People already shitting on the new Pokemon Sword & Shield engine

>People already shitting on the new Pokemon Sword & Shield engine
Listen to me nerds, this is the first game on Switch. They will develop the engine in the next instalment

Attached: b621d42c17a4520f09d0fb02fbbf6023.jpg (574x785, 69K)

Other urls found in this thread:

twitter.com/Pokemon/status/1136267757668880385
youtube.com/watch?v=WO9WwR5Ng3I
youtube.com/watch?v=3ltQDO-rxoU
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>3 years with a brand new console and it looks like shit still

X

I think it looks nice

Attached: galar-header.jpg (1280x720, 262K)

>this is the first game on Switch

Attached: pi.png (2894x4686, 3.39M)

XY had a different engine from BW

This. OP is a fucking retard.

that doesn't c-count baka

That excuse has been used for every subsequent installment of a Pokemon game.
They have yet to actually do it. and at best enhanced one thing at a time will taking several steps back in other things alone the way.
Namely animations.

>They will develop the engine in the next instalment
GameFreak won't do shit and you know it

ask me how I know you are underage

The pokemon literally look shit

>old enough to be a graphics snob
>still plays pokemon

Don't bother, Yea Forums and /vp/ have dedicated shitposters for Pokemon. EVERYTHING is bad here.

It's not the fact that graphics suck that's bad, it's the fact that the game struggles to run at 30FPS with those graphics.

>Projects developed at the same
Doesn't count

For a year 2005 game sure

I heard this with Gen 6. And then Gen 7 ended up being even more shit. You people never learn.

I'm actually 29 years old

They're fun.
I know it's a difficult concept to grasp.

be sure to buy the special double pack for $120 goy

Attached: file.png (920x1550, 2.11M)

>$120
Source: your ass

I bet you can't even go to those mountains

>a new AAA game is 60 dollars
>the pack contains both games
user are you okay?

i-is this real?

>pokemon games aren't coming out for handhelds now
But why?

s-shut up based nintendo might sell me the same game twice for $110 or maybe even $99 if i'm lucky.

Are you?

I can't believe they are finally releasing a mainline Nintendo console Pokemon game and it looks like that. Where is the Nintendo polish? Why are they porting an unreleased 3ds game to the Nintendo switch and pretending otherwise?

the switch is your new handheld

user...

It's okay at most. I don't dislike the style and it's probably the best looking Pokemon game out there, but it does look like an early 7th gen game.

I meant to reply to I know that's sun and moon in OP

Took me a sec to realize there's NO FUCKING SHADOWS. Sun and Moon got this down and all they did was put a black circle under each character.

This
Pokemon died after gen 5 to me. Everything else is beyond recognition.

it's actually one cent more expensive to buy the double pack than it is to buy both games individually

Attached: file.png (1583x910, 642K)

ah prebaked reflections. you do this typically when your hardware is so weak that it can't do reflections in real time. but they fucked up the reflection mapping so it casts reflections on objects that aren't there.

A shekel saved is a shekel earned

>Yea Forums is more excited about Spongebob than Pokemon
fucking based

DELETE THIS THEY WILL DROP THE PRICE DURING E3 IT'S NOT REAL THEY ARE STILL WORKING ON THE GAME IT WILL BE FIXED IN NOVEMBER

Switch can't handle shadows

Not our fault nintendo is a bunch of money grubbing retards and can't focus to make 1 quality product so they make 2 shitty looking games instead

If the shadows are on the game drops from "30fps with drops" to "12fps with drops."

Attached: 1537765301767.png (665x940, 493K)

when has pokemon EVER looked like a current gen game you faggots

It's not the "graphics" it's the art style and coloring.

I'd take Colosseum's overworld over this any day.

OP, Gamefreak is dumb. They thought the Switch was going to fail and they don't know how to make a game for a home console and think it's too hard despite Third Party developers saying the Switch is the easiest console to work with. They deserved the hate.

>it's okay for them to make shit games because their fans are retarded and there is no incentive to put in any effort
well i guess you can't really argue with that logic.

How does this look worse than Breath of the Wild, which was a fucking Wii U game?

Oh right. Their audience is primarily manchildren who will gobble up anything.

bruh.

I haven't watched the direct yet

No way this is fucking real

Attached: 1425345255364.jpg (720x400, 33K)

pokemon isnt about graphics, it is about collecting little monsters with perfect stats, colours, natures, trainer IDs and personalities like a fucking autist

so yeah there is no point for them investing in graphics when all it realisticly would do is slow down the game

>hardware is weak
yet there are other first party games that look much better

BRUH LOOK AT THIS DUUDE

Attached: 1533503574486.png (615x462, 389K)

Attached: dynamax true.png (432x792, 426K)

I'll play it on Yuzu

Still looks nice, and better in motion

Me and my bros hype for the new pokemon.

Attached: 1559149931491.webm (960x540, 2.32M)

>cardboard cut out trees
>default water effect that clashes with everything else
>low resolution
>no anti aliasing
>lifeless with nothing of interest on screen
saddest part of this is that you're not even getting paid for this crappy shilling

Even by ignoring the graphic pokemon is still a boring ass franchise for manchildren and normalfags who don't even play video games. Gameplay is even more simple than Dragon quest 1 on the nes and the story is toddler tier shit.

What's the fucking appeal?

Why is that Eric Butts dude looks so repulsive?

The switch can't even run Devil May Cry 1, a ps2 title, at 60 fps what do you expect them to do

How is it so weeeeak, is it even really stronger than the WiiU? Fuck Im starting to think its as powerfull as a fucking 360 or ps3, this is ridiculous

>still looks like shit
>franchise is still carried by its own brand name made in the past and not by its merits

Attached: 1455526096453.gif (300x300, 2M)

I thought the switch was a portable, not a home console. Make up your minds nintenfags

This shit unironicaly looks like a vita game. What the fuck are you doing Nintendo?

Attached: digimon-world-next-order-ps-vita-third-promo-traiiler.jpg (800x445, 85K)

Capcom could never develop a game that actually runs well, look at MH world on ps4.

I can give a pass to the first 2 screens but god that last one is just fucked

Attached: 1552066027611.jpg (1015x852, 356K)

thats a very nice looking hallway

Shut up Todd

It's a console, everybody knows that snoyfag.

What the fuck is wrong with these people.

>Fuck Im starting to think its as powerfull as a fucking 360 or ps3
>still believing this when said console can't run a port of an 18 year old game properly

based gamefreak giving you more reflection details than objects that actually exist. now that's a real bang for your buck!

Attached: file.png (426x477, 314K)

its not shilling if you arent getting paid dumbfuck, at that point its called having an opinion

>ports run like shit because of the hardware, not because of incompetent developers

I think the problem with the looks is the low resolution of the textures + the lack of filtering and the complete lack of any material rendering.
Everything looks like clay

>pokemon game looks crappy (not really)
More news at 11.
Did you honestly expect something else?

Attached: Anthonys_Dad_looking_back_with_paper_2.png (400x300, 185K)

And? PC gets shit ports all the time.

keep seething nintencel

It should be somewhat more powerful than PS3 but it is just not powerful enough for devs to basically just drag and drop the games to the Switch and make them run. Any game that gets ports to Switch needs tweaking and that means momey must be spend. Switchtards buy the games anyway so publishers don't bother with it and ship games like DMC1. And they sell well.

This is ps2.5 level graphics.

Which is probably why they never made a PC2, mustards BTFOed!

Say that to my face not online, see what happens

LOL, snoyfags outs himself immeditately.

and the lack of dynamic interacting shadows.
Forgot that one.

>graphics snob
>maturity
choose one

why do switch games look like fucking oblivion on low graphic settings?

but that's the baffling thing, BotW has great reflection tech that outclasses some PS4 games. Game Freak's engine is just garbage.

>They will develop the engine in the next instalment
lol no, SS will sell and GF won't have to improve their garbage in any way
They should develop their engine in advance like all decent fucking devs

Nintendo and Game Freak can get away with anything. They are going to charge 60 dollars for this shit, as much as Red Dead Redemption 2. And the drones not only are going to buy it,. but they'll defend it. Truly the most cucked fanbase.

Game Freak's kusoge are a unique flavor of trash. Several first party switch games look way better than this.

i remember when people shit on lets go too

and then it sold over 10 million copies lmao

The competitive multiplayer.

>implying RDR2 was worth full price

lmao than you have terrible taste. Seriously, look at those fucking trees. That's early 2000's tech.

>Pokémon
Fucking grow up, you manchildren

no one said maturity

How much did valve pay to get this game made on the Source Engine?

let's go was, against all of my expectations, a better experience than all of 3ds pokemon and I stand by that

No it doesn’t retard. Think you need glasses you blindfag

>Those nails on my dick
This is my fetish

WHY DOES MY HANDHELD GAME LOOK LIKE A HANDHELD GAME??????????????
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

You make not like the game, but in terms of bugget, graphics and production values of course it was worth full price.

Because Nintendo actually hired that man.

This is the work of just one dude.

Apologize.

Pokemon isn’t really developed by Nintendo though. It is developed by Gamefreak.

Gamefreak are lazy developers and have an appealing track record these days.

you're not wrong

This. It looks like a very early "Next Gen" game.

There are shadows, though. They disappear as cloud cover passes overhead because the game has dynamic weather.

>Gamefreak are lazy developers and have an appealing track record these days.
The fact that nobody likes them for anything outside of Pokemon, or even knows they make other games should really tell people what kind of developer they are.
Some tiny indie dev which struck gold.

Imagine needing to change a working formula because some faggot on the internet insists so.

Nintendo doesn't make pokemon

why does Pokemon fail to excite the audience these days? It seems like they stagnated.

Attached: 76C5BA6D-2AA9-4F8F-93A3-E658BD78366F.jpg (1536x1800, 1.18M)

I forgot how awful X/Y looked, holy shit.

This looks like og windwaker. It's not objectively bad but more embarrassing that this is the best they can do in 2019

I liked X and Y. Am I retarded?

If you like any Pokemon game after Platinum you're fucking retarded.

>They will develop the engine in the next instalment
Good joke faggot. They will use that engine for the next few games.

LOL, what a retard that guy is.
Why do retards believe obviously gay people like him?
twitter.com/Pokemon/status/1136267757668880385

HG/SS, Pt and B/W 1+2 are the only ones worth playing now

Pokemonfags will buy ANYTHING

Attached: 1432451693644.jpg (480x360, 22K)

>landscape has super vibrant colors
>sky is blue as fuck
>lake is black
It looks so fucking disgusting.

Attached: top_10_games_of_the_early_ps2_era.jpg (2960x1440, 1.34M)

Only if it comes with 200 Potions.

Why are they still releasing games on 3DS?

why even release a double pack if the price is going to be the same as buying separately?
both games are dropping 5 bucks after release anyways

How the fuck does the game look this bad when Pokemon sells fucking millions of copies?
Even fucking Atelier games have better graphics and they are lucky to sell 200k copies

he's talking about his own tweets retard

this proves the bad ending in SM64 as the "reflections" not working
based nindy

holy fuck that is outcast levels of detail

>went from late PS1 graphics to early PS2 graphics
Amazing

WHAT THE FUCK Yea Forums! WHY DOESN'T GAMEFREAK, A TEAM KNOWN FOR HANDHELD GAMES, NOT HAVE THE BEST GRAPHICS!? WHAT THE FUCK NINTENDO!!!

Attached: 1558351683986.png (479x370, 71K)

>all this shitposting
Whether it's eric having a field day or not, we already know a lot of people are gonna buy it anyway even if it does end up being shit because they can't possibly resist trying a piece of the pie like so many times before, let's not deny this.

There's best graphics and then there's fucking "whipped up in two seconds with unity" looking tier

So why are Gamefreak so behind the times anyway. Fans have been wanting a proper console 3D Pokemon game since Stadium dropped on the N64. Just fucking give it to them already.

fuck... what happened nintenbros?

Attached: 1528728077151.jpg (2030x1550, 1.07M)

It's fucking gamefreak. You know they're shit devs.

This actually made me excited for the game.

The framing of the story in SuMo was really cute so this game having more of that is a good thing, honestly. Pokemon's always had this very personal and nostalgic feeling of making friends and going on a journey to the big city, so having a group of NPCs you really get to know and a plot thats not "evil organization remaking the universe by capturing god" suits it well. The characters already look charming and the rival seems more likable than Hau so it's off to a good start.

The wild area is really cool too. The story is bound to be linear as shit because it's Pokemon but the routes being wider and full 3D still provides an outlet for secrets and exploration. Dynamic weather and roaming Pokemon help make it feel more alive like Let's Go tried and failed to do, and I'm glad it still has random encounters as well for easy grinding and hunting. It's a good compromise of the current Go direction and the mainline series and what I've imagined a 3D Pokemon game should be for a while.

The graphics are underwhelming but it's a fucking Pokemon game, it's looked like shit on every console it's been on. As long as the designs are good and the animation aren't complete trash I can live with it.

That water reflection technology looks like a ps2 game.

Top pic wasn't in the final game.

pls be more obvious

Attached: jewpost.jpg (600x600, 55K)

gacha exclusive.

Then I'll skip this one and buy the next installment.

Looks better than Sword and Shield, unironically.

Gamefreak's handheld graphics looked like shit too. It looks lazy considering the switch is more powerful than a 3DS. It reaffirms Gamefreak's continued ineptitude and laziness in regards to the Pokemon Franchise.

16 years and still unmatched. Game Freakers SEETHING. Enjoy your weeby anime style graphics and story made for 10 year old children.

Forgot pic related

Attached: 1200px-Agate_Village.png (1200x675, 1.4M)

I'm interested in Pokemon games based on how cute they are, the quality of the new Pokemon, and the design of the overworld. I don't have very high standards for the series.

I hated the Gen 6 games and liked SuMo, and this looks like SuMo with a better overworld. The first trailers map reveal made me worried about the game but seeing it in action made me more confident in it.

I know I'm on fucking Yea Forums but not everything needs to 10/10 GOTY SOINY BTFO GOLDFACE or 0/10 OH NO NO NO HOW WILL NINTENFAGS RECOVER. It's a Pokemon game, there's a million of them and you should know what to expect from them.

How DARE you compliment a game in Yea Forums in the year of our Lord 2019!!!

Attached: big-lebowski-dude-walter-promo.jpg (1200x676, 129K)

No wonder Pokemon is the most profitable franchise, they cut so many corners they end up with a circle

Attached: 1494737021576.jpg (261x151, 11K)

perfect! thanks for obliging

Attached: 1538158797032.jpg (215x246, 12K)

japs can't into 3d animation. just look at all the shitty 3d animes in the last few years. the japs are just terrible with 3d stuff

this webm is bad I can't take my eyes off the retard from that joke video
he looks like one of those kids that deserved to be bullied

>2019
>Still giving a shit about Pokemon
youtube.com/watch?v=WO9WwR5Ng3I

Attached: 1549592689726.png (265x213, 35K)

Yeah I'm gonna call you out on this one. Westerners worked with 3d since its inception while japs kept using drawings, even then, some nips are capable at that. KH is garbage but the 3d isn't half bad and Arcsys Works exists

Because they are handheld devs nigga. You expect from a trainer who works for a soccerteam in the 3rd league now suddenly go with them to the champions league and play and win there

Kek, nice

stop defending those lazy jews
youtube.com/watch?v=3ltQDO-rxoU

The limited power of the switch is one of the most positive aspects of this console. PS4/XBone always prioritize graphics (even when they get an ""upgrade"" model) over framerate. While devs on Switch have no choice since either way the game will always looks like garbage, meaning stuff like framerate often gets improved. PC doesn't have this plebeian problems.

Attached: 1559754944486.png (395x650, 369K)

>Arcsys Works
*hits auto generate particle effect button*
*dump it into background layer*
Wow guys! We're industry leaders now!

> The limited power of the switch is one of the most positive aspects of this console

Attached: .jpg (960x720, 271K)

>Stopped playing pokemon after platinum
>that was in 2008
>fast forward 2019
>new pokemon game
>graphics are exactly the same

I like this

Attached: .png (296x296, 137K)

Just like GF didn't deliver undercooked games with major framedrops on the 3DS. Oh wait.

>meaning stuff like framerate often gets improved.
lmao

>stone
>reflection
>tree

what the fuck xD

Listen to me fuckface, next thing is another gamebryo situation where "it's still good" is the main theme. Fuck off.

BW2 was pretty cool. Last time they used nice sprites for the fights instead of ugly washed out 3DPD

>They will develop the engine in the next instalment
No they won't. Nintendo will release another new console to sell consoles and avoid getting caught up by emulators (they don't want another ds fiasco), and the next Pokemon generation will be in the new console

Different packaging and some cheap miscellaneous shit

The graphics are shit so they can release it on phones after they baited enough sales to Switch

PSS looks like dogshit. Nobody asked for dynamo either, it removes the whole appeal of a big world of small and legendary big pokemon. This isn't fucking digimon ffs

>phones
It would probably run worse than trying to emulate it on your phone

Sadly I'm with this user. So far I'm not impressed to shill out $120 for S&S although I bet the right-wing will have a field day with pokemon "schutzstaffel" and nazi memes

After that direct I will simply not buy the game until I can get it for €30 or cheaper somewhere.

Heck, I might not even buy it at all because these fuckers do not deserve my money.

I might not even play it even if fucking yuzu can run it.

Fuck Pokémon and especially fuck Game Freak.

I fucking hope Yo-Kai Watch 4 and SMTV can at least be good games and do some damage to them, even if they're only convincing 1k or 100k people that Game Freak should not receive their money.

Attached: 1559643883774.png (450x368, 175K)

>cheaper
>nintendo
nigga these faggots are known to keep their prices for years because 28 year old nostalgia boomers will eat anything that's served in front of them by big N

based and animepilled

It's not even that the graphics look dated, it's just ugly. How hard is it to find a half decent art director?

Maybe it will come with 200 potions

they're including a steelbook though

Attached: steelbook.jpg (750x418, 298K)

Oh god, is this going to be like BotW where people pretend open world makes it better?

Linearity is absolutely retarded in a game about catching monsters where each city and route has two biomes at most.

The problem is they chose a western art director and the fact that the game is set in some anglo like world.

pokemon shouoldn't borrow from the real world, it's what made kanto and sinnoh so interesting

>The problem is they chose a western art director
Got a source for that? Because it looks identical to every other jap shovelware on the Vita.

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 173K)

>Don't bother, Yea Forums and /vp/ have dedicated shitposters for Pokemon.
lol, you couldn't be more of a victim huh kid? Some people don't like Pokemon you know.

Attached: dealwithitbuddy.png (735x512, 410K)

You are such a fucking retard.

>multiplayer costs extra

Attached: Screenshot_20190605-135735.png (1920x1080, 1.06M)

You didn't watch the stream?

Attached: Screenshot_20190605-135933.png (1920x1080, 1.44M)

not to mention even back in 2013, the Gen 6 games looked like straight ass even for their time. Compare what they look like to what other contemporary 3DS games looked like. And also keep in mind that even when looking like shit, they were poorly optimized as fuck and fucking CHUGGED in terms of framerate. Even during battles where they're only rendering a couple models on a bland backdrop. Absolutely pathetic.

Coding bery hardu
prease understandu

I didn't get the hate about how the new game looks until I played Ultra sun on an emulator
Guys... This next gen game looks like a last gen game if you removed the outline and gave it a slightly higher resolution

Dude, do you even know buying used games is a thing? Coupons? Specials? Bundles?

Even Nintendo games can be gotten for cheap if you know where and when to buy them.

No, I don't really care about Pokemon.

>meaning stuff like framerate often gets improved

Attached: 1410544633737.gif (170x144, 2.83M)

another shitty pokemon game with the same story

Attached: yeahok.png (120x120, 25K)

where have I heard that nonsense from before?

Attached: pokemonxy.png (625x352, 218K)

>HE'S WRONG YOU CAN JUST DO THIS
He isn't wrong and you know it.

The art director of that game is the same fucking guy that made the worst looking Pokémon (literal Ice Cream Pokémon to name one), and now he's the director and responsible for literally all the new Pokémon.

gen 6 at least still had a semblance of visual stylization and while it wasn't technically impressive, it looked nice and neat
gen 7 on the other hand was a hot mess that makes you think it would look better on a hd console rather than a 3ds, but then you look at gen 8 and realize that's not true, it's just messy, gaudy and bad

>all the KANTOOOOOO shit
i'm so sick of it

you probably get fag fucked at parades

Have you literally never bought Nintendo games for cheap because you don't know how?

Attached: bitchdoyouevenebay.jpg (933x563, 75K)

But that looks so much better than these pokemon games?

I fucking hate the whole look of this game, right from the logos and the stupid 2010 instagram filter they slapped on top of the image. It all looks so low budget indie to me.

I'm not even speaking of style, I'm just talking about it objectively in terms of what was being rendered and how it performed. And somehow GF made a game that both looks unimpressive compared to other games at the time AS WELL AS running significantly worse.

And the worst aspect was how fucking zoomed in everything was. It's especially noticeable in ORAS because you can directly compare that to the original RSE. When playing ORAS it feels like I'm playing with forced tunnel vision because of how zoomed in the camera is on the player and how little of the area you can see compared to the originals. Makes it a lot more tedious actually exploring.

Can't speak for Gen 7. I tried those for like 5 minutes before giving up. Fuck that shit.

But it doesn't. All Vita shovelware and this Pokemon are virtually indistinguishable in art direction.

Attached: s8-6eb6538384116b56a18f64c3a5a095dd.jpg (800x450, 120K)

Let me get this straight.
Switch is competing with ps4 and xbone and one of their flagship games not only looks worse than a ps3 game, it looks worse than a ps2 game.

nice water

at least post the final prices

>ebay
LOL

Attached: 1414438900752.gif (217x217, 1.46M)

>7th gen
DQ8 came out on the ps2 and looks better than this

yeah, now post games that aren't niche spin offs.

Im still mad they are using the X and Y engine still and there are no upgraded models because of that.

retard

Did none of you fucks see "Not final game footage" in the fucking trailer? Holy shit

that means it's going to look uglier you fucking spazmoid

the Lillie character better be as cute as Lillie

Attached: 1559703145613.jpg (530x460, 178K)

Attached: Sans titre2.png (640x904, 1.41M)

How can Monolithsoft do such a great job with Zelda and Xenoblade but these fucking hacks make this shit.

Attached: 1487891817757.png (429x410, 11K)

>but it's just a beta.jpg

BoTW is cool, but xenoblade 2 is fucking garbage

Can i use my vouchers to save $20, Master hook nose?

I dunno I thought it looked alright in motion. But I'm also not a stickler for visuals. The colors were vibrant, the biomes were diverse in presentation. That's all I need really from a visual perspective

I also thought BotW looked good but everyone seems to hate that too

It looks okay, but Gamefreak is a first-party multimillion company, it should look more than ok on current consoles

Go back and play a PS2 game, your memory seems a bit hazy. That is if you actually have ever played one you fucking zoomers.

>xenoblade 2 is the best JRPG of the last 10 years.
*fix'd*

Attached: Poppi boardgame.jpg (1360x919, 285K)

Kill yourself my man

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 66K)

This user is right, real PS2 games looked better than this.

pokemon swsh will bamboozle it on sales, stay saly xenofag

Attached: 1559707851741.png (1876x2010, 743K)

There are shadows, but since there are also clouds, the shadows disappears, just like in real life. Funny right?

>salesfag
Who cares about sales, it's the greatest JRPG made in the last 10 years by far. Pokeshit always sells like crazy.

Not even being picky, these are just random Google stills

Attached: maxresdefault-1.jpg (1280x720, 415K)

I still have my ps2 hooked up. Pokemon looks worse by all metrics.

Why are people complaining about graphics of a game that's still in development?

If the game comes out and looks like shit then you complain. This is KH 0.2 all over again

Retards

(You)

Based nintendo

Attached: maxresdefault-2.jpg (1280x720, 119K)

This is bait
>show off game to drum up hype
>it looks bad
>well duh it looks bad it's not finished yet
I love this retarded method of thinking

Gamefreak is so fucking antiquated they're only just now figuring out how controllable camera and reflections work.

I have a hacked Switch. I'm going to start hacking a bunch of the version-exclusive legendaries and dump them into wonder trade. Hopefully this will stop people from buying both games or at least give them a bargaining chip to trade for the other one. I want as few children to be conned into buying both versions. I fucking hate gamefreak.

I urge anyone else with a hacked switch to do the same. Hack a bunch of legendaries and give them away in wonder trade. Fuck Gamefreak, fuck G

Objectively worse graphics.

shitch was a mistake.
New Pokemon, new FE, Xenotrash 2, Daemon x 10 Machina - all look like hot trash.

Wii U died for this, Jesus.

Attached: PMCS.jpg (2370x4000, 3.42M)

why does my 2018 console game look like a mobile game?????????? REEEEEEEEE

You sure about that, chief?

Attached: b0g.png (638x677, 834K)

So you're saying I should skip these games. Got it.

While Xenoblade 2 took the wrong route, the graphics are still great, it's just that it got hit with the weeb artstyle so it feels worse than 1 and 2

Yup. The new pokemon game looks like shit but it's still better graphically.

Just because you're cherry picking PS2 games with good art direction doesn't mean the graphics are comparable.

*crack*
*siiiiip*
Now that's a console where games didn't look like hot trash.

Attached: img2-33022.jpg (996x560, 94K)

Attached: 4fd01cbfa435d.jpg (550x393, 68K)

>Listen to me nerds,
So you are already implying those complaining have more knowledge than your stupid idiotic of an imbecile brain.
>this is the first game on Switch
Which means nothing. Since the series as a whole doesn't have the practice of going above and beyond. It's just on Switch cause it will be easier for a console to handle the load of over 1000 pokemon with form changes from mega evolution and now the added Z shit.
>They will develop the engine in the next instalment
Not usually how it ever happens at all with japan. Get fucked stupid.

Nah even without cherry picking new Pokémon is unambitious minimalist garbage

Attached: 836021-939418_20071102_006.jpg (1280x720, 283K)

Flirting with Lillie!

5 yen have been deposited into your account

He's right you fucking retard, Game Freak does, Nintendo publishes it

people play pokemon dont know why. well i have theories but theyre all embarassing

>this is the first game on Switch
LGPE was their first game on Switch, you dumbass.

What the fuck is that lake filled with, oil?

>Waaaah, people should be a loyal fanboy like me!

I think the new pokemon game looks like shit and anyone that buys it is retarded, I just also think comparing it to PS2 games is retarded. Just say it looks like shit. Saying it looks like a PS2 game implies it has bad graphics regardless of art style.


Here look, doesn't kirby's adventure look prettier than the new pokemon game? Wow, it must have worse graphics than an NES LOL!

Attached: ps2.png (616x460, 148K)

That looks like a fucking Gamecube game.

>posts 2d
Keep moving the goalposts, it's fucking ugly and for such a shitty artstyle it shouldn't have as much aliasing as it does. Mario odyssey looks fucking great, nupokemon looks like a ps2 game, get over it

You're just as retarded as the PS2 people.

Yeah it's fucking ugly, doesn't mean it looks like a PS2 game.

Attached: gamecube.jpg (640x480, 103K)

>PS1 textures
>reflections of objects that aren't even there
>unstable framerate in the Direct despite barely anything being on screen
This is a mess. They know they don't have to try since they'll make money from fanboys anyway.

Attached: 1356522576889 anne frank.png (574x600, 131K)

That's a literal N64 model.

It looks like a ps2 game

Attached: scus-97213-game-ss-10.jpg (627x353, 61K)

Gamefreak has never been able to optimize framerate on the DS or 3DS. And the SS footage we saw shows they can't get a stable framerate right on the Switch either.

They should be doing 2d stylized, 3d is a meme, and the models look fucking ugly and lack character

Says than manchild on Yea Forums arguing about a children's game

You're a meme and GF is hilariously incompetent.

And you are....

What kind of PS1 did you play?

The N64 games had basically nothing in the background.

Dunno about that, the graphics in that picture are a lot worse than that's in SS. But it looks better somehow.. hmm how could that be?

I wish they went back to 2D. 3D doesn't offer anything to the gameplay and just makes it looks worse. But 3D is a lot cheaper so they won't do that :)

Attached: ps1.jpg (480x335, 35K)

It's the biggest franchise in the world and they still gave crap footage to reveal to the public. And don't say they can fix all of this in development. They really don't have much time. Games have to be finished 2-3 months before release because that's how long it takes to organize shipping and distribution.

Attached: 1357179949426.png (163x198, 72K)

A good point, but this was literally the last first party Nintendo game and even then they were getting ready for BOTW so your argument is just a little sloppy. Now Rayman Legends and DKC TF on the other hand....

Wow thanks user, Sword and Shield looks like a ps1 game

The structure textures in SS are of the same quality as the tank and crate textures in that MGS pic. You're only proving us right.

This new Pokémon game looks like a fucking n64 game

He's right though zoomie

It kinda does. The grass is the only part that looks better.

Attached: untitled.jpg (1920x1080, 900K)

Totally!

Attached: chrome_2019-06-05_21-06-49.png (1250x645, 2.14M)

No, faggot. He said it's LITERALLY an N64 model you posted. Pokemon Colosseum, Gale of Darkness, and Battle Revolution used the same Gen 1/2 character models from the N64 Pokemon Stadium games.

What early DS game is this?

Yes, totally.

Yes I know, and I'm saying just because they reused models don't mean the screenshot isn't indicative of what gamecube can handle. Because there's.. *drumroll* more geometry in the background.

Again, you're just proving my point.

Textures are closer to PS2 levels. Taking into account resolution, geometry and draw distances it comes closer to early PS3 titles graphically speaking.

Artistically it just looks like shit either way.

Agreed, that totally looks like a 240p game that could run on a DS!

I'm only trying to say it's retarded to call new games that look bad "PS2" or "PS1" looking games. Some PS1/2 games looked fucking good as hell despite it's bad graphics compared to today. If you wanna call SS ugly call it ugly, don't say it looks like a PS2 game.

How can devs like CDPR keep justifying making worlds like Witcher when gamefreak can just shit out a DS quality game in 2019 and make a billion dollars.

Yeah but you just cherry picked an empty background. XDs overworld had more going on than Pokémon shitch

>don't say it looks like a ps2 game
But it does

Why does Nintendo think it's okay for their main man Pokeman on their main console switch get dicked around by a game that uses nearly the same premise as pokemon and is running on the ps3?
You would at least expect Nintendo or Gamefreak to set a standard. Hell it ain't implementing anything that Pokemon Let's go added to the franchise. The fuck is wrong with Nintendo?

Attached: ni no kuni ps3.jpg (1280x720, 199K)

Because people are retarded and keep buying pokemon games anyway?

Just the first decent quality pic I could find and I couldn't find any overworld screenshots quickly. Besides that it has a decent level of geometry in the battle scenes and an overworld screenshot would've made it looks worse. I do my best to find decent screenshots and even cherry pic examples that would show the best a console has to offer. look at I could've picked a way uglier early PS1 title, but why would I when ya'll just blind and don't understand the difference between graphics and artstyle?

It doesn't. A lot of PS2 games look much better than it.

For the record you mongoloid. Noone is talking about graphical fidelity but you. The game looks like a ps2 game, it looks like a game where they had to be very minimal due to graphical constraints of the ps2 Era. This clearly wasn't the case of development, but it looks like a fuckin ps2 game even on a stylistic level, holy shit you're so dumb but you have to make this conversation about you. Everyone agrees its ugly but you just have to fuckin show up and collect a bunch of you because GUYS GUYS I THINK WE NEED TO DELINEATE BETWEEN GRAPHICS AND ARTSTYLE WANNA KNOW WHAT I THINKX BECAUSE I THINK IT LOOKS BAD STYLISTICALLY AND NOT GRAPHICALLY LIKE YOU PHILOSTINES. fucking neck yourself

>ya'll
looks like we're dealing with a reddit nigger

Jesus Christ this looks like The Sims 2 on the lowest settings

Isn't that the 3nds one?

is that fornite mobile ?

looking "nice" for the highest grossing series of all time is an insult.

>it doesn't look like a PS2 game but actually it does!
good argument. Using PS2 for calling a game ugly is retarded no matter how you try to phrase it.

>n-no one was talking about graphics vs artstyle!!!
Then what the fuck does PS2 have to do with anything? Nothing, exactly. Just say it looks like shit, saying "LOOK GUYS I PLAYED PS2 GAMES!" doesnt make you cool you retarded zoomer.

Oh you :)

What's that? A comparison that makes sense both graphically and stylistically? Woah!

you've got the 'tism user

Thanks qt

>all these people arguing for the sake of arguing
Jesus Christ go outside or something

Attached: 1527166294736.jpg (1000x1582, 155K)

What's wrong with arguing for the sake of arguing? It's comfy.

It's bad for your mental health

Proof?

>lake is black
So you've never seen a lake before?

Its poluition, your jerk.

You found grimmers on it.

It looks worse than Atelier

Attached: Atelier-Ryza_2019_05-28-19_003.jpg (1920x1080, 420K)

Is this supposed to look good?

I'm sure they intended it to look good. Never said it does though.

Grafixs aside I hope this game nails the hunting Pokemons for once. Being a series focused on collecting Pokemon it doesn't such a poor job. You can't just hunt all because some require to know the exact pixels where they gonna spawn and what % spawn rate; so few quests to hunt special Pokemon, and sometimes pokedex tells you where they spawn and sometimes it doesn't. Impossible to catch them all without looking at a guide, all i want is going in a adventure and complete the pokedex.
How can I even expect for this to be solved if your average pokemonfag only cares about pvp and graphics.

Attached: 1559763707794.png (848x728, 412K)

ni no kuni was gorgeous, I wish level 5 didn't fuck up the partner AI and combat and make the game for braindead 3 year olds who need constant handholding.

Unironically looks worse than a PS2 game

You fucks complained about MHW being shit when it was made from scratch so you don't get this one. New pokemon fucking sucks nerd, deal with it

Have ever seen a tree, grass, or a hillside before? Nothing looks real in the pic.

Wait thats a fucking lake? I thought it was a a chasm or some shit LOL what is that lighting oh my fuck.

Attached: d9c.jpg (1200x858, 117K)

Tax is cheaper though

Soul
Soulless

Or maybe people never bought Pokemon for the graphics.
As long as it just look nice enough, I really don't think most people will care.

Soul(Pic related) vs souless

Attached: the under.jpg (1280x720, 94K)

ps2 games look more impressive

Both are soulless