Can we finally admit that he was right all along

It's amazing how some of you are so willing to revise history. Thompson absolutely wanted to ban violent video games. To say otherwise means you weren't around for it, or you're being intentionally dishonest.

did you even read the post? he never wanted to ban anything. That was something made up to "hurdur da conservatuve christians r comin for a games hyuk"
Meanwhile the same fags pushing this hoax were actually coming for our games.

False. He never did and was incapable of. He was literally a scapegoat to bash christians by liberals.

>based conservative lunatic did no wrong!
>only the left want to come for your games
Idiot

Shit game shit series

>use a lone crank to create an entire false conspiracy theory about christians banning games (and it never happened)
>compared to
>widespread liberal censorship
Which one actually happened?

Retard how dishonest do you want to be? Want lone guy doesn't represent millions.

>want
one*

While the christians never did get any vidya banned, Jack Thompson did attempt to keep Bully from getting released and did try to get Manhunt banned. You can hate what the liberals are doing to censor shit without stooping down to defending Jack Thompson. He may not have been able to get anything done, but that wasn't for lack of trying.

people are mad at thompson because he actually brought up good points and actually had success in other areas.
Also really ironic that leftists hate him since he was specifically going after corporate degeneracy peddling.

>/pol/ now supports video game censorship
i remember when we were just a bunch of libertarians wanting to play video games in peace and say nigger.

>manhunt
Yeah well this isn't suprising manhunts subject matter is banned all over the world.
But his specific issue with video games was kids getting access to the mature ones.
Which is completely reasonable.
It's bizarre how in all these discussions that there are fags insisting kids get access to adult stuff.
This is exactly why censorship happens.

He was literally used as a scapegoat by the kike media, while they and their tranny pets do the same thing. It’s what they always do. He was never a danger to vidya.

Now left and right both want to censor video games and it's starting with Sony. Hopefully they ban guns in video games next.

Praise Jesus.

exacly. For fuck sake Thompson is literally a lefty and proto-sjw he is one of them.
Absolute scapegoat.

Women in video games set an unrealistic standard of beauty no real women can compete with and gross losers I would never sleep with would rather ogle them than me but I don't want to look at me since I'm more than a sex object, also have sex incel

I'm rightwing and i don't want games censored at all.
What i want is for kids parents to be fined everytime they complain their kid is playng a mature game.

>implying leftists care about him at all and everyone obsessed with hating him in the 00s were not libertarian gamer bros
m-muh american binary political positions

>Right
>Children should not play M rated games
>Left
>Vidya addiction is a disease! State-mandated trannies are the future.

Jesus, indeed.

i'm not american candyboy

No he wasnt. However he is a lesser evil compared to the bullshit we deal with today, as if that hasnt been said 30 times in this thread alone. Ill take 10 of him over a single discord tranny any day.

No. Censorship is bullshit, doesn't matter if it's the left or right advocating for it.

>Tfw mass shooters are inspired by Facebook memes more than violent video games

He wasn't right at all. Games don't make you violent, not on their own. For kids to actually become violent people they'd have to suffer traumatic events in the past or grow up in a family where such violence is normal. Like if you were a kid and saw your dad beating your mum every tuesday night, that's a quick fucking way to become a violent person yourself. Video games will NEVER have that kind of impact on developing minds. Even if you banned them it wouldn't change jack shit, it's just pointless moral grandstanding.

It's virtue signalling plain and simple.
Both side whine baout "protectin muh children's" to justify their feels.

>State-mandated trannies are the future.
What sort of word salad is this?

Attached: 1352879453372.jpg (1000x750, 280K)

He was. Every M rated game is now filled with literal 5 year old trash, while the hip jewish left, wants to ban tits through a system of social and financial destruction. I want him back.

entire argument is moot kids shouldn't have access to adult games.

>Not recognized as a disease anymore.
>Children removed from parents by the state for attempting to prevent underage transition.

He’s right.

retard. If you dont protect the kids you know who loses?
Adults.
We no longer get our gritty crime dramas with rape and drugs and tits everywhere etc.

The Moral Right of the early 2000s could only dream of the level of damage (with popular societal support) done to the once shunned spheres of gaming and comics. We sure let the wrong guys win

State enforced homosexuality

Attached: 1556603517849.jpg (960x1199, 233K)

Lol what a totally accurate portrayal and totally not just an obviously biased one-sided strawman!

Seriously though what's with this whole narrative that addiction to video games is unbelievable when people are litterally letting their babies and themselves die because they're so obsessed with gaming?

That's just the thing, there used to be a lot more overlap between leftists and libertarians. Back in 2000 if you said that you were a free speech absolutist, that you advocated racial colorblindness, and that we should seek to improve relations with Russia so there aren't so many proxy wars, you'd get called a pinko bleeding-heart hippie communist sympathizer. Now every single one of the aforementioned opinions is considered "alt-right dogwhistle" at best and "literal Nazi" at worst.

>I get my news from Yea Forums spam threads
Don't let autistic people create your world

Accomodation for != forcing you to be.

You can, but just limit it. Also it's really important to actually sit down with your kids and talk about them too and tell them that the things that happen in these games are not okay to do in real life. Most of these things I think I can fairly blame on shit parenting.

>Medical definition s change with time and increase dunderstanding
>B-b-but day disgarees with muh feels so it's a clown world conspiracy and gamers are opressed and nee to rise up!

I heard that he’s in a prison school teaching prisoners, is that true?

Seriously though what's with this whole narrative that gender dysphoria is unbelievable when people are litterally letting their babies and themselves die because they're so obsessed with their gender?

dilate

Jack Thompson is nowhere near as bad as the SJWs that took up his mantle. I actually miss the old fuck.

Attached: 1559361873404.jpg (1044x1747, 178K)

You're the retard that's completely missing the point.
EVERYONE virtue signals that they're just protecting kids regardless of it it's true. It's just an excuse.
Even for those who truely believe they're protecting kids there's someone with an opposing and mutually exclusive view that believes they're just protecting kids too.

learn to code

Dunno but that sounds pretty wholesome.

See:
Taking your children away because a school teacher says Jimmy wants to be a girl is not accommodating. It’s state mandated sexual abuse.

That doesn't even make sense. Gender dysphoria is classified as a sexual disorder now, not that an illiterate like you would've known that.

State
Enforced
Homosexuality

Attached: 1535579901368.jpg (497x476, 41K)

Kek

I repeat kids should not have access to adult material. Adults are the losers if this is accepted.
It's irresponsible parenting and ratchets up censorship.

Now if kids do get access they should stfu about it and so should their parents or get fined an idiot tax.

Someone triggering me with their existence is litterally tell same as the government holding me down and forcing me to suck cock!

Dunderstanding, indeed.

>people are litterally letting their babies and themselves die because they're so obsessed with their gender
Wut

And the “treatment” provided to even underaged children is statistically unproven to work and often results in death. Oops.

No retard. Read carefully. It isn't about virtue signalling.
It is about separating adult material from kids material.
If you don't do that there is no adult material.
Id really like to know who exactly you autistic fucks are that dont get this.
I can guess though.

No we don't. Also, /pol/ unironically has better vidya threads than Yea Forums. Most of the boomers there have fond memories of playing games like Dungeon Keeper, Mortal Kombat, Fallout 1/2, and Wolfenstein.

There's also significantly less console warring and crying Wojaks.

>"based conservative lunatic" wasn't taken seriously by anyone and didn't accomplish anything at all
>far-left sjws actually get games censored and banned
really makes you think.

>Letting kids be gay is the same as forcing them to be gay
By that logic letting you be a huge shitposting faggot is the same as forcing you to fuck dudes.

I get my news from Tim Pool and Chris Chappell, though.

Attached: chris-chappell2[1].jpg (590x350, 98K)

>Latching onto typos: for when you don't have a real argument!

Attached: DF868E4D-3A18-4452-BA6E-EB886183A4BE.jpg (640x841, 88K)

>statistically unproven to work and often results in death.
It's literally still more effective than any other treatment

>oh jimmy are you playing with your sister's doll? well, off comes the penis

>There's also significantly less crying Wojaks.
So you guys never have Bannerlord threads then?

No, it isn’t. Statistically, no treatment is actually better and results in better survival rates.

Read the words I am posting, you illiterate retard.
Contradictory mutually exclusive positions get justified under "protectin muh kids".
I am litterally not saying that there are no positions legitimately motivated by protecting kids or that kids shouldn't be protected from porn and adult content but everyone uses the same stupid excuse whether it's applicable or not.

People both for and against children being trannies claim they're acting in the kid's interest.

inb4 tranny cope stats

Very few games are actually rated for adults. M15 isn't "adult material" despite most games being rated around there. You can't feasibly stop kids from getting their on mature rated games so you might as well actually try to do proper parenting and talk to them about the games and what happens in them.

He already provided an argument based on statistics and government interference. You only care about feelings.

I thought there was nothing wrong with being gay?

Attached: 1535427140472.png (500x575, 216K)

How many times does a child see someone die in a piece of media before they've hit puberty?

How many times does a child see sexual content in a piece of media before they've hit puberty?

What is the effect of this on the developing brain?

Letting someone be allowed to choose what they want to do is feelings? I thought there was this whole concept of "personal freedom."

USA seriously has a jewish problem.

For fuck sake you are low iq and an idiot.
Kys censorship fag.
My position is tat of an adult that wants no censorship at all fullstop. I want access to stuff intended for me as an adult with the artists work not edited in any way, No covered up women, no translations that censor difficult subjects.
Fuck you and your stupid low iq posting.

Wait so what should they have done?
A nurse mistook them for pregnant, like could happen with cis women too, and as a result proper care wasn't provided.
Is there any indication that the tranny knew they were pregnant and somehow didn't act properly because of gender shit or whatever?

Seriously I'm not trying to deny the possibility of your claims but you haven't really posted enough to support what youre claiming yet.

no the solution is to fine adults a couple of hundred bucks if they let their kids get access to material above their age.

Aside from the fact that srs isn't just chopping off dicks and calling it a day, kids don't get srs.
Your fears and supposed issues with it aren't based on reality, they're based on a strawman you've made up out of your own feelings.

>words words words
i thought it was the left that couldn't meme

And how the hell are you going to determine that?

why are you so fucking retarded? the user isn't talking about trannies at all and you are ranting about them.
You are responding to the wrong anons.
Not everyone is the same user you faggot retard.

Letting an underaged child choose, while having the power of the state behind them is not libertarianism. The right to chose is also a privilege. If said choice, results in mass suicide, it should not be interfered with, in any fashion, by the state.

Good. American "Christianity" is pure cancer.

no they don't get srs they get put on HRT and paraded around on national TV like the freak show they are in preparation for srs that they absolutely will receive at a later date, their "parents" will make sure of it. So yes, jimmy touches his siter's doll he loses his penis

when they open their mouths to complain their kids has titty ninja whores 2 r18+ dur

>statistics
Where?
Not in that reply chain I responded to.
I haven't said shit about feelings, you're just projecting that out of cowardice so you have a simple defenseless strawman to attack.

There's less than 100 words in the entire comic

No child should ever be on any form of extreme hormonal treatment. The fact that anyone argues in the favor of this is scientifically unsound.

Didn't say there was, maybe try working on your literacy instead of just projecting your feels.

>Aside from the fact that srs isn't just chopping off dicks and calling it a day,

Ah, you're right, I stand corrected. What they actually do is turn your penis inside out and stuff it up inside an open flesh wound so you can still "orgasm" despite the fact that your genitals are completely destroyed.

Sounds like a pretty nonsense law to me

this is how most laws work. Its innocent until proven guilty you silly shit.

Literally googled it. First result. No treatment is better than treatment.

Attached: 121C96ED-40F7-4C0F-827E-96E2F8152A26.png (798x464, 28K)

I looked it up. It's not real.

You keep projecting that I'm the idiot but you're the one who's apparently incapable of reading simple English.
Nowhere did I advocate for censorship, you retard. Stop emotionally flailing at your own oversensitive imagination and respond to what I'm actually saying.

My entire and sole point is that "protectin muh kids" is meaningless. People both for and against censorship both claim they're doing it for the kids.

Nah it's just nonsense because of how infeasible it is to actually fine someone. A lot of it just relies on assumptions.

underage b&

you are literally babbling on about trannies like a moron and i didn't say anything about it.
Fuck you idiot.

That's 100 too many.

1) you have zero reading comprehension.
2) you aren't reading others posts
3) you are talking about irrelevent strawmans.

user literally said they want no censorship.
Its peole like you that increase censorship by not resoecting boundries because you are mentally impaired and socially impaired.

I'm not ranting about trannies I only brought them up as an example because others were whining about them.

Trannies are completely irrelevant to my point.
READ nigger.

>If said choice, results in mass suicide, it should not be interfered with, in any fashion, by the state
Wait what are you trying to argue here?
That the state shouldn't support trannies because you think letting them transition will result in mass suicide? You know the 40% meme is lifetime attempts, right? It doesn't control for before/after transition.

It has nothing to do with what i'm saying that is another topic you filthy stupid shit,
And your fallacy that i'm pro-censorship for wanting adult material out of kids hands is so fucking stupid it is insulting.
You are a simpleton.

can you just stop posting you clearly are way over your head.

The fact that there are people transitioning that are on mental disability status should tell anyone what they need to know about current “western medical science”.

t. a tranny

It literally does and yes, trannies should not be celebrated in any fashion for their own good.

>paraded around on national TV
How often really though? There's like one with a TV show.
Yeah media likes to virtue signal and fake support for whatever new bs but that doesn't nessecarily reflect on the things they cover. Trannies are just the new gays to be new and weird and hip and show how progressive you are.
>preparation for srs that they absolutely will receive
Except not all of them do. Anti transition advocates love to point to that one study about desistance rates.
Your argument is entirely based on speculation and fear mongering about what you FEEL will happen.

The entire point would be to stop people saying muh kids as a justification to censor games.
Since admitting you bought your kids adult material would be a crime.

I’d add onto this user’s statement that also for the good of others. Trannism is becoming a dangerous trend, pushed by people who are diagnosed mentally unstable.

No, he isn't.

What is "extreme"? You're not referring to any actual medical measures or definitions, just using buzzwords to fear-monger. Any tretament sounds worse when you describe it as EXTREME!
Furthermore you haven't actually provided any evidence or logic based justification of why your feels should be the rule, just insisted they should be.
You project that anyone who disagrees with you is "scientifically unsound" but there's nothing scientific about your opinion, it's just your personal feelings.

I honestly doubt it'll even stop that. They'll still try and censor them. It won't stop kids from lying about their age on steam to buy R18 video games. It'll just turn their attention to how kids gain access to it. So they'll just try and fuck with internet filters or censorship.

The best solution to this whole thing is just being a better parent. Talk to your kids about these things, regulate the time they spend on video games and implement blocks if necessary, just take the time to sit down with them and get involved. It's really not that hard and it doesn't cost anything. All the fines in the world aren't gonna stop shitty parents from being shitty.

>Literally googled it. First result
Ooooook thanks for the pic but you didn't tell me any terms to Google or anything just claimed that "he"(who?) had already posted stats(despite none existing in that reply chain) and that I was just ignoring it because I only care about feels.
We weren't even talking about suicide rates in the part of the conversation I was a part of, we we're talking about changing definitions of illness.

Seriously it seems like YOU are the one who misread the conversation or read the wrong post and got confused.

>No treatment is better than treatmen
LOL, ummm you don't seem to understand your own stats. Try reading that again, it's a lifetime attempt rate. It does not show weather attempts happened before or after treatment.

At least post the latest stats

Attached: 1550487386403.jpg (1476x721, 294K)

It'd work because it'd force parents to act responsibly and the "muh kids" wouldn't be used to as a justifucation for censorship just as it isn't
See the issue is think of the kids by respecting that adults get access to matre stuff and kids don't the argument of muh kids becomes neutralised.
Just like no one uses it for censoring adult movies.
The entire issue is people still insist on labelling games as for kids.

The issue is parents are acting irresponsible and buying their kids games they shouldn't or otherwise letting them get access.
So naturally if parents or people want to use protecting kids as an argument this should fall on the parents and they should be responsible.
Fine them and they are now responsible.

I only mentioned trannies as an example because other people were talking about them.
Stop trying to deflect and make this about trannies, coward. Trannies are irellevant to my point.

I am not advocating for censorship, illiterate retard. My point is that both those for and against censorship(or really any topic)claim it's all about protecting kids.

>then the man births a stillborn baby
Thank god.

>i mentioned trannies
>because others are talking about them
>don't deflect..

Holy shit you are a moron fuck off. Stop arguing about things beyond your intelligence you underage little shit.

>1) you have zero reading comprehension.
>2) you aren't reading others posts
>3) you are talking about irrelevent strawmans
>Le I'm rubber and you're glue
Lol you're litterally just repeating the things I accused others of and saying "no u".
WHERE did I post a single strawman??
I'll wait.

>user literally said they want no censorship.
And I did not disagree although illiterate retards like you seem to be imagining that I did.
Seriously, quote ANYWHERE where I advocated for censorship?

You have to be over 18+ to post here

Take yourself as a case study. Did you ever feel life shooting up a school after playing CoD?

>your fallacy that i'm pro-censorship for wanting adult material out of kids hands
WHERE?
Where the fuck did I say or imply anything like that?
You are either confusing me with another user or you are litterally so upset that you've become delusional and are imagining things that aren't there.

READ NIGGER

>The 40% rate does not control for before/after transition and therefore says nothing about it's efficacy
>Yeah but 40%
Is English not your first language? Why is reading so hard for so many itt?

Just admit you want preteen boys on puberty blockers in order to satisfy you trap fetish you sick fuck. The /r9k/ discord leaks revealed as much about how you trannies think.

Look you are stupid we get that. The point is your attitude is leading to censorship as companies are not differentiating kids from adults.
They are censoring mature games using the lids are going to access them justification.
If adults were actually respected this wouldn't happen and kids were denied access to these games.

essentially user is arguing what you can't articulate because you are stupid.

>Reeeestop using big words!
You fuck off.
You skimmed my posts and started accusing me off all sorts of shit I never said. At this point I assume you're being retarded on purpose for desperate attention.

Despite your claims, nowhere did I advocate for censorship, you are either lying or delusional.
>underage
Bitch I'm 28 and posting from my own home.
See this is your whole problem, you're such a brainlet coward that you're incapable of arguing against actual people and what they say so you have to invent this stand-in strawman in your head that's easier to attack.

You literal retard the point is keep games oit if kids hands so the muh kids argument can't be used.
And stop saying adults are "censorship lovin conservatives" for wanting their entertainment left alone you partisan moron.

fucking read you subhuman holy shit. Just try it. Stop kneejerk replying like a tard.
You underage dumb cunt.

>Can't post a single example of supposed strawman or advocation for censorship
>I stead just throws out a desperate strawman insult to deflect
I'm 28, kid.
Go ahead and report me for underage posting if you're so sure I'm underage, just remember false reports result in a ban :^)

you speak like a dumb teenager with simpsons level rhetoric.
By the way i'm older than you literallly and in mental age.

>Just admit you're litterally my strawman so I don't have to strains my twi braincells trying to address what you actually say

I think the big difference between censorship now and then is that it used to be regressive. There was always a risk of a game getting banned or censored for being too violent, but it didn't change the overall direction we were moving in. Video games and other media would try to push the boundaries, and conservatives would try to push back.

Now censorship is progressive. Things that were always fine suddenly aren't fine anymore. You can look back at stuff from just a decade or two ago and say "they wouldn't get away with that now". It's scary because censorship isn't moving against the trajectory, it is the trajectory.

>The point is your attitude is leading to censorship
What "attitude"?
Seriously point out where specifically I advocated for anything that would lead to censorship?
>They are censoring mature games using the lids are going to access them justification
Wow so it seems like you can actually agree with me when your triggering calms down.
My entire and sole point has been that "protectin muh kids" is a bs excuse because EVERYONE uses it.

This

>all this tranny cope
Sorry sweaty but hairball vomiting pus spewing open wounds aren't vaginas

Attached: 1549419623527.png (888x894, 520K)

There was pretty much no risk. Back in the 90s there were literal games depicting the most taboo shit possible and they weren't banned.

you are fucking dumb and use arguments from over thirty years ago from the simpsons.
You are obnoxiously stupid.
The entire point is we got to where we are because of you people.

>stop saying adults are "censorship lovin conservatives"
WHERE?
Where did I say this even once you delusional faggot?
You're not really arguing against me, just flailing at your own oversensetive imagination while using me as a prop.
I could just be replying "k" in every post and your I hinged rambling would have just as much relevance to what I say.

just fuck off you lying disingenous shitbag.

You sound like you've never even considered genuinely listening to the arguments posed by someone who disagrees with you on something. You just assume you're right. "Never even make an attempt to explain" is easy to say when you don't take any attempt seriously

YOU read you delusional illiterate oversensetive underage faggot.

You still can't point out where I've said any of the shit you claim I have. Arguing against your own imagination doesn't make you look smart or cool, kid

>You dumby poop head! Me so old I wear diapers so me smart!
Great argument.
Feel free to get over your cowardice anytime and show where I said any of the shit you claim.

you wouldn't be even having an argument with me if you didn't disagree with me.
So you are obviously fucked in the head.
Now you are backpeddling and using that as another strawman argument.
Zero honesty. Just stupidity.

You know about that thing with the pot and kettle?

So what’s Jack up to these days?

>Hillary Clinton wanted to censor video games and Thompson said that her position was in violation of the 1A
You were warned all along

in general sjw argument seem to boil down to man bad, racism, gays feelings.
As justification for censoring everything.

Humans right now are the most peaceful they have ever been.

banning video games doesn't help anything.

Lol kid what's your obsession with the Simpsons? Is it just because you're an old senile boomer?

Learn how to discuss things without having to relate everything to pop culture.

>What specifically have I said that leads to censorship?
>You just lead to it cud I say so stop asking questions!
WEW kid.

they were more peaceful 30 years ago.

Also, where's the porn for the glasses one.

Attached: Dumb down for younger audiences.png (1044x1747, 945K)

If san andreas was released today all the /pol/tard stormfags would seethe because of black characters

Lol youre the disingenuous one you projecting retard.
You refuse to respond to my actual points and just attack strawmen while refusing to show where I advocated for the things you claim I did.
You're just a sad brainlet, too cowardly to argue in good faith.

>lol kid
>old boomer
Confirmed troll.

I clearly stated my position was anti-censorship. So why are you arguing against me?

>you've never even considered genuinely listening to the arguments
The SJW argument is that objectification and the proliferation of sexual media containing women intrinsically devalues women's social value. Since women's social value is depreciated the argument is that it incentivises men to sexually assault and rape women. This is the core argument of Andrea Dworking, Catherine Mckinnon and Anita Sarkessian. The intrinsic problem with the argument is that since the 1980's the rate of rape in America has decreased 80% which runs in contrary to the position that sexual media increases the likelihood of rape.

He got permanently disbarred in 2008 for various violations, so nothing much.

>actually using the word “cis” unironically
Go back.

>falling down the anti-sjw rabbit hole you start agreeing with people white christian conservatives

There is literally nothing wrong with censoring children in sexual situations, but there is still plenty wrong with censoring violence and consensual sex between two adults

eh rape is high in certain communities that also produce pro rape media.

Character assassinations tend to do that.

ncac.org/news/blog/jack-thompson-calls-on-national-policy-to-limit-video-game-sales

He did it back then and he's STILL FUCKING DOING IT WHAT A FUCKING RETARD

How old were you when you played your very first T-rated game? M-rated one? Grand theft auto game, or one with similar subject matter?

We wouldn't be having an argument if you could calm down and respond to what I actually say instead of using me as a prop to project the boogiemeni n your head on to. We're having an argument because you started projecting your delusions on me.

This whole thing started with me just trying to make a point that "protectin muh kids" is meaningless because opposing sides will both try to claim it.
You assumed I was somehow attacking you and also represent everyone you dislike and started ranting and rambling about all sorts of bs I never said.
>Now you are backpeddling
Backpedaling from what? What position did I advocate for and then reverse positions on?
Not that I expect you to give a real respond see since you haven't yet point Ted to a single example of me saying the things you project on me.
>using that as another strawman argument
Wait now THAT makes no sense, how can backpedaling be a strawman? It seems like you don't actually understand what those terms mean.
A strawman is when you substitute your own made up in place of what your opponent says(like you've been doing) because it's easier to attack. It has nothing to do with your own argument which is the subject of backpedaling.
>Zero honesty. Just stupidity.
Lol the irony is amazing, all you've done is lie about what I'm arguing.

pointless ad hominem. The point isn't whether kids get access to stuff. It is that adult material shouldn't be censored for kids.
It is meant for adults not kids. Using but the children is a shit argument.

holy fucking shit holy fucking shit lmfao

I'll repeat again you projecting retard.
I am against censorshop. Fullstop. Period. End of.
That is my position.
What is yours?

>Doesn't understand how kid can be an insult regardless of age
Lol sorry if the bants were beyond your ability to understand at your mental age.

You literally dudn't read a single persons post itt and are just talking past people.
The point is NOT protecting the kids leads to censorship.
As companies are forced to consider kids because they treat gamers as one homogenous blob.
The point is if you say these games are not for kids then kids cannot be used as a justification for censorship.

This entire "kids" argument is retarded and just being spammed by millenial liberals.
The issue is sjw are using muh womyn as the justification to censor things now.

I'm not arguing against that.
Once again, for like the fith time, my point was purely about the "protectin muh kids argument.
Youre the oversensitive one that got so offended by that minor point of nuance that you started projecting all sorts of bs on me and accusing me of advocating for shit I only did in your imagination.

I kept saying "no, I'm not advocating for censorship, where do you see me doing that?" and you morons just kept repeating bs strawmen that I support censorship and say "adults are consorship loving conservatives"(WHERE?) while refusing to point out where you read anything that would suggest it.
It's like I'm talking to a recording where I say one thing and the recording just says what it was going to anyway with nothing to do with what I said.

Summer Yea Forums is in full force

>Who cares about evidence, what REALLY matters is someone using a word that triggers me
You're as oversensetive an sjw as any libcuck

It says here that this is from 2009 user

My entire point is adult material shouldn't be censored because of kids.
There is obviously something not right with you we are done.

>Projecting retard
>Says the moron who litterally keeps putting words in my mouth to project beliefs I don't hold on to me
Lol nice irony.
>I am against censorshop
I am too, great to see we agree although I already mentioned that I'm not pro-censorship several times so you should have been able to figure that out already if you weren't so obsessed with attacking me for things I've only said in your delusions.

Are trannies having a meltdown again that we’d rather deal with Jack?

Which was... ?

You aren't though since you are arguing against me.
You are a liar and you began this shit by responding to me continually with trash posting because i dared to offend your sjw sensibilities.

can you answer his question? why are you resonding continually against him if you are anti-censorship?

>user says he is anti-censorship
>this retard spends an entire thread spamming replies at him
Yeah it is pretty obvious what you are.

>You literally dudn't read a single persons post itt and are just talking past people
Nice projection but I've been directly responding to what people say while others have been talking past me and claiming I've said things I didn't.
Seriously, one of you illiterate morons told me to "stop calling adults censorship loving conservatives". I didn't say that a single time let along multiple times for people to get triggered and demand I stop. The only time I've even just used the word "conservative" is quoting that stupid lie about what I've said.
That's just one example and while I keep asking for you idots to point out ANYWHERE where I even once said any of the shit you claim you just ignore it and talk past me, accusing me of more shit you've imagined.

You are a troll. There isn't really any point arguing with you. But as long as you agree mature games shouldn't be censored that is all there is to it.

Penny Arcade was a mistake.
-Spokam Washawasha

No.
This guy was the biggest clown to exist.
Now if he talked about lootboxes...

And I never disagreed with that or said anything to the contrary.
You just delusionally imagined that I did even though you couldn't point out where I supposedly said such things.
Clearly you're oversensetive from some persecution complex and after misunderstanding my first post as an attack you shut down your brain and couldn't even see what I was actually typing through the boogieman filled haze of your barely functioning brain.
>We are done
Cool, go get something to drink, calm down. Regardless of what your delusions may tell you I don't wish you any ill will, I was just frustrated with your refusal to address my points and you insistance on projecting strawman that you couldn't admit, seemly even to yourself, were not based on anything I said.

im not reading your posts you sperg. The discussion is over. Grow the fuck up.

If just a liar then why haven't you been able to point to a single example of me typing the things you've all been claiming I have?
You make these vague attacks, calling me dumb and underage(lol 28), calling my posts trash ect yet you're incapable of pointing out or describing specific issues and points. It's all just the vague insults to distract and deflect.
>because i dared to offend your sjw sensibilities.
Lol what do you think I was offended by? Where did I indicate offense, or even disagreement?
Really seems like this is just another case of projecting a strawman on me like claiming that I've been calling all adults conservatives(lol what, that doesn't even make sense)

GTA is a franchise, not a single game, fucking retard

There was zero credibility to his charges. Nothing he pushed for was supported by science. In addition, his ideals were in blatant violation of the 1st amendment

if only he boofed a few more chicks he could have got on the supreme court instead to ban videogames

>i remember when we were just a bunch of libertarians
That never happened, in the 00s paultards were a gigantic laughing stock and a target of nonstop ridicule. Your new is showing.

I see what that guy was saying about word salad non-arguments now. You got bodied son.

Gender "reassignment" surgery has roughly a 30% complication rate. That's absolutely massive, up there with open heart surgery or brain surgery. The difference is that those surgeries are performed when the alternative is fatal. Reassignment surgery is cosmetic mutilation, performed to satisfy sick sexual fetishes. 50 years from now the medical community will look back on this like they currently do lobotomies.

Well if you follow the reply chain you'll see that this all started with me just trying to make a point about the "protectin muh kids" argument, see Then called me a retard because they misunderstood and seem to have assumed that I was litterally arguing that we shouldn't protect kids, rather than my actual point that "protecting kids" just gets used as an excuse by everyone including mutually exclusive positions.
I tried to clarify my point in however it just went downhill from there as just talked past my post without really addressing my point and decided that I was secretly a member of some boogieman group out to get him.

Beyond that it was mostly just talking past each other with me restating my point about "protectin muh kids" again and again (there I also clarified that I did not and was not advocating for censorship though that didn't stop them from continualy claiming I did/was like in the very reply to that post )

They also started to lie more, claiming that I said things I didn't like claiming I had suggested they were pro-consorship
When I asked where I said such things like in they started to try deflect and distract with pointless insults like or vague nonsense like that it wasn't anything I'd actually said but my "attitude" that had somehow suggested all the bs they made up. They also kept lying about what I'd said too like telling me to "stop saying adults are censorship loving conservatives" which, you know, I never said so idk what ass or dank corner of their mind they pulled that out of. And of course when I asked WHERE I'd supposedly said such a thing they just started calling me a disingenuous liar to distract and deflect from them getting called out and being unable to support their delusions of persecution with reality.

Sure, just ignore that I explicitly said that I was not advocating for censorship way back in >464275243
Ignore that I never said anything advocating for censorship.
Ignore that I never even disagreed with what anyone was saying against censorship.

I'm sure that for brainlets it's much easier to just ignore all the fine points and twist it into some "us very them" bs instead of straining your brain trying to understand any nuance.

Why struggle to read the content of posts? Surely the very act of replying to someone proves that you disagree with them about EVERYTHING, even the things you say you agree with.

>Ur jus troll
Great non-argument, kid.

>Sperg!
Right back at you :^)
>The discussion is over
Yeah you said that yet your still responding.
>Grow the fuck up
Lol sure, "stop saying things I don't like I'm not listening lalalla" is the surest sign of maturity.

What an absolutely retarded takeaway.

And then one day, for no reason at all...

games don't turn people into violent drones, but sex in games turns people into sexist thugs?

It's time to admit that you fucked up. You should have been eager to control media from the very beginning. Inserting your ideals into it and forcing everyone to conform. You should have embraced Jack, and made games conservative, now it is too late.

>sjws don't make sense

But that is so wrong. What they are doing is very logical if you know about the overton window. By making it the norm that you have so many transexuals, gays and other misfits in games you can create a baseline where discussion/dialogue must start at.

To accomplish this they will use whatever emotional based argument based on victimhood they can get their hands on.

It's time to stop whining about their tactics, and simply embrace it wholeheartedly.

First thing you do is to stop treating all of this as an intellectual debate or argument, and treat it like a war. Demonize them as bigoted anti-conservatives and graduate to calling them pedophiles who endorse underaged tranny children stripping for cash at bars (which is real).

Attached: 44C.jpg (1080x1350, 101K)