whether you're interested in the game or not. Then the only way to truly evaluate it is to play it, of course.

> in the pursuit of our “spiritual reboot” and the launch of a new console, we also want to make sure that this is a perfect starting point for new players too
>This story will mark the beginning of a new chapter and challenge for the Chief, but it will also respect and continue threads that led to this point.

We don't know what they're going to throw out, my safe bet is that it's good to know what has come of the Master chief and cortana in Halo 5. Just watch a video, not worth playing

You know I can kind of enjoy Halo 4 and Reach as those weird games in the series that tried something different. Kind of like Zelda 2 for Halo. But Halo 5 is just ass. It's so fucking bad.

Glad they're going back to the old Art/Music styles for Infinite. Hopefully the gameplay does the same. But if they're going keep something in from the new games please God let it be Halo 4 Cortana

Attached: 6fa764f91ffb97578ad802fe9cf07ca8.jpg (997x2048, 136K)

Yes and all the tie in novels, comics, tv show, movie that may or may not come out, podcast radio drama, the advertising campaign which is also canon or maybe not and then finally you must huff Kiki Wolfkill's, Bonnie Ross', Frank O'Connor's and Brain Reed's farts simultaneous which are contained within a Master Chief branded jar that has been fermenting in 343's lunch room since Halo 4 completed development.

And Spartan Ops as well.

Attached: cools.png (1280x720, 2.06M)

>implying threads on page 10 don't deserve to die

The UNSC guy in the trailer is already more likeable than Locke

>And Spartan Ops as well

kek

why no gameplay, just show us the fucking gameplay 343 so i know if to give up or not.

I liked Locke in the Halo 2A opening cinematic. He should have stayed a mysterious ONI operative. Halo 5 should have been all about Chief

Just give up now it'll be easier.

fucking telling it like it is. based.

>I THINK HALO SUCKS

>NO WAIT DON'T TRANSMIT THAT!

>343
>welcoming to new fan narratively
no chance.

Last I played was halo 3 and I didn’t understand the trailer at all, so I assume so

I mean why was the unsc guy sad about the halo being broken? Doesn’t make sense

i don't want to be babysat, i want to punch aliens in the face and get told what to do by an angry naked purple lady because i am SAVING THE UNIVERSE

this nu-halo shit is so contrived as hell and i can't believe i am using that as criticism of fucking halo

Halo 2 had tons of drawn out storytelling sequences to explain the situation at high charity though

>Halo 5 should have been all about Chief

because removing the master chief from halo is like removing jesus from the christian theology and expecting it to still be christianity. the end result might function but that doesn't mean that it works at all without the central protagonist and symbolic anchor for the entire fucking franchise

and they were absolutely by far the weakest part of halo 2 and despite being 'fine' they just led to more and more of that stuff in later games, especially as a crutch for exposition

Imagine being this delusional

4 has a shit plot, a meh campaign, and shit MP and core gameplay that's covered in 5 layers of CoD bullshit

5 has a shit plot, a bad campaign, but it has the best forge in the series, and great MP/core gameplay, getting rid of the loadouts, perks, armor abilities, killstreaks; etc, and returning to even starts, brings descope back, has some of the best weapon balance in the series, etc.

5 is still a shit product because no local MP, mind you

Not that 4 and 5's plots aren't pretentious pieces of shit, but Imagine being this much of an impatient fucking baby, go play Doom if that's the sort of experience you want.

Halo's lore and worldbuilding has always been it's strength, and 2's cutscenes aren't just expositonal as claims:: They flesh out the world and give insight into it's factions, history, etc.

Halo works fine without cheif. The arbiter's plot in 2 is the best writing in the games by anybody who isn't a dudebro/narrative minimalist, ODST was great, and Reach's plot, while not great, was a big step up from CE and 3.

The books also prove Halo works fine without cheif. If anything, MC is one of the least interesting parts of the franchise.

MC's story should have fucked ended at 3, and future games should have either been pure spinoffs dealing with past events and smaller scale current era conflicts; or there should have been a new mainline series picking up like 3-4 decades after the events of Halo 3 when another big conflict pops up

>if a game has a feature that has appeared in another game then it's automatically bad
I guess we shouldn't play Halo CE then because it copied 4-way split-screen from GoldenEye 007.
I guess we shouldn't play Destiny, Rainbow Six Siege, Apex Legends, Titanfall, and pretty much any modern shooter, because they all have sprint in them.

In fact we should never play any game that has features that were previously in other games. Game developers shouldn't try and keep up with the rest of the industry at all. We should all play Pong and nothing else.

Attached: brainlet2.jpg (645x729, 57K)

3 deliberately leaves a cliffhanger ending, where you see the Forward Unto Dawn approaching a mysterious planet, as the music changes to suspense.

I would guess Microsoft asked for this to be added, but in any case, the game left a clear cliffhanger ending, so it made perfect sense that 4 would pick up from this exact point. If 4 hadn't picked up from that point it would have made no sense at all.

>Oh no another steve/bango fag smash thread got deleted for this!

>I chose you because you were special
>we were perfect together
I for one look forward to a storyline about yandere Galactic Empress Cortana trying to capture Chief and keep him as her sex slave

Attached: cortana yandere.jpg (829x484, 39K)

Genuine question, why do some people get so triggered that Halo 4 and 5 have sprint, and that Halo 4 had loadouts?

Firstly, Reach introduced both loadouts and sprint. Secondly, why do you think that the gameplay of Halo should stay static forever when it has NEVER done that? Halo 2 introduced massive gameplay changes from 1 (tons of new weapons including sword, dual wielding, no more health packs, destructible vehicles, hijacking vehicles, ghost boosting, lock on rockets, and many many more). Halo 3 introduced changes too (Brute weapons like the spiker and mauler, Brute vehicles like the chopper and prowler, equipment like power drain and regenerator). Also, if we think of armour abilities (introduced in Reach), they were really just a natural evolution from the equipment in Halo 3. And then Halo 4 used armour abilities just like Reach had, but again evolving it slightly, with support upgrades and tactical packages.

Personally I want Halo to innovate and adopt features that make games better. Staying in the past is fucking stupid. Yeah I liked the old games, I played them when they came out; I got Halo CE very soon after it came out, before anyone else I knew if I remember correctly. But games change, and I wouldn't want them rereleasing the same game over and over. That would be shit. I actually have played the original trilogy again this year. They're good, but I like Reach, 4 and 5 as well. They're good games.

Why do people shit their pants because games change and pick up better ideas and new interesting mechanics over time? Do they think that Halo 3 shouldn't have dual wielding, shouldn't have destructible vehicles, shouldn't have the covenant carbine, shouldn't have equipment, shouldn't have got rid of health packs, because all of these are changes from Halo CE and therefore "not Halo"?

Attached: confused person.jpg (900x615, 341K)

>I guess we shouldn't play Destiny, Rainbow Six Siege, Apex Legends, Titanfall, and pretty much any modern shooter, because they all have sprint in them.

By some strange coincidence all of those games are shit...

Fuck off you retarded zoomer.

chief's armor looks great

Probably not but I am.

>the most popular shooters on the planet are shit
So you're just a Yea Forums contrarian that says "I hate everything, everything is shit, the world sucks" because you're a thirteen year old teenager?

>Yeah I liked the old games, I played them when they came out; I got Halo CE very soon after it came out, before anyone else I knew if I remember correctly.
So you can't even fucking read? All you're proving is that I'm smarter than you, because you're too dumb to even read.

Finish the Fight... ALL OVER AGAIN

Madter Keef is back!

The Covenant was only the start

Halo is back, oh no it’s broken

There I explained the story for you,

Yeah you're right, nothing should ever have a sequel ever again. Sequels should be banned. Outlawed. Fun isn't allowed. Autistic arbitrary nonsense should rule the day instead.

Fucking idiot.

Back to plebblit shill.

Attached: 1553466004892.jpg (840x544, 62K)

it looks like neon green baby shit

343 for some reason also doesn't understand basic human physiology, MC for some reason has the body of a twink fridge with 1:1 shoulder hip ratio, has he been living off soi for the last 3 years?

Attached: halo legends armor.png (472x599, 303K)

>meanwhile he joins into the contrarian circklejerk
pot meets kettle.

>continuing to search...

Halo 5 is fucking dead. Holy fuck this game was a mistake

Looks fine to me desu, your image is too cartoony

Attached: file.png (954x533, 381K)

No, but I will.

>I AM user MURDERER OF THREADS

Fuck off, lol.

I heard this game's multiplayer is great. If it comes to PC, would it be worth getting to play it? I admit I'm a babby whose first game was Halo CE, so I've been longing for some Halo multiplayer but I'm pretty sure all the other games are dead

It’s time to finish the fight, the right way.

I really disliked Cortanas face and animations in 4. Something about it just felt way to off.

Attached: 3CMD1oXx_XfkkvXzIlScwF6LlYaTFlgaWP8pRasXvWM.jpg (960x540, 58K)

Cortana has looked off since Halo CE.

Attached: .png (1200x1200, 1.8M)

>I heard this game's multiplayer is great.

Nobody has seen the multiplayer yet. 343i are going to focus their attention on MCC/H5 while working on Infinite. They don't want another Halo 5 disaster.

It's not a trilogy. They said ages ago after Halo 4 that it would no longer be a trilogy.

Because Halo isn't about randomness, it's about a static environment where all players are equally equipped and the better team leaves period.You win and stay alive because you have better aim, better placement, better coordination , better judgement and better strafing not because you can Sprint to get out of bad positioning, not because you can press X to win with AAs.

Oops, I thought the pic in the OP was Halo 5. I was referring to Halo 5's multiplayer.

I was actually just coming here to comment these exact images.

Attached: file.png (1634x983, 1.5M)

>doesn't have an argument
How pathetic.

Which circlejerk opinion have I stated? Please quote exactly which one you're referring to. I think that Halo 4 and 5 are good games, which is exactly the OPPOSITE of what the circlejerking morons of Yea Forums will try and meme.

>I heard this game's multiplayer is great
No one has seen gameplay of Infinite yet. You're probably thinking of Halo 5, which many people think has a good multiplayer.

>I've been longing for some Halo multiplayer but I'm pretty sure all the other games are dead
You can play all the multiplayers of the earlier games (everything apart from Halo 5, which is separate) with MCC on Xbox One. Or you could wait for MCC to come to PC, but it's releasing in stages. The first is Reach, and apparently it'll cost $10, but I don't think there's a release date yet.

Attached: pathetic.jpg (818x503, 163K)

he looks like a fat ass with t-rex arms, even halo 4 armor was better. At least he didn't look like some out of shape cosplayer

Attached: halo virgin vs chad.jpg (1127x693, 67K)

Attached: file.png (530x1000, 490K)

i would a buy a project scarlet for this

>her entire end plan in 5 was just to seal her hubby in ball while she wipes the Galaxy or police it into submission
God Cortana, he’s a Virgin he doesn’t know you want him

Shut your bitch ass up.

what does master chief look like without the helmet i've never played a halo game before

Attached: 1501722381531.gif (480x270, 2.27M)

Most likely bald and old

Bill Gates.

>you shouldn't be able to take evasive action when someone else is shooting you
???
>it's all about being "equally equipped"
And all players are equally equipped to sprint.
>better aim, better placement, better coordination , better judgement
And all of those things apply to 4 and 5 as well.
>AAs
AA? Aim assist? Every Halo has had that.

I would like them to go for a more cortana 4 look.
I would even accept if she is with her horrible Halo 5 look, and then when she turns good she goes to the Halo 4 one.

Attached: maxresdefault (22).jpg (1280x720, 56K)

supposedly clint eastwood but we've only seen his eyes

Attached: mc.png (1354x576, 487K)

you can see him if you hack into the first game
youtube.com/watch?v=c9ji3b0ziqI

it's only ever hinted at in the legendary ending for halo 4. his helmet is taken off and you can see his wrinkled eyes and pale skin around them. so most likely old, wrinkly and probably bald. being part of the spartan program takes a lot out of you, I guess.

Not the guy you were responding to but you don't have an argument and you're pathetic. Why don't you fuck off to another website since rational thought is clearly beyond you, fuckface.

>Destiny
Was trash with no story and cannibalized DLC.
>Apex
Was popular for all of three week and is now dead
>Titanfall
Franchise is dead
>Siege
Decent, I guess?

I don't know how you can get so assblasted when someone questions your modern shooters, the business models and management for all of them are horrendous.

So I just watched the trailer, haven't played 5. When the Mexican guy says "we lost" what is he talking about?

Attached: mpv-shot0058.jpg (1920x1080, 268K)

Halo 4 was peak Cortana

You're right about the arm length, but I still think the armor itself is great

Armor Abilities you Reachbaby
Let's take one senario that happened constantly in the Reach BETA and all throughout Reach-5
>you shooting a guy in the back, he's two shots down, he's out of place
now what does he do without Sprint? He's dead because he's a dumbfuck
now what does he do with Sprint? He runs around a corner and sets a trap for you
do you chase him into an obvious grenade/HS? No you let him get away because now you are at a disadvantage
To Sprint after him you need to lower your gun, the gun raising animation puts you at risk of being the guy that's now two shot down AND ON TOP OF THAT THEY LOWER BASE MOVEMENT SPEED SO STRAFING ISNT EVEN EFFECTIVE YOU BRAINDEAD FUCKING ZOOMER
this conversation has been had a thousand times over since the Reach BETA

His head HUD says it has no AI, it's pretty clear that they're still going to go for the "save Cortana" route. I hope the OC squad doesn't come back though, they were useless and charisma vacuums. I just want a stoic green spess mereen killing aliens n blowing up rings alien locations.

It's likely that the Infinity was lost/destroyed, Spartan 4s are scattered across the ring and you're on a quest to form an effective resistance whilst simultaneously trying to get Cortana back to the dismay of your colleagues.

Maybe, maybe not. Either way it's probably not worth our time, I haven't played it and probably won't.

>john, you're going to cease this childish resistance and fuck my new physical body or I'll throw another planet into a star, do you want millions of deaths on your conscience

Attached: cortana rampant.jpg (721x540, 32K)

Imagine this face with crows feet and no freckles, there you go, you have what the Master Chief looks like as an adult.

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 64K)

Replaying the trilogy on heroic is required. Also listen to youtube.com/watch?v=5yHuuBZgif0

Are Master Chief and Samus, robots?

yet.

You need to complete halo 2 on legendary

Samus is a bird, Chief is an AYY LMAO

Her animations were ok. Face was a bit silly and tits too saggy, though. 2 classic had the best body shape and face.

Attached: takeagirlout.webm (900x1080, 1.88M)

I have. Gravemind made me want to kill myself

>C'mon, Chief. Take a girl for a ride.
What did she mean by this?

>tits too saggy
she changed her avatar to try and get a response from chief, she spent 4 years going crazy and lusting for him while he was frozen

Attached: cortana human weakness.jpg (607x267, 15K)

That's what I like about it though. She's beautiful if a realistic sort of way. It's like seeing a beautiful girl in real life opposed to seeing a super model just walking around. Imperfections often make things better as they seem more tangible

why didn't they just go back and make a pre-Halo 1 game
just Chief with a bunch of other Spartan IIs fighting insurrectionists or Covenant on some planet

I don't know how you can get so assblasted that shooters have moved on. Go and play Quake or whatever old fucking game you want to play. You can even play all the old Halo games on MCC. Fucking idiot.

Attached: laugh.jpg (1000x667, 81K)

Eww. Why does Cortana like this geezer

It looks like its basically a soft reboot so no.

I like Cortana from CE and don't like the over-sexualization of the character

Just fuck her chief!!!! That’s an order!!

>getting frustrated because you're a shit player
Pottery.

Attached: laugh3.jpg (780x439, 24K)

Look at her eyes. You know what she means.

I find it funny that people put 5 on the same level as 4. Let's be real, Halo 4 was pretty trash, but it wasn't nearly as trash as Halo 5 - not even close actually, 5 was an absolute abomination.

I quite liked the new design, what I didn't like is we didn't change into that armor in 4 just "oh he's always looked like that"

[SPOILER]I. AM. ORDERING YOU... TOSURRENDERTOTHATAI'SSEXUALADVANCES[/SPOILER]

Attached: tumblr_inline_o5r989OrfQ1re8d6u_540.png (313x313, 107K)

I don't know why you're laughing. He's right and you were BTFO. All you're doing is posting reaction images without refuting any of his opinions

343's excuse was literally nanomachines courtesy of cortana

Attached: armstrong meme expansion.jpg (600x999, 52K)

I have.

Gravemind really isn't that difficult. Quarantine Zone was harder in my view with all those flood at the beginning. Maybe I was restarting it because I was trying to save my elites, I can't remember exactly, but I remember having to start over and over again. Gravemind was very straightforward for me. When you're fighting in the council chamber or whatever that big room is, there are these side corridors that enemies come out of - if you walk into one of them, then the door will lock you in there, and you're safe. Then you can open that door from the inside by walking towards it. Then it's very easy to kill all the enemies and take cover when necessary. Another method, which I saw online, is to jump up onto the bleacher things on the sides of the room.

They actually said the exact opposite. Before Halo 4 came out 343i said multiple times it was a new trilogy that didn't focus on the same aspects as the original.
>And 4 and 5 turned out to be shit, so not sure why there is hype for 6.
>it will never be as good as the original trilogy, which is why they keep reselling it multiple times.

I agree. It's abysmal. I always get shit for saying that I'd rather play Halo 4 than 5.

I'll say this. Halo 4 was irredeemable garbage but it wasn't as bad as 5. I would much rather have to deal with loadouts than that stuff they added in 5. Yeah you have even starts but if none of it is enjoyable then what's the point? Just please for the love of God go back to classic gameplay in Infinite

i seriously hope they'll just retcon 4 and 5.

>"Millions of deaths are already on my conscience."

4 was way fucking worse, it was literally Halo: COD edition

Already confirmed not happening. Soft reboot that takes place after 5

its dead then.

Attached: 51b.png (1332x934, 870K)

>Nanomachines are also used in conjunction with MJOLNIR armor systems. As of 2552, the UNSC had developed nanotechnology designed to perform repairs on MJOLNIR armor while its Spartan occupant rested in cryo-sleep.[4] Given enough time and in the hands of a capable "smart" AI, these nanomachines were capable of completely overhauling a suit. While the Charon-class light frigate Forward Unto Dawn drifted through space for four years, the AI Cortana used nanomachines to upgrade and redesign John-117's MJOLNIR Mark VI armor.[5]
halopedia.org/Nanotechnology

Meanwhile, I'm not sure if there's even a canon reason for Halo 3's changes over Halo 2 (they're subtle, but they're there - e.g. his hands now have 3 dots instead of 5, and his ankles have 4 dots instead of 5). Halo 3 is supposed to take place straight after Halo 2. So that change doesn't even have a canon explanation. While Halo 3 to Halo 4 does have a canon explanation.

Then that should tell you how bad 5 is. If I'd rather play a CoD clone than a Halo with even starts you really fucked up

>halopedia.org/Nanotechnology

Attached: kojimble.png (200x191, 54K)

>getting frustrated because you're a shit player
If you're too shit to kill people what do you want me to say? I'll tell you that you're shit, because you're obviously shit. Are you going to try and act like only some players have sprint and others don't? Even in Reach, you can apply sprint if you want. Anyone can. Or you can choose a different ability. It's up to you! Your skill, ability, and ability to use tactics correctly will decide whether you win or not.

Sorry if you're shit.

Attached: laugh4.jpg (500x333, 51K)

And I'd much rather play 5 than 4 and I don't even like 5 so that should tell you something

I feel ya. If 4 was trying to reuse some elements, but dumb them down for a new audience, 5 was grabbing everything you liked and identified of the series to bait you in and then "subverting" it to create a sense of ownership by dissing the old fans.
The Star Wars TFA = Halo 4 and TLF = Halo 5 comparison isn't that off.

Charisma vacuums are fine if they are put in a role where their charisma doesn't matter. I don't mind their designs; helps punctuate the differences between the old veteran and the new overconfident upstarts.

Don't throw away the past 2 games at this point by glossing over them. Letting them down nicely and quietly will be better in the long run.

>if a game has a feature that has appeared in another game then it's automatically bad
I guess we shouldn't play Halo CE then because it copied 4-way split-screen from GoldenEye 007.
I guess we shouldn't play Destiny, Rainbow Six Siege, Apex Legends, Titanfall, and pretty much any modern shooter, because they all have sprint in them.

In fact we should never play any game that has features that were previously in other games. Game developers shouldn't try and keep up with the rest of the industry at all. We should all play Pong and nothing else.

Fucking idiot.

>Have sex!
Ummmm sorry sweetie, but chief is a volcel

Attached: chief dab.jpg (512x308, 44K)

>Halo 2 to Halo 3
Bungie: It's a video game.
>Halo 3 to Halo 4
343i: For lore reasons.
Guess which one I value more.

Isn't the story in Halo incredibly straw-grasping after Halo 3?

obsessed

It's better to interpret 4 and 5 as in-lore propaganda.

TLJ, not TLF

yes and the story was never anything special to begin with, just cinematic marathon without any of the interesting stuff

Oh, I know what she means.

this except the other way around

>Halo story was never interesting
that's a lie

Attached: 1545856097935.png (478x456, 407K)

>if none of it is enjoyable
Well tons of people enjoy Halo 5 and many people say it's the best Halo multiplayer. So I guess you're objectively wrong.

>classic
I was thinking about how absolutely fucking stupid morons like you are. Think about this: let's say they released a remaster of Halo 3. Exactly the same game, but with updated graphics. You fucking idiots will complain about the graphics, no matter how good they are, because they're "not original", "not Halo", "hurr durr they've changed the art style even though literally every Bungie game changed the art style (take a look at the Brutes from Halo 2, to 3, to Reach, and they changed completely in appearance in each one)", etc. Or just imagine they made a new game, and they added a single new gun, or a single new power up. Again, you stupid fucks will say "THIS ISN'T HALO, THIS BREAKS THE GAMEPLAY WHICH NEEDS TO BE EXACTLY THE SAME AS IT WAS IN HALO 3, BECAUSE I THINK ONE SINGLE HALO GAME DEFINES ALL THE HALO GAMES, BECAUSE I'M A FUCKING IDIOT WHO DIDN'T EVEN PLAY HALO CE AND HALO 2".

That's the point, if they made a new game with """"""""""""""""""""""""classic gameplay"""""""""""""""""""""""", you stupid fucks will still throw a fucking hissy fit about ANY SINGLE FUCKING THING which isn't EXACTLY THE FUCKING SAME as it was in Halo 3.

So what the fuck do you braindead fucks even want? You clearly don't want a new game at all. So why don't you just go and play Halo 3 on MCC? They're still doing tournaments of that game, in fact 343 have hosted some haven't they I think? So why don't you do that? That's obviously the game you want to play so why don't you go play it and stop fucking whinging?

How does 5 even end?

SEETHING

Attached: 1522042915052.jpg (542x350, 49K)

>HURR DURR IT'S TOTALLY UNEXPLAINED WHY CHIEF'S ARMOUR CHANGES FOR HALO 4
>Actually here's the explanation right here...
>HURR DURR ACTUALLY I DON'T CARE ABOUT THE EXPLANATION AT ALL, I'M JUST A FUCKING BRAINDEAD IDIOT WHO DOESN'T ACTUALLY CARE ABOUT VIDEO GAMES ANYMORE, WHICH IS A PERFECTLY ACCEPTABLE POSITION, BUT I PROBABLY SHOULDN'T GO AROUND PRETENDING THAT I STILL CARE ABOUT PLAYING VIDEO GAMES AND THAT I'M CAPABLE OF EVALUATING THEM OBJECTIVELY, WHEN IN ACTUAL FACT I'M JUST A NOSTALGIA-ADDLED MORON WHO IS SAYING THE EQUIVALENT OF "GUYS REMEMBER CASSETTE TAPES? YEAH THOSE THINGS WERE KINDA COOL WEREN'T THEY"
You're an irredeemable idiot.

Attached: brainlet12.png (842x792, 82K)

sorry man I never cared about Captain King or squidface Keith David, Cortana was the only interesting thing about Halo and she peaked in the Cortana letters before the first game even came out

>doesn't have an argument
Not surprising.

Attached: brainlet11.jpg (645x729, 77K)

>Well tons of people enjoy Halo 5 and many people say it's the best Halo multiplayer. So I guess you're objectively wrong.
Users think it's below mediocre and reviewers think it deserves the same score as Halo 4. Yes I pulled a metacritic on you.

Attached: Untitled.png (682x312, 54K)

Fireteam Osiris, the black guy and his team, stop Cortana from taking Chief away. Cortana still goes through with her plan of waking the guardians, ancient forRunner weapons that police planets and civilizations. The guardians have long range EMPs that fry ships so she most likely destroyed UnSC forces

basically they are pretending that the details of the last game don't exist. like it kind of happened but we can just ignore it for the most part.

>it's shit because I don't like it
you are not special

It still got more positive user reviews than mixed and negative combined, and there isn't a single negative critic review on there.

Attached: Screenshot 2019-06-10 at 18.53.52.png (1316x198, 33K)

>trusting journalists reviews over actual fan reviews
Oh no no no

>Seething so hard you have to samefag

Call of duty and call of duty derivitives are shit.

Attached: 1546637464929.jpg (200x200, 13K)

Massive cope lmao.

>Chief has been trying to save Cortana since Halo 2
This has became more of the main plot than the interspecies conflicts.

I wish they’d just drop Cortana already. Halo 5 pretty much killed her as a character

>It still got more positive user reviews than mixed and negative combined
Can't you fucking read?

>doesn't have an argument so he has to make shit up
Imagine being this pathetic.

>doesn't have an argument so spergs out a pathetic response
Pottery.

Attached: Screenshot 2019-06-10 at 19.10.07.png (770x384, 134K)

Well, if Infinite kinda ignores 5 it might not be so bad. Her interactions with the Chief was one of the thing that made me love the first 3 games.

>Being a massive faggot

Well imagine my shock

Attached: Screenshot_2019-06-10-14-19-14.png (680x318, 39K)