Why did Bill of the hill shoot John Marstcorn?
Why did Bill of the hill shoot John Marstcorn?
Faggot came around imploring shit like he owns the fort.
When your former gang member is dumb enough to walk right up to your fort unprotected...its kind of like shooting a fish in a barrel
But I IMPLORED him! He shoulda been IMPLORED!
It wasn't Bill, it was the nigger, and they did it because John was there to "save him", which means take him to hang to save himself. John is pretty much an antagonist in his own right in rdr1
Jesus christ, I remember RDR looking so great. Now it looks like shit.
You sound retarded
Rockstar character models used to always look like shit, it was the open worlds that were technologically impressive for their time
Textures are a little rough but no joke, it looks really good for its time and is still 100% playable without graphics mucking up your time
why was rdr1 so kino
What the fuck are you talking about?
it doesnt look that bad
In what way? The gang raised John, and then after everyone is killed or separated the last that remains go on to live their own lives and John pretty much single handedly ruins all of his remaining comerades lives just because he got dealt a shit hand and couldn't cover his own tracks or move on. Like it or not, John is a backstabbing coward
It wasn't Bill who pulled the trigger, it cuts to a black lakey of his who does. John was there to kill or capture Bill, OP asked why John was shot
This. John is only acting to save his own ass. He has no goal or mission of his own, he just does stuff to serve his masters. He's a terrible protag.
nah its aged better than most games from that gen
Because dutch has a plan and he needs faith to grow dildos
Because my Arthur never gave Bill some hair pomade so he had to take it out on someone
Hey now, I never said the ordeal makes him a terrible protag, the fact that his mission is so fucked up on so many levels is what makes him one of the BEST protagonists. Just saying, his quest is very antagonistic and forces him to stab backs
Red Dead Redemption is one of the most beautiful visual experiences that has ever been accomplished with pixels.
It only doesn't look as photorealistic as other 3D triple A games like a decade after it came out. And good luck doing that.
More interesting than "photorealistic" (look we rendered every pore on his face) is the living and breathing presence of things.
Look up "Red Dead Redemption horse animation" on Youtube and try to begin to appreciate how difficult it is to replicate something like that with a series of logic gates in a computer.
I'm saying he's a bad protag. For a rockstar game protag he won't even sleep with whores. That's inexcusable.
Arthur didn’t smash any whores and he was great
i still think the horse animation in RDR1 looks better, in some ways, than in 2
Whoaaaaa thats some bad opinion user
Arthur was a gay, whiny, obnoxious dipshit. I fucking hate the fans whoring over his character. Hes an unlikable moany Mary Sue bitch
Man doesn't come around imploring unless they expect to be shot and left for death round these parts.
How is he a marry soo
the animation for full gallop in 2 honestly does not look that good. it looks very choppy
he always has the most admirable self doubt and rockstar begs us to look at him in a good light, to see him as a good ol' boy. he's a fucking asshole who chooses to remain part of a gang that robs and kills and yet rockstar portrays him as some golden boy. its obnoxious
John wanted to die
>Whiny
How so?
Bill.....had a hard life
how he bitches to the women in camp about everything he's done and how he bitches with dutch. even still remains to be part of the gang the whole time. he's like niko but ten times worse.
You mean Marian.
Ok. I just watched it. Sorry about that. I swear I remembered it as Bill shooting John.
It looks 100% real compared to 1, in the first game the animals were too stiff and had its trot and full sprint speeds WAAAY too high. Whearas RDR2 has seamless transitions between trots and gallops, the clunky and slower sprint is much more real, the ability to make horses do gait dances and the super simple ability to hang a single arm of the side of your horse or not on command makes me vote RDR 2 and the most realistic horse simulator Ive ever played. Love it
That gang was his family.
God forbid we have character progression and good guys make bad decisions
Because John didn't insist.
That's not the only hard thing he had.
Those are "therapy" sessions you have to activate yourself, so just avoid it. And as for Dutch, how could you NOT argue with him, every choice he makes from the get go gets the gang annihilated
Just ignore him, he's retarded.
Why is RDRedemption one of my favorite games of all time but I got bored like 30% of the way through RDR2 and found it generally unappealing? I actually can't figure out why I feel this way.
Why do you think a bald man needs so much hair pomade?Ehehe
RDR1 controls more like an actual videogame. People will complain that John controlled like a tank but that doesn't change how your actions still felt snappier