Concurrent players on Steam do not tell anything about single player game sales. Stop using those in your shitty arguments.
Concurrent players on Steam do not tell anything about single player game sales...
Other urls found in this thread:
arstechnica.com
twitter.com
We know.
>porting a game which already had a run in its primal plataform
>I-IT'S A FLOP GUYS
Those sales plenty cover the port company salary and give some revenue, so you are a huge and incredible faggot. fuck off.
What the fuck are you talking about? I'm proving that low concurrent player counts for single player games do not mean that they sold poorly like some Yea Forumstards try to push.
They only matter for multiplayer games since it's the most likely measurement for if you would need to wait too long for queues
Yea Forums DESTROYED
OBLITERATED
ANNIHILATED
Why do you even care about sales?
We all care because if a thing we like sells well we will get more of the thing.
Dunno there's plenty of franchises that have died even if those sold well. I think it's more about "haha the purchase that i made sold more than what you purchased" So pretty pointless
>citing dsogaming as a source
they're dumb faggots for assuming FFXV wouldn't have denuvo and then crying that it's SE's fault they couldn't recognize basic patterns