Baldurs gate 3

Are you ready for the best WRPG to be ruined forever?

Attached: 1474047059563.jpg (1160x540, 514K)

Other urls found in this thread:

twitter.com/GavinEtc/status/1136682943898931200
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

>ruined
it's being made by Larian, not Obsidian.

Why does tumblr always do this shit? Adding a bunch of sexualities to existing characters?

Attached: csGzF25.jpg (600x315, 51K)

Larian is based.

If it were Bioware or Obsidian it would be DOA.

Why not?

Attached: humantale.png (1577x548, 616K)

Somebody should make a D&D alignment chart with all the made-up genders. CIS being lawful good and trans as chaotic evil.

But Beamdogshit is not developing it.

I just find it weird man. A book series I've read before has the same shit. They race bent all the characters to being black/hispanic/arabic and making them all gay/trans.

>korgan is the only CIS
kek

Even the fags don't want Korgan.

it's gay
and I don't mean happy.

They only way they can identify themselves is by adhering to the labels they place on themselves, so naturally this extends to the characters they like.

>Bionicle
An excellent franchise

>best WRPG
>BG
Sorry, that's wrong

are you guys literally digging from the tumblr cesspit to find stuff to be offended about?

>made up genders and sex stuff
okay?

>it's being made by Larian
So, ruined

>the best WRPG
Dark souls?

go dilate

The game was finished like 20 years ago. You can all go home.

I would if I was a Larian fan

CIS i chaotic evil

>best
But Ultima has already been ruined, user. A long time ago.

I'm going to give BG3 a fair chance. I don't like D:OS very much, but I'm hoping they realise BG needs to have a very different tone from those games and try to make a faithful sequel.

Attached: viconia.jpg (248x350, 24K)

In your dreams Beamcuck

>we got a trailer and nothing else
>both Yea Forums and RPG Codex already angry and denouncing the project as a failure

I wish I was surprised.
Personally, I can't wait. I am optimistic about this.

Also twitter.com/GavinEtc/status/1136682943898931200

Attached: anger.png (629x1173, 131K)

>I am optimistic about this.
Why? It's a sequel to dead game old and venerable enough to have spawned several homages. Using the Baldur's Gate name at this point sounds more like looting a grave, than a serious attempt to make a worthy successor.
Faerûn was never a good setting.

>90% of those words are made up

>The 5th Edition rules upon which Baldur's Gate 3 is based are purposely streamlined in comparison to their predecessors. Vincke talks about being able to explain them in less than 10 minutes to total newcomers, which he says he wasn't able to do with 2nd Edition or 3.5. It's part of D&D's attempt to woo new and lapsed players to the series.

It's over, bros. It's gonna be shit.

I trust Larian. I don't trust WotC. They are scum that would probably want to meddle in the project way to much. I don't see them giving Larian enough breathing room.

>>we got a trailer and nothing else
We got a confirmed setting that has nothing to do with BG2 except yet will bring back cameos of old characters, promises of a simplified 5E because apparently the target audience is too stupid to understand it within a video game context otherwise, and absolutely zero info on what the gameplay will look like. WHY are you optimistic?

why? D&D is notoriously fucking terrible for videogames
2e and 3.x come apart at the seams after 5 minutes if you don't rule 0 them constantly, which you can't do in a videogame

Oblivion?

Korgan absolutely based as usual.

>plot not entirely based on source material
>simplified tabletop rules for vidya
So basically the same circumstances as BG and BG2?

except unlike Bioware, Larian can make an rpg that's actually fun to play

What is a demigirl

>Polymorph Self: Mustard Jelly
>Breaks 80% of game since lol 125% Magic Resistance
Who thought this was okay

>We got a confirmed setting that has nothing to do with BG2
Yeah, it takes place in Baldur's Gate, like a game called Baldur's Gate should.

If you want to play that game, I'd rather a dev tell me "we've looked at history and heard what the fans want and we're going to work towards that" than "we're going to do THIS and you're going to like it or leave it" with the added insult that they're supposedly delivering a sequel-like and not an entirely separate story with a few callbacks.

What does this post have to do with reality? I can't fit it in this timeline. What the fuck are you attempting to communicate?

>Ultima has already been ruined
It is actually really sad, that Ultima is slowly fading into oblivion.

Attached: Avusurp.jpg (1280x640, 221K)

>BG2 took place in Athkatla
BG series was always about Bhaal and his plans to resurrect himself first and foremost. The city was just a backdrop.

>to be ruined forever
Is it made by Beamdog?

>highly segmented and structured western-medieval society where unelected nobility and clergy hold most of the power existing alongside widespread, thoroughly modern ideas of gender and sexuality
this will never not feel weird and forced

Bhaal saga ended tho. This is a new chapter.

>only one cisgender

There's two

If they want to continue on the BG brand, then they need to show something to be "optimistic" about, something that proves they understand what a sequel needs. Not vague "we're not ready to talk about this just yet" cop-outs which only leaves the worst to think about. Why can't they decide whether it's turn-based or not just yet?

It's not canon anyway. It's just a bunch of twats from tumblr masturbating themselves to a meaningless word salad.

>chaotic evil irredeemable character is the only CIS
You cant make this shit up

who are trash at every single aspect of the game except for gameplay, kys Lariantards

>Aerie
>Non-binary
>Asexual

I'm going to find who made this and I'm going to make them pay in blood for what they've done

>The only cisgender heterosexual is Chaotic Evil.
Whoever made this stupid fanart wasn't particularly subtle.

I dont think it will be ruined, but I am very much expecting it not doing the name justice.

whats the point of calling it baldurs gate then?

4e would have made a pretty good videogame
though I do trust the makers of Divinity OS2 to do a decent job of making the gameplay fun.
D&D 5e relies a lot on the GM making stuff up, and I think Larian would know that, so they'll probably know what to patch up.

>every single aspect of the game except for gameplay
This is a videogame, you do realise.

where is this gender thing coming from?

and you expect games to have no graphics, textures, story, rp or anything?
what kind of faggot normie are you?

the jews are trying to eradicate the white men

>it's being made by Larian,
they're the biggest hack

I never understood why people got mad at this, real talk.

>t. seething tranny