EA bad, THQ good
>Buy game series
>Add in microtransactions and make freemium sequels
Vs
>Buy game series
>Make awesome remakes and sequels
EA bad, THQ good
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
>soulless vs soul
Remember, if it makes people want to take, it's excellent, regardless of effort
>teeth
Patrick has teeth though
forget soul, right just looks more like spongebobs use of colors/textures. left looks better but it just seems off from the source material
At least it isn't the single tooth that was used for a while
stop lying
That Patrick is terrible.
What level are you looking forward to the most? I remember goo lagoon being a bit annoying
I wanna see how they touch up Kelp Forest
pretty sure this is concept art, not the actual finished design. even then everything besides the main characters looks great.
the robot in this image has x10 the soul that patrick does.
The dream sequence
>adds cut content from the original like the robo Squidward boss fight
Fucking finally, I trough he was a secret 100% boss or something as a kid but I never finished the game at 100% (fucking socks)
Patrick had teeth in the original game.
THQ has sure had a weird journey.
>Be video game company
>Overstock video game drawing tablets
>Go bankrupt
>Get all your trademarks and IPs bought out
>Purchasers rename themself to THQ Nordic
It's like they're wearing the skin of someone else.
A man can dream
>NEW BAD, OLD GOOD
My first thought in seeing that
youtube.com