Link’s Awakening

LINK! YOU'RE GOING TO DROWN! WAKE UP!

Attached: 1530010832695.png (1024x576, 571K)

Is anyone actually hyped for this Unity project?

Imagine if they just made BoTW: Egg Island Adventures instead.

It's a free gameboy game
Which is more than you'll ever get from nintendo
They're still pretending that a single fucking NES ROM is actually worth money

All these seething poorfags
Get a job losers, $60 is literal chump change

But they are making BotW: Something Else Edition anyway, this is a stopgap in the meantime.

>NINTENDO, HIRE THIS MAN: the game
I'm gonna pass on it and get something else instead.

you can also use that $60 to buy other games and play LA on an emulator instead

Attached: link_s_awakening___link_and_bowwow_by_kaigetsudo-d66j34z.jpg (825x397, 165K)

Attached: 45D0E0A1-193A-48D2-9E43-AE9AD98275B9.jpg (1242x504, 135K)

>pay $60 for shit
I could literally get a superior version of Link's Awakening for my 3DS right now.

Attached: 88579D9D-E441-443B-90D3-C4C2CE1FB23D.jpg (1242x555, 162K)

Where are you getting these and why do they hurt so much

>replying to desperate mass repliers
don't

stein

nintendolife.com/news/2019/02/talking_point_is_the_remake_of_zelda_linkrs_awakening_worth_usd60

Attached: 7918F010-D0E3-443C-8A59-E97C95AC7096.jpg (1242x479, 161K)

Why are people so afraid of this game sucking, Koizumi isn't gonna let some rando ruin the game he ever work on, especially now that he is the new face of Nintendo.

Attached: 1525769227152.png (1129x800, 340K)

*will also be $60 even though CotN was $15*

Attached: cadence-hyrule.jpg (522x348, 38K)

But the game is already ruined with the awful claymation artstyle.

>(you)
newfag detected

He let Majoras Mask be ruined.

I will now buy your game.

No, you gotta put some ‘oomph’ into it.

Arrrrrrrrrrgh!

No i thought i use my money for something useful instead of overpriced shit. Tell me how much you make user?

Arrrrrrrrrrgh my matey
Off to free games land

Attached: 590E2F5E-861F-41E8-AF67-206CF959A312.jpg (1242x428, 100K)

if you don’t already have everything that’s of use to you, you are not only poor but retarded as well
there’s absolutely no reason to be proud that buying 10 games a month impacts your funds and future spending in any remotely noticeable way

Because he didn't have any sway back then, now with odyssey being a smash hit and him being feature prominently as the new Miyamoto, he would put the dev into a goddamn choke hold for trying anything funny.

Even as a Nintendofag, 60 dollars is way too much for a remake of a GB game. They're going to have to add way more content if they want a purchase from me.

Attached: 1454386733776.gif (148x152, 195K)

Nah, it’s going to be critically acclaimed, Yea Forums will love it, and you’re going to buy it because there’s nothing else to play on the Switch.

is it confirmed $60?

>I'll add this to the pile of shit I get to play for free

But are you actually going to play it?

No.

I'm not buying this. It looks like shit and I already have the game for my GBC which is far superior visually.

I got Mario Maker 2. Could play that garbage forever.

Then people would be crying that it's nothing like the original, and so it's bad.

Why do people like Links Awakening so much?

Despite being the best selling game system of all time, the gameboy had literally no games
That's why people value link's awakening so much, just like how PS4fags value bloodborne

It's a pretty good Zelda game. Good overworld, good dungeons, lots of side content, and a surprising story on top of that. What's not to like about it?

so what would this game need for you in order to justify the 60 dollaroos
randomizer, local coop like 4 swords, some sort of master quest?

Attached: 165167.png (600x600, 143K)

Nice buzzwords user

LA has literally no side content apart from the shitty shell collecting. Also, it has no story at all apart from IT'S ALL A DREAM

Include the oracle games as well since they share the exact same graphics and arsenal as link's awakening

Come to think of it, my GBC was pretty much a Pokemon and Zelda machine.

Hey you try to make a videogame then. You think it is fucking easy to program and code a videogame? Even the most simplest tic tac toe videogame needs some knowledge of programming. The artist also need time to develop art assets. The distributor needs money to print out the cartridge and box art.

You think everything is fucking free? You are probably a poor moron who pirate videogames despite being able to afford a monthly internet subscription

>and you’re going to buy it because there’s nothing else to play on the Switch
Speak for yourself, I'm getting Dragon Quest Builders 2, Big Marring Maker and Fire Emblem: Zigludo's 2nd Holy War: More Canto edition.

I'm buying it because I want to still see traditional zelda games come out and BOTW has dominated the old formula in place of a new one.

We need to buy this.

>We
Fucking kill yourself shill.

Yes we. I'm saying this as someone who prefers Playstation consoles as a whole.

I fucking hate BOTW so much I'm buying this just to see BOTWfags seeth.

Because of the trade wars

>Remake
Nah. Its REINVENTED

interesting new marketing tactic

Nigga I WISH I worked for Nintendo. I'm a night wage slave. I barely even play Nintendo games anymore and don't even own a switch. Mainly want one for Luigi mansion 3 and Bayonetta 3. Maybe astral chain.

No, it's such a straight remake it's keeping the exact same proportions and tiles as the original.

Hu. I keep forgetting that the trading sidequest is not that optional.

okay dude, you have fun paying. I won't

>tripfag
>retarded opinion
why am I not surprised?

Attached: 1474350013429.png (625x626, 72K)

>I fucking hate BOTW so much I'm buying this just to see BOTWfags seeth.
But you're the one forever seething about BotW.

It was “Baby’s 1st Zelda meets Mario”
Seriously it’s a near parody game
There’s yoshi eggs, chain chomps Link jumping all over the damn place
Do retards forget Zelda is for kids?

Why wouldn't you pay for a good game?

NPC comment

because it's $60

NES ROMs are obviously worth money if people are paying for them. Learn2economy

I hate BoTW but at least that looks nice. If LA looked like LBW I would buy it, but not what it is now.

>no u
hilarious

Tell that to poor yoshi.

$60 is just fine for a good single player game.

>Piratefags pirate everything
>Gains popularity
>Mainstream even doing it
>Wonder why publishers for devs to put creeping microtransactions

I will try to get it used, ain't hyped that much for it so won't instant buy

so fucking true

A fellow brother I see

There is no fucking way in hell that I'd pay $60 for a shitty looking Gb remake.
But Nintenbots will eat this shit up like an obese man eats cake.

You would have a point if you weren't shilling for this particular game. I love single-player games and 2D Zeldas but I'm not paying $60 for an ugly version of a nice looking game.

WRONG. People only pay for them because Nintendo is incredibly stingy with releasing them, so people think they have value.

>Wonder why publishers for devs to put creeping microtransactions]

Yes, because that has NOTHING to do with, nope, NOTHING.

>POORFAGS

O yes. Nintenbots will be hyped for a Nintendo logo stamped into a pile of shit.

lol you sir are ignorant. It has nothing to do with price.

Retard, I'm getting several Switch games in the next few months. I'm NOT getting Links Awakening.

Nintendo fan boys are the worst fans for anything. It's really sad, it honestly is.

fpbp

>Why are people so afraid of this game sucking

The graphics alone are terrible. The fact it's a shitty untiy project is enough.

I'd pay 60 if the graphics looked like they do in the intro video, a 2.5d style ala Octopath Traveler. I'd fucking pay that much for that style in a god damn heart beat.

I WILL NOT pay anywhere NEAR 60 for a shitty looking unity port with WAY too much depth of field.

Or if the game had, Link's Awakening, Orcale of Age, and Seasons, AND the cancelled third game.

Seriously why the fucking clay artstyle, the original version didn’t look like that at all, even in the concept art.

It's UE4 though.

not true, trash like animal crossing amiibo festival, starfox zero, and sushi striker prove this.

Nintendo is the Apple of video games and the fanbase is just as stupid. They will pay for it.

I wish you were right, then we could have gotten more people to buy NMH Travis strikes back and subsequently get NMH3.

Yeah, I never saw the point of it myself. If you're going to try and reheat a Game Boy game for sale in 2019 you're going to need to update more than than just the graphics for me.

It looks exactly like a shitty unity game and nothing like an U4 game.

It's UE4: ign.com/articles/2017/11/07/zelda-remake-studio-hiring-for-new-legend-project

>The listing asks for C++ programmers with experience in Unreal Engine, as well as 3D character and map modelers, suggesting that the 'Legend' project will be a 3D title made in Unreal Engine 4.

Attached: lol wat r u poor.jpg (1177x1194, 284K)

literally Wind Waker all over again

It's all just about graphic fidelity. As long as that remains the main selling point for normalfags, they will continue to shell out their hard earn cash for what are essentially pretty looking gameboy games.
I mean, just look how far AAA devs have gone with this shit.

Attached: 1469993325886.webm (720x404, 2.68M)

There’s an image like this for sonyfags too during the PS4 reveal.

Just goes to show you how every fanbase here is cancerous, literally the same.

I really hated the TR reboot. It was so full of scripted ''epic cinematic'' moments like this. They want you to feel excited but how am I supposed to do that when I know is scripted and I am safe? I cant fall. Shit is just so forced. Platforming was more nerve-wracking in the originals because some of those timed jumps were hard to pull off.

huh didn't know suggest meant fact

GBC had no games that weren’t shitty ports of console games, Pokemon, and Tetris. I’m not even trying to meme here, its library was trash and was basically just another distraction for people to play GB games IN COLOAR until the Advance came out.
That would be a decent thing for $60.

They hired people to work on a game made in UE4. They didn't ask for experience with Unity.

Attached: retards.jpg (2061x1806, 1.49M)

Fuck off Snoy

Attached: sonygaffer.jpg (1020x231, 24K)

>Nintendo can get away with literally anything because their retarded fanbase eats up everything.

You could replace Nintendo with Microsoft or Sony and the same shit applies

>$60
>''free'' games
lol

the fuck is your point? the thread is specifically about Nintendo

Rugggarell, you tiny dick sony faggot! Stop false flagging and avoiding my filters, you dumbass.

I was a casual gamer as a kid and now my kids are Nintendo kids (Wii, WiiU, 3 3DS in the house and now a Switch). My youngest fell in love with BOTW and is now playing her way through older games. She's already bugging me about Link's Awakening.
For those of us who didn't play through the games previously, this only makes the Zelda series that much deeper for us. She's played through Link Between Worlds and is excited to get at Ocarina and Majora on the 3DS now that they've dropped in price.
If $60 is the price to pay, then so be it. She wants it and we know Nintendo titles rarely drop in price and hold value long after the system retires.
I look at Nintendo purchases differently from PS4/Xbox because it feels like Nintendo is always fun, even when dusting off a 10 year old system. There's value in this, even if the game is short.

Really so what ur telling me is that every one who owns an xbox ran out and bought crackdown 3...no? The surely the got sea of thieves...right?

what did you expect
it's nintendo
when have they ever released a port that wasnt $60+

this isn't a port tho, it's a remaster

Wind Waker HD

Where has it been confirmed to be A.) A physical release or B.) 60 dollars

You have to remember 4 Swords 3DS is a thing.

based remakes coming through, and is half the price of this single dogshit remake

Attached: 3max.jpg (497x629, 76K)

Yup.

Attached: 81eJlNQ1UCL._AC_SX215_.jpg (215x348, 22K)

Crash Bandicoot's platforming is broken and the second and third Spyro games were rushed. They're both trash remakes.

mine too, the few other games I had never really felt as good to play, except any donkey kong game

still doesnt make the $60 gameboy remaster any better, stay mad

It is LITERALLY only Nintendofags that make this "everyone who doesn't like x shitty business model is poor" shitpost.
Whether or not this post is baiting, it's always done on here with Switch Online, $60 ports, the dumb price of the tablet in the first place, and more.
I always used to try and rationalize this shithole wasn't nintendogaf, but I can't deny it since the Switch released .

Where was it confirmed to be 60 dollars.

>Crash Bandicoot's platforming is broken
It was fine, try paying attention, zoomer.

>PS+ or Xbox Live

>It is LITERALLY only Nintendofags that make this "everyone who doesn't like x shitty business model is poor" shitpost.
Looks like somebody wasn't around for the ps3 launch.

>nintendogaf
Why do people use that name when NeoGAF has always been known to be the sony circle jerk?
The name just doesn't work.

In the original
>Jump onto platform
>Land on it

In the remake
>Jump onto platform
>Fall of it because the edges are rounded

I came to this thread expecting to see negative comments on Nintendo for selling this game... for a price that is still unknown, but assumed to be 60 dollars.

All I see are assblasted Nintendo haters who can't accept the fact that some people people are willing to buy this remake, even if it costs 60 dollars.

Is this pure autism?

But it totally works retard, try to use your brain.

Yea Forums was filled to the brim with apologetic sonyfags trying to defend ps4's paid online and calling everyone who disagreed with them a poorfag, not to mention these people also unironically defended 599 US DOLLARS
I don't think you've ever tried to "rationalize" anything because you've got some serious bias.

Sounds like you see what you want to see like all nincels.

To be clear, i’m not accusing you of lying, it’s much worse.

not made by nintendo
and genuinly a bad game
also nmh3 is gonna get made anyways you absolute faggot

>I came to this thread expecting to see negative comments on Nintendo for selling this game...
And that's exactly what you got?
Look through the thread again, it's just people doing nothing but hanging shit on it and saying they're glad they hacked their switch so they don't have to pay for it.

It's OK, user. Your company will be and show something at E3 next year. Probably.

iam a snoyfag

i hate horizon zero dawn its shit
god of war is also shit

see if nintendo fans would actually be critical at some point they wouldnt have to pay 60 dollar for their precious titles

Except 599$ wasn’t even a jew move because OG PS3 cost Sony 800$ to make.

>impeach Trump
Well, that avatar explains it.

You literally just proved my point.

>literally
Just say you're tranny.

I don’t even own a PS4, what now Nincel? What’s your next move?

Again, you see what you want to see.

Explain pic related then you fucking apologist. It was also released for $40 and is one of the best remakes ever made.

Attached: shadow-of-the-colossus-special-edition-box-art-02-ps4-us-25jan18.jpg (1513x1916, 636K)

Yeah, I doubt it.

Why are people so fucking mad? Just emulate the gameboy version or wait till the fucker goes on sale. I'm not shelling out 60 euros/dollars on this in any case.

Attached: 1558779025248.png (746x508, 114K)

sony didn't get their priorities straight when developing the system and what came out was a non-cost efficient product that sony assumed people would just roll with and buy because they were cocky at the time due to the success of the ps2
thankfully the backlash from the populace made sony run back to R&D with their tail between their legs and fix their shit

>Nintendo game
>Goes on sale
Imagine believing in this

Well one of the online shops here in my country are putting them on sale if they aren't selling enough. Otherwise you can always buy used.

because nintendo is making it shitwit

They do. Three times/year on eShop.

Sure, but it’s different, i almost find it endearing and cute, dysfunctional and cocky sure, jewish? Not really.

Selling Wii U ports for 60$? Joycons which have terrible build quality for 80$? A fucking dock which is a 2$ piece of plastic for 90$ as standalone? That’s jewish and disgusting.

Nintendo dropped the quality so hard there isn’t a single 1st party acceptable d-pad for the platform, and yes that includes the sad joke that is the Switch Pro controller.

what is wrong with having the d-pad set as individual buttons
I never got the issue with this, it removes the danger of leaning your thumb and accidentally having it register as a different direction

It's bad for fighting games.

ah okay, I haven't used the switch to play any fighting games so I wouldn't know

Electronic stores here tend to have sales like 5 for 3 which makes the price more bearable, but buying used is still king, especially for cartridges.

Not just fighting games.

Came here to post this.

Based.

FPBP

Attached: 1522859192911.webm (1104x620, 1.65M)

Is that a bad thing?

>I look at Nintendo purchases differently from PS4/Xbox because it feels like Nintendo is always fun, even when dusting off a 10 year old system.
This is the kind of brainwashing Sony or Microsoft marketing only wishes they were capable of.
I gotta hand it to Nintendo marketing department, they are doing a fantastic job brainwashing retards like this poster to this extent. If nothing else, they are excellent at this.

Dumbass, it makes fighting games easier

If Wii U Ports, which were originally released for 40 bucks instead of the usual 60, got ported to switch for flat out 60 bucks then you can be sure that it'll be 60 bucks

>user really loves his blu ray players

if it was called "no more bowsers: mario strikes back," then all the bing bings would have bought it in droves.

It's a fucking port.

Don't know why you think it's brainwashing. I started with a NES, then went SNES, Playstation, PS2, PS4 and then Switch. I can remember equally many fun titles for either system, but have the fondest memories of the SNES because muh nostalgia.

>but buying used is still king
That's true, but there's still some retards wanting consoles to go all digital (just like the XBOX ONE SAD and PSP GO) on the next gen, fuck those people.

Sony time, let's rewind a little!
PS4 is the new console on the market. The game is coming out on both PS3 and PS4. but PS4 version costs 10 dollars more. Why?

it's literally a different game made to be exactly like the old one but with graphical updates, there's no "port" part involved here, this new version had been built from the ground up
it's just like the shadow of the collosus remake and the crash remake
if it was a port, it would be emulated with the same gameboy graphics and same coding from several decades ago
fucking educate yourself

I wouldn't mind all digital consoles as long as the sales were actually sales and the game prices dropped over time. But since that isn't going to happen, fuck going digital for consoles.

It's basically what Disney do with their shit live action remakes, people go watch abominations like this new Alladdin just because of muh memories.

i.imgur.com/4Grb84C.jpg

archive.nyafuu.org/meta/thread/254205/

Attached: microdick and no money why would she ever stick around.jpg (1824x224, 70K)

Do you even play video games?

I seriously can't believe it's real.
I sure as hell won't buy this turd I can tell you that.

Attached: zelda-comparison-1-1.jpg (1310x686, 257K)

I also have fond memories of old NES and SNES games, yet I'm still not retarded enough to think that a GB remake is worth $60 just because it's made by Nintendo.
Don't know why you think it's not brainwashing.

>there's no "port" part involved here

What is it called when you take a game for one console and copy+paste it for another but make it look a little better?

remaster

pretty sure that's a remaster pham

Oh fuck, I forgot. Ignore this reply. Remaster is when other companies are involved. When it's about Nintendo, it's a port. There,

Sad that the artwork there looks fantastic but the actual graphics look like some mobile garbage.

in other words, and enhanced port.

$60 is nothing, it's going to be better than most $60 games, you're almost certainly blind to the stupid ways you spend money and probably don't care much about video games anymore.

Look at this snoynigger falseflagging like this, absolutely pathetic.

Yes, it's a good thing Link's Awakening is a remake and not a remaster though.

Just because Sony is massively retarded doesn't mean Nintendo should follow

Reminder that NO ONE likes this remake.
What were they thinking?

Attached: 1550447671538.png (1080x844, 1.33M)

>$60 is nothing, it's going to be better than most $60 games
>you're almost certainly blind
user...

But really WHO asked for this?

>complaining about a remake that you couldn't really do any other way while also remaining true to the GB version's art style and gameplay
every top down zelda game would look something like this remake if they did it

woah some dude with original game said remake is trash, for sure no one likes it
i mean i dont defend it cause its bad but the original game is bad aswell so whats the problem

Do we even have a real price for it?

>so whats the problem
That they're selling an inferior version for $60

It isn't.

Attached: 0.jpg (1770x1549, 112K)

That doesn't confirm anything. Mario Maker 2 is 40 on Amazon. 30 dollars for this game is fine.

Attached: 1550522316251.jpg (1901x1249, 751K)

how is it inferior again?
because it's not just a colorized 1:1 port?

Will the game actually be 60$ though? I'd get it if it was 40$ or less. I guess I'll have to wait for the price drop if they end up doing that

>remaining true to the GB version's art style
I don’t remember Link’s Awakening looking like a shitty claymation Kirby spin off.

You know, with how many people are pissed off about the FF7 remake being in an entirely different genre you'd think people would appreciate when developers make a faithful remake.

>buying Nintendo games in 2019 when they haven't made anything good since the SNES

Attached: 1554174330043.jpg (790x645, 189K)

Except it’s not faithful at all visually?

it's a 1:1 port except it's unbelievably hideous looking
This isn't a remake, it's a reskin, and the skin is horrendous. For $60.

>except it's unbelievably hideous looking
It look good to me. I like how they managed to capture the style of the Mouse's pictures.

Attached: 0.png (659x591, 64K)

FPBP.
McDonald's toys and literal cardboard are notable examples.

>visually
So?
One, it's a game first, faithful gameplay matters the most.
Two, very, very little remakes are recreated 1:1 visually.

>it's a reskin
You don't know what a reskin is. the game is basically redone from Scratch.

wrong

Attached: 1550335752645.png (671x375, 44K)

So you’re saying it’s not actually faithful? Cool, i’m glad we agree.

>game look bad
opinions
you fags never say what you would like the remake to look like, you just cry about it

Except it actually is.

It's a reskin. It's the exact same game but ugly.

This board is literally Yea ForumstendoGAF and I can say that as a Yea ForumstendoGAFfer

>remake
Reskin*

>you fags never say what you would like the remake to look like
PH/SS and LBW all look fine, any of those I'd be happy with.

>So you’re saying it’s not actually faithful?
I'm saying that being visually faithful would be impossible as it is and gameplay is the only thing that really matter.

I bet you also liked that Secret of Mana remake, right?

see

Attached: 0.png (1641x1475, 398K)

Can you show me an image of Link’s Awakening looking like Kirby clay shit?

Oh? You can’t? Then i guess it’s not faithful at all, cope.

This is like remaking Wario Land 2 but making everything out of yarn, it’s not faithful at all, retard.

Please stop posting, it’s embarrassing.

Not him but

If it's coded from scratch it isn't a reskin. Learn the meaning of words.

?

Attached: 1550324907656.jpg (1080x1080, 75K)

Theres still no release date, December 31st is a place holder, and I'm sure the price is too.

You people are stupid as fuck.

>Can you show me an image of Link’s Awakening looking like Kirby clay
here and here Never played that game.

God damn it, I don't even remember clicking the auto post.
Anyway what I was going to say what exactly is a faithful remake to you if gameplay is doesn't matter in the slightest?

So you’re saying it could be 80$ instead? Wouldn’t surprise me.

They want to hate it and little things like consistency isn't going to stop them.

>game has no anime sidemouth
>people hate it
but why?

Attached: 790655201685781282.jpg (320x240, 15K)

Yup , right part fyour pic look like the link in the mouse pictures alright

It's coded from scratch to play just like the original, that's even worse, it wastes money and manpower on nothing.

I won't stop calling it a reskin, that's exactly what it is, an abomination.

but it's basically that except more faithful to the GB version, what's the actual problem?

Hey Y'all

Attached: scott_the_cuck.jpg (800x450, 57K)

they charged $60 for a switch port of tropical freeze that was $20 at the time on wii u. you're out of your mind if you don't think nintendo won't charge $60 for a brand new fucking zelda game.

But that doesn’t look like it’s made of clay at all.

Do you have brain problems user?

doesn't look like clay funko shit to me, Link's also farther in those pics away so details had to be compromised. You are retarded.

>It's coded from scratch to play just like the original, that's even worse
Not really. And therefore it isn't a reskin.

>I won't stop calling it a reskin, that's exactly what it is
You just admitted it's coded from scratch. Please use words properly.

>to play just like the original
Why is this a bad thing? It's a fucking remake, it's supposed to play like the original.

>doesn't look like clay funko
The remake doesn't look funko either. And the characters in the remake look like the Link in those pics.

It's an ugly reskin.
Because it's the same game except it looks worse. And it costs $60.

have sex

with gameboy graphics

Kek you know this game will come out and get rave reviews through the roof and you'll spend the next year fucking seething about it.

Cannot wait. I'm going to buy the $150 Special Edition with cuddly Bow Wow amiibo and never open it. Then I'll buy the digital download for $60 and love every minute. Looking forward to seeing you sperg-out next week.

Attached: 1557177460828.gif (333x194, 1.78M)

It look like the exact same design as the remake.

The remake look like those Link's design given 3D form.

Brain problems, got ya.

Nope. Get your eyes checked.

>I'm retarded u mad???
lol ok

>It's an ugly reskin.
It's not a reskin. Learn the meaning of words. And not it doesn't look like a reskin at all either. You really don't know what it means.

Based af

Confession time, I really don't get why everyone is shitting on the graphics of this game.
Don't get me wrong, I was super pissed when they announced that game. Pissed they were making yet another Zelda game when so many other IPs are being left for dead. Pissed they were making yet another remake no one asked for instead of a brand new game. Pissed they were making a top down game when they've got the BOTW engine handy. Pissed they were probably gonna sell this 20 years old game 60 bucks. But I never had a problem with the graphics, in fact when I saw them i thought "Well, at least they've got a cute artstyle going for them."
When I logged on Yea Forums and saw the reaction everyone had, I thought "Just another day on Yea Forums-sonygaf" but then I saw everyone else on the internet seemed to think the same, and I got a bit confused.
I've never been this out of the loop. Can somebody explain to me what is it about those graphics that are so horrible? It honestly seems to me like it's the least of this game's many problems.

Attached: 1363111405340.jpg (680x684, 51K)

Attached: chibi vs funko pop.jpg (2184x996, 416K)

Nope.
Link in the mouse picture look like the link in the remake.

It's a really ugly reskin.

>a colorized 1:1 port
Link's Awakening DX

Why does the word “reskin” triggers you so much?

I mean, it is a reskin, reskins play exactly the same but have a different skin, thus the term reskin.

Reskin reskin

>except it looks worse
it looks exactly like a gb remake would look
your microbrain just can't accept DOF effects and cartoon color palettes on a fucking 2d zelda game

>Because it's the same game
Which is a good thing. The last thing you want with a remake is ruined gameplay like FF7.
>except it looks worse.
Which is an opinion and not fact. That said the graphics are very clearly better if just for the fact that it's in 3D and has more colors to use.
>And it costs $60.
Which is blatantly wrong. We don't know the price, it could be 60 but at the same time it could be 40 or 30.
We have to wait and see.

autism

>But I never had a problem with the graphics, in fact when I saw them i thought "Well, at least they've got a cute artstyle going for them."
some hates are trendy, it just need a few upset people with "funny" meme and people will join them to join the fun and rewrite their opinion so they can be part of the riffers.

Looks like the nincels with legit brain damage who literally soend all day on Yea Forums defending bing bings honor have arrived.

I feel pity for these subhumans, unironically.

>I mean, it is a reskin, reskins play exactly the same but have a different skin
>but have a different skin
There is the point, it's not a different skin. game remade from scratch are not reskin. Reskin require to take the old code and just put anew skin on it. This isn't the case here.

Attached: 0.png (300x330, 14K)

>it's okay to pay $60 for a 3 hour AAA walkathon
>but god fucking forbid you pay money for Dragon Quest IV just because technology
People have shit priorities when it comes to vidya.

Attached: 1551212142225.jpg (1771x1771, 287K)

Your judging something that we still don’t know much about.Wait until after E3 and then you can bitch.

>mommy only buys me one console so I have to throw shit at the others to make myself feel better
>she bought me a PS4 because I'm a big boy who likes big boy games

I'll still by it. Call me a sucker but I like the switch and I like videogames.

Can't even reason with those people, absolutely unbelievable. They'll defend a full price reskin that looks like shit.

Attached: 91508-4-59876ab2cb3f3.jpg (1059x800, 88K)

Enjoy your POP gears of war bro :)

it's an ugly reskin, just let it go
also learn English your grammar is shit

>Yea Forums is a dozen people
>top and bottom are exactly the same people

way to prove him right, lmao

You can blame Sony for that. Even Microsoft at its worst still prioritised actual games over cinematics.

I don't own a ps4.

>Can't even reason with those people, absolutely unbelievable
Except it literally like the sprites. It's the exact same proportions.

>it's an ugly reskin,
Still not a reskin. And saying it look like Funko basically means the original sprites look like Funko.

>GoW
>ps4
God you sonyfags can't do anything right.

The original looked like a cartoon not like clay.

This isn't the playstation or xbox, the switch has a fuck ton of games and a big line up coming out too.

You can bitch about the quality but Nintendo is killing it on the number of titles and first parties.

I only own a PC and Switch because of that fact (even halo is getting a PC release now).

The rise in le Grorious Nippon tribalism here has not helped. They'll suck any tiny Japanese dick just to "own the westacucks".
>bu-but Yea Forums was f-founded by weebs!
Not this kind.

are people supposed to just boycott the game because some fat ass on the internet said it looks dumb?

it's a remake of a game pretty much everyone liked, what do you expect?

Didn’t GoW won goty? Cope harder kid.

>pretends he isn't a Sonyfag
>immediately acts like one
See

Here we have a much better and more aesthetically pleasing remake on a much weaker console that isn't just a reskin.

Attached: Sealed_Cave_FFIV_DS_Battle.PNG.png (960x545, 248K)

The original wasn't in 3D. If they are going to keep the "animated" vibe, using Clay style make sense.

>what do you expect?
I'm guessing he expected BoTW but with LA or something that retarded.

Very ugly reskin.

>that isn't just a reskin
good think LA isn't a reskin either.
you just prove yourself a fool not knowing the meaning of words.

>that isn't just a reskin.
>plays the same
>same characters
>same design for everything
Sounds like a reskin to me.

Or, you know, cellshading?

>claims he doesn't have a PS4
>this makes him a sonyfag
Top logic my dude

wouldn't work when 90% of the game is viewed at the same angle

fpbp
this was clearly a 3DS game they moved to Switch and can now charge $60 for, when it should have been a $20 download title.

I like some of the nintendo exclusives but fuck them

I hope it has the content of DX and with its own version of the colour dungeon

Attached: 1430253452100.png (1295x1079, 814K)

Yeah let's just ignore the part where you went into an immediate "I don't like Sony" defense for a game that isn't on a Sony system and then thought we were talking about God of War.

>Or, you know, cellshading?

I actually prefer something different from a new reuse of toon-link, thank you. Now I would havebeen mad if they had used that.

>plays the same
Clearly you haven't played it, they introduced a shitton of new mechanics.

Attached: botw.jpg (800x450, 39K)

It's Nintendo, they rarely do remakes that don't have everything from every version plus substantial new additions.

serious question: has nintendo ever not charged full price for a zelda game?

But it had the best Metroid.

Attached: Metroid_II_US_boxart.jpg (640x640, 72K)

Ugly.
Reskin.
For $60.

>you
Try harder nig, my first post in this thread was pointing out how dumb you are.

the colour dungeon wasn't very good anyway, I won't mind if they decide not to include it
and the reward made the rest of the game too easy

If they keep the picture collection quest, I hope they get an alternate pic for the store to be able to beat the game without being called a THIEVE.

Like getting a picture of yourself and the Happy Merchant when you buy the bow with "My best customer" as a the title of it.

Literally unplyable,you can’t see 2 feet in front of you.

Fuck off to /vr/ if you want cool boomer points.

Yeah the handheld games, of which this is one. But since the Switch is a hybrid they can put a $60 tag on it.

>they introduced a shitton of new mechanics.
Outside of Whyt? Not really, unless of course your only exposure to 4 was FF2.

>Reskin.
You don't know what that word means.

Attached: 0.jpg (480x360, 18K)

These are the same people who spam smash threads because they don't want it on the board. Don't try to make sense of their shitposting.

You really haven't played it have you?
The whole skill swap system and new game+ing with certain skills is entirely new.

>on a much weaker console
?

>Make a reskin
>charge $60
>fans defend it
Man some series sure have it easy.

Nah it was fucking shit
1 was harder than the original for that shit alone while 2 and 3 were actually easier because of the slide working stupidly well with the shitty platforming

So you only played FF2.

>Big Marring Maker
based lmao

>Flood the board with shit for an entire year and then claim it was all a falseflag by another fanbase.

Absolutely amazing, i’m guessing the 500 replies on each thread were all snoys and Pc.ucks too?

Seek help.

>remake metroid 2
>WTF IT DOESN'T LOOK LIKE SUPER SO IT'S SHIT
>$60? THAT'S TOO EXPENSIVE

Yes, the Nintendo DS is weaker than the Nintendo Switch.
This is new to the DS version, neither the PS nor GBA versions have it.

Do you think they'll add a hardmode like with Windwaker HD?

>i’m guessing the 500 replies on each thread
500?
They barely reached 20 before they dropped off and you lot went to /qa/ with "evidence". Hell, even mods called you out on your shit.

Tell me user, have you played any version?

>Remake Metroid 2
>Change the artstyle to wool
>WHAT THE FUCK IT’S TRUE TO THE ORIGINAL! It LOOKED LIKE WOOL TOO!!! SEE THAT METROID? HERE’S A SCREENSHOT SEE? SEE HOW IT’S MADE OF WOOL?
*Doesn’t look like it’s made of wool at all*

>OH MAN THIS GAME LOOKS LIKE BLAND SHIT
>CAN'T WAIT TO WASTE MY TIME BY PIRATING IT ANYWAY
Just pirate a game you're actually interested in at that point, pirating a game you don't like out of principle just makes you look like a 12 year old
Y'know what, fuck you, I'm turning this into a Hex Mania thread

Attached: 1556306039070.jpg (881x938, 72K)

>Yes, the Nintendo DS is weaker than the Nintendo Switch.
i was confused because i assumed you meat the DS was weaker than the SNES for some reason.

>wwhd had it
>tphd had it
>MM3D had it
>ALBW had it
>BOTW had it
I don't think it will.

I own all of them.

Living in your head must be amazing when you can just imagine random shit and end up believing it.

>Do retards forget Zelda is for kids?
Retards are very easy to fool.

Attached: 1459486029844.jpg (640x901, 98K)

if you'd stop letting your mommy buy all of your games, you'd realuze that its a matter of principle instead of money
sure I can waste 60 bucks on this glorified gameboy color port, or I could buy better things

Attached: 1557555264394.jpg (1260x1800, 735K)

Sure you do.

what's wrong with wool nigga?
you're changing a 10 pixel sprite into 3d graphics, something's going to change at some point

wool metroid would be pretty neat

Well when you put it like that, I feel silly

Attached: 1531806633387.jpg (499x498, 65K)

>being this casual
How about you fuck off to Reddit instead?

Prove me wrong then if you think I'm mistaken.

Attached: _hex_maniac_pokemon_pokemon_game_and_pokemon_xy_drawn_by_genkillua_03e1ca125e790c2fdf5a1932d9f7473f. (1117x1593, 917K)

when is this out again? sept?

How about you fuck off to /vr/ instead? Boomer.

It's okay, it happens to the best of us especially in threads like these.

Attached: 1557550677939m.jpg (623x1024, 69K)

Prove you don't own a game?
I don't think you know how proof works.

I see someone is lost.

Attached: 1487959754133.png (800x820, 445K)

Attached: D43Lj9NXkAAeMCE.jpg_orig_0.jpg (860x1204, 89K)

Crash was shit mate.

I do remember Final Fantasy IV's groundbreaking 1991 3D graphics, yes.

Attached: _hex_maniac_pokemon_pokemon_game_and_pokemon_xy_drawn_by_yuguraniru_4e69263e4f4cd3101531c4145a276b64 (1128x1507, 777K)

Original game was a tech demo only praised by Kojima faggots and DEEP diarrhea eaters (AKA sonyfags). LA is one of the most loved zelda games.

user please stop embarrassing yourself.

Attached: skills.jpg (896x192, 69K)

Not him but they only added augments, restricted equipment and removed some things the gba version had which aren't major changes. The game still plays exactly the same with the same ATB combat.

Okay?
What is this supposed to prove? At best it's now a reskin

Attached: 1555315982731.jpg (784x1132, 161K)

He's not the one saying ff4 isn't ATB.

>Okay?
>What is this supposed to prove?
That you haven't played the games while pretending I didn't, and that's really cringe.

Attached: 1554250313887.jpg (550x700, 43K)

I never said that.

Yeah you did when you said it didn't play the same. Do you think a small amount of minor changes can alter the core of a game or something?

Attached: 1503283740476.jpg (1157x1636, 218K)

Yikes.

>Nincels can’t take it anymore
Sad

Dude, you had to go to a wiki for that of all things and you still didn't prove it played differently.

>exact same insult as before
>telling someone old enough to post on Yea Forums to fuck off
At least get some new material for your next post.

Attached: boomer.jpg (700x695, 117K)

No I didn't, I said it added new mechanics, and yes it changes a lot obviously, it's like having 10 new tools in Link's awakening.
I only had to because you didn't know what you were talking about.

>and is one of the best remakes ever made.
>no new content
>broken physics
>ruined lighting
>doesn't even have Ico like the last port
Yeah you got Jew'd hard with that one.

I think he means "will it not be DLC this time?"

>No I didn't, I said it added new mechanics
Yeah, in an attempt to claim it played differently. But you know what? You can still play it like it's the original FF4 which is exactly why it's such a minor change to the gameplay.

Using your logic a new gun in CoD makes it an entirely new genre.

I will buy two copies because of this thread.

user, it was only DLC in one of those games.

Seething boomer

>$60

Prove it

I guess that was my bad then, I didn't mean to say it plays like an entirely different game.

>LITERALLY no argument
Cope.

Maybe you should read before you post next time retard.

But instead of 2 oracles they are the 3 games that were originally planned.

it's only chump change if you're a chump

Nah, you wont
>Prove it
How about you cope?

YAAAARGHHH!

>reskin defense force

Attached: 1497700919608.png (546x432, 283K)

What reskin?

cope

You still need to give me an argument besides the 2008 hilariously old and cringey “casual” insult, boomer.

Please explain how not being able to see 2 feet in front of you “hardcore” and fun and not just unplayable.

Putrid indie garbage, Nintendo may as well just release the CD-i games for the switch at this point. They clearly don’t respect their IPs

I will, keep seething tranny.

No seriously, what reskin?

Can confirm, i intend to buy yhis despite fullu understanding that it is a ripoff. If it was called anything other than Zelda i almost certainly wouldnt have given it a seconds thought. Nintendo has me by the balls.

Have sex.

If you want a new 2D Zelda game to play try Golden Axe warrior on a Master system emulator

VOTE NOW BROS
strawpoll.me/18108834

strawpoll.me/18108834

strawpoll.me/18108834

Attached: ec3.png (1400x1400, 130K)

True. Nintendo fans are insufferable manchildren and every time I think they can’t get any more pathetic they prove me wrong.
Pic related:it’s the average Nintendo fanboy

Attached: CA67A0AB-212C-4D7A-865E-5C64FBF873A1.jpg (101x125, 3K)

You'd be complaining about something else if it was priced at 40$

What's the issue? Most remakes are full price. RE2 was. FF7R will be. If you don't want to pay, you don't have to.

Yes, the latest one.
I think you can gather what that means.

Links awakening is a short game so you won’t be getting much play time for what you’ve paid for. If they included ALBW with it I’d buy it

They'd be complaining about it if it were free.
This isn't a board for Nintendo discussion.

That it won't be DLC because the trend is being in the base game.

How come our mods haven’t deleted this thread already? They usually do when the first post insults Mario’s honor.

What the fridge mods???!!!

Attached: 87FCBE70-D7C9-4B59-A16A-096483E08043.png (808x805, 415K)

>mods
>deleting Nintendo shitposting threads
HA.
Because they can't ban you idiots they just leave them up now.

>This isn't a board for Nintendo discussion.
That is true. This is 4channel, a ResetERA colonization of Yea Forums.
...for now.

Attached: 1488667140152.png (501x585, 17K)

I know fellow nincel, we need to do something about it.

Time for another discord chat with /ninmods/?

>...for now.
...for ever.

And? It's not just some lazy port.

Attached: 0287340-8213.png (1877x807, 2.35M)

Dude, you have people calling it a reskin because it's faithful to the gameplay.
There's no rational discussion to be had here.

Genealogy of the Holy War remake when

Cope

Attached: 09281304823.png (1576x648, 1.18M)

They could have at least given it a prettier reskin fucking YIKES

and pcfags are the same but even worse.
every thing down to the mouse and keyboard are company wars.

the question is now that everyone is aware of "it"
why do people perpetuate the "wars" then?

Cope

Attached: Untitled.png (1589x644, 1.05M)

Imagine degrading yourself just to spite some rando on Yea Forums lmao at your life

It's that why good games like Titanfall 2 sold like shit?

did you make all these just to shill the reskin in a thread on Yea Forums?

No it wasn't. The hitboxes and physics are objectively fucked.

People have shit priorities when it comes to anything.
People were a mistake.

Cope

Attached: 987219374.png (1873x828, 2.27M)

And Color Splash, Tennis Ultra and Codename Steam to name a few.
But apparently not for games like Days Gone and Detroit. Funny how that works.

It is if you know your file's egg route.

AHAHAHAHA

Cope

Attached: 02304823.png (1555x650, 1.75M)

60 dollars for a reskin of a gameboy game is pretty ridiculous my man
To compare Sonic Mania was 30 for buttloads of new content

I don't think you know what a reskin is user. They would have to build this game from scratch from the ground up because of the age of the original game.

Attached: 109384901273491724.gif (320x240, 1.83M)

>reskin of a gameboy game
Huh?
The gameboy couldn't do 3D you know.

>To compare Sonic Mania was 30 for buttloads of new content
Well yeah, it was a real reskin.

Whats even the purpose then? Why would I pay 60 dollars for a game I already played but now in 3D?

It is, but they'll buy it anyways even though they could just emulate the non-ugly version
Can't wait For Oracles and Ages remake to look exactly like this garbage OH BOY

i hope not but it wouldnt surprise me
if it is im not buying it

Remember back when Iwata knew better than to sell you mediocre games for $60? During the Wii U era certain games like Game & Wario and Kirby and the Rainbow Curse retailed for $40, because that's what those games were really worth. I'm sure the Wii U flailing like a fish out of water gasping for air also had something to do with it, but generally speaking he knew better than to nickel and dime consumers.

Now that Shitaro Fuckuwara is in charge, he's gonna jew the fuck out of you with the Switch Tax. It doesn't matter how crappy or insignificant the game is content wise, you WILL pay those 60 dollars like a good little Nintenlet. This game would have definitely been $40 on the Wii U, or hell just on the 3DS, since it was definitely a 3DS game originally, all they did was upscale it and add bloom + blur.

Attached: 1552588348732.png (1322x905, 392K)

I haven't played it though. Also if you have played it and liked it a full on remake of it with modern hardware is never a bad thing.

Attached: boxing.webm (1280x720, 1.42M)

Some people spend $500 on mobile games. This is nothing

The new content they'll most likely add?
The improved graphics?
The lower price point?
Everything?

NO MAN IT'S ZELDA IT'S TOTALLY DIFFERENT NOT A RESKIN BTW

Correct but stop yelling pls user.

I'm not going to get it though.

Why not just buy the cheaper time proven original? Not all remakes are good and most end up being pretty shit and inferior to the original. Look at Majora's mask.

>The new content they'll most likely add?
I'll wait until there's actual confirmation of anything substantial
>The improved graphics?
>Being a graphics whore in 2019
>The lower price point?
Huh?
>Everything?
You mean nothing?

Attached: Screenshot_2019-06-04 Amazon com Link's awakening.png (262x450, 143K)

>I'll wait until there's actual confirmation of anything substantial
Then do it? There's a reason why I said "most likely" and not definitely.
>Being a graphics whore in 2019
That's not what graphics whoring is. Graphics whoring is when you ONLY care about the graphics and thing that it's what makes or breaks the game like you and your reskin nonsense for instance.
>Huh?
What do you "huh" it's probably going to be 40 if not lower.

I forget that shitty blur is in the game and everything looks lifeless and plain now

corporations have replaced the institution of the church for millennials

>Why not just buy the cheaper time proven original?

I'm probably not going to get either one because I'm not a big fan of Zelda. But the remake does still appeal to me somewhat and buying a game on Gameboy isn't exactly convenient. Or cheap either unless there's a virtual console version available that I'm not aware of.

>Why not just buy the cheaper time proven original?
Not him but for one it's going to be woefully obsolete just for the fact that you have more that two usable buttons in the remake.

Links awakening DX is on the eshop. It’s the definitive way to play it

>Then do it? There's a reason why I said "most likely" and not definitely.
I doubt there will be anything substantial. Nintendo isn't known for putting quality content into remakes.
>That's not what graphics whoring is. Graphics whoring is when you ONLY care about the graphics and thing that it's what makes or breaks the game like you and your reskin nonsense for instance.
That absolutely is what graphics whoring is. You're using graphics as a selling point to grossly overpay for a remake when the cheaper original exists. I'm not saying the games reskin breaks the game for me, I'm saying the reskin being so far the only tangible thing being brought to the table over the original is what breaks buying this remake for me.
>What do you "huh" it's probably going to be 40 if not lower.
Still more expensive than a refurbished LA at 30 bucks, and it being 40 bucks is unlikely when every retailer lists it as 59.99.

Ask and ye shall receive

Why does a game that was built for two buttons need more than two buttons?

Attached: Screenshot_2019-06-04 Amazon com link's awakening.png (255x384, 100K)

So who is going to be the Jesus that gets people to stop listening to them?

>Nintendo isn't known for putting quality content into remakes.
user, they're usually the only ones to do that nowadays. Even with their ports they put in a substantial amount of new and quality content.
There's only one company that doesn't and saying it might trigger you.
>That absolutely is what graphics whoring is.
Again, graphics whoring is when you ONLY care for the graphics not when graphics are being used as a selling point in conjunction with gameplay changes.
>when every retailer lists it as 59.99
That's what we call a placeholder. It was the same for Mario Maker and it ended up being 40.

>user, they're usually the only ones to do that nowadays. Even with their ports they put in a substantial amount of new and quality content.
>There's only one company that doesn't and saying it might trigger you.
Gonna have to disagree with you there. Starfox 3D is the only notable port in recent years that comes to mind where the base was improved. Every other thing they've done has either not done anything notable or butchered the source.
>Again, graphics whoring is when you ONLY care for the graphics not when graphics are being used as a selling point in conjunction with gameplay changes.
What gameplay changes?
>That's what we call a placeholder. It was the same for Mario Maker and it ended up being 40.
40 is still too much for aesthetic changes.

>Starfox 3D is the only notable port in recent years that comes to mind where the base was improved.
Of all the games you pick, you choose the one that didn't have many new features or anything.
Not MK8D with a new mode, several new racers, new items, mechanical changes.
Not SM64 DS with three new unique characters, 30 new stars and 36 minigames.
Not Zero Mission which was an entirely new game.
Not Wind Waker with Master mode, a revised Triforce hunt and new items like the Swift Sail.

You picked Star Fox which was just a graphics update.

>What gameplay changes?
The ones that usually come with Nintendo remakes along with the additional buttons that a Zelda game always needs unless you want to play menu navigator.

>40 is still too much for aesthetic changes.
Said the person who just praised Star Fox for being an aesthetic change.