Reminder that if you oppose the concept of games as a service, you're saying that they should be art. Games should only be a service given to the consumer that should change as the provider sees it fit.
Reminder that if you oppose the concept of games as a service, you're saying that they should be art...
Other urls found in this thread:
superdataresearch.com
twitter.com
>Reminder that if you oppose the concept of games as a service, you're saying that they should be art
only a Sith deals in absolutes
Tell me why they should not change then.
????
all i'm saying is if games are not a service they can be other things besides art. it's not one or the other, there is a wide variety of middle ground
> if you oppose the concept of games as a service, you're saying that they should be art
No, they would be a product, you retarded shit-for-brains.
Stop embarrassing the world and disconnect your network cable or wifi.
Software are services.
Like what? I remind you that software are services.
>software are services
proofs?
>like what
like what they were in the past, when they were sold on discs: a consumer-grade PRODUCT, not service.
>proofs?
Office, Calculator, any antivirus, the majority of software is a service.
videogames aren't just software. EVE Online is not Microsoft Excel, and vice versa, MS Excel is not EVE Online.
>uses a prime example of games as a service (an MMO) to debunk me
Thanks.