His favorite FE game isn't Conquest

Just because it's the best of THREE(3) games, doesn't make it the best Fire Emblem game, tard.

The Exile patch will tell you straight-up about things like hidden teleport traps and that Leif should Escape last from a certain map.

I don't like gimmicks and shit weapons, and Conquest is full of e'm.

If I wanted difficulty, then I'd play a ROMhack or XCOM.

It's only one third of the intended experience, so you're playing a blatantly incomplete game.

Attached: 1510113304326.jpg (1088x596, 207K)

Each third is bigger than every Fire Emblem game but Awakening though.

I like getting all the content when I buy a game.

Simple.
For starters i'm not a faggot and second and most importantly.
New Mystery of the Emblem exist.

And hundreds of games are bigger without the need to pay extra, what's your point?

It's Conquest more similar to Awakening or Shadows of Valentia?

Has a lot of content, each map is fun to play, and uses a lot of the interesting aspects of Fire emblem Giaden

Attached: ephraim.png (500x355, 185K)

I like FE4 more even with the massive maps. I'm playing FE5 now and I'm having problems with my urges to capture every single enemy for weapons.

Awakening by a long shot

reminder that fe5 is garbage since a new translation patch came out recently

Its more similar to Awakening, but it isn't really a fair comparsion since SoV/2 are so vastly different in the first place. I'd say Fates in general is a more mechanically polished Awakening, in that while a lot of mechanics from Awakening are lifted over, they are overhauled and changed to give the game deeper and more complex systems that avoid cheesing the whole game with pair-ups.

The way Conquest differs from the other Fates entries is that it is balls to walls difficult with complex map designs, tough enemies and no EXP grinding.

>And hundreds of games are bigger without the need to pay extra, what's your point?

That your argument falls apart when it's still actually better value than most Fire Emblem games.

Haven't played conquest, that's why,
tought i think i'd still prefer sacred stones

>playing fe after gba era

It's one of the best, for sure.
Despite the shit character and the shit story, which still manage to be better than Sacred Stones.

Can you marry that young girl in the middle?

Path of Radiance is better. The bonus experience mechanic promotes efficient play and discourages grinding. The game has a simple, understandable story that enjoyable without being overbearing. The maps are diverse enough to give you different gameplay when needed. The characters are relatively balanced, other than Ike, with no single strategy being "the best", (again, assuming you don't do than min/max Ike and have him clear the entire map).