*Locks the best skins in the overpriced Deluxe edition*

loot boxes are much worse than paid map packs and i promise this game will have some of the worst rng drops in the industry.

>camouflage is now paid dlc
Lol

>Ugh skins in a box are worse than maps that split the community

Attached: arouyfm.png (400x449, 160K)

explain.

Someone posted some youtubers opinion in a thread yesterday. vocaroo.com/i/s1wnkdNtXAMZ Think he might be onto something

payday 2 didn't split the community with map packs, all the devs have to do to fix the problem of community splits is not act like complete retards.
>actually activision will only have cosmetics in loot boxes it won't be game breaking
if you have a single functioning brain cell you shouldn't trust activision to do anything for the benefit of the consumer. if they're not going to be charging extra for map packs they sure as fuck are going to double down on microtransactions to make up the difference.

>loot boxes are much worse than paid map packs
lol no
paid map packs that split the community is the reason I don't buy some games
I dont care about loot boxes, even if I like cosmetics at least I won't be left behind if I don't pay, also most games with loot boxes give you some boxes for free, like Overwatch

>now
2008 is calling. Thanks Kojima.

Yeah becAuse everyone installed the addon for payday 2 that let you use the dlc for free.

>paid map packs that split the community is the reason I don't buy some games
being locked out of content because it's locked behind a .00000001% chance to drop from a loot box kills any interest i have in a game, especially if they lock actual game changing items behind it. if you actually expect activision to not gouge as hard as possible you don't know activision, loot boxes will be game changing in some way.

>female black fat soldiers
no thanks bro

its new game
there won't be any of the original's levels
it's not called MW4 because it's not related to original trilogy story (other than Price and maybe some other characters might appear but in different scenarios)

>some shitty gay ass cosmetics
Who bother?

Imagine playing a game that charges you for content that you've already downloaded.

>there are retards itt who think microtransactions are okay if "it's just cosmetics"
>there are retards itt who think Actishill will stop at just cosmetics
nu-Yea Forums needs a great purge.

in other news it apparently makes no russian seem like a pixar movie...

They have locked actual new weapons behind microtransaction for years now.

who gives a fuck about cosmetics other than women?
real men stay as the absolute fucking default they can but still carry the entire time regardless

>It's just cosmetics

This excuse is old, tired, and has been debunked multiple times. Microtransactions are not acceptable even if they're only cosmetic. They're still psychologically manipulative by design.

If they didn't want you to buy them, they wouldn't be in the game. Skins are shit that used to be unlocked by playing the fucking game.

>additional bonus items
This does not bode well

>turning CoD into a realistic Siege rip-off
yikes

>Operators
Oh god they're bringing back those fucking Specialists

Attached: 1490566485476.jpg (248x248, 23K)

You don't -have- to buy them, kid

>It's just cosmetic

fuck off you shill. This game's only content will be skins and the once in a blue moon map.

>that retard who cares about how his character looks because he's a special snowflake

Their presence in the game means that the game has been negatively impacted by being designed in a way that encourages you to buy them.

That's acceptable in a F2P game. It's not acceptable for a game you already paid for to harass you for more money; anyone who says otherwise is a corporate shill

>they're bringing back those fucking Specialists
They are, but without special abilities.

youtu.be/Ce5CDrq4dGg?t=343

except they are not

How tf does the SAS look WORSE THAN IT DID IN 4.

>I take activision at their word
Not like they blatantly lie every fucking year about how they are going to exploit the goyim each iteration, and then retards like you complain that Activsion "betrayed" them when they inevitably roll what they've been planning out from the very start.

Attached: firefox_2019-05-31_12-23-25.png (721x167, 9K)

>17 minutes
kys and make a real argument, snowflake

Real argument: They wouldn't in the game if Activi$ion didn't want you to buy them, or they'd be unlockable just by playing the fucking game

It's no coincidence that games became grindier than ever at the same time microtransactions were introduced

You're delusional. It's specifically bringing back old characters and even hints at old missions. You are 100% delusional if you think it won't just rip off missions from the first game.

Remember when skins were signs of dedication and skill and not how much money you put into the game?