Why can't normalfag commirfornians distinguish fiction from reality abd why do they have to force that mental...

Because murrcucks are mentally retarded

No the writer messed up it should say "limited in"

Attached: americans.jpg (500x110, 27K)

Only in non censony versions.

I feel like we have failed as consumers by not making it clear, earlier on, before the precedent was set - that we would not accept censorship.

Everything from now on is going to be censored, and it's going to get worse and worse. Eventually everything will be heavily censored directly while it is being developed, and we won't even know about it.

VR will be marred by extreme censorship, particularly. And it could've been something really special if that weren't the case.

ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/CRC/Guidelines/USA.pdf

> The United States prefers use of the terms “women and men” and “girls and boys” to “gender” in appropriate situations where they provide greater clarity and focus in the Draft Guidelines


> Paragraph 63 states that “‘simulated explicit sexual activities’ should be interpreted as including any material, online or offline, that depicts or otherwise represents any person appearing to be a child engaged in real or simulated sexually explicit conduct and realistic and/or virtual depictions of a child engaged in sexually explicit conduct.” As noted above, such visual depictions are typically protected by the First Amendment (unless the visual depictions are obscene) and the United States’ obligations under the ICCPR. As a result, this language could complicate bilateral law enforcement engagement where other States expect the United States to investigate or prosecute leads based on activity that is not criminal and in fact protected expression in the United States. We suggest editing the paragraph as follows: “‘simulated explicit sexual activities’ should be interpreted, consistent with their national legal systems, as including any material, online or offline, that depicts or otherwise represents any person appearing to be a child engaged in real or simulated sexually explicit conduct and realistic and/or virtual depictions of a child engaged in sexually explicit conduct.”

Don't confuse a vocal minority with an entire country.

Can we just saw off commiefornia and let them be their own nation in the pacific?

What the fuck is this post? No one was talking about the legality of loli.

Why americans are so bad at reading?
Looks like the RETARDO is real.

...