how many games will actually hit 120 on anything but low?
How many games will actually hit 120 on anything but low?
All of them
Oh you mean on xbawx? Maybe minecraft if you are careful with chunk loading
depends on how powerful that vidya card will be. Thank god for two companies that care about performance and graphix otherwise the console market would be complete shit on the technical side of things ala nintendo since 2006.
>120 fps on 8k
Yeah fucking right.
Uno will be 8K 120fps
save this post
Nothing, they put HDMI 2.1 in it, some retard heard that supports up to 8k and 120fps and even though the hardware wouldn't be anywhere near capable of doing that, but decided to run with it anyway.
Can a pc with a 2070 or similar match this? Thinking modern day system.
Yes, for a while.
It can match "scarlett"? What do you mean for a while?
I was told by a computer engineer friend that SSD have a very limited use-life
He said it's around over a billion transactions or read/writes , but no SSD would be useful for 7 years straight.
Is this true? I'm just pulling numbers out of my head as I remember him telling me this
They do have a definite amount of writes, but modern SSDs wouldn't even reach that in 10 years with moderate use. Even when they do reach it, I think all of them now will enter locked read only mode to allow you to recover what's on it. They're also much less failure prone in general so they'd probably outlast most HDDs anyway with the same amount of use.
None, they will still go with graphics over performance because that is what easily sells to the stupid public
I have an EVO Samsung 500gb SSD. I have been using it for two years now
You mean to tell me I aint going to be needing a replacement for at least 10 years?
how many TVs will actually hit 120
>talk about load times for majority of their hype talk
>SSDs have been out for years and millions of people already put them in their consoles bc its better
>claim ray tracing will be legit when a $1000 GPUs can barely run it on PC
>120fps
LOL
Quality components in consoles drives PC hardware and development to be better.
>up to
if it can hit 4k 60 fps, that's sufficient desu
Would a console's constant read/writes end up lunching the thing in relatively short order? It's a different animal from dumping your OS and games you want to load quicky-fast onto the SSD and a hard-drive does everything else, like with a PC.
I think they're rated up to 300tbs, so that's 50gb a day for like 16 years. Even then, that's what they're rated for, endurance tests have shown they can do up to 700tb.
Asking here as well:
Ok so I am a tech retard. Just asking for speculation here.
- 8k in one year when 4k is not even the standard? What tvs can handle this?
- What kind of pc matches this? Will a modern decent setup with say a 2070 be able to match it performance wise? Obv not 8k resolution...
Not a problem with modern SSDs since 3D NAND is a thing.
Still if they cheap out and use QLC(Trash but cheap NAND) then it will be a problem eventually.
Not to mention, PC's are already moving onto RAM and PCI drives which manage to make SSD's look slow. Consoles are sad
>What tvs can handle this?
We barely have cables that can handle it, let alone TVs.
Monitors yeah, but they are in the $3000 range.
Anything with the same specs they will use probably.
If they use an APU, easy anything with a modern GPU.
If they use a 5700 well then the PC version of the 5700.
>We're putting SSDs in consoles
??????????
I did that with my PS4 back in 2015
Don't act like this is a major fucking breakthrough just because it's affordable to market it now
it was about time for fucking SSDs to go down in price. And now 128gb flash drives cost like $25.
Are we finally entering the era of terabytes on solid state?
PS4 uses SATA2 so it will be a huge difference.
Still its nothing new at all.
We already have been for a while, so far only Samsung is still trying their best to keep prices high.
You can find 1TB for $95 right now, and it keeps getting cheaper.
TODAY I WILL REMIND THEM
gamesindustry.biz
Technically it can, and the PS2 can also do 1080.
They have no intention of going for 8k, they're just using a new connection standard which -can- support it, but the power isn't there. It's bullshit pr speak. Variable refresh rate is something to get excited about though.
>using a SSD for page file
rip in peace
It won't do 8K 120fps or even 8K games.
Games will most likely be 4K/30fps or less than 4K at 30.
you can use something like crystaldiskinfo to see how much you've put through it, and compare to the specified lifespan online
None, the real target is probably 4k 60fps. I doubt they'll manage even that.
But the games will be coded with this in mind now. Like they said no more elevator shit.
Unless you have been stress testing it for years, no.
I used an 80gb Intel ssd from 2010 to yesterday as the main OS on three different computers. It still had life in it. Just too small for the latest windows updates.
>- What kind of pc matches this? Will a modern decent setup with say a 2070 be able to match it performance wise? Obv not 8k resolution...
Current PC specs with mid-high components will match it, your assessment is correct. "4k 120FPS" is doubtful at best.
Everything else is PR speak to appease the knuckle-draggers and college frathousers that want MOAR POWER at any cost.
How often are you actually writing to it user?
The only comprehensive test I've seen was years ago, but SSDs can last quite a while.
techreport.com