It is still a great game. But it could have been a masterpiece.
DMC5 was disappointing
Other urls found in this thread:
gfycat
boards.fireden.net
boards.fireden.net
boards.fireden.net
boards.fireden.net
boards.fireden.net
boards.fireden.net
boards.fireden.net
boards.fireden.net
boards.fireden.net
boards.fireden.net
boards.fireden.net
boards.fireden.net
boards.fireden.net
boards.fireden.net
boards.fireden.net
twitter.com
it's a good game, just not a good dmc game
It's a good dmc. But bad in everything else.
are you two autistic?
I disagree man, i fucking love DMC5 so much.
The only valid shortcomings i can think off the top of my head is
>Abit too easy
>loading screens can get annoying
>V isnt the best he couldve been
>the ending seems alittle forced
>no fucking post release content until next console generation
>level design starts slacking at the end
Other than that, Nero is great, Dante is near-perfect, story is great for long term fans, music is good, most of the enemies are fun to fight, some of the best bosses in the franchise. Its a fucking fantastic game
No. I'm just not a shit eater like you
Yes. Those are the flaws I'm refering to. But
1, I don't give a shit about dlc. 2, level design is utterly shit more than half of the game. Not only at the end
And you forgot the biggest flaw in the game.
nice shitpost, Barry
the level design really is not that bad, first half of the games design is much better but the later half isnt entirely bad, it sure does get alittle boring navigating a generic hellscape but its still playable, it doesnt hinder your gameplay at all
>And you forgot the biggest flaw in the game.
what might that be?
>>Abit too easy
2005 was 14 years ago...